BIBLE IN TEN

Matthew 18:27

Friday, 10 April 2026
 
Then the master of that servant was moved with compassion, released him, and forgave him the debt. Matthew 18:27
 
“And having gut-wrenched, the lord of that servant, he dismissed him, and the debt, he forgave him.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, the servant prostrated himself before his master, promising to repay the entire debt. With his having done this, it next says, “And having gut-wrenched, the lord of that servant.”
 
The paraphrased words “moved with compassion” are correct. The word signifies that the inner guts of a person churn from the situation, moving him to act in a particular way. In this case, it is in the direction of compassion. His sentence was stern and strict. After seeing the misery of the man, he relents from what he had pronounced. As it says, “he dismissed him.”
 
The words mean that he was released from custody. The same word is used elsewhere in this manner, such as when people are released from prison in Acts. As such, the sentence was already being carried out at the order of the king. However, he petitioned for release, and it was granted. And more, it says, “and the debt, he forgave him.”
 
A new word, daneion, debt, is seen here. It is from the same as the verb danizó, to loan on interest, as a business transaction. This is the only time it is seen in the New Testament. Based on what happens later in this same parable, a problem arises.
 
Because of circumstances, the master will deliver this servant to the torturers until he pays all that was due to him. How does that square with the forgiveness of this debt? Because this debt is forgiven, it means that more than just this particular debt is owed.
 
Life application: Although the debt here is pardoned, it is not an infinite amount. The previous life applications have referred to man’s sin debt as an infinite amount. Therefore, though this man owed a great deal with this debt, what he owed here cannot be equated to an individual’s sin.
 
Care has to be taken when parables are considered. We are being instructed on what is on God’s mind concerning particular issues. How could God forgive an infinite sin debt and then say the debt, which was infinite and forgiven, and thus meaning infinitely forgiven, then re-impute that sin? That would be a logical (and biblical) contradiction.
 
As such, this forgiven debt is not referring to forgiveness in Christ. What Christ forgives is, as it says in the psalms, as far as the east is from the west. Unlike the fixed north and south, there actually is no fixed east or west from a biblical perspective. As such, it is a term considered infinite in distance.
 
Understanding that the debt in this verse, which is forgiven by the master, is not what is owed in verse 34, the parable will be more readily understood.
 
Lord God, help us to always consider Your word carefully. Keep us from running ahead and, thus, running into error. Instead, may we keep things in their proper context so that our thoughts will be rightly aligned with Yours. Help us in this, O God. Amen.
 

Matthew 18:26

Thursday, 9 April 2026
 
The servant therefore fell down before him, saying, ‘Master, have patience with me, and I will pay you all.’ Matthew 18:26
 
“Having fallen, therefore, the servant, he prostrated to him, saying, ‘Lord, you long-wrath upon me, and all, I will pay you.’” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, the master commanded that the debtor be sold along with his wife and children. In fact, all he had was to be sold to pay his debts. Jesus continues, saying, “Having fallen, therefore, the servant, he prostrated to him.”
 
It is a natural reaction one would expect when facing such a terrible sentence. The man was completely overwhelmed at the prospect of a life that would forever be removed from him and another life that would end in bondage, maybe until the day he died. Therefore, he fell flat before his master.
 
The word proskuneó is believed to be derived from kuón, dog or dogs. As such, it signifies total submission, even to licking a master’s hand or maybe his foot. It can be out of honor, respect, or groveling submission. In this case, it is certainly the latter. Along with that, he was saying, “Lord, you long-wrath upon me, and all, I will pay you.”
 
A new word is seen, makrothumeó, it is derived from makros, long, and thumos, wrath. Thus, a literal translation would be long-wrath, as in holding off in anger and thus being patient. The servant not only asks for this patience, but he also promises full restoration of everything he owed.
 
With the knowledge that he could be taken into servitude anytime afterwards, he would be highly motivated not to let his promise fall to the wayside.
 
Life application: An obvious question that comes to mind is, “Just how did the servant amass such an enormous debt?” Regardless of how it came about, the debt existed. One can see an obvious parallel to our pitiful state before God.
 
We owe a sin debt that must be dealt with. It doesn’t matter if it is a little child in Papua New Guinea or someone like Adolph Hitler, the sin debt that is owed is infinite. We were born of Adam’s race, thus inheriting sin. As Paul says in Romans 5:12, “just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned.”
 
Hitler may have more sin-debt accrued in his life, but the sin of both is infinite in relation to God. Therefore, there is no hope of restitution, even if we say we will repay it, as law observers think we can. But that is only because pride in self overcomes the realization that only God can accomplish what is necessary for restoration.
 
A second point of this verse is that the person has asked for release from the sentence. The master has not arbitrarily said, “Ok, you owe me all this money, never mind it. We’ll just start fresh from here.” But this is the premise of Christians who say we must forgive every offense, without exception.
 
That is not taught in the parable, nor is it taught anywhere else in Scripture as a prescription. God sent Jesus into the world to pay the sin debt for humanity. The payment is universal in scope, but it is not universally applied without the condition for its application being met, which is to believe the gospel.
 
No person on the planet will ever be received by God without coming through His Messiah, Jesus Christ. To reject Him means that the infinite debt will never be paid. Complete and total separation from God is the inevitable result. Choose wisely. Choose Jesus.
 
Lord God, may we be wise in understanding the level of debt that is owed to You. May we never assume that by our deeds we can find restoration with You. The law only further separates us from a restored relationship. Help us to think clearly and then trust completely in the cross of Jesus Christ to mend the rift. Amen.

Matthew 18:25

Wednesday, 8 April 2026
 
But as he was not able to pay, his master commanded that he be sold, with his wife and children and all that he had, and that payment be made. Matthew 18:25
 
“And he, having naught to pay, the lord, he commanded him sold, and his wife, and the children, and all, as much as he has - and repayment.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, one of the king’s servants was found to have owed him myriads of talents. Because of this, it next says, “And he, having naught to pay, the lord, he commanded him sold.”
 
This would be understood from the Law of Moses, such as –
 
“And if one of your brethren who dwells by you becomes poor, and sells himself to you, you shall not compel him to serve as a slave.” Leviticus 25:39
 
The provisions in Israel for bondservants such as this were carefully laid out in Leviticus 25:39-55. It is probable that other countries within the Roman Empire had their own such laws. Slavery was common throughout the Roman system as well. It was an accepted part of life. As for the man, not only was he to be sold, but it continues with, “and his wife, and the children.”
 
An example of this is found in 2 Kings 4 –
 
“A certain woman of the wives of the sons of the prophets cried out to Elisha, saying, ‘Your servant my husband is dead, and you know that your servant feared the Lord. And the creditor is coming to take my two sons to be his slaves.’” 2 Kings 4:1
 
Family members were not exempt from the financial failings of the head of the house. One such provision of note concerning how family was dealt with for slaves is found in Exodus 21 –
 
“Now these are the judgments which you shall set before them: 2 If you buy a Hebrew servant, he shall serve six years; and in the seventh he shall go out free and pay nothing. 3 If he comes in by himself, he shall go out by himself; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. 4 If his master has given him a wife, and she has borne him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master’s, and he shall go out by himself.” Exodus 21:1-4
As for this individual referred to in the parable, not only is he sold along with his family, but more, “and all, as much as he has - and repayment.”
 
Due to the extreme amount of debt, everything he possessed was to be confiscated and sold off. In his impossible situation, he would be a man without anything except the hope of service to whoever became his master.
 
As noted above, if this hypothetical person being referred to was a Hebrew under the Law of Moses’ provisions, he would be released in the year of release, which occurred every seventh year. An example of the abuse of this practice is found in Jeremiah 34.
 
If this person were sold to be property of Gentiles, he would probably never be freed.
 
Life application: The Bible assumed the condition of slavery was an axiom of humanity. It treats the subject in a neutral manner and as something that was expected to happen. The various reasons for its coming about are detailed with the understanding that the practice was acceptable.
At the same time, provisions for the proper treatment of slaves were detailed. Today, most countries and cultures do not have slavery, but there are still expectations for people to pay their bills and work in order to tend to their needs and the needs of those dependent on them.
Not acting according to set guidelines for personal responsibility is to be considered inappropriate. For those who fail to tend to their needs, their own miseries are normally a self-inflicted wound. As Paul says, “For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat” (2 Thessalonians 3:10).
 
If you are a properly functioning human and you don’t want society to leave you in poverty, it is up to you to work, pay your bills, and deal honestly with others. In doing this, you will normally fare well.
 
Lord God Almighty, help us to be responsible people who will work hard and be effective in the things we do so that we will not be a burden on others. May our lives be directed to glorifying You in all ways. Amen.
 

Matthew 18:24

Tuesday, 7 April 2026
 
And when he had begun to settle accounts, one was brought to him who owed him ten thousand talents. Matthew 18:24
 
“And he, having commenced to balance, he was presented, one, to him, an ower of myriads of talents.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus began the parable of what is known as “the unforgiving servant.” A king determined to balance his account with his servants. Jesus continues, saying, “And he, having commenced to balance, he was presented, one, to him.”
 
It can already be seen that the focus of the parable will be on the relationship between the king and this particular person. Other side issues may be brought in, but the nature of the parable is to set the tone quickly and then develop the story around that initial person or situation. Understanding this, Jesus notes this person is “an ower of myriads of talents.”
 
Two new words are seen here. The first is murios, a myriad. Strong’s says of this word, “Plural of an apparently primary word (properly, meaning very many); ten thousand; by extension, innumerably many -- ten thousand.”
To say, “ten thousand” is simply a way of defining an otherwise indeterminate number, just as saying “one hundred” when someone else said “heaps.” The second new word is talanton. HELPS Word Studies says, “a silver talent, worth about 6,000 denarii (gold talents were worth about 30 times as much). A talent was not a coin but rather a weight (about 75 lbs, NIVSB) used as the basis of monetary exchange.”
 
The idea of a talent, then, is equivalent to a bar of silver or gold. Its value would change based on the prevailing currency rates or by some other set or changeable standard. It would be equivalent in thought to the Hebrew word kikkar, a word signifying “circular.” It may speak of a circular region, a loaf of bread, or a measure of silver or gold that is in a circular form rather than a bar.
 
The word is used this last way, for example, in Exodus 25:39, “It shall be made of a talent [kikkar] of pure gold, with all these utensils.” The intent of Jesus’ words is that this guy owes the king an insanely large amount of money.
 
Life application: One can already see the comparison taking shape from Jesus’ words. Man owes an infinite debt because of sin. The reason for this is that sin, even inherited sin, in relation to God, who is infinite, will infinitely separate us from Him. At no point will we ever be able to overcome the gap because of this.
 
There is literally nothing we can do to change our state. We are in time, heading forward. The sin cannot go back and be undone. Thus, our condemnation remains forever. But this is where Jesus stepped in and handled the problem.
Because His Father is God, He bears God’s infinite nature. And because His mother was human, He became a suitable sacrifice (as allowed under the Law of Moses, God’s standard) for substitution. In essence, our sin can transfer to Him while His innocence is transferred to us.
 
Because of this, and because He prevailed over death, Jesus can now mediate between the infinite and the finite. There is no other way to reconciliation with God because no other avenue can attain the infinite pardon that is demanded by God’s holiness.
In other words, it is Jesus or eternal separation from God. There is no other way –
 
“He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” John 3:18
 
“Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.’” John 14:6
 
Choose wisely. Choose Jesus.
 
O God, help us to clearly and precisely explain the importance of Jesus to others. Without Him, there is no hope. This life is absolutely pointless without Jesus. But You, O God, have made it worth all of the joy eternity can provide because You sent Jesus. Thank You, O God, for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Matthew 18:23

Monday, 6 April 2026
 
Therefore the kingdom of heaven is like a certain king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. Matthew 18:23
 
“Through this, it was made to resemble the kingdom of the heavens – man, king, who he desired to balance a word with his servants.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus’ response to Peter’s question about forgiveness was “Not, I say to you until sevenfold, but until seventy-fold, sevenfold!” Next, to explain the matter of forgiveness, Jesus begins with, “Through this, it was made to resemble the kingdom of the heavens.”
 
Jesus will give an analogy of what forgiveness in the kingdom of the heavens is like by using worldly situations and human conditions, emotions, and desires. Understanding this, He begins the example, saying, “man, king, who he desired to balance a word with his servants.”
 
A new word is seen, sunairó. It is derived from sun, together, and airó, to lift. In other words, there is to be a balancing of accounts. One may owe another, or the books may be lifted and shown to be equal. In order to determine the matter, the king will look over his books, and a settlement of the differences will be the determined outcome.
 
Being a king, he has the authority to make decisions that affect those under him. And more, he has the authority to enforce the things he has decided. In such matters, he would be the final authority over the process.
 
Life application: As can be seen from Jesus’ words, the way things are in the heavenly realm is the standard. Things that happen here will align with the standard, or they will not. This is what the word of God is intended to show us.
 
Our human cultures, governments, and decision-making processes are tainted with our fallen nature. Therefore, we cannot properly run things according to the way God expects unless we are informed of just what He expects.
 
And more, there are things that are set forth in the word, such as the Law of Moses, that are good and serve a good purpose, but because of our sinful natures, what is good actually becomes an overwhelming obstacle to our efforts to be pleasing to God. Paul explains this in Romans 7.
 
The very thing that we want to do is what we don’t do. We want to be pleasing to God, but we find that our nature will not allow us to properly do so. Law, intended for life, has actually brought about death.
 
This is what Jesus came to fix. By doing what other humans are incapable of doing, He fulfilled the strict demands of the law. In His fulfillment of them, He ended the law through His crucifixion. Now, for anyone who trusts Him, law is no longer the enemy to our relationship with God. We have fellowship with Him once again through Jesus’ death.
 
The heavenly standard of forgiveness is being explained by Jesus in a way we can understand. Like the lesson of the law, we need to consider what He says. But suppose we disagree with one evaluation or another. It has been established that we are not under law, but grace.
 
As this is so, even if we don’t meet the bar set forth by Jesus concerning forgiveness, there is no law to condemn those who are in Christ. Therefore, our failings will be judged in a different way and for a different purpose. This is detailed in Paul’s letters concerning the judgment seat of Christ.
 
Don’t fear if your ability to forgive is not perfect. Jesus is. Because you are in Him, you are already forgiven.
 
O God, thank You for the full cleansing and freedom from sin that Jesus provides. Being forgiven, may we faithfully do those things that You desire to the best of our ability at all times. Be glorified in how we conduct our lives. Amen.
 

Matthew 18:22

Sunday, 5 April 2026
 
Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you, up to seven times, but up to seventy times seven. Matthew 18:22
 
“‘He says to him, Jesus, ‘Not, I say to you until sevenfold, but until seventy-fold, sevenfold!’” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Peter came to Jesus and asked how many times he should forgive his brother sinning against him. Should it be up to seven times? In response, “He says to him, Jesus, ‘Not, I say to you until sevenfold.’”
 
Peter’s suggestion seemed magnanimous. He would demonstrate a careful, patient, and seemingly longsuffering attitude towards the person who was offending him.
 
However, despite this proposition, Jesus finds the number deficient. Peter’s assumption was that there was a termination of such forgiveness based upon human wear and tear on patience. It is a common mistake people make concerning theological and doctrinal matters, where we align our thoughts about God based on our emotions, mental constraints, etc.
 
God, however, is Spirit. His patience, for example, is unlimited. Having said that, this is only so when certain conditions are met. Again, as noted in the analysis of the previous verse, Peter’s question was incomplete in its scope. However, Jesus is answering it as it stands and will clarify the scope in His continued response. For now, He continues, saying, “but until seventy-fold, sevenfold!”
 
It is a new word, hebdomékontakis, seventy-fold. This is the only time it is seen in the New Testament. The meaning of the words is debated. Grammatically, the number could be interpreted in two ways. Some translations say seventy times seven (meaning 70 x 7). Some say seventy-seven times (77).
 
The latter is contextually what is intended. The word “times” is normally used. In this case, our minds think of multiplication of the next number. Thus, we think seventy... times... seven. But the Greek reads seventy times (70), seven times (7). Placing a comma between the two helps get the point. However, if one changes the word “times” to the ending “fold,” it clears things up: seventy-fold, sevenfold.
 
The number is used in the Greek translation of Genesis 4 –
 
And he said, Lamech, to his wives, Adah and Zillah, “You must hear my voice, wives Lamech. You must cause to enear my saying. For man, I killed to my wound, and child, to my stripe. 24For sevenfold [hebdomékontakis] he will be ‘caused to avenge Cain’, and Lamech, seventy and seven.” Genesis 4:23, 24 (CG)
 
There, the context is clear. The meaning is seventy-seven. The biblical precedent was set, and Jesus was certainly using that verse as a reference for his words to Peter. It was understood from the earliest writings that seventy-seven was the intent. However, later scholars expanded the meaning to 70x7 = 490. This was done to emphasize the magnanimity of the forgiveness. Later preachers picked this up and included it in their sermons.
 
The number seventy-seven is simply a way of saying the same thing Lamech was conveying, meaning an unlimited number. Repeating and/or doubling things in such a manner is intended to give such an idea to the mind of the hearers, and this is just what Peter would have understood.
 
Life application: As noted above, God’s patience is unlimited. And yet, God judged and destroyed His people at times. So how do those thoughts reconcile? Examples permeate Scripture. For example –
 
“And the children of Israel said to the Lord, ‘We have sinned! Do to us whatever seems best to You; only deliver us this day, we pray.’ 16 So they put away the foreign gods from among them and served the Lord. And His soul could no longer endure the misery of Israel.” Judges 10:15, 16
 
Reading all of Judges 10:6-16 will give a better sense, but this portion is sufficient to see what is necessary for God’s “unlimited patience” to come about. The people turned, humbled themselves, and petitioned for deliverance. God did not automatically forgive them. Such a thing is not found in Scripture.
 
Sin causes a wall between God and man. It cannot simply be overlooked. It is something that must be dealt with. When the appropriate means of dealing with it have been effected, the forgiveness is granted. God does not expect more of us than He metes out upon us.
 
Again, Peter’s question is incomplete in and of itself, even if the intent behind it was implied. Any reasonable Jew would have known that God does not arbitrarily forgive. There are conditions to His forgiveness, and the same is true with us. Believers are not punching bags.
 
When an offense is brought to bear against another, there can be no true forgiveness without the offender acknowledging his wrongdoing. We can “let it go,” but that is all we can do until the matter is resolved by both parties. The utterly inane concept of forgiving everyone of every offense all the time, which is taught in Christian circles, is unbiblical and damaging to proper doctrine and theology.
 
Lord God, thank You for the cross of Jesus. Its potential for forgiveness is unlimited. But it actually only forgives those who come to You by faith in what it signifies. Help us, O God, to always remember the cost of our sin. To Your glory. Amen.

Matthew 18:21

Saturday, 4 April 2026
 
Then Peter came to Him and said, “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Up to seven times?” Matthew 18:21
 
“Then Peter, having approached Him, he said, ‘Lord, how often, he will sin unto me, my brother, and I will forgive him? Until sevenfold?’” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus noted to the disciples that where two or three are gathered together in His name, He is there in their midst. Matthew next records, “Then Peter, having approached Him, he said, ‘Lord, how often, he will sin unto me, my brother?’”
 
A new word is used here, posakis. It is a multiplicative from posos, how much, how great, etc. Thus, the meaning here is “how many times.” In this chapter, Peter has heard about who the greatest in the kingdom of heaven is. Jesus also explained about causing one of the little ones (meaning those of simple faith) to sin, and what to do about it.
 
Jesus then spoke about the shepherd leaving the ninety-nine sheep to seek the one, and the reconciliation that is hoped for from that. If it is found, He spoke of the joy of it. After that, Jesus referred to the matter of a brother who sins against another and the efforts that should be taken to bring about restoration.
 
As a result of that, He spoke of the matter of binding and loosening, a topic that was developed based on the lack of reconciliation of the wayward brother. These things have led Peter to want to know the extent of forgiveness that should be extended to another. He has asked how often the brother would sin against him, and as he continues, “and I will forgive him?”
 
Peter’s question must be taken in connection with other thoughts that have been presented, that will be presented in Matthew, and that are presented in the other gospels. So far, Peter has only asked about forgiving for an offense against him. The question is actually incomplete. Because of this, and by taking it as a complete thought, too many err in their evaluation of the subject of forgiveness. For now, he answers his own question with another question, saying, “Until sevenfold?”
 
A new word is seen, heptakis, sevenfold. It means repeating something seven times. Peter’s suggestion is one that seems appropriate. We only have so much time in a day, so much patience with nonsense, and an inability to read the hearts and intents of others.
 
Seven is a number well known in Scripture and one already seen in Jesus’ ministry several times. It is the number of spiritual perfection. As such, it is a logical number for Peter to put forth. Some people argue that the rabbinic interpretation of forgiveness was up to three or four times based on Amos 1:3 and other Amos references.
 
This is not an acceptable place to go for understanding such a matter, but it is common for the rabbinic society to try to define every moral thing in a set manner. The attitude, however, is one that has only caused them eons of grief for misapplying God’s intent in this fashion.
 
As for Peter’s question, it will be answered by Jesus with a direct answer, but then He will provide a couple of paragraphs of explanation to fill in the details of Peter’s incomplete question. He will then sum up the matter in verse 35. Unfortunately, when Jesus’ response is evaluated by people, they read the beginning of His answer, skip to the last part, and fail to consider the middle content.
 
They also fail to consider all other examples of the matter of forgiveness. Thus, they conclude that forgiveness is mandatory in all circumstances. This is not only inappropriate, but it has also caused great damage to people throughout the ages.
 
Life application: Without even getting into Jesus’ answer, the matter of Peter’s question being incomplete should be addressed. What is it that prompts forgiveness? The answer is that there is an understanding that a wrong has been committed.
 
In the previous example, a brother was offended. He went to the offender and addressed the matter. The offender refused to listen. The matter was elevated to two or three witnesses. The offender still refused to acknowledge his wrongdoing. Therefore, the matter was brought to the out-calling. The offender still refused to yield.
 
So what was the result after that? He was to be like the ethnicity and the taxman to them. What was lacking in the man’s demeanor that caused his expulsion? The answer is that he did not acknowledge his offense, and he did not ask for forgiveness for it. And that leads to the next obvious question: Was he forgiven? The answer is a giant, NO.
 
Peter’s question is incomplete because it only addresses the matter of forgiveness without the matter of his brother coming to him and asking for forgiveness, or at a minimum, Peter going to him and addressing the matter as in the example cited by Jesus.
 
The thought may have been implied in Peter’s mind, but it is not clearly stated. Jesus’ example, however, will bring up the matter of repentance, demonstrating the incomplete nature of Peter’s question for us to understand more fully what is expected in the process of offense and forgiveness.
 
Pay attention as the verses continue to unfold, and this will be seen. Jesus has already given an example of when not to forgive others. Peter’s question is based on that, not separate from it.
 
Lord God, help us to consider the context of what we read. It is very easy to be duped into bad doctrine taught by others who sound convincing, but who really have no idea what they are talking about. Give us the desire to both read and contemplate Your word so that we are not led astray by false ideas about important doctrinal issues. Amen.
 

Matthew 18:20

Friday, 3 April 2026
 
For where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in the midst of them.” Matthew 18:20
 
“For where they are, two or three having been gathered into the name of My Father, there I am in the midst of them.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told the disciples that if two of them harmonized about any deed, that if they should ask, it would come to pass for them from His Father. He next continues, saying, “For where they are, two or three having been gathered into the name of My Father.”
 
The words here refer to any assembly of people. It does not appear that there is anything exclusively pointing to the disciples. However, it does not logically follow that the previous verse gives a grant as stated there to all such gatherings.
 
In other words, Jesus’ words of the previous verse clearly refer to the disciples. The reasons for that were stated. As such, the idea that a claim by two or three gathering at any time in church would necessitate that the Father to agree to whatever they ask cannot be supported. What Jesus is saying in this verse is a general statement about anytime such a group meets. It is an obvious truth.
 
The reason it is obvious is what is said in Hebrews 13:5 –
 
“Let your conduct be without covetousness; be content with such things as you have. For He Himself has said, ‘I will never leave you nor forsake you.’”
 
The words are directed in the singular, “...no not you [sg.] I should leave, neither no you [sg.] I should forsake.” (CG)
 
The weight of that is seen in Jesus’ next words, “there I am in the midst of them.” If Jesus states there is no point at which He should leave or forsake an individual, then He is always with him. If two or three are gathered, then it is certain He is among them, acknowledging that they have gathered in His Father’s name.
 
Again, however, it does not logically follow that everything Jesus says to His disciples applies to all people in the church at all times. The follow-up general statement is given to the disciples to ensure they know that the first statement is true.
 
For example, in Ezekiel, it says that Gog will be destroyed along with all of his armies. It then says that God will give them to the birds and beasts to be devoured. This doesn’t mean that every person slain in the armies will be eaten by birds and beasts. It is a general statement given to confirm the fact that the armies will be destroyed.
 
We can be certain that the Lord is always with us. We can also be certain that when we gather in the Father’s name, Jesus will be with us. But we should not claim that because we have met in this manner, the Father is going to agree to everything we determine. It assumes too much.
 
Life application: It is important to consider the context of what is being said in Scripture. Once the context is understood, we should go further and question if what is said in the surrounding verses is a specific or general statement. Does what is said logically follow if a general statement is made? The answer will normally be no. The general is given to confirm the specific, but not necessarily in all circumstances or in all ways.
 
The example of Gog above is just one of many such examples that show one does not logically follow after another. As this is so, let us lean toward the more conservative idea concerning such things. To go further may, and usually will, assume too much.
 
And as an additional confirmation of such things, just look realistically at the world around you. Has your experience shown that every time two or three are gathered in Jesus’ name, God has done for them what they determined? Of course not! If not, then why not? Are the words of Jesus in error? Of course not! Then the disconnect is in our thinking and understanding of the passage, not in what Jesus is telling a certain group of people.
 
Lord God, give us the wisdom to consider Your word in its intended context. May we not run ahead with various thoughts from Your word without thinking them through and properly considering what is said and why it is said. Give us this wisdom, O God. Amen.

Matthew 18:19

Thursday, 2 April 2026
 
Again I say to you that if two of you agree on earth concerning anything that they ask, it will be done for them by My Father in heaven.  Matthew 18:19
 
“Again, I say to you, that if two of you, they may harmonize upon the earth about any deed, that if they should ask, it will become to them from My Father, the ‘in heavens’.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus instructed the disciples about binding on earth what is bound in heaven and loosing on earth what is loosed in heaven. Following along with that same authority, of which the context demands it is referring to these disciples, it says, “Again, I say to you, that if two of you, they may harmonize upon the earth.”
 
Here is a new word, sumphóneó, to be harmonious. One can see the obvious etymological ancestor of our modern word symphony. The word is derived from sýn, together with, and phōnḗ, sound or voice (think of the telephōnḗ). HELPS Word Studies says, “to be in harmony, agreeing, because in one concord.”
 
When a symphony plays, each voice of the instruments is playing in accord with the whole to form a tapestry of music. Jesus continues, saying that if these disciples harmonize upon the earth “about any deed.”
 
A second new word is seen, pragma, a deed. By extension, it refers to a material object, a business, a matter, a thing, or work in general. This word is the great-grandfather of our modern word pragmatic. From there, it became the Greek word pragmatikos (relating to a fact). That was then adopted into English.
 
Jesus is looking for harmony among these disciples to form a united consensus. Once that is obtained, He says, “that if they should ask, it will become to them.”
 
This is the main key to obtaining what is needed for the furtherance of the church in its infancy. There cannot be individual voices pulling from one side and other voices pulling from another in an attempt to obtain personal victory. That type of dealing is left up to business leaders, politicians, etc. But the early church would only properly function when they were united.
 
And that could only happen when the will of the Lord, a will whose general principles and main goal were already known to them, would be pursued. Should they have been united in this manner, they would receive their request, as Jesus says, “from My Father, the ‘in heavens’.”
 
Jesus is restating and reconfirming the thought of the previous verse. There is an ability to obtain what is asked because it has already been ordained to be so in heaven.
 
Life application: The words of Jesus in this verse are quite often taken to inappropriate and unintended extremes. The words are used to claim things that will not come about because the intended recipients of what Jesus says were these disciples, not the church at large, after the word was completed.
 
As seen in the previous commentary, an example was given concerning binding and loosening from Acts 15. In the same chapter, the decision that led to the letter sent to the believers at Antioch says –
 
“Then it pleased the apostles and elders, with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas, namely, Judas who was also named Barsabas, and Silas, leading men among the brethren.” Acts 15:22
 
This is the type of agreement Jesus was referring to. It was a necessary grant to the early church because there was no New Testament to guide the church in its decision-making process. Therefore, they came together, united in an agreement, and then disseminated that decision to where it was needed to go.
 
A similar type of agreement came about in Acts 6 over a matter. Today, the church’s instruction manual is Scripture. If a church body agrees on something that is contrary to the word, how could God grant that? For this to come about, every single church would have to be in perfect agreement over every point of doctrine given in Scripture.
 
And yet, there isn’t a single point of doctrine that every church agrees on! The words of Jesus in Matthew 18:19 are not, and indeed they cannot be speaking of people today. Using this verse as a way of supposedly settling a matter is inappropriate. The word is given to do that. It is our job to learn the word, apply the word in its proper context, and be obedient to its precepts.
 
Lord God, help us to remember that You have bound what we are to do and You have loosed what we are not to do. As such, our agreement in spiritual matters must be based upon the word of God, not upon a misunderstanding of what Jesus has taught. Help us to remember the context of what He instructs us. Amen.

Matthew 18:18

Wednesday, 1 April 2026
 
“Assuredly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven. Matthew 18:18
 
“Amen! I say to you, as much if you should bind upon the earth, it will be ‘having been bindings’ in the heaven. And as much, if you should loosen upon the earth, it will be having been loosenings in the heaven.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus gave instructions on someone who would not listen to the out-called gathering. If he continued to stubbornly listen, he was to be treated like the ethnicity and the taxmen. Now, he provides an authority similar to that stated to Peter in Acts 16:19, beginning with, “Amen! I say to you.”
 
The “you” is plural. In Matthew 16:19, it was singular, referring to Peter. Therefore, the authority is not limited to Peter. This authority is, “as much if you should bind upon the earth, it will be ‘having been bindings’ in the heaven.”
 
The plural “bindings” refers to the plural number of people. Each such decision is a part of those things having been bound in the heaven.
 
Access to heaven is through faith in Jesus. That is something ahead for the disciples at this time. Hence, the future tense, “it will be.” These disciples are being told that they will have authority to bind, meaning prohibit, that which is prohibited in the heavens. That is seen with the use of the perfect participle “having been.” Likewise, Jesus says, “And as much, if you should loosen upon the earth, it will be having been loosenings in the heaven.”
 
To loosen means to undo and thus to allow. These disciples were given the authority to make decisions concerning what was to be done or not done in the church, confirming that which was bound in heaven. This is how the church was established. Decisions were made, authority was set, and matters were discussed, such as in Acts 15 at the Council in Jerusalem.
 
These matters were granted to men, inspired by the Spirit, to establish the workings of the church and also to pen the words of Scripture that would then become the final authority for church conduct. These words are logically connected to the previous section that dealt with a sinning brother, because that was a matter that they would decide.
 
If they decided such a person was to be returned to fellowship, that is what was bound in heaven. If they determined he should be expelled, that was bound in heaven. With the word of God complete, we now have Scripture to determine what is bound in heaven. We simply need to follow what has been provided.
 
Life application: It is not uncommon in some churches to hear people claim they are “binding” this or that, or that they are “loosening” this or that, as if they personally have authority to direct heaven to do certain things.
Rather, God in heaven determines what is acceptable and what is not in spiritual matters. He has given us His wisdom for church-age guidance in the pages of Scripture. That is what is bound and what is loosed.
 
A problem with churches arises when they don’t use the Bible to make such determinations. How can you allow or prohibit something in accord with God’s will if you don’t know what His will is? The answer is that you cannot.
 
A process was set in motion for Christ’s church to be established. Moses received God’s will, penned it, and passed it on to the people. That is what was bound or loosened for the people. God took a bit of a different direction with the church. He gave the leaders authority to get things going, to make decisions in accord with the Spirit’s directions, and eventually, they penned the New Testament.
 
That is seen, for example, in these words from James –
 
“For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things: 29 that you abstain from things offered to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from sexual immorality. If you keep yourselves from these, you will do well.” Acts 15:28, 29
 
The decision was bound in heaven (good to the Holy Spirit), and it was then passed on to the people as a binding precept. Now that the word is completed, we are to go to the epistles to further clarify what was initially set forth.
 
Lord God, how good it is to have Your word to direct us. We don’t need to worry if we are living in accord with Your will or not if we are aware of what Your will is! And so, we will continue in Your word, learning its precepts and living in accord with what it says. Amen.

Matthew 18:17

Tuesday, 31 March 2026
 
And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector. Matthew 18:17
 
“And if he should ignore them, you say to the out-calling. And if also the out-calling he ignores, he is to you as the ethnicity and the taxmen.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus cited the precept from Deuteronomy concerning establishing a matter by two or three witnesses. He next says, “And if he should ignore them.”
 
A new word is seen, parakouó, to mishear. By implication, it then means to disobey. In this case, he simply ignores what has been presented, failing to hear their reason. The matter was brought up privately between the offended and the offender. That didn’t work, so the one offended brought witnesses to assist in adjudicating the matter. That attempt has failed. Therefore, the next step is noted by Jesus, “you say to the out-calling.”
 
This is the second time the out-calling is mentioned. It is a called-out group of people in any given context. Today, we call it the church. But the church didn’t exist as an entity until after the Pentecost recorded in Acts 2. Thus, saying “church” at this point is a bit of a misnomer. As for it being brought to the out-calling, Jesus next says, “And if also the out-calling he ignores.”
 
The word parakouó is used again. It will only be seen one more time, in Mark 5:36. This stubborn guy has now thrice ignored reason. Because of this, there is no more remedy available. And so Jesus says, “he is to you as the ethnicity and the taxmen.”
 
In this case, the ethnicity means a non-covenant person. Jesus, at the time, was speaking to the people of Israel. At the time, they were the covenant people. Therefore, it was anyone outside of their realm. The taxmen, even if in Israel, were outcasts from the people. They worked for the Romans and thus harmed the state of their own people. As such, this guy is now like an ethnicity, being out of the covenant graces. He is also like the taxmen, being at enmity with the cause.
 
Life application: In the epistles, Paul handles matters concerning such people in various ways –
 
“But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.” 1 Corinthians 5:11
 
“And if anyone does not obey our word in this epistle, note that person and do not keep company with him, that he may be ashamed. 15 Yet do not count him as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother.” 2 Thessalonians 3:14, 15
 
“This charge I commit to you, son Timothy, according to the prophecies previously made concerning you, that by them you may wage the good warfare, 19 having faith and a good conscience, which some having rejected, concerning the faith have suffered shipwreck, 20 of whom are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I delivered to Satan that they may learn not to blaspheme.” 1 Timothy 1:18-20
 
One can see that Paul had a variety of disciplinary methods for various infractions against the church. The circumstances dictated what he would do. What he says in 1 Corinthians and 2 Thessalonians is prescriptive and is to be adhered to.
 
Paying attention to what is going on in the word is important. Issues arise that must be addressed from time to time. Churches do not need books of order, books of discipline, etc., to make judgments within the congregation or for laying charges against elders and deacons.These things are laid out in Scripture. Such books begin to take the place of Scripture in the minds of people. When this happens, and it inevitably does, the word loses its importance in the church. Later, when the morals of the church degrade, as is common, such books are amended to accommodate whatever perversion is now considered acceptable.
 
But the word of God cannot be amended. It stands as the rule and guide of the faith. Be sure to go to it, not some other source, to determine matters of church policy.
 
Lord God, help us to remember Your word for all occasions where we need spiritual guidance and direction. May we never forsake this precious gift You have blessed us with for conducting our life’s walk. Amen.

Matthew 18:16

Monday, 30 March 2026
 
But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that ‘by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ Matthew 18:16
 
“And if not he should hear, you take with you yet one or two, that ‘upon mouth – two witnesses, or three, it should stand, every word.’” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus said, “And if he should sin against you, your brother, you withdraw, and you confute him – between you and him alone. If he should hear you, you gained your brother.” Next, He will cite words from Deuteronomy 19:15, beginning with, “And if not he should hear.”
 
Jesus has been speaking of the “little ones,” meaning those who accepted the message by simple faith, like a little child. If a matter arises between two of them, there should first be a private attempt to reconcile. If that does not resolve the issue, because the person will not hear, “you take with you yet one or two.”
 
This means that the matter is worth elevating. Someone might do something to another that was upsetting, but does that mean every matter needs to be handled this way? Rather, some disputes are better left unaddressed. But this is a matter where someone has been really wronged by another. Bringing one or two more to stand as witnesses thus fulfills a necessary requirement of validation. The reason for this is explicitly stated by Jesus, saying, “that ‘upon mouth – two witnesses, or three, it should stand, every word.’”
 
As noted, this was a precept of the Law of Moses, and Jesus is currently speaking to people under the law. However, it is a precept of wisdom that extends beyond the law. This is certain because Paul repeats the sentiment in his epistles –
 
“This will be the third time I am coming to you. ‘By the mouth of two or three witnesses every word shall be established.’” 2 Corinthians 13:1
 
Paul was careful to ensure that a precept which is logical and appropriate not be overlooked simply because the law was fulfilled in Christ.
 
Life application: With a precept from the law being addressed by Paul, it would be easy for someone to conclude that we are somehow bound to the other precepts of the law as well. Without understanding what God has done in Christ, this is what many have concluded over the years.
 
But such a position ignores the entire weight and significance of what Christ came to do. Just because there are precepts in the law that make sense and should be applied to our continued walk, it in no way logically follows that we are somehow bound to the Law of Moses, in part or in whole.
 
The same is true with verses in Acts where Paul apparently observed Jewish rites, customs, and practices. Law-observing heretics will point at those examples and say, “See, Paul never stopped observing the law, and neither should we.”
 
Again, such a thought ignores what is clearly stated elsewhere, such as –
 
“For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win the more; 20 and to the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might win Jews; to those who are under the law, as under the law, that I might win those who are under the law; 21 to those who are without law, as without law (not being without law toward God, but under law toward Christ), that I might win those who are without law; 22 to the weak I became as weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some. 23 Now this I do for the gospel’s sake, that I may be partaker of it with you.” 1 Corinthians 9:19-23
 
Paul was an apostle. It was his job to get converts. Paul was also a Jew. If it meant observing a now-fulfilled law in order to open the eyes of his fellow Jews to their need for Christ, that is what he did. Elsewhere, such as in Galatians 2, he argues against Peter for this same thing when in the presence of the Gentiles.
 
The Gentiles were never under the law. In Peter’s failure to uphold the integrity and truth of the gospel, he turned from grace back to the law. And he did it not for saving Jews, but to save face with the Jews. It was an unacceptable action because it harmed the Gentile believers, confusing them and bringing them into a bondage they never faced before.
 
Be careful to think things through. Don’t get swayed by the failed arguments of law observers. Stand fast on the grace of God in Christ.
 
Lord God, may we be faithful people who faithfully follow You. There is no need to find our righteousness in the law. Rather, we find it in You. You are the Lord, our righteousness. May we remember this and cling to it all our days. Amen.