BIBLE IN TEN

Saturday, 8 August 2026
 
But when they sought to lay hands on Him, they feared the multitudes, because they took Him for a prophet. Matthew 21:46
 
“And seeking Him to seize, they feared the crowds, since as ‘prophet’, Him, they held.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, it said that having heard Jesus’ parables, the chief priests and Pharisees perceived that He was speaking of them. Next, it says, “And seeking Him to seize, they feared the crowds.”
 
It is the same trepidation they had in verse 26. Jesus asked them a question about the source of John’s authority. They refused to answer, one reason for which was that they feared the crowds. And it is for that same reason that they again feared the crowds, “since as ‘prophet’, Him, they held.”
 
Verse 26 said, “If, also, we should say, ‘From men,’ we fear the crowd, all, for, as a prophet, they have the ‘John’.”
 
The leaders, demonstrating their unfitness to lead the people, had to work behind the scenes rather than openly. Therefore, they held off, waiting for the time when they could be rid of Him. The stage is being set for the fulfillment of God’s plan. Christ, the true Passover, was being readied to complete His earthly mission.
 
Life application: In the days of Jeremiah, a weak and ineffective king, Zedekiah, ruled in Jerusalem. Like the leaders of Jesus’ time, he was afraid of the people more than acknowledging the ways of the Lord. In Jeremiah 38, it says –
 
And Zedekiah the king said to Jeremiah, “I am afraid of the Jews who have defected to the Chaldeans, lest they deliver me into their hand, and they abuse me.”
20 But Jeremiah said, “They shall not deliver you. Please, obey the voice of the Lord which I speak to you. So it shall be well with you, and your soul shall live. 21 But if you refuse to surrender, this is the word that the Lord has shown me: 22 ‘Now behold, all the women who are left in the king of Judah’s house shall be surrendered to the king of Babylon’s princes, and those women shall say:
“Your close friends have set upon youAnd prevailed against you;Your feet have sunk in the mire,And they have turned away again.”’
23 ‘So they shall surrender all your wives and children to the Chaldeans. You shall not escape from their hand, but shall be taken by the hand of the king of Babylon. And you shall cause this city to be burned with fire.’” Jeremiah 38:19-23
 
Instead of listening to the word of the Lord given through the prophet, Zedekiah feared what man could do to him. In the end, it cost him greatly. Those around him were either killed or taken into captivity. His sons were killed before his eyes, and then his eyes were put out. He was taken to Babylon in bronze fetters, and he stayed in prison there for the rest of his life.
 
We who have called on Jesus have been given the word of the Lord to read and accept. The Lord tells us that no matter what happens to us in this life, we are safe in His hands. And yet, we cling to this life as if it is all we will ever experience.
 
In health, we try to get every moment of pleasure we can out of it. Vacations, new cars, a better refrigerator, only the best sheets and towels, etc. We become so consumed with this life that we forget to focus our attention on God, His word, and His sure promises that what lies ahead will be so much better than whatever we have here.
 
In sickness, we fear death, as if it were the great enemy that will prevail over us forever. We shake at the thought of that moment coming. And yet, it is a transitory step to the greatest experience we will ever know.
 
Tomorrow may never come. Instead of the cancer we have, we may die in a car accident on the way to the next treatment. So why do we become so fearful? We don’t have a single bit of authority over the time of our demise. God knew before the world was created when that day would come.
 
Let us live our lives with joy in thinking of God’s goodness. Let us bask in the wonder of God’s love. Let us live confidently in the promises He has made, never waffling or fearful of what we cannot control.
 
Don’t be like the weak-kneed leaders of Israel who constantly failed to be reassured in God’s ways. Be like the heroes of the faith, like David, who trusted in God’s provision with his very life. This is what will be pleasing to the Lord. Stand firm that God has it all taken care of for you, because He does.
 
Lord God, the Bible is like a mirror, reflecting on our lives as we live in Your presence. Seeing how things occur in the word can then mold us into better people, filled with confidence, as we convert our ways to be in accord with Your will. May it be so for each of us. Amen.

Friday, 7 August 2026
 
Now when the chief priests and Pharisees heard His parables, they perceived that He was speaking of them. Matthew 21:45
 
“And having heard, the chief priests and the Pharisees, His parables, they knew that concerning them, He speaks.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told the leaders He was speaking about the results of falling on the stone or having the stone fall on someone. With that, it next says, “And having heard, the chief priests and the Pharisees, His parables, they knew that concerning them, He speaks.”
 
The light finally dawned on them. Jesus has been telling them these parables, but their minds were completely dulled to the fact that He was speaking His words about them. Jesus spoke of two sons being asked to go into the vineyard. The first said that he wouldn’t, but later did. The second said he would, but later didn’t.
 
After that, Jesus explained to them what He was speaking about. The next parable was about the wicked vinedressers who killed the servants sent to them and then killed the son. Once Jesus cited the psalm and then told them that the kingdom would be taken from them and given to another nation, they realized the parable itself was about them. They are the wicked vinedressers.
 
That would have been a bitter pill for them to swallow, and it would have enraged them. That reaction will be seen in the verse to come.
 
Life application: How often do we not see what is evident to others? We let our own sense of pride or self-worth shut out our own failings. Instead, we look at the failings of others while overlooking the same type of things in ourselves. James speaks of this -
 
“If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself,’ you do well; 9 but if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by the law as transgressors. 10 For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all. 11 For He who said, ‘Do not commit adultery,’ also said, ‘Do not murder.’ Now if you do not commit adultery, but you do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. 12 So speak and so do as those who will be judged by the law of liberty. 13 For judgment is without mercy to the one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.” James 2:8-13
 
We may not commit the same offenses as others, but our offenses are no less wrong. A single sin eternally separates us from God. Jesus is the answer to this problem. When we come to Christ, all sin is forgiven. As this is true, when someone with his own sinful life comes to Christ, he will receive the same forgiveness.
 
Extending that thought to others, we can see that no matter how bad someone is, he can be redeemed. Our job is to compassionately tell all people about Jesus. If they reject Him, that is their decision. But we shouldn’t look down on others because of the sin they are stuck in until they have made that decision.
 
If they reject Jesus, we should pity them. Eternity is a long time, and we are all going to spend it somewhere. Jesus spoke to the leaders of Israel, warning them of what was ahead. They chose to reject Him. But even after crucifying Him, they could have come to Him and been saved.
 
Let us continue to be positive examples of Jesus for others to see. It isn’t easy when someone is so violently opposed to the message of Christ, but it is right that we try to always uphold our witness before others.
 
Lord God, help us to remember that others who have not called on You have no hope of eternity with You. May we be willing to extend ourselves to the greatest extent possible to bring a chance of salvation through sharing the gospel. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.

Thursday, 6 August 2026
 
And whoever falls on this stone will be broken; but on whomever it falls, it will grind him to powder.” Matthew 21:44
 
“And the ‘having fallen upon the stone, this,’ he will be pulverized. Upon whoever, also, if it should fall, it will winnowize him.” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told the leaders He had been talking to that the kingdom of God would be taken from them and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it. He next says, “And the ‘having fallen upon the stone, this,’ he will be pulverized.”
 
A new word, sunthlaó, to dash together, as it shattering or breaking, is seen here. It is seen only here and in the comparable passage in Luke 20:18. Properly, it signifies to “pulverize, crushing parts together into dust” (HELPS Word Studies). This is a reference to Isaiah 8 -
 
“He will be as a sanctuary,But a stone of stumbling and a rock of offenseTo both the houses of Israel,As a trap and a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem.
15 And many among them shall stumble;They shall fall and be broken,Be snared and taken.” Isaiah 8:14, 15
 
Jesus is the chief Cornerstone for the temple that God is building. It is a house formed out of people from any people group. This is alluded to many times by Paul, such as, “For we are God’s fellow workers; you are God’s field, you are God’s building” (1 Corinthians 3:9). Paul is a Jew, and he is writing to the Gentiles in Corinth. His letters are prescriptive for the church age, anywhere and at any time.
 
This would have been unthinkable to the Jews. They were supposedly what God is doing in the world. For Gentiles to be so prominently included, and at the same level as them, was an intolerable idea. This is what Isaiah is referring to.
 
Jesus’ words mean that those who fell upon this stone, rejecting the notion that the Messiah would set up such an edifice, would be pulverized in the process. They would be completely aghast at the notion, and in rejecting it, they would find judgment. Jesus next says, “Upon whoever, also, if it should fall, it will winnowize him.”
 
Another new word is seen here, likmaó. There is no English word that matches the meaning. It is from likmos (a basket used for winnowing). Thus, it signifies to powderize something to a state where the winds will winnow it. Winnowize is a coined word that satisfactorily meets the intent. A suitable paraphrase is seen in the NAS: “it will scatter him like dust.” This word is also only seen here and in Luke 18:20.
 
Jesus’ words refer to the judgment of those on whom His (Jesus, the Stone) wrath falls. It will be as if they never were. This is what occurred in the judgment on Jerusalem in AD 70. The people were destroyed, and they were scattered even to the furthest parts of the world, as if winnowed.
 
Jesus’ words are connected to everything He has been saying since He started the parable of the vinedressers. In verse 41, it said, “He will destroy those wicked men miserably.” Jesus confirms the analysis with His citation of the Psalm and the reference to Isaiah.
 
Life application: The words of Jesus are limited to the immediate context. It is true that Jesus will judge the world and that all who fail to come to Him will be sent to the Lake of Fire. However, the context of His words here is that of judgment upon Israel for rejecting Him.
 
They failed to accept that He had a plan for the salvation of the whole world, utterly rejecting any notion that they would not be the “thing” God was doing any longer. The judgment that came upon them, as described here, does not belong to those in the world today. As such, this is not a verse that can be used when referring to rejecting Jesus today.
 
Unfortunately, this is what is commonly the case when this verse is cited. As always, we must maintain the appropriate context to obtain the appropriate meaning of what is being conveyed. Remember this: context is king when evaluating Scripture. If you hold to this, you will save yourself from getting misdirected.
 
Prayer: Lord God, help us to carefully and responsibly evaluate Your word. May we not stray from staying within the context that is presented. Help us to remember this as we dive into Your wonderful word. Amen.

Wednesday, 5 August 2026
 
“Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it. Matthew 21:43
 
“Through this, I say to you that it will be lifted from you, the ‘kingdom, the God,’ and it will be given to ethnicity producing the ‘fruits, it’.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus cited Scripture to the chief priests and Pharisees, concerning the stone which the builders rejected being the chief cornerstone. Based on that, He next says, “Through this, I say to you that it will be lifted from you, the ‘kingdom, the God’.”
 
Israel was selected among the nations of the world to bear the message of the One true God, keeping a remembrance of Him and representing Him before the nations. The Law of Moses was given to the people to guide their conduct and to regulate their society.
 
The tabernacle (and later temple) with its sacrificial system, as prescribed in the law, was how the nation maintained a right relationship with God. These things were given to them as types and pictures of the coming Messiah.
 
Within the law itself, as spoken through the prophets, a New Covenant was promised (as indicated in Jeremiah 31). A New Covenant implies the ending of the Old Covenant. With that occurring, there would be a new order of things within God’s economy, as metaphorically seen in the vineyard parable.
 
Those who once were the stewards of the covenant would be removed, allowing for new stewards to come in and tend to the vineyard. Because the leaders of Israel rejected Christ, as indicated in His citing of the psalm, something known by God in advance and as prophesied there, the kingdom of God would be lifted from them, “and it will be given to ethnicity producing the ‘fruits, it’.”
 
The word ethnicity is described by Strong as, “race (as of the same habit), i.e. A tribe; specially, a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually, by implication, pagan) -- Gentile, heathen, nation, people.”
 
Here, it is singular. This does not mean a single nation of people would be given the kingdom. Rather, it is a singular group comprised of all nations, including those Jews who would believe the message. As such, and as the nation of Israel comprises only a teeny percent of the people of the world, this would be a prominently Gentile led group.
That is explicitly stated by Paul as Acts was ending -
 
“So when they did not agree among themselves, they departed after Paul had said one word: ‘The Holy Spirit spoke rightly through Isaiah the prophet to our fathers, 26 saying,
“Go to this people and say:‘Hearing you will hear, and shall not understand;And seeing you will see, and not perceive;27 For the hearts of this people have grown dull.Their ears are hard of hearing,And their eyes they have closed,Lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears,Lest they should understand with their hearts and turn,So that I should heal them.’”
28 Therefore let it be known to you that the salvation of God has been sent to the Gentiles, and they will hear it!’ 29 And when he had said these words, the Jews departed and had a great dispute among themselves.”  Acts 28:25-29
 
Paul speaks of this further in his epistles. In Christ, there is one group formed out of many. It is inclusive of Jews and Gentiles, with none being considered any more special than any other.
 
Life application: Jesus never addresses the millennial kingdom here. He simply states a fact concerning Israel as a nation and what would happen in regard to the New Covenant. What He said is just what came about. God did take the vineyard from Israel, and He did give it to another nation.
 
To assume that this is the end of the story for Israel is to assume too much. If the church will end at the rapture, as is clearly described in Paul’s writings, it would be ludicrous to think that the people on earth would be left without a working economy where God continues to deal with man.
 
Where will such a system come from? It is explained in Scripture. The nations of the world will be led by Israel. Israel will be led by their worship of Christ Jesus, the One they had long-rejected as their Messiah.
 
To say that Israel is out (which is currently true) and that they have no useful purpose as a nation in the future is to disregard a large portion of Scripture from both testaments. It is a very poor handling of what God has laid out in His word. Be assured that His rejection of them during this dispensation will have an end after the church is taken to glory.
 
Lord God, give us wisdom in understanding Your word. Help us to consider what it says is reliable and will come to pass if promises have been made that are as yet unfulfilled. Nothing in Your word will be left undone. Grant us this understanding so that we will always keep things in their proper context. Amen.

Tuesday, 4 August 2026
 
Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures:‘The stone which the builders rejectedHas become the chief cornerstone.This was the Lord’s doing,And it is marvelous in our eyes’?”  Matthew 21:42
 
“He says to them, the ‘Jesus’,
 
‘Never you read in the Scriptures?“Stone – which they rejected, those building – this,It has become to ‘head, corner’.From ‘Lord’, it was, this,And it is marvelous in ‘eyes, ours’.”’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, the response to Jesus concerning what the housemaster would do was that he would come and destroy them and lease his vineyard out to others willing to render him the fruits when they were ready. Next, it says, “He says to them, the ‘Jesus’.”
 
Mark and Luke seemed to differ in who the speaker was in the previous verse, but all three agree that Jesus is the One who says the next words, beginning with, “Never you read in the Scriptures.”
 
Jesus returns to Scripture to make His point. He cites Psalm 118:22. Depending on who the author of the Psalm is, it would have been between four hundred and a thousand years old at the time of Jesus.
 
What is implied in His quoting this psalm is that He understood that the Scriptures were both reliable and authoritative. Further, there was a context to the words that was to be understood at the time when they would be fulfilled.
 
Various interpretations of what the psalm was referring to were made, such as that it references David or Israel the nation. However, the context within the psalm clearly identifies it as referring to the Messiah who would be recognized by His rejection at some point.
 
As for the words, they come from the Greek translation of the Old Testament. Jesus begins the citation with, “‘Stone – which they rejected, those building – this’.”
 
The metaphor of a stone suddenly comes forward. But it is not inconsistent. The last reference in the parable was that of the son. Jesus is saying that the son in the parable is the Stone in the psalm.
 
Jesus implies here that because the psalm speaks of the Stone, which is the son in the parable, He is the fulfillment of the Psalm. He further implies that He is the Son of the Housemaster as conveyed in the parable. Everything is being tied together, and the leaders would fully understand His intent. Of this rejected Stone, He continues with, “It has become to ‘head, corner’.”
 
A stone was looked over in the quarry for shape, size, beauty, etc. When it was considered, those doing the building rejected it. Jesus is telling them, in advance, that He would be rejected by them, just as the son was rejected by the vinedressers.
 
In Jesus’ case, Isaiah 53 says that the Messiah would have no form or comeliness and that there was no beauty in Him that made Him desirable. He was overlooked as someone unfit for ruling, or so they thought. However, the One who was rejected became the very foundation stone of the temple. Jesus continues, “From ‘Lord’, it was, this.”
 
This was God’s design all along. He determined when His Messiah would come, what He would look like, where He would grow up, etc. Every aspect of who Jesus is was determined by the Lord to perfectly fit His designs. Once this was understood by those seeing it, Jesus finishes with, “And it is marvelous in ‘eyes, ours’.”
 
Those who see who Jesus is and how God orchestrated all things in relation to His being the Messiah, would consider it marvelous. Two thousand years later, this continues to be true. Each person who comes to God by seeing what He has done through Jesus finds it wondrous.
 
Someday, even those who rejected Jesus will stand before God and consider His ways. They too will find it wondrous, but for them, it will be too late.
 
Life application: Consider the love of God in what He has done in the giving of Jesus. If God wanted to rule over the people from the start with a brutal fist and a demanding hand, He could have done so. Instead, He slowly and methodically laid forth the plan of redemption both in literal history and in typology found in stories from that same history.
 
That way, He could lead the world to Jesus while showing what He had done and would do in Jesus’ coming, and even till the end of the age. Throughout it all, the story continuously brings us back to God’s care for those who demonstrate faith in who He is and what He has done and will do.
 
For us, that faith is in the giving of His Son. He was willing to send Jesus to bring us back to Himself, and all He asks of us is to believe. What a great, glorious, and loving God to do what He has done.
 
Lord God, thank You for Your tender mercies which You have lavished upon us. Thank You that while there was enmity, You came forward to offer peace. We love You and praise You for Your tender mercies. Amen.
 

Monday, 3 August 2026
 
They said to Him, “He will destroy those wicked men miserably, and lease his vineyard to other vinedressers who will render to him the fruits in their seasons.” Matthew 21:41
 
“They say to Him, ‘Worthless! Badly, he will destroy them, and the vineyard, he will lease to other farmers who, they will give him the fruits in the ‘junctures, theirs’.” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus asked Israel’s leaders what the housemaster would do when he comes to his vineyard. In response, “They say to Him, ‘Worthless! Badly, he will destroy them.’”
 
If the response is from the leaders, they have admitted with their own mouths that such treatment is from worthless people who deserve to be destroyed. The reason for the “if” will be explained later. As for the continued words, they say, “and the vineyard, he will lease to other farmers.”
 
The leaders of Israel were the ones being spoken of. They rejected Christ, failed their people, and were set for a bad end. However, the vineyard won’t simply be left unattended. God is working in the world for the redemption of man.
 
The economy in which this takes place will be a new cultural setting. In fact, it is one that spans the entire world of cultures. Anywhere the gospel is believed and churches are formed, the leaders of those churches bear the responsibility for tending to God’s vineyard. As for those responding to Jesus, they say these new vinedressers will be those “who, they will give him the fruits in the ‘junctures, theirs’.”
 
When the fruits are ready, they will be offered to God accordingly. This will come about in the various ways people are brought to saving faith, discipled in doctrine, reassured through preaching, raised up to become ministers, etc. As for the words of this verse, it appears that the response to Jesus is from the leaders. However, in Mark and Luke, the answer appears to be given by Jesus –
 
“Therefore what will the owner of the vineyard do? He will come and destroy the vinedressers, and give the vineyard to others.” Mark 12:9
 
“Therefore what will the owner of the vineyard do to them? 16 He will come and destroy those vinedressers and give the vineyard to others.”And when they heard it they said, “Certainly not!” Luke 20:15, 16
 
So how can this be reconciled? There are at least a couple of possibilities. One is that the leaders, in fact, spoke to Jesus as is recorded in Matthew. After that, Jesus then responded with their own words in a manner that made them understand He was referring to them, such as “He WILL come and destroy those vinedressers...” while looking directly at them.
 
From there, they responded, “Certainly not!” as is recorded in Luke, having realized Jesus was speaking of them. A second option is that the word “they” in Matthew 21:41 is not the leaders, but the other people who were listening. From there, the leaders called out, “Certainly not!”
 
Either way, there is no reason to assume there is any contradiction.
 
Life application: God was evaluating the leaders of Israel and held them accountable for their failure to acknowledge Christ in His coming. They were the stewards of the law and should have known perfectly well that Jesus was the Christ. Because of their rejection of Him, they were judged accordingly.
 
As this is true, there is no reason to assume God will be any less ready to judge those leaders in the church who mislead their people. It has become almost fashionable in liberal churches to deny the resurrection, to make sick claims about Jesus that have no basis in Scripture, etc.
 
Such people will not fare well when they stand before the Lord to give an account of their lives. Similarly, false prophets and teachers like Joseph Smith and Ellen G. White, among a host of others, will suffer the consequences of their false teachings.
 
Even if not teachers, each of us should tread carefully when we conduct our affairs before God, treating His name with great honor, exalting Him for His goodness. We will be evaluated on the lives we live, so be sure to keep in mind that you are always in the presence of the Creator.
 
Lord God, we thank You for the salvation You have provided us in Christ. Help us to remember that You are always present and that we should conduct our lives before You in holiness all our days. May it be so to Your glory. Amen.
 

 Sunday, 2 August 2026
 
“Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those vinedressers?” Matthew 21:40
 
“When, therefore, he should come, the ‘lord, the vineyard’, what he will do to the agronomists, to those?” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus said that the agronomists took the son, cast him out of the vineyard, and killed him. He now questions Israel’s leaders concerning the matter, beginning with, “When, therefore, he should come, the ‘lord, the vineyard’.”
 
This is the time of judgment that will come upon Israel for their having crucified the Son of God. Paul explains this in 1 Thessalonians –
 
“For this reason we also thank God without ceasing, because when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which also effectively works in you who believe. 14 For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God which are in Judea in Christ Jesus. For you also suffered the same things from your own countrymen, just as they did from the Judeans, 15 who killed both the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they do not please God and are contrary to all men, 16 forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they may be saved, so as always to fill up the measure of their sins; but wrath has come upon them to the uttermost.” 1 Thessalonians 2:13-16
 
For Israel, there was a certain amount of sin that the Jews could expect to be dismissed by God through His grace and mercy, but there is a point at which that amount would be filled up, and beyond which only destruction could be the result. This same concept is true with any given nation, church, or person. There is a point where sin finally fills up to its measure, and then only wrath can be the inevitable result.
 
This is what Paul is saying concerning his people of national heritage. They had filled up the measure of their sins, and he knew, as he says, “that wrath has come upon them to the uttermost.” Understanding this, Jesus asks the question: “what he will do to the agronomists, to those?”
 
The answer is obvious, and Jesus is asking them this for a particular reason. In their response, they will indict themselves. As for Paul’s words in 1 Thessalonians, he knew that the time had come, that Israel had r ejected Christ, and that there was no remedy left for them as a nation.
 
The cup was full, the wrath had been ordained, and it was only a matter of time before the wine would be poured out. This would be realized at the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem, and the dispersion of the nation to the four corners of heaven, just as their response will indicate.
 
Life application: The words of Isaiah are calling out to the people of Israel, instructing them on exactly what Jesus conveys to them. The leaders, without considering their own Scriptures, were being presented with the fulfillment of the prophetic word –
 
“And now, O inhabitants of Jerusalem and men of Judah,Judge, please, between Me and My vineyard.4 What more could have been done to My vineyardThat I have not done in it?Why then, when I expected it to bring forth good grapes,Did it bring forth wild grapes?5 And now, please let Me tell you what I will do to My vineyard.”
 
Israel was filled with bad grapes. To this day, it is that way. There was a portion of the people who believed, but they were a fraction of the whole. Today, this is true as well. The messianic believers who look to Jesus as the fulfillment of their Scriptures are taunted by the observant Jews.
 
But the observant Jews are observant in a system of pick-and-choose religiosity that ignores precepts of the law they are unable or unwilling to observe, while proclaiming their “holiness” by the things they do observe. They may hold fast to the Sabbath and dietary laws, but they ignore innumerable other laws found in their Scriptures.
 
It’s the problem with the law. It always reflects back on us. We pick and choose our “holiness” through law. But it doesn’t work. Only when Jesus is our holiness do we come to the point of having fulfilled the law. His righteousness is granted to us. In Him, we now have rest and fellowship with God. Thank God for Jesus.
 
Lord God, help us to remember to set aside attempts at justifying ourselves before You through our own efforts. Rather, keep us trusting in what Jesus has done. May pride in our accomplishments never cloud our understanding that we need Jesus. He alone is our righteousness. Amen.
 

Saturday, 1 August 2026
 
So they took him and cast him out of the vineyard and killed him. Matthew 21:39
 
“And having taken him, they ejected from the vineyard, and they killed.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, the agronomists saw the son and plotted to kill him and take his inheritance. Following through with their plot, it next says, “And having taken him, they ejected from the vineyard.”
 
As has been seen, the vineyard represents the economy (a cultural expression) where God is dealing with man in order to bring about a result. Therefore, this refers to Jesus being handed over to the Gentiles for sentencing. It was essentially an act of excommunication from them by doing this.
 
Barabbas was under the Gentile’s full authority. The leaders of Israel asked for him to be returned to them and for Jesus to go under their full authority to be crucified. This is what happened. Thus, Jesus’ next words, “and they killed.”
 
Whether they actually did the killing or not, the guilt of it was theirs –
 
“When Pilate saw that he could not prevail at all, but rather that a tumult was rising, he took water and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, ‘I am innocent of the blood of this just Person. You see to it.’25 And all the people answered and said, ‘His blood be on us and on our children.’26 Then he released Barabbas to them; and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered Him to be crucified.” Matthew 27:24-26
 
Through the parable, Jesus is already speaking of His death as a certainty. It is certain that the handing of Jesus over to the Gentiles is what is being referred to in being ejected from the vineyard because Mark reverses the two thoughts, saying they killed him and cast him out. This remains true because they did kill Jesus, and they disavowed Him as the Messiah.
 
As such, being cast out is not a reference to Jesus’ death outside the city walls. It is a reference to being cast out of the cultural expression where God is dealing with man. Instead, Jesus has been a part of the Gentile-led cultural expression since then. Israel has no national dealings with Him to this day.
 
Life application: Of this verse, Ellicott says –
 
“Cast him out of the vineyard.—The minor touches of a parable are not always to be pressed in our interpretation of it; but we can hardly help seeing here a latent reference to the facts (1) that our Lord was delivered over to the judgment of the Gentiles; and (2) that He was crucified outside the Holy City, (John 19:20; Hebrews 13:12), which was, in a special sense, as the vineyard of the Lord of Hosts.”
 
The minor touches of a parable are a part of the parable. If God is giving it to us, every touch of it has meaning. Because Ellicott misunderstood the typology of the vineyard, he incorrectly evaluated the meaning of the vineyard. Jerusalem may be the seat of power in the vineyard, but it is not the vineyard.
 
Jesus is building on the words of Isaiah. The vineyard is referred to in Isaiah 1:8 and 3:14. From there, Isaiah 5:1-7, a song of His Beloved “regarding His vineyard,” is given. The words of verse 7 say, “For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel.” It is the cultural expression that defines the vineyard.
 
Jesus’ words remain in accord with this typology. Therefore, the metaphors being used are understandable and should be consistently maintained. When they are, there is no need to worry about the “minor touches” of a parable, as if they are unimportant. They will fit seamlessly with the larger details.
 
Someday, Israel will again be the cultural expression in which Jesus is proclaimed. The world is being readied for that today. After the rapture, things will go into hyperdrive as the world begins to tear itself apart. However, God’s plan will unfold as the pages of Scripture detail. Israel will be saved, and Jesus will return to them at that time.
 
Be firm in your convictions concerning Israel. Many are turning from them today, and that is fine in regard to their unholy practices. But it is not fine if we reject what God is doing to bring them back to Himself. We don’t have to like the things they do, but we should pray for God’s will to be done in and through them. And because the pages of Scripture are written, we know it will be.
 
Lord God, we pray for Your plan of redemption to continue to unfold, knowing that it will because You have spoken. We pray for deliverance at the rapture, safety for Israel through the tribulation, and a great reunion of them with Jesus, whom they have for so long rejected. May these things come about according to Your word. Amen.

Friday, 31 July 2026
 
But when the vinedressers saw the son, they said among themselves, ‘This is the heir. Come, let us kill him and seize his inheritance.’  Matthew 21:38
 
“The ‘also, agronomists’, having seen the son, they said in themselves, ‘This, he is, the heir. You come, we should kill him, and we should retain the ‘inheritance, his’.’” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus said to the leaders, while still telling them the details of the parable, “Afterward, also, he sent to them the ‘son, his’, saying, ‘They will be in-turned of the ‘son, mine’.”
 
As noted, the normally recognized translation of the word entrepó in that verse is a positive state, like respect or reverence. This is something that should cause an immediate difficulty for those who know the outcome of the parable and what it is pointing to.
 
The word signifies an in-turning. This can be positive or negative. The housemaster would be quite naïve to assume that those who had already killed his other servants would act favorably toward his son. 
 
Rather than respecting him, he would fully expect them to be ashamed of him and respond accordingly. Despite that, he sent him anyway. Having done so, it next says, “The ‘also, agronomists’, having seen the son, they said in themselves, ‘This, he is, the heir.’”
 
Almost all translations here say “But.” As if the response of the laborers is somehow a surprising new detail in the ongoing narrative. The word de is similar to the Hebrew prefix v’, and. Translations will often translate v’ as but, then, moreover, etc., based on a presupposition about what the text is saying.
 
Those translations may carry the correct intent, or they may not. As such, it is best to leave it as “and.” Likewise, the Greek de means also (as in continuance). Saying “but” is a presupposition that may or may not rightly translate de. In this case, depending on how the previous verse is rendered, it may be incorrect. Saying “also” or “and” gives the right sense. In this case, the housemaster knew they would not respect his son, and that is just what happened.
 
His appearance is recognized. He is obviously the son of the housemaster. When Jesus came, it was obvious that He was who He claimed to be. They were told explicitly who He was, and He did everything according to Scripture to prove that it was so. The evidence was overwhelming.
 
To this day, because of the recorded words of Scripture, that remains true. All a person needs to do is to read the Old Testament, compare what it says in the New Testament, and they will agree that the intent of the writers is that Jesus is the promised Messiah. This may not be believed, but it is undeniable that this is the intent. Understanding the parallel, it next says, “You come, we should kill him.”
 
Understanding the favorable position of the son in relation to the inheritance, they determine to kill him as well. The parable is given by Jesus. Jesus is God incarnate. Because this is true, it would be ridiculous for Jesus to say that the servants would receive Him favorably and then continue the parable with these words.
 
It would demonstrate a complete inconsistency in the words of the parable, and in the Person who is speaking the words, to make a comparison to God while knowing that the comparison is faulty.
 
Despite knowing that the son would be rejected, the house master sent his son. With the agronomists deciding to kill him, they next give the reason for doing so, saying, “and we should retain the ‘inheritance, his’.”
 
Because of the obvious difficulty presented in the previous verse, the Pulpit commentary says of these words –
 
“It would have been a wild and ignorant scheme of the husbandmen to consider that by murdering the heir they could obtain and hold possession of the vineyard. Here the parable bursts from the allegorical form, and becomes history and prophecy.”
 
Rather, the whole parable parallels the historical nature of Jesus’ words. God foreknew that when He sent His Son into the nation of Israel while under the Law of Moses, the leaders would kill Him. Despite knowing in advance that it was so, He sent Him anyway.
 
Life application: This parable, like the other parables given by Jesus, is given to show exacting truths about what God is doing in redemptive history. It would make no sense for Jesus to present a parable that didn’t match what would be borne out in literal history.
 
If Jesus’ intent in the previous verse was for the laborers to show respect, esteem, or honor to the son, there are other words in the New Testament that would reflect that sentiment.
 
Instead, He purposefully chose a word that carries a dual sense to reveal the fact that, despite His foreknowledge of what would occur, He still sent Jesus to accomplish the work intended for Him, including being rejected by Israel’s leaders and being crucified.
 
This reveals the very heart of God for the people of the world. It also reveals the determination of Jesus, who had already said several times that He would be treated shamefully and killed by those in Jerusalem. Despite all that was to come upon Him, He faithfully and resolutely went forward to do what needed to be done to restore us to God.
 
Lord God, thank You for what You have done for us in the sending of Jesus. The cross of Christ is truly the most precious symbol of love and reconciliation that could ever be. May we only boast in what He has done, never attempting to set aside the grace poured out on us there. Yes, may our hope rest in Jesus alone. Amen.

Thursday, 30 July 2026
 
Then last of all he sent his son to them, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’ Matthew 21:37
  
“Afterward, also, he sent to them the ‘son, his’, saying, ‘They will be in-turned of the ‘son, mine’.’” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus continued the parable, noting that the housemaster sent other servants, greater than the first, and they treated those servants the same. With that noted, He next says, “Afterward, also, he sent to them the ‘son, his’.”
 
The meaning of the words, at least to us, should be plain and obvious, even if the leaders don’t immediately get what Jesus is saying. A succession of servants has been sent to receive the fruit of the vineyard, and they have been treated shamefully.
 
These represented the messengers of God, the prophets and wise men, looking for fruit in the nation of Israel. Without success, God sent His Son into the nation, “saying, ‘They will be in-turned of the ‘son, mine’.’”
 
A new word is seen, entrepó. It is derived from en, a fixed position usually translated as “in”, and tropé, a noun signifying “a turning” which is only found in James 1:17. Together, they give the idea of “in a state of turning,” as in turning “one’s attention to in a riveted (‘locked in’) way” (HELPS Word Studies).
 
The word is used positively when turning in respect, but it is also used when feeling a state of shame. It is seen when there is no respect (as in Luke 18:2 and 18:4). In Hebrews 12:9, almost all translations say something like, “Furthermore, we have had human fathers who corrected us, and we paid them respect [entrepó]” (NKJV). However, the verb is passive, and the word “them” is not in the text.
 
Having said that, because of the difficulty, most take this as a passive with a middle force. This is done to justify the reading as “respect.” However, Thayer’s Greek Lexicon notes the word in classical Greek signifies “properly, to turn about, so in passive even in Homer; τινα, properly, to turn one upon himself, i. e. to shame one.” Thus, if the passive is retained, the word would indicate a sense of personal shame, not respect.
 
The entire paragraph in which Hebrews 12:9 exists is based on chastisement, either by God or by our fathers. As such, there is a sense of shame for wrongdoing, which is exactly what sin is and what it causes. We are chastised, and we are ashamed because of our actions.
 
Without that shame because of a lack of correction, we would be unashamed and unrestrained. Something common in the world when there is no correction. Hebrews 12:9 continues, We had fathers who were instructors “... and we were in-turned, not much, also, more we will be subject to the ‘Father, the spirits’, and we will live?”
 
One can see the progression: 1) Earthly fathers discipline, 2) children respond, being in-turned (ashamed), 3) therefore, how much more should we be subject to God in humility? The same passive mood is found in the three synoptic gospels in regard to this parable. 
 
Because translations reject the passive voice in Matthew 21:37, stating it is to be rendered in the middle voice, it then causes scholars a true dilemma. The Pulpit Commentary, reflective of others, says –
 
“God condescends to speak in human language, as hoping for a good result from this last effort for man’s salvation. He, as it were, puts aside his foreknowledge, and gives scope to man’s free will. Though the sad issue is known to him, he often acts towards men as if he had hope that they would still use the occasion profitably.”
 
This makes no sense. Why would the housemaster assume or even hope for those in the vineyard to act appropriately? Why would he assume they could be trusted when they have already killed his servants? Such a thought is not in line with what we would consider concerning Jesus’ portrayal of the omnipotent God in a parable. 
 
An in-turning concerning the son is much more fitting to the surrounding context. And it is exactly what happened to Jesus. Thus, Jesus is clearly saying that they will not accept the son. Rather, they will be ashamed of him. And this is what God the Father knew, in advance, concerning His Son. This is perfectly in line with what Jesus told the disciples just a few days before –
 
“Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be betrayed to the chief priests and to the scribes; and they will condemn Him to death, 19 and deliver Him to the Gentiles to mock and to scourge and to crucify. And the third day He will rise again.” Matthew 20:18, 19
 
It is a sentiment He had already stated to them twice before as well. The fact is that, despite knowing in advance, that Jesus would not be accepted, God sent His Son to Israel to offer them salvation. This demonstrates the immense love of God for those He created. It also shows the lengths God was willing to go to for those same creatures.
 
Life application: If the word discussed above is intended to be translated as “respect,” it would demonstrate a naivete in God that does not exist. The only way to get around that is to deal with the words in the way the Pulpit Commentary did. But parables are not merely an inexact representation of what is going on. Nor are they an accommodation for our sensibilities. Rather, they are a type of speaking intended to convey actual meaning, even if veiled.
 
Jesus was standing before the leaders, having just been hailed as the Messiah. If He is, then He is God’s selected choice for that position. To say, “Maybe the leaders will respect Me” or “My Father thinks the leaders might respect Me” is completely out of the context of the situation in which He is speaking. The leaders were ashamed of Jesus, and He was rejected and crucified, just as God foreknew that He would be.
 
This analysis fits the surrounding narrative. As such, leaving the translation as literal as possible allows for a resolution to the otherwise nonsensical idea that God would not know that His Son would not be respected.
 
Lord God, what a wonderful delight it is to come to Your word and consider its contents. Help us to be diligent each day to pick it up and dive into it with enthusiasm and zeal. Thank You for this beautiful treasure that tells us of JESUS! Amen.
 

Wednesday, 29 July 2026
 
Again he sent other servants, more than the first, and they did likewise to them. Matthew 21:36
 
“Again, he sent other servants, ‘greater, the first’, and they did to them as thus.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus referred to the treatment of the servants sent to the vinedressers. They were scourged, killed, and stoned. Jesus continues the thought, “Again, he sent other servants, ‘greater, the first’.”
 
Two words should be considered. The first is allos, other. It refers to another of the same kind. These servants are in the same category as those who were previously sent. If they were in a different category, the Greek word heteros would have been used.
 
The second word is pleión. It signifies a comparative, such as greater in number, greater in quality, more abundant, etc. It is used in the greater-than-quality sense in Matthew, such as righteousness greater than the scribes and Pharisees is needed to enter the kingdom of the heavens (Matthew 5:20). It is used this way when making a comparison to Jonah (Matthew 12:41) and Solomon (Matthew 12:42). Jesus is greater than them.
 
What seems likely is that if Jesus is making a comparison, it would be to the pre-exilic and post-exilic prophets. The post-exilic prophets would be “greater” than the pre-exilic prophets because they had greater revelation, for example, in having the word of the previous prophets fulfilled.
 
As such, they stood in a greater position of knowing the reliability of the word of God, both in judgment and in mercy. There is no reason to assume there were only “more” servants sent either to the vinedressers in the parable or to the prophets after the exile. A good example of this is found in Numbers 22:15 –
 
“And he added yet, Balak, sending commanders greater and being enweighed from these.” (CG).
 
This “greater than” is certainly seen in the final prophet of the Old Testament –
 
“Assuredly, I say to you, among those born of women there has not risen one greater than John the Baptist; but he who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.” Matthew 11:11
 
In that verse, a different word, megas, signifying greater, is used, providing extra weight to this idea. Israel had been exiled. They should have known better, and yet, even after the exile, the maltreatment continued, as Jesus indicates, “and they did to them as thus.” This is explicitly recorded in Matthew 17:11-13 –
 
“Jesus answered and said to them, ‘Indeed, Elijah is coming first and will restore all things. 12 But I say to you that Elijah has come already, and they did not know him but did to him whatever they wished. Likewise the Son of Man is also about to suffer at their hands.’ 13 Then the disciples understood that He spoke to them of John the Baptist.”
 
This, therefore, is the likely meaning of Jesus’ words here. The Bible does not explicitly focus on the maltreatment of the post-exilic prophets outside of John, but Jesus’ words are certainly inclusive of him.
 
Life application: The Old Testament records maltreatment of the prophets at various times. In Jeremiah 26, the prophet Urijah escaped from King Jehoiakim but was captured, brought back, and put to the sword. The priests of the Lord, including Ahimelech, who inquired of the Lord for David, were put to the sword by Saul through the hand of Doeg.
 
The Spirit of God came upon Zechariah in 2 Chronicles 24, prophesying to the people who rejected His word. King Joash had Zechariah stoned to death. In 1 Kings 19, Elijah exclaimed to the Lord that the children of Israel had “killed Your prophets with the sword.”
 
These and other such examples show that the words of Jesus are fulfilled just as the parable proclaims. Despite this overwhelming evidence recorded in Scripture, the Expositor’s Greek Testament unfathomably says –
 
“The husbandmen treat the messengers in the most barbarous and truculent manner: beating, killing, stoning to death; highly improbable in the natural sphere, but another instance in which parables have to violate natural probability in order to describe truly men’s conduct in the spiritual sphere.”
 
How can it be “highly improbable in the natural sphere” if the Bible explicitly records it is so, including in Jesus’ words of the previous verse? These, along with verse 37, are explicit references to the ill treatment of the Lord’s people.
 
Understanding this, be careful not to just accept “scholarly” comments as if they are correct and reliable. Jesus’ parables do not “violate natural probability.” Rather, they are given to reveal exactly what has been going on, or what will occur. They are a unique and marvelous way of conveying information that is reliable and targeted.
 
Lord God, may we never dismiss what is recorded in Your word as unreliable, questionable, or fanciful. Rather, Your word stands as a witness to what You are doing in the world. Thank You for the sure and reliable word You have given us. Amen.
 

Tuesday, 28 July 2026
 
And the vinedressers took his servants, beat one, killed one, and stoned another.  Matthew 21:35
 
“And having taken, the agronomists, the ‘servants, his’, one, indeed, they scourged. One, also, they killed. One, also, they stoned.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus said in the ongoing parable that at the time of the ripe fruit, the housemaster sent servants to the agronomists that they might receive its fruit. He continues next, saying, “And having taken, the agronomists, the ‘servants, his’, one, indeed, they scourged.”
 
The word is deró. It literally signifies to flay. By implication, it means to scourge, which causes the skin to be flayed. This is a painful, and at times lethal, form of punishment. Next, He says, “One, also, they killed.”
 
This is a general word that signifies to kill outright. No particular type of killing is implied, just that the person is killed. Once again, Jesus says, “One, also, they stoned.”
 
This is another new word, lithoboleó. It is from lithos, a stone, and balló, to throw, cast, etc. Thus, it signifies lapidation. It is a form of punishment recognized in the Law of Moses, and it is noted as being used against offenders in Israel’s history, such as –
 
“And Joshua said, ‘Why have you troubled us? The Lord will trouble you this day.’ So all Israel stoned him with stones; and they burned them with fire after they had stoned them with stones.” Joshua 7:25
 
Having gone this far into the parable, we can now start to look at the metaphors that Jesus is using. Thus far, we’ve seen the vineyard that God prepared to bear fruit. It is Israel, the nation. The barrier wall is the Law of Moses. That is seen in the word used, phragmos. Paul uses it in Ephesians 2:14 when referring to the law –
 
“For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation.”
 
The purgos, or tower, is defined by Strong as specifically being a burgh, an old word signifying an incorporated town. The main building of the town, often a tower-type building, would be representative of it. This would be the tabernacle/temple with the Levitical system of rites and sacrifices. The agronomists are the leaders of the nation, given charge of the nation’s cultural, political, and religious care.
 
The fruit season is the time expected for there to be religious fruit borne among the people. There was expected to be a fruitful harvest of the people. However, when God sent the prophets in anticipation of such a harvest, they treated them as is seen in this verse now.
 
Life application: Jesus is using examples of one thing to convey a message about other things. His words, when He is complete, will be so obvious to those who hear that it will say in verse 45, “Now when the chief priests and Pharisees heard His parables, they perceived that He was speaking of them.”
 
Everything about His words relies on other things in Scripture to make these points. By understanding the cultural, political, and religious aspects of Israel that are presented in the Bible, the words come into focus, and the meaning of the overall parable can then be rightly understood.
 
There is usually no reason to go beyond the word itself to find the meaning of the metaphor, although that may be needed at times. For example, the barrier wall explains itself when studying the other uses of the word. Paul explicitly states that the law is that barrier. The full context in Ephesians 2 says –
 
“For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation, 15 having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace, 16 and that He might reconcile them both to God in one body through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity.” Ephesians 2:14-16
 
As the Bible has stated this, there is no need to go further to find other symbolism. Pay attention to what is going on as you read. What a treasure we have in God’s wonderful word.
 
Lord God, open our eyes as we read and study Your word. Illuminate our understanding so that we can know just what You intend for us to see. And, Lord, help us to live according to this word all the days of our lives. Amen.