BIBLE IN TEN
The first episodes are from Genesis. Since Feb 2021 we began an exciting daily commentary in the the book of Acts since it is certain that almost all major theological errors within the church arise by a misapplication, or a misuse, of the book of Acts. If the book is taken in its proper light, it is an invaluable tool for understanding what God is doing in the redemptive narrative in human history. If it is taken incorrectly, failed doctrine, and even heretical ideas, will arise (and consistently have arisen) within the church. Let us consider the book of Acts in its proper light. In doing so, these errors in thinking and theology will be avoided. The book of Acts is comprised of 28 chapters of 1007 verses (as in the NKJV). Therefore, a daily evaluation of Acts, one verse per day, will take approximately 2.76 years to complete.
Episodes

Sunday Feb 02, 2025
Sunday Feb 02, 2025
Sunday, 2 February 2025
“Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. Matthew 7:7
“You ask, and it will be given you. You seek, and you will find. You knock, and it will be opened to you” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus said that what is holy is not to be given to dogs and pearls are not to be cast before swine. In doing so, He spoke of the negative consequences that would result. Now, He continues His teaching, seemingly transitioning to a new thought.
If these words are logically connected to the previous thought, it must be in relation to discernment. Jesus spoke about not judging, but that didn’t mean not judging at all. Rather, it is to be based on the attitude in which one judges. This is obvious because He then told them how and when to make judgments.
As this is a difficult and sensitive matter, His words now – unless a completely new thought, which seems unlikely – are given in the sense of asking for the wisdom and discernment necessary to judge appropriately. This certainly seems likely based on what He will say in verse 12. Notice the similarity between verses 7:2 and 7:12 –
7:2 “For in what judgment you judge, you will be judged, and in what measure you measure, it will be remeasured to you.”
7:12 “Therefore, all as what you may determine that men, they should do to you, thus also you, you do to them. For this, it is, the Law and the Prophets.”
Because of this similarity, Jesus appears to be using verses 7 to 11 to answer the question of how they can apply His teaching according to the law. In fact, it may be that one of the disciples asked Him and this is Jesus’ answer to the unrecorded question. Understanding this, Jesus begins this thought with, “You ask, and it will be given you.”
Assuming this is asking about wisdom and discernment in how to handle such things, which seems likely, we can see how James took Jesus’ words and expressed them in his own epistle –
“If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all liberally and without reproach, and it will be given to him.” James 1:5
It is certain that Jesus’ words are not a blanket statement of getting what you ask for under any circumstances and for any desire. Therefore, wisdom and discernment are the most likely things He is basing His words upon. Next, He says, “You seek, and you will find.”
This elevates the force from prayer to personal action. One asks for wisdom, but there has to be a synergistic working on the part of the individual. God is not going to inject wisdom directly into one’s head while he lays on his pillow.
Wisdom begins with the fear of the Lord. It does not end there. Once a person prays for it, demonstrating his fear of the Lord, he is to then read the word, heed instruction on the word, contemplate what it means to apply Jesus’ words, etc. Such things are a personal act of seeking. From there, Jesus next says, “You knock, and it will be opened to you.”
The word krouó, to knock, is introduced here. Knocking implies a request for permission to enter. Again, the force of the action is elevated. The disciple prays, he seeks, and then he knocks at the place he has found. Notice that it doesn’t say he opens the door by himself. When the knock is made, the door will be opened.
One may come to a faulty conclusion in his seeking. And so, in order to ensure his search for understanding has been properly conducted, he is to then knock. In essence, “Lord, if this is how you are leading, and if my search has been correct, open this door. If not, keep me from error by keeping me from pursuing this incorrect path.”
There is an implied approval of the searching, however, in Jesus’ words. In other words, the person prayed and then searched. Jesus says that when the knock is made, the door will be opened. Therefore, it must be that He is speaking of a proper search to begin with. Someone intentionally knocking on the wrong door would make no sense.
Therefore, Jesus’ words do assume that a proper search prior to the knock has been made for the door to actually be opened. This shows that the path to obtaining wisdom in how to deal with others and how to make right judgments is something that has to be conducted through a proper search. This is what Scripture is intended to do.
Life application: As noted above, one cannot use the contents of this verse as a standalone set of words to indicate that whatever we ask for will be given to us. Unfortunately, this is how many in the church treat them. This is especially so in charismatic churches where people claim prosperity, health, abundance, etc. as if they have a right to those things based on what Jesus says here.
Jesus is speaking to His disciples. He is doing so under the law. They are of the nation of Israel. The passage, though containing spiritual truths that may extend beyond Israel, must be evaluated in the proper context. Verse 12, cited above, clearly shows this. Only Israel was given the Law and the Prophets.
Gentiles who come to Christ come to Him after His having fulfilled the law. Therefore, it cannot be that Jesus is telling the church to claim things and they will be parceled out based on their claims. Further, the context isn’t just Israel under the law, but seeking out how to treat others, judge appropriately, etc.
Keep things in their intended context. In so doing, your doctrine will be sound, and your walk with the Lord will be agreeable.
Lord God, may we be careful to evaluate Your word in the manner that is intended based on the context. Help us to consider the context and then evaluate what we are reading based on that. Give us wisdom in Your word and then the diligent desire to search it out. Yes, Lord, may it be so to Your glory. Amen.

Saturday Feb 01, 2025
Saturday Feb 01, 2025
Saturday, 1 February 2025
“Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces. Matthew 7:6
“You give not the holy to the dogs, nor you shall cast your pearls before the pigs, lest they ever will tread them in their feet and, having turned, they shall dissever you” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus told His disciples that one should first remove the plank from their eyes. In so doing, they can see clearly to remove the speck from the eye of their brother. Jesus next instructs them that they are to, in fact, render judgments. He does that beginning with the words, “You give not the holy to the dogs.”
How can one know what is holy unless he has determined it is so? And how can one identify a dog, meaning an impure or contemptuous person, unless he has made a judgment about his character? As for the dog, it is the Greek word kuón.
To this day, many cultures in the Middle East despise dogs. They scavenge, eat unclean food, they are predators that feed off of others, and so forth. HELPS Word Studies says in biblical times they were “viewed as a ‘mooch pooch’ that ran about as a scavenger.”
In both the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 23:18) and the New (Revelation 22:15), male homosexuals are equated to dogs because of the position they take when engaging in their abhorrent, perverse, and deviant sexual practices.
Despite this, one of the most trustworthy and steadfast figures in the Old Testament, Caleb, is named after the Hebrew word kelev, dog. In typology, he anticipates the Gentiles as being steadfast, trustworthy, and accepted by God despite their impurity before the law. Next Jesus instructs His disciples concerning more discerning judgments to be rendered, saying, “nor you shall cast your pearls before the pigs.”
As before, how can one identify a pig, meaning an unclean and morally offensive person, unless he renders a judgment concerning such a person? One can see that in Matthew 7:1, Jesus is not making an absolute prohibition on judging. Rather, it is the attitude in which one judges. Only after instructing His disciples concerning removing the beam from their eyes does He now instruct them concerning making right judgments.
As for the word translated as pearl, it is margarités. One can see the etymological root of several women’s names, such as Margaret, Margarite, Margarita, etc. The pearl is given as representative of that which is precious and valuable. In this case, Jesus is metaphorically equating them to precious doctrines.
The word translated as swine is choiros. The swine is one of the animals that was considered unclean according to the dietary restrictions found in the Law of Moses. (Thank goodness the dietary restrictions of Israel are not binding upon the church today!)
The Hebrew word for pig, khazir, comes from a root signifying “to enclose” as if penned up. Pigs divide the hoof, but they do not chew the cud. They represent those who know the word and divide it properly (the split hoof), but they do not meditate on it and dwell on it (chewing the cud).
The pig thus represents the scholarly types who pour over ancient manuscripts, the professors who teem with sound doctrine, the preachers in the pulpit who give the finest of sermons, etc., but at the same time, they are often unwilling to apply that knowledge to themselves. They are penned up in their minds concerning doctrine without having a love for the One who gave the doctrine in the first place.
As for why the disciples are instructed not to do these things, Jesus continues with, “lest they ever will tread them in their feet and, having turned, they shall dissever you.”
Imagine giving something holy to someone who is perverse. He will laugh at it, mock it, and treat it contemptuously. If one were to give something of great value to a perverse or arrogant person, he would take it and ruin it. In the process, he will also turn around and eviscerate the one who gave it in the first place.
In this clause is another new word, rhégnumi. It gives the sense of breaking, wrecking, cracking, etc. However, along with that is the sense of sundering it. Therefore, the word dissever fits it well. One can think of a dog’s teeth or the pig’s fang being used to slice and dice its foe. This is the sense of how someone who fails to discern the dog or the pig will be treated. He will have wasted his efforts and been eviscerated in the process.
Life application: In general, people are set and unchanging in their ways. If you give something of true value to someone who lives in the projects, a rosewood table for example, they will not treat it any differently than a cheap plastic table. Both will wind up in the dumpster in no time at all.
If you give the same person $100 in the morning, the chances are it will be spent by the afternoon on something completely worthless, maybe drugs or something else that has no lasting value.
On the other hand, if you give that same $100 to a Chinese immigrant who is fresh off the boat and looking to start again in your country, the chances are that he will take that $100 and turn it into a business. In a year, his business will be thriving and he will have a house, a car, and extra money in the bank.
Jesus’ point is that we must make judgments about the precious things we possess. To hand out money to indolent people who have spent their lives on the government dole is to waste the resources we have at our disposal.
It is not cruel, biased, racist, or bigoted to withhold helping those who are unwilling to help themselves. Rather, it is harmful and wasteful to give them something they are unprepared to properly handle. We must judge, but we are to do it without the beam in our eye. If we have a beam of woke ideology in our eye, we will never discern what is right concerning people who are actually bad actors.
This is exactly why crime is so high in liberal-run cities. The leadership, attorneys, judges, and government workers ignore the fact that they are serving dogs and pigs and continue to cater to those who should be incarcerated or otherwise punished. They should promote industry and self-help, not indolence and lethargy in those they are elected or appointed to assist. This is the lesson we are to learn from Jesus’ words.
“For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat. 11 For we hear that there are some who walk among you in a disorderly manner, not working at all, but are busybodies. 12 Now those who are such we command and exhort through our Lord Jesus Christ that they work in quietness and eat their own bread.” 2 Thessalonians 3:10-12
Glorious God, when we render judgments, may we do so in accord with the moral principles set forth in Your word. Help us to be good to others, but to be discerning in how we ultimately help them so that our resources and time will not have been wasted. Amen.

Friday Jan 31, 2025
Friday Jan 31, 2025
Friday, 31 January 2025
Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye. Matthew 7:5
“Hypocrite! First, you eject the beam from your eye, and then you will thoroughly see to eject the splinter from your brother’s eye” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus spoke about someone saying he wanted to remove the chip from another’s eye while he had a beam in his own eye. Now, He continues that thought, saying, “Hypocrite! First, you eject the beam from your eye.”
The person is identified as a hypocrite because he is attempting to eject a moral defect from someone else while having his own, much greater, moral defect left unresolved. This is one of the tactics of those on the political left.
They identify some supposed fault in those they oppose but they are filled with fifty times the moral corruption than the insignificant point they have called out in their opponents. They make a mountain out of a molehill while sitting on their own heights of hypocrisy. Understanding this, Jesus continues with, “and then you will thoroughly see to eject the splinter from your brother’s eye.”
Jesus introduces the word diablepó. It is derived from dia, through, and blepó, to see. The prefix dia intensifies the thought of seeing. Thus, it is when one can see thoroughly. The meaning is that when a person has a moral defect, even if he sees a defect in others, he cannot clearly identify and root out another’s moral defect.
However, once he has cleaned up what is defective in himself, he will be able to more thoroughly review what is wrong in another. With this clarity of vision, he can then help the person remove what is defective in his own life.
Life application: The city of Chicago has gone from worse to worse in its selection of mayors. In fact, with the selection of a mayor, it seems that whoever is elected turns out to be so bad that there is no possible way the next person can be anything but a step up. Amazingly, however, once elected, it is seen that the new mayor is, in fact, worse than the one before.
How can this be when the people are so fed up with their mayor that they eject him or her from office, but then choose someone worse? The answer is that they are so morally corrupt themselves that they cannot see clearly to choose anything other than another liar whose promises woo them into believing they will be showered with abundance if they only elect him.
The problem is with those who choose the candidate. The candidate is simply taking advantage of the selfish greed of the people. Until the people themselves are willing to clear out the defect in their mode of selection, they will continue to go from one bad choice to another.
This is true at any level of politics. It is true in the selection of pastors for churches. It is true in a variety of ways in life. Critical thinking is not taught in schools. People are also unwilling to stop and evaluate the root of their problems, and so bad decisions continue to flow in their lives.
The only way to truly stem the tide of moral degradation in one’s life is to have a standard that is beyond oneself as a guide for right living. This is true with societies as well. However, for the person or society to be truly godly, that standard must be God.
There are many teachings that claim God as their source, but God is not fickle. He will not present Himself in one way to one group and in another way to others. Rather, He has presented Himself in one historically long and yet readily discernible way, which is through the pages of Scripture.
His presenting the law to Israel and then grace at the coming of Jesus are not two different presentations of Himself. Rather, it is one continuous instructional tool, each dispensation building on the others so that we can fully understand and appreciate His full plan of redemption.
Therefore, if a person or society wants to clear out immoral baggage, following the Bible is the only true way to do so. The further a society moves from the teachings of Scripture, the more morally corrupt it will be. The types of corruption may be different, but they will all be a presentation of morality that is incapable of true and lasting reformation.
God has given us the standard by which we can thoroughly see where our defects lie. It is up to us to accept or reject that truth. May we make the right decision and look to Jesus, the ultimate Standard of God’s proper moral way, as our guide. In doing so, things will go well for us.
Lord God, man is capable of great achievements and productivity, both individually and in societies. But without following Your guiding hand as it is presented in Scripture, there will always be defects in how we do things. Perfection will never come through our efforts. But through Jesus, we know that perfection lies ahead for Your people. Thank You, O God, for Jesus who promises us Your perfection. Amen.

Thursday Jan 30, 2025
Thursday Jan 30, 2025
Thursday, 30 January 2025
Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own eye? Matthew 7:4
“Or how you will say to your brother, ‘You permit – I may eject the chip from your eye,’ and behold, the beam in your eye” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus asked why someone would see a chip in another’s eye but not examine the beam in his own eye. He now continues that line of thought, saying, “Or how you will say to your brother, ‘You permit – I may eject the chip from your eye.’”
The person Jesus is speaking of is annoyed at the teeny perceived imperfection in someone else’s eye. It is as if it is too much of an annoyance to allow it to continue without being highlighted and removed.
But more, he doesn’t say to the other fellow, “You should work on getting that chip out of your eye.” Instead, he deems it appropriate that he himself will be the one to eject it from his eye. He assumes that he is qualified to mess with such things.
In Jesus’ words, He uses a new word, ekballo. It is derived from ek (from, out of, etc.) and ballo, (to throw, cast, etc.). It is the same word used later when referring to casting out demons. It is used in the sense of ejecting something.
In this case, he wants to get his hands on the other guy’s eyeball and squeeze it until the chip comes free. Despite this, Jesus repeats the same thought as the previous verse, noting that his own troubles are far greater, saying, “and behold, the beam in your eye.”
While standing there noting that he can take care of the little chip in another’s eye, he is unwilling to acknowledge the 2x4 sticking out of his own eye. It is the height of hypocrisy because Jesus is actually referring to a moral defect in the person, using the chip and the beam as metaphors for spiritual truths.
People find it very easy to highlight teeny weeny little faults in others, even while they have immense moral defects of their own.
Life application: The words here are given as support for the initial words of Chapter 7, “Not you judge.” Jesus is not telling His disciples to never make judgments. In fact, in the next verse, He will actually tell them it is ok to do exactly that. He will then do so again in the verse following that.
However, there is an appropriate way to do so and there are inappropriate ways of doing so. For someone to walk around judging when they are committing their own moral transgressions is not a sound way of conducting one’s life.
And the fact is that everyone commits some sort of transgression at one point or another. Therefore, to arbitrarily judge others without clearing up one’s own personal failings is a hypocritical way of conducting one’s affairs.
Jesus is speaking to His disciples and to Israel in general in these verses, but many of the truths He conveys to them extend beyond the law to people in any culture or time. They are moral precepts that should be considered so that we don’t find ourselves on the receiving end of judgment.
Such is the normal way things will turn out when we go pointing fingers at others while we ourselves are not living in a manner that is appropriate.
Lord God, give us wisdom to apply the moral precepts of Your word to our lives. The book of Proverbs is a great place to learn basic truths about such things. May we read it along with the rest of Scripture to continually refine our thinking and remind ourselves of those things You find acceptable or unacceptable. Amen.

Wednesday Jan 29, 2025
Wednesday Jan 29, 2025
Wednesday, 29 January 2025
And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Matthew 7:3
“And why you see the chip, the ‘in the eye’ of your brother, and in your eye, a beam not you examine?” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus referred to the standard that is being used by a person in judgment will be returned to him in his own judgment, and the measure one uses will be measured back to that person. He now continues with, “And why you see the chip, the ‘in the eye’ of your brother.”
Here, He uses the word karphos, a chip. HELPS Word Studies defines it as “something dry and light; a ‘chip or splinter, of the same material with the beam.’” It is derived from karphó, to dry or wither up. It is a dried piece of wood that has separated from a larger piece.
One can think of the pile of wood left behind as a chainsaw cuts. They are teeny weeny little chips that dry almost immediately as they fly out behind the saw. Someone using a chainsaw might get hundreds of them in their eye during a regular workday. Anyone working around the sawman is bound to get them in their own eyes as well.
Jesus uses such a little thing as an example. Someone might see another person with an itty-bitty chip in his eye and say, “Hey, you have something in your eye.” At the same time, however, Jesus says, “and in your eye, a beam not you examine?”
Jesus uses the word dokos, HELPS Word Studies defines this as, “a large beam (joist) of wood; ‘a beam of timber’ (Abbott-Smith); ‘a log on which planks in the house rest (as in the papyri); joist, rafter, plank (Moffatt); a pole sticking out grotesquely.’”
As for the word translated as “examine,” it is katanoeó. Again, HELPS Word Studies provides clarity to its intended meaning, saying, “‘properly, to think from up to down, to a conclusion; to consider exactly, attentively (decisively); to concentrate by fixing one’s thinking’ ‘to perceive clearly’ (kata, intensive), ‘to understand fully, consider closely.’”
One can see that the word “examine,” suits the intent well. The guy is standing there with a plank the size of Montana hanging out of his eye while being upset about a bit of sawdust in the other guy’s eye.
The intended meaning from Jesus is that the person is out judging others without examining himself. He has a major fault in his life such as being addicted to pornography, and yet, he rebukes someone else who notices a beautiful lady walking down the street. He is a total hypocrite.
Life application: People often take things to unintended extremes in relation to the Bible. They may read a passage in the Bible about drinking wine that is negative in its portrayal of the subject matter, such as Proverbs 23:29-35. In reading that, and tearing the intent of the passage out of its proper context, he decides that any drinking of alcohol is wrong and condemns anyone who has a glass of wine.
But the Bible never teaches such a thing. In fact, the exact opposite can be easily discerned from a short study of the subject. Likewise, a person may have been saved from a life of alcohol addiction. When he is freed from it, he immediately goes about condemning everyone who has no problem with drinking.
Someone may have had a problem with pornography. In being cured of it, he decides all women should walk around with baggy plain dresses and wear bonnets. The next thing you know, an entire denomination is walking around doing just that.
But the Bible never speaks of such things. In fact, the beauty of women is particularly noted several times in Scripture, such as with Rebekah, Rachel, etc. An entire book, The Song of Solomon, addresses the beauty of a woman numerous times. Just because one person has a stumbling block in his life, it is inappropriate that he forces his new mores upon everyone else.
Be sure that when you hear a sermon or study on such an issue, you check to see if what the instruction taught is correct or not. Otherwise, you may be placing yourself under a bondage that the Bible never imposes on God’s people. Be wise, be discerning, and check what you hear. It is your walk with the Lord. Don’t be intimidated into something that is unbiblical.
Lord God, we are so thankful to You for Your word that guides us as we walk through this world. May we direct our feet according to what it says. When we hear something that is given to instruct us in Your word, may we be responsible enough to check out what we hear before we run with it. Help us in this, O God. Amen.

Tuesday Jan 28, 2025
Tuesday Jan 28, 2025
Tuesday, 28 January 2025
For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. Matthew 7:2
“For in what judgment you judge, you will be judged, and in what measure you measure, it will be remeasured to you” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus said to not judge that not you may be judged. Now to continue explaining that, He says, “For in what judgment you judge, you will be judged.”
In other words, and what should be evident from Matthew 7:1 alone because of how Jesus’ words fit into the rest of Scripture is that when one judges in a certain manner, that same judgment can be expected to be returned to him. If you pass by people and judge them based on their clothing, it can be expected that the same judgment will be returned to you.
The person who calls the police about people speeding by his house is bound to get ticketed by the police he called for his own driving too fast to get home. He may have only been going 47 in a 40 zone while the people he complained about were going 65, but he is now subject to the same judgment that he expected toward others. If he didn’t call the cops to patrol his road, he never would have received the ticket.
The nagging woman down the road who calls code enforcement over every minor issue will, eventually, have someone call code enforcement on her for her own issues. Examples such as these are the types of things Jesus is referring to.
He was not saying to not make any judgments, period. He is making a point concerning what can be expected by those who go around pointing fingers at others from some supposed position of moral authority that really doesn’t exist except in their own minds. He reconfirms this with another similar example, saying, “and in what measure you measure, it will be remeasured to you.”
The word metron, a measure, is introduced. HELPS Word Studies says it “is the controlling basis by which something is determined as acceptable or unacceptable – preeminently rooting to the Lord Himself as His being is the only ultimate measure of truth.”
When making up one’s own measure instead of using an accepted standard, an equal measure can be expected to return upon the one who has initiated the standard.
This repetition of thought while using a different subject confirms the entire analysis. Jesus is not saying to not judge, period. He is saying that when you do judge in a particular manner, a like judgment is expected to come back to you. Albert Barnes says, “You shall be judged by the same rule which you apply to others.”
A basic example of this measure rule is seen when a person walks down the street and arbitrarily punches someone else in the head. He has set an arbitrary standard of acceptability which stems from his own demented mind.
There are times when the person who is hit will go down for the count. However, some people can take a punch like that and return the same, bringing a measure of pain in return.
If the first person minded his own business and left others alone, he would have been fine. But in measuring out punches during his afternoon walk, he may suddenly be forced to have liquid lunches for the rest of his life.
This type of measurement is exactingly seen in the Lex Talionis provision found in the Law of Moses –
“If a man causes disfigurement of his neighbor, as he has done, so shall it be done to him— 20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; as he has caused disfigurement of a man, so shall it be done to him. 21 And whoever kills an animal shall restore it; but whoever kills a man shall be put to death. 22 You shall have the same law for the stranger and for one from your own country; for I am the Lord your God.” Leviticus 24:19-22
Life application: Matthew 7 began with, “Not you judge.” As a stand-alone thought, one can easily conclude that based on Jesus’ words, Christians are not to make any judgments at all. And this is exactly how those words are used innumerable times a day by others in an attempt to impose their own perverted sense of morality on others.
But those opening words fit into a context that explains just what Jesus meant. To take what He said out of context is to form a pretext. That is now clearly evident after analyzing the rest of Matthew 7:1 along with Matthew 7:2.
Understanding this, doesn’t it seem reasonable that when you are told by someone that you must observe the Law of Moses you should check the context to make sure that what you are told actually fits into the rest of Scripture?
Many verses concerning the law are pulled out of their greater context and are then used in just this way, forming a pretext with the intent of bringing you into bondage to their perverted ideas of doctrine and theology.
Of all of the concepts found in Paul’s epistles, this is the one that he deals with the most. His words, along with a proper contextual analysis of the rest of Scripture, show that the law is fulfilled and annulled through the work of Jesus. Christians are to accept this, live by grace, and not place themselves under a yoke that they were never intended to carry.
Be on guard! Check the context! Live by God’s glorious grace! Come to Jesus and be free from the law.
“And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is a debtor to keep the whole law. 4 You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.” Galatians 5:3, 4
Lord God, Your word is big and filled with many concepts and precepts, but everything it says must be considered based on the surrounding and the overall context. Help us to consider these things and to not be led astray by people with perverse agendas. May we live by grace in Your presence all our days. Amen.

Monday Jan 27, 2025
Monday Jan 27, 2025
Monday, 27 January 2025
“Judge not, that you be not judged. Matthew 7:1
“Not you judge, that not you may be judged” (CG).
The previous verse closed out Chapter 6. Now, Chapter 7 opens with one of the top misused verses of all time. Jesus says, “Not you judge.”
Those words alone are what are torn out of their context, shoved in the faces of others, and used as a pretext to claim nobody has the right to ever make a moral decision or render a judgment concerning pretty much any matter someone else doesn’t want to be judged over.
The Greek word is krinó. Essentially, it means to distinguish. From that, its meaning is based on the context of what is being said, such as to decide (whether mentally or judicially), to try, condemn, punish, decree, judge, sue, call into question, etc.
Taking these words out of context and applying them as people do essentially means that no person could ever make a decision on anything, ever. However, throughout Scripture judgments are both expected to be made and are openly promoted as necessary. In fact, in verse 7:6, Jesus will instruct His disciples to make necessary judgments.
This continues throughout the gospels, Acts, and the epistles. So what is Jesus saying? The verse continues with, “that not you may be judged.”
Jesus is not actually saying, “Not you judge” period. There is a second half to His words and a greater context in which they are spoken. He says, “Not you judge, that not you may be judged.”
There is a standard that is being conveyed to His disciples. It is a standard that is further explained in His coming words. For now, it is evident that He is telling them that when they judge, judgment will return to them. It almost mirrors Newton’s Third Law of Motion, “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.”
When certain things happen in the moral world of judgment, certain other things of a like kind are to be expected. The more judgmental someone is, therefore, the more judgment he will bring on himself. A good word for a person with such an attitude is censoriousness.
The more censorious someone is, the more censored he can expect to be.
Life application: One of the most nauseating things on the planet is when people post the first words of Matthew 7:1 on social media or cite them in some forum or another. Doing this is an immediate attempt to shut others down about some particular issue or another.
More often than not, it is directed toward Christians by non-Christians. The very people who don’t even believe in the Lord, use His words against those who do, but who are unprepared for responding to such citations.
And far too often, Christians then cave in their stand against moral perversion and even outright wickedness. They are unwilling to learn what the Bible is saying, especially in its proper context. If a person is not a part of the solution, he is a part of the problem.
In the case of citing Matthew 7:1, it is a huge problem. Be prepared to respond to people whose agenda is to restrict, silence, or eliminate the moral standards expected of Christians.
Lord God, help us to make right judgments as we live in Your presence. When we judge, we can expect return judgment, so help us to not make decisions or judgments unwisely. Above all, help us to rightly understand Your word in the proper context for the situations in which we find ourselves. Amen.

Sunday Jan 26, 2025
Sunday Jan 26, 2025
Sunday, 26 January 2025
Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble. Matthew 6:34
“Therefore, not you shall be disquieted into the tomorrow, for tomorrow – it will be disquieted itself, its evil – sufficient to the day” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus instructed His disciples to seek the kingdom of God first. In doing this all the other things will then be added. Having told them that, He now finishes Chapter 6, saying, “Therefore, not you shall be disquieted into the tomorrow.”
The meaning of “into the tomorrow” is as most translations render it, “about tomorrow.” The Lord instructs the disciples to not let what is ahead in time and completely out of one’s grasp get the best of them.
It is contradictory to calm to reach into the next day and start agonizing over what may transpire. The only thing that will do is rile up any chance of mental calm on a day that has nothing to do with the next except that it happens to be the one before the next occurs. Understanding this, He next says, “for tomorrow – it will be disquieted itself.”
Like any other day that comes to pass, there are to be expected complications, difficulties, sadness, moments of confusion and loss, etc. For those who invest, there may be a morning of 25% profit in the portfolio, but by midday, there may be a 90% loss. Driving to or from work may find a nail in the tire, maybe even one in both directions.
The list is absolutely endless as to what might go wrong on any given day. This is why Jesus finishes with, “its evil – sufficient to the day.”
The word kakia is found only here in the gospels. It is in Acts and the epistles though. It is a strong word signifying evil which includes wickedness, depravity, malignity, etc. It is badness in general. HELPS Word Studies defines it as “the underlying principle of evil (inherent evil) which is present, even if not outwardly expressed.”
It is this that Jesus notes is arketos, sufficient, to the day. It is also a new word indicating being enough. Each day can be expected to have enough evil to fill it that inserting the problems of a day ahead will only lead to a day overflowing with disquietness and anxiety.
And yet, how often do we do our best to insert that which is unknown into the problems we are already facing? Jesus instructs His disciples not to do this. As these words form a general precept, apart from the law itself, they contain truth that we can apply to our own lives in this dispensation. And more, we have the continued words of the Lord through Paul to guide our daily walk –
“Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God; 7 and the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.” Philippians 4:6 7
Life application: Jesus divides the acceptable period of taking on life’s challenges into days. This is for obvious reasons. Our lives are divided up into these most basic units based on how God has structured the rotation of the sun. Paul’s words, on the other hand, bring things down to a case-by-case situation.
There is no contradiction in this. Nor would we be wrong to say the same thing about something that will occur later in the afternoon or even something coming in an hour. We have no control over what lies ahead. Planning is something we need to do, but it is something that must consider that things may not work out.
The best thing to do is to allow the future to unfold as it will without the added stress of worrying about how it will do so. We make plans, but the events that follow must be left to the overarching providence of God.
Tractors tires get stuck, shipments of supplies are delayed, rains come, and the house sits idle waiting to be completed. We could not have prevented any of those things. So why be distressed over what may or may not happen? Live with the future planned to whatever degree is necessary, but do so knowing that the Lord may have other plans.
No matter what, He is in control. Our future in His presence is assured because of Jesus. We just have to get through this unknown earthly walk as best as we can in the process, trusting Him with each step as we go.
Lord God, help us to confidently walk in this world, knowing that no matter what happens, we are Yours. Whatever trials we may face, they will be behind us someday. Even death itself cannot keep us from standing before You spotless and pure. Because of Jesus, we have full assurance of reconciliation and peace. Amen.

Saturday Jan 25, 2025
Saturday Jan 25, 2025
Saturday, 25 January 2025
But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you. Matthew 6:33
“And you, seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and these all – it will be added to you” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus noted that the heavenly Father knows all the things we need. Therefore, He next says, “And you, seek first the kingdom of God.”
It should be noted that some manuscripts do not include the words tou theou (the God, indicating “of God”). Whether they are original or not, they are to be understood because of the surrounding context of what Jesus is explaining.
To understand what “kingdom” Jesus is speaking of, refer to the comments on Matthew 6:10 where Jesus said, “Your kingdom come.” The term kingdom is used to apply to different things within the dispensations God has set forth in the plan of redemption. What He is speaking of is sufficiently explained in that commentary. Along with seeking the kingdom of God, Jesus next says, “and His righteousness.”
This would correspond to the next words of Jesus in Matthew 6:10, “Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” Seeking God’s righteousness is to seek that His will is done at all times in our lives before Him.
The disciples were instructed on prayer. Jesus then explained the things His prayer detailed. For example, saying, “And do not lead us into temptation,” is explained through Jesus’ examples concerning treasures on earth. If our treasures are in heaven, we will not be led into temptation over earthly things.
As such, what Jesus is now saying is a summary of everything He has explained since the giving of the Lord’s prayer. Praying for the will of God to be done and for the coming of His kingdom was noted in Matthew 6:10. It was then plainly expressed in the closing words “For Yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever.”
The intervening words since then have not been a lot of new and disconnected thoughts. Rather, they have been helping us understand what it means when the Lord’s Prayer is spoken. Therefore, in seeking first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, Jesus next says, “and these all – it will be added to you.”
Notice how Jesus’ words speak of the plural, these all, and then are summed up in the singular, it. It is an indication that the plural/singular words of the previous verse are probably the correct textual rendering. Jesus is taking plural concepts and then referring to them as a single unit.
Jesus assures His disciples that the things they need will not be kept out of reach when people put God first. Rather, the things they need will find their proper place in their lives.
Life application: Notice how the words of Jesus here actually dispel the notion that having wealth is somehow inappropriate. How often has it been seen that people focus too heavily on certain words while ignoring the greater context.
By telling His disciples to not worry about their lives in regard to food, drink, and clothing, people assume that Jesus is saying that we should not possess such things. This seems bolstered by His words that say, “For after all these, the Gentiles seek.” If the Gentiles seeking them is stated in a negative way, then it must be that Jesus is saying, “Get rid of all your stuff!”
With that, they quit their jobs and join a monastery, or they promise themselves to give away everything they have earned, dying without a penny left in the bank, as if they are only responsible with each week’s paycheck by doing this.
Such an attitude is dispelled throughout the Bible where godly people are seen to have great wealth, such as Job and David. Good men are also noted as saving even for their grandchildren (Proverbs 13:33). But the attitude is also dispelled by Jesus’s word of this verse.
Jesus doesn’t tell them to not have these things. Rather, He is speaking of priorities. Put God first, and God will still give them these things. A person will not be without them, but the possessions will be in the right place in one’s life.
Be sure to take the entire context of what is being said into consideration. Who is speaking, when and where is the person speaking, who is being spoken to, etc. From there, consider the rest of the words as they are presented without over-fixating on a single thought that will then result in a faulty conclusion about the overall presentation. This is the responsible way of looking at all things in Scripture.
Lord God, help us to always put You first in our lives. It is easy to get misdirected with the things of life that crop up and distract us. We know that it is right to seek You, Your kingdom, and Your righteousness first. May we do so, to Your glory. Amen.

Friday Jan 24, 2025
Friday Jan 24, 2025
Friday, 24 January 2025
For after all these things the Gentiles seek. For your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. Matthew 6:32
“For all these the Gentiles, it seeks upon. For your Father, the heavenly, He has known that you need all these” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus instructed His disciples not to worry. They should not anxiously ask about what they would eat, drink, or wear. Such things should not be points of concern, realizing that God is in complete control and has provided sufficiently for His people. Jesus next says, “For all these the Gentiles, it seeks upon.”
Jesus uses the term ethnos, Gentiles, or nations. It is a word associated with the people of the non-Jewish nations of the earth. It is derived from ethō, the forming of a custom or culture.
He notes that the nations who do not know the Lord as God don’t possess sufficient knowledge to understand that He is there tending to them and taking care of them, just as He has been addressing thus far. Therefore they “seek upon” the things of the world. As they cannot trust in God beyond this world, their trust must be placed in what is derived from this world.
The word translated as “seek upon” is introduced here, epizéteó. It is derived from epi, upon, and zéteó, to seek, search for, etc. By adding epi, it intensifies the word. They don’t just look for food and clothing, they do so diligently. They hungrily look for what will satisfy them in this life.
It should be noted that in some texts, this word is singular, thus the translation “it seeks.” New translations use another source text where the verb is in the plural form, “they seek.” One would think that the plural is correct, but it may be that Jesus was taking the entirety of the nations and making a point by lumping them into one unit by using the singular.
Either way, He next continues with, “For your Father, the heavenly, He has known that you need all these.”
Jesus uses the verb in the perfect tense. The Father has known the state of His people. His knowledge of this is, and it will not change even into the future. As this is so, Jesus’ words are to be taken as such. “Don’t worry and don’t fret. Your heavenly Father has it all under control, and that isn’t changing, even as you go forward into the unknown.”
The point of Jesus’ words is that when one knows the true God and how He has set things in motion, there should be no reason to worry about what lies ahead. He has a plan that has been in the works since the very beginning. We are living in the unfolding of that plan as the future continuously meets with the present.
We don’t know what the future holds, but He does. Therefore, in not worrying about the future, His people are acknowledging that He is already there, tending to what is ahead so that the plan He initiated will come to pass. This is what trust is. It is also the source of our faith –
“And faith, it is confidence of hoping, conviction of matters not seeing” Hebrews 11:1 (CG).
Life application: By using the term ethnos, Jesus has clearly and without any contestation, demonstrated that His words are not inclusive of Gentiles. He has set an absolute distinction between His audience and the Gentiles by using this word.
It is true that the word is used to describe Israel several times, such as in John 18:35 –
“Pilate answered, ‘Am I a Jew? Your own nation [ethnos] and the chief priests have delivered You to me. What have You done?’”
However, what Pilate has done is to note the distinction between Israel and other nations. If a Chinese were to speak of other nations, he would do the same. Thus, he would be indicating they are not Chinese. The reason why this is important is that it tells us that at this time, Jesus’ words are not being spoken to the church, an entity that will eventually be Gentile led.
Rather, He is directing His words to those of Israel. Some of the truths of what He says will apply later to the church, when they possess the knowledge of the true God, but that is not the context here in Matthew.
Therefore, to shove the church into the words of Jesus here is wholly inappropriate. We are to evaluate what He is saying, consider it in light of the context, and understand the truths as presented. When the time comes, and Jesus has fulfilled the law and set it aside by introducing a New Covenant, Jesus’ words can then be properly evaluated from this new context.
Those matters that deal with law, or which are specifically addressed to Israel as points of doctrine are to be left in that context. Greater truths, such as those presented in Matthew 6:26, can then be considered general rules of conduct at any given time. What He is saying in this verse is not so much a matter of law as it is a matter of the expected interaction of God’s people with their heavenly Father.
Heavenly Father, help us to consider the context of Jesus’ words as we evaluate His ministry. At what point do we directly apply them to our lives and doctrine, and when do we stand back and note that they are directed to Israel for a different purpose? Help us to think clearly in this lest we get misdirected. His work under the law is complete. May we rest in that and live our lives accordingly. Amen.

Thursday Jan 23, 2025
Thursday Jan 23, 2025
Thursday, 23 January 2025
“Therefore do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ Matthew 6:31
“Therefore, not you shall be disquieted, saying, ‘What we shall eat?’ or ‘What we shall drink?’ or ‘What we shall don?’” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus spoke of how God enrobes man. Because of what He does, Jesus next says, “Therefore, not you shall be disquieted.”
God has ordained how things are. He has invested man with ability, and He has provided the earth with abundance. Taking these things together, man can feel confident that he has what he needs to have sufficiency. Fretting about what might be is pointless.
Those things that we cannot change are not going to change through anxiety attacks. Therefore, there should be no reason to get disquieted, and there is no reason for us to be “saying, ‘What we shall eat?’ or ‘What we shall drink?’ or ‘What we shall don?’”
This takes the reader right back to verse 6:25 –
“Therefore I say to you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink; nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food and the body more than clothing?”
Rather than focusing on these earthly, temporary things, man should consider the Source and Giver of these things first. Having faith in His provision and how He has orchestrated things should be where our trust lies. The birds go out each day and find what they need. When they find it, they use what He has provided, a beak, for example, to obtain it.
Flowers are sown into the earth. They come up according to His plan and adorn it with beauty. The flower doesn’t consider what is coming tomorrow. It simply exists as a beautiful adornment of the earth.
As God has placed man on the earth, based on how He has orchestrated everything else, surely He must have given man what he needs to exist as well. As we are a part of this ongoing cycle, we should accept that this is so, trust Him to continue to provide, and not fret about what lies ahead.
Life application: There are people all over the world. Man is found in the hottest, driest places, the most barren and cold areas, sweaty heated sauna-like places, along coasts, and in the mountains.
Wherever man has gone, someone in the traveling party has said, “This would be a great place to live!” And so, he settled in and became accustomed to the area and what it provides. Others said, “No way, Jose! I am moving on. Who would ever want to live here?” And so, onward he went until he found a place suitable to his desires.
From there, the earth was fully inhabited. But everywhere people have settled, they have adapted to the location because God set up the earth to give them what they need. Some things are more abundant in one place but lacking in another. However, the things that are necessary for man to survive have been found and exploited.
This is how God has provided and continues to provide. We adapt because God has given us the ability to do so. When a place is too inhospitable, man moves on. In this manner, the earth is filled with humanity.
As this is so, and as the one thing that is truly necessary but which is lacking except when it is brought into man’s various places of dwelling, shouldn’t we be willing to get it out to others. What is this thing? It is the gospel of Jesus found in the word of God.
Man exists around the globe because God has made it possible for him to do so. But man exists without salvation unless we are willing to share what God has done. Let us help turn the temporary existence of each man on earth into an eternal existence in the presence of God. May we be a part of filling this otherwise unfilled necessity.
Glorious God, You have provided life and abundance for us to dwell in Your presence. You have also provided the way that we can do so for all eternity. However, that way will not be available to others unless we are willing to make it happen. Help us, Lord, to share the message of Jesus to those who so desperately need it. Amen.

Wednesday Jan 22, 2025
Wednesday Jan 22, 2025
Wednesday, 22 January 2025
Now if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is, and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will He not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? Matthew 6:30
“And if the herbage of the field, today being and tomorrow throwing into the furnace, God thus enrobes, not much more you – little-faithed?” (CG).
In the previous verse, Jesus made the comparison between the lilies and Solomon, stating that the lilies exceed Solomon in how they are arrayed. Now, to explain why that is important to consider, He next says, “And if the herbage of the field.”
The word is new, chortos. It literally signifies a court, garden, field, etc. where grass grows. Thus, by implication, it refers to that which grows in such a place. This would be inclusive of grass, but not limited to it.
In this case, saying grass is insufficient because Jesus has just been speaking of lilies. Switching to grass confuses the analogy. Rather, using herbage allows for the inclusion of whatever has grown in the field, including any lilies that pop up to adorn it. Understanding this, He continues with, “today being and tomorrow throwing into the furnace.”
Here is another new word, klibanos. It refers to an earthen pot which is used for baking. As such, it is a furnace or oven. It corresponds to the Hebrew word tanur. Today, because of the popular nature of Indian food, many people know of their tandoor which is quite similar.
Depending on the style of pot, it is either heated from the inside and then bread is slapped onto the outside to be baked, or it is heated from the outside and bread is slapped onto the inside to be baked. Either way, the flat bread adheres to the side until removed by the baker when it is turned and heated on the other side.
In the case of Jesus’ words, it would be one heated from the inside. This is because the herbage is thrown into it. The point so far is that Jesus has spoken of the immensely intricate and beautiful nature of the lily, outshining the beauty of Solomon.
And yet, in a day, it is dried up and dead, becoming stubble, useful only for burning in an oven. Understanding this, how the next words are applied varies based on the translation, “God thus enrobes, not much more you.”
Most translations apply these words to the lilies –
“Now if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is, and tomorrow is thrown into the oven” (NKJV).
However, some apply them to the hearer in the final clause –
“...God so clothes much rather you, ye of little faith!” (SLT).
Without the dogmatic nature of other translations, the ambiguous nature of the CG translation allows the reader to come to his own conclusion –
“And if the herbage of the field, ... God thus enrobes,” or “God thus enrobes, not much more you?”
Either way, if God has ordained it to be this way, the point is understandable because of what Jesus has already said previously about the lilies. However, another complication arises because of how translations are rendered.
There are different ways of interpreting what Jesus is saying concerning being clothed. One is that man is more important than the lily, and so God will tend to our needs in a way that is commensurate with the honor and dignity that man has been bestowed as the pinnacle of His creation.
This is how most translations express the thought. They do this by either shuffling the words around and/or inserting words to fit this presupposition, such as “will He not much more clothe you” (NKJV, et al). The SLT omits the negation (not) and comes to the same general thought, “God so clothes much rather you.”
The word amphiennumi, to clothe or enrobe, is used. It signifies to put on clothes or to enrobe. In this case, God is the One who is performing the action. The way the words are structured it seems more likely to point to the state of the clothing, not a later granting of it, “God thus enrobes, not much more you.”
The verb is present tense, not future, as the NKJV and others imply. As such, Jesus is not saying God is going to give us garments to enrobe us, but that He has given us garments that enrobe us – meaning the dignity and honor of being a human.
The comparison is to the beauty of the lily, which didn’t labor or spin. It was simply enrobed with beauty. Unlike the lily, man is enrobed with intelligence and ability. Therefore, he has the necessary basics to provide himself with garments.
Therefore, why should we worry about what we will wear? When the time for garments is needed, we will obtain what we need because we have already been enrobed with the garments of humanity by God. Understanding this, Jesus next uses an adjective to describe those who are anxious about such things, calling them “little-faithed?”
The word is also new, oligopistos, coming from two separate words that indicate little in number or low in quantity and faith. He is saying that humans who worry about such things are little-faithed. They walk around constantly worried about what might be. Instead, they should trust that God has given them the wisdom and ability to take care of themselves. In turn, they should be grateful to Him for such blessings.
Life application: The basic intent of Jesus’ words, regardless of some of the pointless or obscuring changes in translations, is that man has importance to God. He is the highest point of God’s creation, and we should conduct our lives in a manner that demonstrates that we believe it is so. Not in arrogance or boasting, but in humility that God has given us such wisdom and ability.
We should provide for our needs as humans because we are human. We shouldn’t fret about what lies ahead when we are fully capable of using what God has given us to provide for ourselves because He has and continues to provide for us.
Let us do so at all times. And as we do, may we remember to thank and praise Him for allowing us the honor of existing in His presence for all eternity because of what He has done to reconcile us to Himself through Jesus Christ – the One enrobed in humanity and yet fully God. Thank God for Jesus Christ our Lord.
Glorious God, because of Jesus, we are granted greater and eternal garments of righteousness so that we can stand in Your presence for all eternity. Why You have so favored us is hard to imagine, but we accept that it is so. We have faith that what Jesus has done is sufficient to carry us through to behold Your glory forever. Amen.