BIBLE IN TEN

Acts 22:27

Friday, 15 December 2023
 
Then the commander came and said to him, “Tell me, are you a Roman?”
He said, “Yes.” Acts 22:27
 
A literal translation is, “And the commander, having come near, said to him, ‘Tell me, are you Roman?’ And he said, ‘Yes.’”
 
The centurion had just gone to the commander and informed him of Paul’s claim of being Roman. Having heard this, Luke next records, “And the commander, having come near, said to him, ‘Tell me, are you Roman?’”
 
The commander seems truly shocked by the claim, as seen in his words. The “you” in the question is emphatic. In essence, “You? Roman?” By this time, the commander is certainly scared, probably in disbelief, and surely baffled. The coming response would make his heart drop, “And he said, ‘Yes.’”
 
The commander never thought to ask, and now he was in a very difficult position before the law. If Paul were to press the matter, he might find himself reduced in rank, sent to an even worse outpost, or even imprisoned for having failed in properly discharging his duties in this regard.
 
As for Paul’s response, it is unimaginable that he would lie about such a thing. As Ellicott notes, “The combination of so many more or less discordant elements was so exceptional as to be almost incredible.”
 
Paul’s answer is either horrifyingly true or it is the answer of a fool with a death wish. Attempting to claim such a position to which he had no right would be the claim of a madman. Therefore, the commander must assume it to be true.
 
Life application: Paul directly appealed to his citizenship as a right that he possessed and which he was exercising that right to. This sentiment is found throughout Scripture, and the reason it is so is because God has set the nations before Him. By dividing the peoples by individual languages, He directed that they would unite in a manner that would result in the establishment of individual nations.
 
Within those nations, those who are citizens are given the right to whatever benefits are to be derived from such citizenship. How tragic it is that Christians in today’s world have failed to rightly understand this, and they have ceded their rights by not voting according to biblical principles.
 
For each Christian who neglects to vote, there is another non-Christian with whatever perverse agenda he is supporting. The vote of the Christian is lost. Along with that, his own rights are slowly stripped away from him. This is all because of a failure to responsibly act in the nation where God has placed him.
 
When people such as this are rounded up for extermination, they will only be able to blame themselves. If you are a citizen of a nation with a right such as voting, use your right to the glory of God. In such instances, failing to be responsible because of supposed piety will only lead to future tragedy.
 
Lord God, may we be aware of our position within the societies You have placed us. When we have a right that can be determined by our active participation, may we be wise and responsible to act for the betterment of the nation in which we live. In failing to act, we are only bringing disaster upon ourselves. Thank You for the rights we possess in the land in which we live. May we use them to Your glory. Amen.

Acts 22:26

Thursday, 14 December 2023
 
When the centurion heard that, he went and told the commander, saying, “Take care what you do, for this man is a Roman.’” Acts 22:26
 
A literal translation would be, “And the centurion, having heard, having gone to the commander reported, saying, ‘See what you are about to do! For this man is Roman” (CG).
 
As the Romans were binding Paul, intending to scourge him, he asked, “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?” An immediate response follows. Luke next records, “And the centurion, having heard, having gone to the commander.”
 
As soon as Paul uttered his words, the centurion realized there could be trouble. Any further action by him concerning Paul without direct approval of the commander could mean any level of punishment. Therefore, he “reported, saying, ‘See what you are about to do!’”
 
Some manuscripts place this as a question, saying, “What are you about to do?” Others make it a proclamation, “See what you are about to do...” The change doesn’t substantially alter the intent. The centurion is simply protecting himself and the commander from real trouble. If the commander presses the punishment on Paul, and Paul’s words are true, it could permanently change the course of their lives. The centurion’s next words explain why, “For this man is Roman.”
 
Paul was a citizen of Rome. What they were about to do was illegal and a punishable offense. Further action against Paul had to be stopped, and at this point, trouble may already be brewing. Paul’s personal attitude towards them could still result in real problems ahead.
 
Life application: Citizenship in a country carries certain rights and responsibilities. However, in many countries today, the leaders are purposefully following an agenda where those who are illegal in a country are treated better than those who are citizens.
 
Those who productively work are having the effort of their labors stolen from them and handed over to those who have no right to them. When a citizen is raped or killed by an illegal alien, the government – from the local level even to the federal level – will shield the illegal from punishment and deportation. Why do you think this is occurring?
 
There is a globalist agenda that is attempting to bring the world under a single authority, removing national barriers, rights, and laws. In order to do this, destroying the foundational underpinnings of societies is required. The only time those following this communist agenda have a change of heart is when their agenda personally backfires on them.
 
These things are, however, inevitable. The Bible’s prophecies about the future are being realized with each wicked step of these insufferable people. Don’t be surprised as you continue to see those in authority despise the nations they are charged to run and the people they are sworn to protect. Realize that the times are drawing near for God’s judgment on a global scale.
 
This also means that the time for Jesus to come for His people is also drawing near. Be ready! Tell people about God’s goodness in Christ now. The time for our departure is coming quickly.
 
Heavenly Father, help us to be prompt in speaking to others about their need for Jesus. May we not hold back in explaining the good news. Rather, may we be about fulfilling our call to evangelize, sharing the wonderful news that Jesus has prevailed over death, and He promises us eternal life in a world without wickedness. Instill this desire in us, O God. Amen.
 

Acts 22:25

Wednesday, 13 December 2023
 
And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said to the centurion who stood by, “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?” Acts 22:25
 
Paul has been taken into the barracks where the commander ordered that he be examined under scourging. Now, that continues with, “And as they bound him with thongs.”
 
Luke uses another word unique in Scripture, proteinó, translated by the NKJV as “bound.” It signifies “to stretch forward.” There is a debate about the correct way to translate these words. It could either say, “As they stretched him out to thong him...” or “And as they stretched him forward with thongs.”
 
In other words, are the thongs used to tie him in preparation for being beaten, or is he being tied up in order for the thongs, on which are the scourges, to be used on him? Vincent’s Word Studies argues that it would be superfluous to say, “bound him” and then add in “with thongs.” But Luke is normally very precise in his use of words. What others may find superfluous, he will find as an exacting and necessary detail.
 
On the other hand, Ellicott notes that “The Greek word for ‘thong’ is always used in the New Testament in connection with the idea of tying.” A good question to ask is, “Does it make any difference in the end?” For precision, yes. However, in the overall picture, the result will be the same. Paul is facing a good beating with scourges. Therefore, “Paul said to the centurion who stood by.”
 
The commander gave the order. A centurion is ensuring the order is complied with and will probably be the one to administer the scourging. Lower-ranking soldiers are the ones tying Paul up. Paul addresses the one in greatest authority in the room at the current time, asking, “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?”
 
His question would have an immediate effect on the centurion. If this person were a Roman citizen, those in the barracks would already be guilty of a crime for violating Paul’s rights by not giving him a trial first. Further, even if guilty, this type of punishment could not be given to a citizen.
 
To continue would make him even more guilty and possibly liable to the same punishment he was about to administer. If Paul were not a Roman, he would be a lunatic. To claim citizenship in this way would be punishable, probably by death. His claim alone would be enough to make the centurion stop and investigate what he was about to do.
 
Cicero says, “It is a heinous sin to bind a Roman citizen, it is wickedness to beat him, it is next to parricide to kill him, and what shall I say to crucify him?” Another ancient witness says, “According to the Valerian law, it was not lawful for magistrates to condemn a Roman without hearing the cause, and pleading in it; and such condemned persons might appeal to the populace” Pompon. Laetus de Legibus, p. 157.
 
Life application: If we think about the situation being described, Paul possessed certain rights that kept him from being bound, scourged, or executed without the strictest of investigations and proper judicial processes. Jesus was born in the same general generation, but He did not possess these rights.
 
Although we can dismiss that idea without much thought, we can also contemplate the enormity of it and stand in awe of what it means. God could have sent His Messiah into the world as the son of a Roman citizen. If this were to have been the case, the result would have been completely different.
 
But He preordained every aspect of the birth of Christ to meet His purposes. Hebrews 10 says –
 
“Therefore, when He came into the world, He said:‘Sacrifice and offering You did not desire,But a body You have prepared for Me.6 In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sinYou had no pleasure.7 Then I said, “Behold, I have come—In the volume of the book it is written of Me—To do Your will, O God.”’” Hebrews 10:5-7
 
God’s preparation of a body for Jesus includes every ancestor who came into His genealogy, purposefully selecting the line to ensure each prophecy about Him would come to pass. It included the timing of His birth, its location, the rights or lack of rights He would possess, etc.
 
Everything was meticulously ordained by God for the purpose of redeeming man. Those who dismiss the life of Christ do so without thinking through the incredible nature of what transpired, and thus the immense love God must have for the objects of His affections, meaning those whom He will save through the giving of Jesus.
 
Let us never minimize the magnitude of the marvel that is displayed in the coming of our Lord. God’s affections are on redeeming the people of the world. May we consider this and be willing to speak out the good news to those who so desperately need to hear it.
 
Lord God, how can it be that You would look upon us and see anything of value? We have all sinned and gone astray in our hearts, minds, and actions. And yet, You have graciously accepted us and forgiven us because of faith in what was done in the giving of Christ Jesus our Lord. We shall praise you forever and ever because of the glory of our Lord. Hallelujah and amen.

Acts 22:24

Tuesday, 12 December 2023
 
the commander ordered him to be brought into the barracks, and said that he should be examined under scourging, so that he might know why they shouted so against him. Acts 22:24
 
The Greek reads, “The commander ordered him to be brought into the barracks, having directed him examining by scourges so that he might know for what reason they cried out thus against him” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Paul’s words had caused the crowd to go into an uproar, casting off their clothes and throwing dust up into the air. With that, Paul’s words were forcibly finished, and, as it next says, “The commander ordered him to be brought into the barracks.”
 
No further purpose could be served by allowing Paul to again attempt speaking to the crowd again. As Paul spoke in the local dialect to the people, the commander probably would not have known the substance of what he had said. He might have known a little of the language, but he obviously didn’t understand the entire discourse. And so, he gave order to his men to bring him into the barracks, “having directed him examining by scourges.”
 
This implies that this was the standard way of eliciting information from someone. Were it not, the account would have gone through stages of interrogation leading up to torture. As for the word translated as examining, anetazó, it is used o  nly twice in the Bible, first here and then again in verse 29.
 
It signifies thorough examining, as if a person were on trial, such as a witness. Strong’s notes that this was frequently accomplished through the aid of torture. Such is the case now with Paul. The word is not found anywhere in classical Greek, but it is used once in the apocryphal book of Susanna.
 
As nothing is noted concerning interrogation leading up to torture, it shows that the Romans wasted no time in getting to the point. Hence, it next says, “so that he might know for what reason they cried out thus against him.”
 
It would be well known that this type of punishment was how the Romans operated. Therefore, it would be a way of keeping the peace through threats. Paul was to be subjected to a brutal interrogation that would leave him in agonizing pain and with permanent scars to remind him of the ordeal.
 
Life application: Ecclesiastes 8:11 says, “Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.” We can philosophize all day long about whether the judgment to beat Paul in order to elicit information from him was wrong or not. But it is certain that it was an effective deterrent within the Roman society.
 
When people saw the consequences of being a miscreant, it would keep them in check concerning their own conduct. Today, it is exactly the opposite. Those who do right are punished as offenders of the law. Those who break the law are given no bail, light or no sentences, and are pandered to by the news media, portraying them as victims.
 
Because of this, society in many large cities has devolved into abject fear among the general populace. They know that if they defend themselves and their property from evildoers, they will be charged. Police are likewise hand-tied. If they capture a thug who should otherwise be removed from society and something happens to him, even accidentally, they can be charged and spend many years in prison.
 
This has led to a total breakdown in society. Ecclesiastes, Proverbs, and even Job provide wisdom concerning these things. This wisdom has been rejected by left-leaning politicians, media, judges, and academia. Thus, societal harm, possibly permanent, has arisen.
 
A society cannot function like this. A rejection of the biblical standard of morality by a nation that was established on the biblical model can only result in its own implosion. Be sure to vote when the time arises. The only thing that will stem this unholy tide is to vote against these ungodly lefties.
 
Heavenly Father, nations that previously honored You, Your word, and the moral principles set forth by You are quickly turning away to ideas that can only result in societal degradation and ever-increasing moral turpitude. Give us wisdom and the ability to stand against these things. It is our desire that our societies be honoring of You. Help us to restore godly values in the nations we live in. Amen.

Acts 22:23

Monday, 11 December 2023
 
Then, as they cried out and tore off their clothes and threw dust into the air, Acts 22:23
 
The tense of the verbs is all wrong in the NKJV. The Greek uses present participles, saying – “And they – howling and hurling their garments and casting dust into the air” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, the crowd before Paul shouted out for him to be removed from the earth, not being fit to live. With that, it next says, “And they – howling.”
 
It is a word that signifies clamor. It is properly identified with the loud bay or croaking of animals. Thus, it can signify shouting, shrieking, etc. Plato used it when describing the howling of dogs. These people, who were supposedly the holy nation of the law, had assumed the aspect of unclean canine, yelping as if a pack of rabid Dobermans. Next, it says, “and hurling their garments.”
 
It is a word found only here in Scripture, rhipteó. It signifies to cast or hurl. In this case, one can see them like a bunch of angry school children ready to fight. They pull their outer garments off and toss them in the air or to the ground, away from their bodies, thus freeing themselves for a rumble. It then adds, “and casting dust into the air.”
 
It is a metaphor for their conduct about Paul. He is a man of the dust, and they are recommending he be returned to dust. It is a sign of great distress and, at times, mourning. The scene may seem almost comical to us, but what is written here is the customary way of showing both anger and a sense of anguish over what they perceive as blasphemy.
 
Even today, we can see this type of Middle Eastern rage on TV as people show their offense or revulsion in similar displays. Both acts also have to be considered in light of Paul’s detention by the Romans.
 
The Jews knew that they couldn’t stone Paul while he was in their custody. But showing him that this is what they would do if he wasn't protected by them, they 1) cast off their clothing, a sign that they were readying to stone him; 2) they threw dust into the air, a sign that if he wasn’t surrounded by Romans, it would be rocks instead of dust.
 
Both actions are signs that they would gladly fulfill their words of removing him from the earth.
 
Life application: There is a lot of rage in the world against the gospel. That is becoming more pervasive as time goes by. Nations that were once heralds of the gospel now send government agents to spy on people who simply want to worship Jesus as their forefathers had done.
 
This attitude stems from an internal hatred concerning their own deviant morals. Christians hold that their ultimate moral standard is based on what God expects of them, not what the government dictates. Thus, it is ultimately an attack against the God who gave man the moral guidelines in the first place.
 
These people claim they don’t believe in God, and yet they have a vehement hatred for the God they claim doesn’t exist. Their thinking is irrational and violent, just as the Jews in Paul’s time were. They hated that the God Paul proclaimed had a moral base inclusive of Gentile salvation. Thus, they hate His Messiah, who came to represent God.
 
From there, they hate any messenger of this Messiah. But Jesus stated this would be so –
 
“For the Father judges no one, but has committed all judgment to the Son, 23 that all should honor the Son just as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him.” John 5:22, 23
 
“If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it hated you. 19 If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.” John 15:18, 19
 
This attitude continues today toward those who hold to the words of Scripture. The world hates the message of Jesus because it proclaims a standard of morality that the world does not accept. It also holds a standard of acceptance that most people groups do not want to accept. All people are on the same level of acceptance in Christ, regardless of culture, genealogy, etc. This is highly unpalatable to many.
 
Hold fast to the word despite this. God is calling out a group of people from this world who will worship Him in spirit and in truth for all eternity. What happens now is a temporary blip on the way to glory.
 
Lord God, thank You for allowing us to come to You just as we are. The color of our skin, the family line we descend from, the cultural background we possess, and other such distinctions are set aside in Christ. We are accepted by faith in Him. How freeing that is! Thank You for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Acts 22:22

Sunday, 10 December 2023
 
And they listened to him until this word, and then they raised their voices and said, “Away with such a fellow from the earth, for he is not fit to live!” Acts 22:22
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told Paul he was to depart because he was being sent far from Jerusalem to the Gentiles. Now, that continues with, “And they listened to him until this word.” The reference is to the word “Gentiles.” 
 
One word. Just one word is all that it took to remove any further chance of reasoned dialogue. That same thought permeates the theological and cultural minds of Jews to this day. Gentiles, though being the people among whom they dwell, are not considered on the same spiritual or cultural level as they are.
 
To think that one of their own would be willing to minister to them about the “supposed” Messiah was worse than a slap in the face. Everything Paul had said implied that he was a spokesperson for this Messiah and that the message he proclaimed was in line with this Messiah’s intents and purposes. Therefore, Paul’s Messiah could not be their Messiah. Therefore, it next says, “and then they raised their voices.”
 
One can see the crowd suddenly roaring as one. Those who had sat down to listen while he spoke would have raised to their feet with their fists held high. Teeth would have gnashed, and faces would have fumed with fury. They collectively shouted out “and said, ‘Away with such a fellow from the earth, for he is not fit to live!’”
 
The Messiah Paul proclaimed was, to them, a total failure. How could He favor the Gentiles when He hadn't even broken off their bonds? The people of Israel were looking for an earthly ruler, never considering that the bonds they were in were spiritual ones. They were slaves to sin, and the law kept them in that bondage.
 
Only in the Messiah that Paul proclaimed could such bonds be removed, but they couldn’t see this. They stumbled over the stumbling block, and in the process, they killed the messengers of the truth. They now intended to kill this one as well.
 
In proclaiming that the messianic message was intended for all people, Paul had raised Gentiles to their level. At the same time, he had lowered them from their supposed exalted and chosen status. However, this attitude was from a selective reading of their own Scriptures that proclaim salvation to the nations and restoration of life to the Gentiles as well as Israel.
 
Having missed this obvious precept, they found him wholly unfit to live and called for him to be removed from the earth.
 
Life application: When we are taught something by someone we trust, such as our preacher, we will generally accept his words as correct. After all, he is the specialist in matters of faith. Dad might be a dentist, and the preacher may go to him to have his teeth repaired, but Dad goes to the preacher to be taught the word.
 
As we grow up, having believed a particular doctrine, we will tend to mentally dismiss anything that contradicts what we now believe is true. This is known as cognitive dissonance. It is a state where we have inconsistent thoughts, attitudes, or beliefs that are related to particular matters or concepts.
 
For example, if we are taught that there is no such thing as a rapture of the church, we will tend to ignore any teaching that supports that doctrine, even if there is a preponderance of evidence that supports it. Even irrefutable arguments will be dismissed.
 
This is why it is so difficult for people to leave cults. What has been trained into them is extremely difficult to overcome. Therefore, it is so very important to read and know the Bible and ask God to correct anything in your doctrine that is wrong. But you must be willing to go where He leads directly from His word.
 
Removal of bad doctrine is difficult, but it is not impossible. As Paul says, “Test all things; hold fast what is good” 1 Thessalonians 5:21.
 
Lord God Almighty, we are prone to take wrong turns in life, thinking we are on the right path. Help us to keep our feet on sound doctrine and proper biblical interpretation. Clean out those doctrines that are faulty and fill us with right and proper thinking concerning this precious and sacred word You have given us. Amen.
 

Acts 22:21

Saturday, 9 December 2023
 
“Then He said to me, ‘Depart, for I will send you far from here to the Gentiles.’” Acts 22:21
 
Paul just tried to defend why he was no longer a threat to the people, even after Jesus had told him he should quickly leave Jerusalem. However, Jesus had already spoken, knowing what was best. Therefore, without allowing any further appeal, it next says, “Then He said to me, ‘Depart.’”
 
After Jesus’ first instruction to depart and Paul’s rebuttal concerning his certainty that the Jews would understand his conversion and surely convert as well, Jesus again instructs him to depart. What is implied in this is that Jesus knew that the Jews would continue to reject His Lordship.
 
The offer of salvation had been made, and those who were to accept it had done so. However, the leaders of the nation, thus representing the entire nation, had rejected their Messiah. Paul’s words would fall on deaf ears. But more, Jesus doesn’t just tell him to depart, but He specifically says, “for I will send you far from here to the Gentiles.”
 
Jesus’ words directly imply that Paul’s being sent to the Gentiles was for the purpose of telling of his conversion, of the offer of salvation that extends to them, and that they would accept it.
 
There can be no doubt this is what is implied in His words based on the reaction that is forthcoming from the crowd. It must be remembered that the word “Gentiles” included the Romans who ruled over them and who stood between them and Paul at that very moment.
 
Israel was anticipating a Messiah who would break off their yoke and set them at the head of the nations. One of many prominent sets of verses that promise this is from Isaiah 2 –
 
“The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem.2 Now it shall come to pass in the latter daysThat the mountain of the Lord’s houseShall be established on the top of the mountains,And shall be exalted above the hills;And all nations shall flow to it.3 Many people shall come and say,‘Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,To the house of the God of Jacob;He will teach us His ways,And we shall walk in His paths.’For out of Zion shall go forth the law,And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.” Isaiah 2:1-3
 
These words are repeated, almost exactly, in Micah 4. They, along with many other assurances, prophesy about a time when Israel would be under her own control while also being the main point of focus throughout the world.
 
For Jesus to instruct Paul to depart to the Gentiles did not fit in with that idea at all. With Rome having authority over Israel, Paul was saying that he was directed to evangelize the very people who had the yoke upon the necks of the people. They could not accept such a Messiah who would allow this at their expense.
 
Life application: The problem with Israel lay in a misunderstanding of their position before the Lord. That same problem continues to this day. Everything about Israel’s calling, even before the calling was made, was of grace.
 
Noah found grace and was saved through the waters. Abraham was selected by grace. Isaac was chosen apart from any merit. Jacob was known to be the one God favored before the children were born. Israel was given grace in the sending of Moses.
 
The covenant between the Lord and Israel came about because of the gracious promises made to the patriarchs. The continuation of the covenant, even after Israel’s breaking it repeatedly, was based on the grace of God. Every step of the way, God demonstrated grace in the establishment, calling, and preservation of Israel.
 
Today, Israel has been called back from among the nations as prophesied by the Lord. Thus, this restoration is an act of grace. And yet, Israel has consistently looked at their calling as one of personal merit – “We deserve this because we are Israel.” If Israel truthfully looked at their history, they would realize what every sinner who comes to Christ realizes – “All we deserve is condemnation, and yet God has given us grace.”
 
Until they come to this realization and accept Jesus, thus entering into the New Covenant, their days will be marred with unhappiness. In our relationship with God, personal merit is excluded. Let us consider this and be grateful to Him for His unlimited grace in saving even us.
 
Lord God, thank You for the grace of God that is found in Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Acts 22:20

Friday, 8 December 2023
 
“And when the blood of Your martyr Stephen was shed, I also was standing by consenting to his death, and guarding the clothes of those who were killing him.’ Acts 22:20
 
Paul has been defending his conversion and adherence to the Way based on his life prior to his conversion. He continues that thought now, saying, “And when the blood of Your martyr Stephen was shed.”
 
Paul uses the word martus to describe Stephen. Some translations say “martyr,” while others “witness.” Either is correct, depending on the context. It is generally believed that the use of “martyr” came later. Therefore, “witness” is probably a better rendering for this account.
 
Also, as he is speaking to a congregation about the events that occurred and of which they would have been familiar, the idea of Stephen having been a witness seems more appropriate. However, by the time Revelation was written, “martyr” was probably more in use and is probably a correct translation for Revelation 2:13, although even there, “witness” is possible. Of Paul’s conduct at the time of Stephen, he next says, “I also was standing by consenting to his death.”
 
Paul ensures that the account of Stephen is conveyed to them with exacting detail in order to show them the extent of his zeal before his conversion. He was willing to consent to the murderous act of a person because of his belief that it was the right thing to do. He was part of a crowd, not unlike those now standing before him, looking for the blood of the accused.
 
His words are an attempt to show them that just what they were engaged in is what he previously engaged in and for essentially the same reasons. Therefore, there must have been a change in him that converted him to the stand he now took. As for his actions at Stephen’s death, he next says, “and guarding the clothes of those who were killing him.”
 
These were the outer garments of the people who stoned him. Today, we might take off our jackets if we are going to engage in an activity that needs labor or precision of movement. This is true with the outer garments of the Jews. They were flowing and cumbersome for such activities.
 
Therefore, the people would have removed them and placed them near someone trustworthy to watch them. The meaning is that even if Paul did not pick up stones and cast them at Stephen, he was complicit in Stephen’s death through his actions, approving of what was occurring and giving the death a better opportunity to come about.
 
Life application: Paul was a part of the execution of Stephen, even if he never cast a stone. There are ways that groups of people can execute someone where no one person is directly responsible for the person’s death.
 
For example, if a hundred people lined up and each punched someone, none of them might land a death blow, but the person would die from the many blows he received. The same is true with death by a thousand cuts. One little cut on the skin may not kill someone, but when a person is cut many times, he will not survive.
 
Such actions reveal to us that we may know something is wrong, but we will take various legal or quasi-legal avenues to make it happen, thus trying to find a way of exonerating our consciences from the guilt of what we have done. This may occur in divorce situations, business dealings, and so forth.
 
These types of things show us that there is a problem in man that already exists. It is the infection of sin. It is in our lives, and it permeates ourselves and our societies. We all bear guilt for many things that occur. An example of this is found in the law –
 
“So you shall not pollute the land where you are; for blood defiles the land, and no atonement can be made for the land, for the blood that is shed on it, except by the blood of him who shed it.” Numbers 35:33
 
This is a statement that is found in the law, but it follows from a general principle about the nature of God. That can be deduced from other verses that speak of such things in relation to the inhabitants of the land prior to Israel’s entry.
 
As this is so, we collectively bear guilt when we allow murderers to walk free. Abortion is something that cannot be excused, and yet we pass laws allowing it to happen, as if a human law can override a God-centered principle. When we vote for those who will pass such laws, we bear direct responsibility for such deaths.
 
The only way to be free of such sin debt is to come to Jesus and be cleansed. Only through the atonement of His precious shed blood can we ever find restoration with God because of the sin debt that we bear. And when that restoration is made, it is an eternal restoration. Therefore, let us not disgrace what God in Christ has done for us by continuing in sin.
 
Rather, let us be grateful for His gracious atonement and live for Him according to holiness. May we have this attitude, to the glory of God who saved us.
 
We praise You for Your goodness to us Lord God Almighty! Thank You for the forgiveness we have been granted because of the work of Jesus. May we live out our lives in gratitude and holiness all our days. Praises to You for JESUS! Amen.
 

Acts 22:19

Thursday, 7 December 2023
 
“So I said, ‘Lord, they know that in every synagogue I imprisoned and beat those who believe on You. Acts 22:19
 
The verbs are all present participles – “And I said, ‘Lord they know that I was imprisoning and scourging in those synagogues those believing on You’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, the Lord instructed Paul to get out of Jerusalem because those in the city would not receive his testimony. Of course, like Ananias in Acts 9, Paul’s human nature decided to argue against the Lord’s word instead of simply complying with it. Therefore, he tells the crowd before him, “And I said, ‘Lord they know.’”
 
Despite the divine warning, Paul felt compelled to defend his presence in Jerusalem, as if his words would sway the Lord to change His mind or something. And so, he continues, saying, “that I was imprisoning and scourging in those synagogues.”
 
The word translated as imprisoning is found only here in Scripture, phulakizó. It is derived from phulax, a guard, or a sentinel. Thus, it signifies the act of incarceration. The word translated as scourging means to flay. By implication, then, it means to scourge, which can flay the skin. However, it can also mean to simply thrash or beat another person. In this case, he continues speaking to the Lord saying, “those believing on You.”
 
Paul was a persecutor of the very faith he was now being persecuted over. He had converted, but his change would not positively affect those he later encountered in Jerusalem. He was given authority to do these things, the people of Jerusalem knew this, and yet Jesus knew that his conversion would be upsetting to them. None of this was unknown to the Lord, and Paul’s appeal would not change the matter.
 
Life application: Despite the divine warning, Paul felt compelled to defend his presence in Jerusalem to the Lord. Sharing that now with the crowd who was accusing him actually serves a two-fold purpose in the ears of his hearers.
 
First, he was opposed to the faith that he now professed. Thus, they would know that his actions were sincere for the tenets of being an observant Jew, but that he realized that these tenets did not extend to persecuting Christ’s followers. Instead, those actions were opposed to the true faith of an observant Jew.
 
Secondly, it showed the audience that it was they, not him, who stood opposed to what was correct and proper. Though he had imprisoned and beaten thosethese followers of Jesus in defiant opposition to Him, his zeal was misdirected. Thus, their zeal at his arrest is similarly misdirected.
 
Therefore, Paul could use his own failing (meaning arguing against the Lord’s word) to reinforce his present position before the people. However, this doesn’t change the fact that he originally argued instead of simply obeying. As noted, this is what Ananias did in Acts 9. It is also what Moses did in Exodus 4 and Jeremiah in Jeremiah 1.
 
Despite this obviously being a human trait that is hard to overcome, as evidencedevinced by these and other examples in Scripture, we can learn from them. The word of the Lord is now complete. It is written, and it is authoritative. And yet, people who have believed on the Lord and been saved will still argue against the word of the Lord.
 
We rebelliously buck against the instructions laid out there, acting as if we know better than He does. Until we are willing to accept His word as written and in proper context, we are no different than those who stood right in front of the Lord and argued why He must be wrong.
 
Let us not rebel against His word. Instead, we should be willing to comply with its directives. The Lord is infinitely more intelligent than we are. When He directs, it is for a good purpose. Therefore, let us obediently submit to His will.
 
Heavenly Father, forgive us for those times when we question Your word, either openly or through our general conduct as we walk before You. Give us knowledge to understand the things that are often difficult to grasp and the wisdom to apply that knowledge to our lives. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.
 

Acts 22:18

Wednesday, 6 December 2023
 
“and saw Him saying to me, ‘Make haste and get out of Jerusalem quickly, for they will not receive your testimony concerning Me.’ Acts 22:18
 
A literal rendering would be, “and saw Him saying to me, ‘Hasten, and in speed depart from Jerusalem: because they will not receive your testimony concerning Me.’”
 
Paul just noted that after his conversion that when he had returned to Jerusalem, he was praying in the temple and a trance came upon him. That continues now, saying, “and saw Him saying to me.”
 
Without going any further, who “Him” is can be discerned by referring to the nearest antecedent. In verse 16, it said, “Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord.” Thus, Paul is referring to the Lord. He is continuing his thoughts about his relationship with the Lord as His chosen instrument. Next, he details what the Lord said with the words, “Hasten, and in speed depart from Jerusalem.”
 
At various times in Scripture, the Lord either directly or indirectly tells people to move from one place to another. For example, after serving Laban for many years, the Lord directed the steps of Jacob –
 
“Then the Lord said to Jacob, ‘Return to the land of your fathers and to your family, and I will be with you.’” Genesis 31:3
 
The Lord also directed the steps of His prophets from time to time, and that continued with His apostles during the establishment of the church –
 
“As they ministered to the Lord and fasted, the Holy Spirit said, ‘Now separate to Me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.’ 3 Then, having fasted and prayed, and laid hands on them, they sent them away.” Acts 13:2, 3
 
In this case, it is early in Paul’s ministry, he has been selected as the apostle who would most thoroughly explain salvation by grace through faith apart from deeds of the law, and he was in the location from which the law issued forth. His message would not be well received at this time by any Jew, but especially not in Jerusalem. Hence, the Lord continues, saying, “because they will not receive your testimony concerning Me.”
 
Paul was direct in his approach, he did not hold back what he had learned, and he meticulously detailed what it meant to enter into the New Covenant by faith in Christ. This is clearly laid out in Romans where he, time and again, addresses matters directed at particular categories of people.
 
When addressing an issue concerning Jews, he explicitly uses them as his example, such as, “Indeed you are called a Jew, and rest on the law, and make your boast in God...” (Romans 2:17). From there, Paul explains the problems with resting on the law as one’s boast. This type of abrupt and direct discourse concerning Jesus and the effects of His work would not be well-received by the Jews. Indeed, two thousand years later, it still is not.
 
As for Paul’s words in this verse, the account in Acts 9 doesn’t mention any of this. However, it does mention his disputing with the Hellenists. It may be that at this time, the warning in the trance came. He may have thought to stay and debate with these people, hoping to convert them, but if he had, they would have sought to kill him. Instead, and because of the vision, he took the direction to depart as he was instructed.
 
Life application: When speaking to others about spiritual matters, a lot of enmity can arise. People are often sensitive about even discussing matters of salvation, condemnation, etc. Therefore, tact in one’s approach is necessary.
 
And yet, being tactful should not include waffling on proper doctrine. For example, the Bible teaches that all people are born in sin and are at enmity with God. This is something that we cannot avoid sharing when asked. However, how we present this truth can make a great difference in the anticipated response.
 
If a person stands on a street corner and yells at everyone who passes him, “You are a sinner. You are going to hell!” He probably won’t make any converts. Someone might give him a good pounding, though.
 
On the other hand, if the same person quietly approaches someone and says, “May I share the good news of what Jesus did with you?” He might get a favorable response. From there, he might say, “Because of the sin in our lives, God cannot accept us, but He loves us enough to have sent Jesus to restore us to Himself.”
 
Such an approach conveys the same truth as the first approach, but it does it in a spirit of caring, not high-handed superiority. Paul’s approach was always direct but not necessarily confrontational. However, when dealing with matters of the law, even something nonconfrontational can still be very upsetting to those whose boast is in the law.
 
Therefore, he was directed by the Lord to depart from Jerusalem. His message needed ears that would be receptive to it at the right time. That time is yet ahead for this troubled city, but it will come someday. Until then, Jerusalem continues as a city without a proper relationship with the Lord. Pray for the peace of Jerusalem by praying for its collective heart to be turned to Jesus.
 
Glorious Lord God, today we lift up Your wayward nation, the people of Israel. We also pray for Your holy city, Jerusalem. There is not yet peace in the people’s hearts, nor is there peace in the city. But we pray for hearts to be changed before the days of tribulation come upon them. May the word about Jesus continue to expand and convert hearts and minds before that time comes. Amen.

Acts 22:17

Tuesday, 5 December 2023
 
“Now it happened, when I returned to Jerusalem and was praying in the temple, that I was in a trance Acts 22:17
 
The Greek is more literally translated, “And it happened to me, having returned to Jerusalem and my praying in the temple, I came into a trance” (CG).
 
Paul had just been instructed by Ananias to arise, be baptized, and wash away his sins, calling on the name of the Lord. That was while he was in Damascus. Next, he tells the crowd, “And it happened to me, having returned to Jerusalem.”
 
His words now occurred upon his return, which is recorded in these few verses of Acts 9 –
 
“And when Saul had come to Jerusalem, he tried to join the disciples; but they were all afraid of him, and did not believe that he was a disciple. 27 But Barnabas took him and brought him to the apostles. And he declared to them how he had seen the Lord on the road, and that He had spoken to him, and how he had preached boldly at Damascus in the name of Jesus. 28 So he was with them at Jerusalem, coming in and going out. 29 And he spoke boldly in the name of the Lord Jesus and disputed against the Hellenists, but they attempted to kill him. 30 When the brethren found out, they brought him down to Caesarea and sent him out to Tarsus.” Acts 9:26-30
 
Though these words in Acts 9 are recorded directly after his departure from Damascus, as if he immediately traveled there, it is probable that he first went to Arabia, returned to Damascus, and then went to Jerusalem –
 
“But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb and called me through His grace, 16 to reveal His Son in me, that I might preach Him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately confer with flesh and blood, 17 nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me; but I went to Arabia, and returned again to Damascus.
18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and remained with him fifteen days.” Galatians 1:15-18
 
It is then during this fifteen-day stay in Jerusalem that his next words probably took place. He says, “and my praying in the temple, I came into a trance.”
 
The fact that he went to the temple to pray forms a part of his defense against being a blasphemer. His words to them indicate that he has remained an observant Jew all along.
 
Versions such as the KJV and NKJV don’t give the correct sense here. Instead of “he was in a trance,” it says he “came” or “fell” into a trance. Like both Cornelius and Peter in Acts 10, the state came about during a time of prayer.
 
Life application: By the time of these events, Paul had personally received revelation from the Lord in Arabia. He had believed in the Lord for a full three years. And yet, he took time to pray while in the temple.
 
In other words, his attitude was not, “I personally know the Lord and don’t need to pray anymore.” Rather, prayer was a part of his continued life in Christ. In his epistles, he holds prayer as a key and integral part of his walk with the Lord.
 
If this is so with someone who was personally called by the Lord and who had then personally received revelation from the Lord, it shows the high value of prayer. It should be something we likewise place a high value on. Let us remember this and take time to stop and pray. Moving mountains in one’s life begins while stationary on one’s knees.
 
Lord God, help us to remember to connect with You as we conduct our affairs each day. May prayer be considered an important part of our walk as we draw near to You with our souls open before You. Help us to solidify this as a priority in our lives. Amen.

Acts 22:16

Monday, 4 December 2023
 
“And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord.’ Acts 22:16
 
The Greek reads, “And now, why delay? Having arisen, be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Ananias said to Paul, “For you will be His witness to all men of what you have seen and heard.” Now, with his calling set forth, Ananias continues with, “And now, why delay?”
 
There is a sense of urgency in his words, as if the clock of people’s lives is winding down. Paul has a charge to carry forth the word of the Lord, and without that message, people will die apart from Jesus. He needs to begin his ministry immediately. But before he does, Ananias next says, “Having arisen, be baptized.”
 
Baptism is the normative thing seen after any conversion. It is based on the word of the Lord to those who were with Jesus at the beginning –
 
“Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age. Amen.” Matthew 28:19-20
 
However, unlike many who heard the word, received the Spirit, and were then baptized (for example, Acts 10:46-48), Ananias continues, saying, “and wash away your sins.”
 
Baptism for repentance is what John the Baptist told Israel to do and which all of Israel would have been aware of. However, in Luke 7 it says –
 
“And when all the people heard Him, even the tax collectors justified God, having been baptized with the baptism of John. 30 But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him.” Luke 7:29, 30
 
Paul was in this group. The people of Israel were then admonished to be baptized into Jesus in Acts 2. There is no record of the other apostles having been baptized. However, Paul was told to be baptized “and wash away your sins.” In Acts 2, Peter instructed the people, saying –
 
“Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39 For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call.” Acts 2:38, 39
 
This implies that their sin (as with Paul) was not connected with the law, which could have been forgiven on the Day of Atonement. Instead, they were connected with “the Just” mentioned in verse 14, meaning the Messiah. Paul, like Israel, had rejected the Messiah. Israel had to repent (change their minds) concerning this. Their minds needed to be converted from rejection to acceptance.
 
At this point, however, Paul does not need to repent. He has already changed his mind about who Jesus is. And yet, he was still told to be baptized to wash away his sins. Those in Acts 10 did not need to do this. They were baptized as an outward demonstration of the faith they possessed, and which had saved them. In both instances, baptism is required, but the underlying reason is different.
 
As for the word translated as “wash away,” it is apolouó. It is a compound word, coming from words meaning “away” and “wash.” It is only used here and in 1 Corinthians 6:11. However, louo is used in an important passage during Jesus’ ministry, John 13:10. In that verse, a picture of both justification and sanctification are given by using two different words for “wash,” louo and nipto. Paul needs to be “washed,” meaning sanctification and justification, in order to be cleansed from his sins.
 
Those in Acts 10 received this immediately. Paul, having previously rejected Jesus, needed to go through the process of baptism for this purpose, just as those in Acts 2 did. In his baptism, he was to enter into a new life in Messiah while “calling on the name of the Lord.” 
 
The Greek word translated as “Lord” is used, kurios. Some manuscripts simply say, calling on His name. Either way, it is implying that the Just is the Lord because only God can forgive sins. Once again, the text clearly indicates that Jesus the Man is the embodiment of Yehovah of the Old Testament. Thus, He is the God/Man. 
 
As for the giving of the Spirit to Paul, nothing is said of when he received it. However, it can be inferred that the Spirit only came upon him after the act of Baptism. Notice the necessary conditions for those Jews who had first rejected Jesus –
 
For Israel on Pentecost: “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39 For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call.” Acts 2:38, 39
 
For Paul as noted in Acts 9: “And Ananias went his way and entered the house; and laying his hands on him he said, ‘Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you came, has sent me that you may receive your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.’ 18 Immediately there fell from his eyes something like scales, and he received his sight at once; and he arose and was baptized.” Acts 9:17, 18
 
For Paul while speaking to Israel in Acts 22: “And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord.” Acts 22:16
 
Without telling us when Paul received the Spirit, it can be inferred that it occurred only after he was baptized. The sin of rejection by these early Jews was to be overcome through water baptism. The reason for this is because it is a sign to national Israel of their need to be identified with the Messiah in order to be saved as a nation. That is actually prefigured in typology in Joshua 3 and 4. Take time to watch the Superior Word sermons on those chapters to more fully understand this.
 
Life application: Today, a person who accepts Jesus is saved by faith and he is immediately sealed with the Spirit. At that moment, he is sanctified and justified before the Lord. Water baptism follows this as an outward sign of the inner change that has taken place.
 
It is a command of the Lord that baptism takes place, just as taking the Lord’s Supper is a command. Such rites are obviously important to the Lord and He expects us to follow through with them. Salvation is not tied up in either, but it is sure that rewards are. Be sure to receive baptism if you have never done so, and then be sure to take the Lord’s Supper when you meet.
 
Also, take time to read the Bible each day. Consider it in its intended context and think about why things occur as they do in Scripture. There is always a logical reason for why things are detailed as they are. So, contemplate the word as you go about your day.
 
Heavenly Father, thank You for salvation by grace through faith. Thank You that when we believe, we are saved and sealed for the day of redemption. We no longer have to fear death or condemnation. Rather, we can look to the future with hope and joy because of the work of Jesus our Lord! Thank You for Jesus. Amen.