BIBLE IN TEN

Acts 23:1

Tuesday, 19 December 2023
 
Then Paul, looking earnestly at the council, said, “Men and brethren, I have lived in all good conscience before God until this day.” Acts 23:1
 
The Greek is more literally translated, “And Paul, having looked fixedly at the council, said, ‘Men, brothers, I – in all good conscience – have citizened to God until this day.’”
 
In the previous verse, Paul was brought by the Roman commander and set before the council. With him there, Chapter 23 begins with, “And Paul, having looked fixedly.”
 
Paul’s fixed look implies a staring gaze. HELPS Word Studies says it signifies “to fix one’s eyes on some object continually and intensely – ‘to look straight at, to stare at, to keep one’s eyes fixed on.’” It was used in Luke 4:20, Acts 6:15, and Acts 7:55, among other times. If his eyesight was bad, as speculated, it would be all the more relevant to show that he diligently was attempting to meet the eyes of his accusers. Therefore, he having looked fixedly “at the council, said, ‘Men, brothers.’”
 
In his address, he greets them as equals, “men, brothers.” This would have been the first time in a quarter of a century that he stood in this place, sometime around the stoning of Stephen. There, after all these years, he begins his defense with the words, “I – in all good conscience.”
 
Here, a new word is introduced into Scripture, suneidésis. It signifies “joint-knowing.” It thus signifies “conscience which joins moral and spiritual consciousness as part of being created in the divine image. Accordingly, all people have this God-given capacity to know right from wrong because each is a free moral agent” (HELPS Word Studies).
 
Paul is summing up all of his time during those intervening years and his ministry to the Gentiles, whom they so despised, as right and appropriate. He asserts that his moral conduct in this regard was above reproach and that it would have been approved of by the higher moral power before whom he conducted his affairs. That is next expressly stated in the words “have citizened to God until this day.”
 
Another new word is brought into Scripture here and is defined by a new Charlie word now gifted to the English language, politeuomai. It means to behave or live as a citizen, coming from polités, a citizen. Thus, it means to citizen oneself. As it is a perfect participle, “have citizened” fits the meaning exactly. The word is found only elsewhere in Scripture in Philippians 1:27 –
 
“Only let your conduct [lit: citizening (another new Charlie word)] be worthy of the gospel of Christ, so that whether I come and see you or am absent, I may hear of your affairs, that you stand fast in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel.”
 
This word is an idiom of the times to mean that he had lived properly, and his conscience was clean, even before God. This would have riled up those before him to no end, having been aware of his efforts among the Gentiles and of his walk with the Messiah they had rejected.
 
For some other times Paul speaks of conscience, see 2 Timothy 1:3; 1 Timothy 1:5; Romans 2:15, 13:5; 1 Corinthians 4:4, 10:25; and Acts 24:16.
 
Life application: As noted in previous commentaries, Paul never denied his citizenship either before God or as a citizen of the empire (Rome) or country (Israel) to which he belonged. He used each according to the rights and benefits conferred upon him because of that citizenship.
 
And more, he claimed his rights to a heavenly citizenship as is indicated elsewhere in the New Testament. Of this status within a society, Wikipedia defines the word politeia. It is a help in understanding one’s rights within a particular society –
 
According to Liddell and Scott's Greek-English Lexicon a meaning of politeia is ‘the conditions and rights of the citizen, or citizenship’, analogous to the Latin civitas.
 
Politeia, in Greek means the community of citizens in a city / state. ...
 
Politeia is derived from both the root word polis meaning ‘city’ or ‘state’, and from the verb politeuomai that means ‘I am living as an active citizen of the polis.’
 
People living in a Greek city/state were not necessarily citizens. A person that was ostracized from the active matrix of the city was an example of such. Another example was people who lived in the city but were not active citizens who had a say in the political processes of the community. Women, slaves and others who Greek men deemed unworthy were not in the active matrix of the political formations of that city state, making them not-citizens, so not part of politeia.
 
In countries of the world today, many illegal aliens are brought in. And yet, they do not possess the rights of the nation in which they live. In the visible church, there are unbelievers. They are in the church, but they are not of the church. Thus, they have no right to the citizenship of the church.
 
Paul held the rights of a Roman, a man of Israel, and a member of the church. He thus possessed the rights of the heavenly citizenship found in Christ. The Jews who had rejected Jesus do not possess those rights. This continues to this day.
 
This is an important point. Dual Covenantalism claims that Jews are saved by adherence to the law. This would be like saying that the illegals, or even legal immigrants still on visas or Green Cards, in the US have rights to citizenship because they work in jobs earning money.
 
Anyone with a modicum of sense can tell that such a notion is false. Only a person who is made a citizen can have the rights of a citizen. This is the false dichotomy set forth by people like John Hagee, who teach Dual Covenantalism. They claim rights for others that do not exist. The only way to possess the heavenly rights of citizenship of the New Covenant is to enter into the New Covenant through faith in the completed work of Jesus Christ.
 
But this also again shows the sad state of those Christians who do not participate in the political decisions of the nations in which they live. They fail to understand that God has placed them in those nations to be active members of them.
 
Understanding the nature of the Hebrew or Greek writings from the perspective of the people who lived during those times helps shed light on what we are being told in Scripture. Be sure to pay heed. Be sure to participate in each body of which you are a citizen. And be sure to never acknowledge others’ rights to citizenship that they do not possess, lest you lead them to a false sense of security that they do not enjoy.
 
Lord God Almighty, may we diligently study Your word and show ourselves approved before You by adhering to the precepts You have laid out for us there. May we carefully consider our state before You and never waffle in conducting our lives accordingly. We have been granted heavenly citizenship because of Jesus. Help us to live in accord with that truth. Amen.
 

Acts 22:30

Monday, 18 December 2023
 
The next day, because he wanted to know for certain why he was accused by the Jews, he released him from his bonds, and commanded the chief priests and all their council to appear, and brought Paul down and set him before them. Acts 22:30
 
A literal translation would be, “And the next day, desiring to know for certain why he is accused by the Jews, he loosed him and commanded the chief priests and all the council to assemble. And having brought down Paul, set him among them” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, the Roman soldiers withdrew from their plans to scourge Paul. Now, the words continue with, “And the next day.”
 
Without any delay, and certainly because Paul was a Roman, the commander acted. He surely didn’t want to keep Paul incarcerated if he had done nothing wrong. Continuing, it says he was “desiring to know for certain why he is accused by the Jews.”
 
This refers back to Acts 21:34, which occurred on the previous day –
 
“And some among the multitude cried one thing and some another.
So when he could not ascertain the truth because of the tumult, he commanded him to be taken into the barracks.”
 
The circumstances following need to be carefully considered. If Paul was a Roman, then the commander would certainly have talked to him about what happened and asked about the situation. No charges had been filed against Paul that we are aware of. He was in the midst of a ruckus and was carried out of it. At this point, the commander just wants to know for certain why he was accused.
 
As he had not been able to satisfactorily determine what the Jews were in a tizzy about, and because he could not “examine” Paul through torture, he needed to set the record straight before he could take any further action. Therefore, “he loosed him.”
 
The word is luó. It means to loosen. Thus, he may have been bound, or he simply may have been in a cell from which he was released. Either way, once he was loosed, the commander “commanded the chief priests and all the council to assemble.”
 
A general meeting of the leadership was called. This probably would never have been needed if Paul was not a Roman. Instead, the scourging would have revealed what they needed to know. However, that could not take place, and so this meeting was necessary. There is still the consideration that if Paul was telling the truth in whatever they had discussed, he would still be open to attack and harm. Therefore, the verse and the chapter end with, “And having brought down Paul, set him among them.”
 
In order to both protect Paul and also to get the leaders to tell their side of the story, he had Paul escorted to them for all to openly work through the matter. The commander had made a giant mistake in his handling of Paul the previous day. He would not allow such an error to take place again. Therefore, Paul was to be carefully escorted and protected during the entire process.
 
Life application: The account of the Roman commander shows that cutting corners is not the best way to go about things. He was given the responsibility of maintaining the peace, but he was also given the responsibility of protecting the citizens of Rome from those among whom they dwelt.
 
It may have been unexpected to find a Jewish man in the middle of a ruckus to be a Roman citizen, but it was something he should have checked anyway. This is especially so because putting anyone through a scourging would be a serious matter. But to put a Roman citizen through that ordeal would be a life-changing ordeal for both of them.
 
He didn’t stop to check. Now he must make an extra effort to determine what he might have found out the day before without the additional grief. We can learn from this. When we have a matter that is set before us, the least we can do is think through what the outcome of being hasty may be. Small things can turn into big problems if we don’t consider how our decisions may adversely affect the result we are trying to obtain.
 
Go slow, think through your actions, and then act in a wise and prudent manner in the matters you are involved in. Be sure this is especially so when others may be negatively affected by what you do. Stop and pray about matters as well. James tells us that if we lack wisdom, we should ask of God, “who gives to all liberally and without reproach” (James 1:5).
 
Glorious Lord God, may the decisions we make and the actions we take be carefully considered before we act. Give us wisdom to not cause harm to others as we go through life. May we carefully think through the steps we take so that harmony will reign, and You will be glorified through the wise conduct of Your people. Amen.
 

Acts 22:29

Sunday, 17 December 2023
 
Then immediately those who were about to examine him withdrew from him; and the commander was also afraid after he found out that he was a Roman, and because he had bound him. Acts 22:29
 
The words are more literally rendered, “Immediately, therefore, those being about to examine him departed from him. And also, the commander was afraid, having ascertained that he is a Roman, and because he had bound him” (CG).
 
Paul just confirmed to the commander that he was born a citizen. With that, it next says, “Immediately, therefore, those being about to examine him departed from him.”
 
Oopsie. As soon as the words left Paul's lips, they stepped back from his “examination.” The word here is used in a euphemistic sense for scourging him. They would have done so until he spoke whatever they wanted to hear. Hence, it was an examination.
 
This is the second and last use of the word anetazó in Scripture. The first was in verse 22:24. As noted then, it signifies thorough examining, as if a person were on trial, such as a witness. In Paul’s case, the examining was to be done in conjunction with torture. There is a point where even the hardest of men will yield under such inquisition, although that point may lead to death.
 
As for Paul, any thought of the examination continuing was ended. One might ask why he didn’t object to the punishment he and Silas received in Acts 16, but he objected now in Jerusalem. The reason is that their beating in Acts 16 was with rods. Though painful, it would not be life-threatening. This treatment in Jerusalem would have resulted in a great loss of blood and an extended period of convalescence, or possibly death.
 
Therefore, and knowing that he could use this to his advantage, he appealed to his citizenship. Understanding this, it next says, “And also, the commander was afraid.”
 
The word afraid could be an understatement, depending on those appointed over him. He had almost degraded a fellow citizen in one of the most humiliating and painful examinations that could be imagined. Having even prepared Paul for this by stretching him out and readying the scourges was intolerable treatment. He knew this, “having ascertained that he is a Roman, and because he had bound him.”
 
One thing is certain, it would not be wrong to bind him in chains. This is known because Paul will be in chains later, even though a Roman. Therefore, the illegal binding is rather having strapped him into a position where he could be tortured and then binding him there with leather straps.
 
Life application: Imagine yourself in a crowd, and the authorities were about to execute a baby in front of her mother. Because of your position within society, you have the ability to appeal on behalf of the child, thus saving its life. Would you remain silent, or would you speak up for the child?
 
Any person with even a modicum of God-centered morals would immediately speak out. To not do so would mean you were actively complicit in the murder of the child. In Proverbs 3:27, it says –
 
“Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due,When it is in the power of your hand to do so.”
 
This sentiment is not unique in Scripture. Rather, we are to speak up and speak out about such matters. So why should you think your vote is any different? You are a citizen of a nation. If your nation allows you to vote and you withhold your vote, knowing that an ungodly person may prevail in the election, you are working against what is good.
 
Likewise, if you vote for a person who supports abortion, you are actively working against God’s intent for human life. In the US, for example, abortion on demand is the platform of the democrat party. If a Christian votes for a democrat, he is – by default – supporting the murder of the unborn.
 
Do you not fear God? There is a judgment coming, even for believers. We cannot be held guiltless when we work against the moral principles God has laid out in Scripture. Be wise and be discerning. Use your citizenship through the power of the vote to glorify God.
 
Lord God, please give us wise and discerning hearts concerning matters of morality as outlined in Your word. May we apply our lives and our decisions in such matters to uphold what is right and good and to stem the tide of wickedness that will arise if we fail to act. Yes, Lord, give us wisdom in this way. Amen.

Acts 22:28

Saturday, 16 December 2023
 
The commander answered, “With a large sum I obtained this citizenship.”And Paul said, “But I was born a citizen.” Acts 22:28
 
While preparing to have Paul scourged, the centurion was alerted to the fact that Paul was Roman. Hearing this, the centurion told his commander. From there, the commander went to Paul and asked if he was Roman. Paul responded affirmatively. Now, it says, “The commander answered, “With a large sum I obtained this citizenship.”
 
The words bear emphasis – “I, great sum, this citizenship bought.” The commander’s response shows without any doubt that citizenship could be purchased and that he had done so at great expense, something he was quite proud of. Some believe that such a purchase was made through bribery of corrupt officials. Vincent's Word Studies says –
 
“The purchase of Roman citizenship was an investment. Under the first Roman emperors it was obtained only at large cost and with great difficulty; later, it was sold for a trifle.”
 
If that doesn't sound like the US today! It used to be an honor to earn citizenship. Now, it means nothing. It is handed out to those who don’t deserve it, and it is denied to those who have demonstrated the wits, intelligence, and business acumen to merit it in the way the law clearly states.
 
The word translated as sum is kephalaion. It is used only twice in the New Testament, here and in Hebrews 8:1, where it is translated as “the main point.” It comes from kephale, meaning the head, a cornerstone, or even the primary head of something, like a ruler.
 
Also, the word translated as citizenship is politeia. It indicates “citizenship; concretely, a community -- commonwealth, freedom” (Strong’s). Its only other use is in Ephesians 2:12 speaking of the commonwealth of Israel –
 
“Therefore remember that you, once Gentiles in the flesh—who are called Uncircumcision by what is called the Circumcision made in the flesh by hands— 12 that at that time you were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth [politeia] of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. 13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ.” Ephesians 2:11-13
 
Now, and understanding the commander’s words, it next says, “And Paul said, ‘But I was born a citizen.’” Again, the Greek is more emphatic. It reads, “I, and even, was born.” This means that he was born into a family who were already citizens. Many theories have arisen as to how he obtained it, but Ellicott may be correct –
 
“Many of the Jews who were taken to Rome by Pompeius as slaves first obtained their freedom and became libertini, and afterwards were admitted on the register as citizens. The mention of kinsmen or friends at Rome (Romans 16:7; Romans 16:11), makes it probable, as has been said, that the Apostle’s father may have been among them.”
 
Life application: Think about what this conversation means in relation to the world today. Something that was once highly cherished, even precious and/or life-saving, eventually meant nothing at all. The leaders of the great and vast Roman empire squandered what had been built. The mid-level officials had become corrupt and uncaring about safeguarding what had been entrusted to them.
 
Eventually, Roman citizenship had no value at all. Today, the exact same attitude is on display in most of the great and powerful governments of the world. Obtaining US citizenship, for example, is a laughable process that is so misused by government employees that for a quick bribe when no one is looking, even pedophiles can easily obtain it.
 
The only citizenship that truly matters in this world is the one that will never be diminished in how it is obtained –
 
“Now, therefore, you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, 20 having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief cornerstone, 21 in whom the whole building, being fitted together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord, 22 in whom you also are being built together for a dwelling place of God in the Spirit.” Ephesians 2:19-22
 
There is only one way heavenly citizenship is realized, and it is through faith in what God has done in and through the giving of His Son, our Lord Jesus Christ. While the rest of the world is hurriedly seeking things that have no lasting value, Jesus Christ’s offer stands as an eternal hope for those who come to him.
 
This offer comes at the highest price of all, and yet, that price has been paid already through Jesus’ cross. All that is needed to appropriate it is to believe to the saving of the soul.
 
Lord God, how thankful we are that there is a hope beyond this fallen world. We strive for things that have no value and things that can be taken away or lost in a moment. But what You offer is eternal citizenship in a heavenly kingdom. May we be willing to share this good news with those who so desperately need it. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.

Acts 22:27

Friday, 15 December 2023
 
Then the commander came and said to him, “Tell me, are you a Roman?”
He said, “Yes.” Acts 22:27
 
A literal translation is, “And the commander, having come near, said to him, ‘Tell me, are you Roman?’ And he said, ‘Yes.’”
 
The centurion had just gone to the commander and informed him of Paul’s claim of being Roman. Having heard this, Luke next records, “And the commander, having come near, said to him, ‘Tell me, are you Roman?’”
 
The commander seems truly shocked by the claim, as seen in his words. The “you” in the question is emphatic. In essence, “You? Roman?” By this time, the commander is certainly scared, probably in disbelief, and surely baffled. The coming response would make his heart drop, “And he said, ‘Yes.’”
 
The commander never thought to ask, and now he was in a very difficult position before the law. If Paul were to press the matter, he might find himself reduced in rank, sent to an even worse outpost, or even imprisoned for having failed in properly discharging his duties in this regard.
 
As for Paul’s response, it is unimaginable that he would lie about such a thing. As Ellicott notes, “The combination of so many more or less discordant elements was so exceptional as to be almost incredible.”
 
Paul’s answer is either horrifyingly true or it is the answer of a fool with a death wish. Attempting to claim such a position to which he had no right would be the claim of a madman. Therefore, the commander must assume it to be true.
 
Life application: Paul directly appealed to his citizenship as a right that he possessed and which he was exercising that right to. This sentiment is found throughout Scripture, and the reason it is so is because God has set the nations before Him. By dividing the peoples by individual languages, He directed that they would unite in a manner that would result in the establishment of individual nations.
 
Within those nations, those who are citizens are given the right to whatever benefits are to be derived from such citizenship. How tragic it is that Christians in today’s world have failed to rightly understand this, and they have ceded their rights by not voting according to biblical principles.
 
For each Christian who neglects to vote, there is another non-Christian with whatever perverse agenda he is supporting. The vote of the Christian is lost. Along with that, his own rights are slowly stripped away from him. This is all because of a failure to responsibly act in the nation where God has placed him.
 
When people such as this are rounded up for extermination, they will only be able to blame themselves. If you are a citizen of a nation with a right such as voting, use your right to the glory of God. In such instances, failing to be responsible because of supposed piety will only lead to future tragedy.
 
Lord God, may we be aware of our position within the societies You have placed us. When we have a right that can be determined by our active participation, may we be wise and responsible to act for the betterment of the nation in which we live. In failing to act, we are only bringing disaster upon ourselves. Thank You for the rights we possess in the land in which we live. May we use them to Your glory. Amen.

Acts 22:26

Thursday, 14 December 2023
 
When the centurion heard that, he went and told the commander, saying, “Take care what you do, for this man is a Roman.’” Acts 22:26
 
A literal translation would be, “And the centurion, having heard, having gone to the commander reported, saying, ‘See what you are about to do! For this man is Roman” (CG).
 
As the Romans were binding Paul, intending to scourge him, he asked, “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?” An immediate response follows. Luke next records, “And the centurion, having heard, having gone to the commander.”
 
As soon as Paul uttered his words, the centurion realized there could be trouble. Any further action by him concerning Paul without direct approval of the commander could mean any level of punishment. Therefore, he “reported, saying, ‘See what you are about to do!’”
 
Some manuscripts place this as a question, saying, “What are you about to do?” Others make it a proclamation, “See what you are about to do...” The change doesn’t substantially alter the intent. The centurion is simply protecting himself and the commander from real trouble. If the commander presses the punishment on Paul, and Paul’s words are true, it could permanently change the course of their lives. The centurion’s next words explain why, “For this man is Roman.”
 
Paul was a citizen of Rome. What they were about to do was illegal and a punishable offense. Further action against Paul had to be stopped, and at this point, trouble may already be brewing. Paul’s personal attitude towards them could still result in real problems ahead.
 
Life application: Citizenship in a country carries certain rights and responsibilities. However, in many countries today, the leaders are purposefully following an agenda where those who are illegal in a country are treated better than those who are citizens.
 
Those who productively work are having the effort of their labors stolen from them and handed over to those who have no right to them. When a citizen is raped or killed by an illegal alien, the government – from the local level even to the federal level – will shield the illegal from punishment and deportation. Why do you think this is occurring?
 
There is a globalist agenda that is attempting to bring the world under a single authority, removing national barriers, rights, and laws. In order to do this, destroying the foundational underpinnings of societies is required. The only time those following this communist agenda have a change of heart is when their agenda personally backfires on them.
 
These things are, however, inevitable. The Bible’s prophecies about the future are being realized with each wicked step of these insufferable people. Don’t be surprised as you continue to see those in authority despise the nations they are charged to run and the people they are sworn to protect. Realize that the times are drawing near for God’s judgment on a global scale.
 
This also means that the time for Jesus to come for His people is also drawing near. Be ready! Tell people about God’s goodness in Christ now. The time for our departure is coming quickly.
 
Heavenly Father, help us to be prompt in speaking to others about their need for Jesus. May we not hold back in explaining the good news. Rather, may we be about fulfilling our call to evangelize, sharing the wonderful news that Jesus has prevailed over death, and He promises us eternal life in a world without wickedness. Instill this desire in us, O God. Amen.
 

Acts 22:25

Wednesday, 13 December 2023
 
And as they bound him with thongs, Paul said to the centurion who stood by, “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?” Acts 22:25
 
Paul has been taken into the barracks where the commander ordered that he be examined under scourging. Now, that continues with, “And as they bound him with thongs.”
 
Luke uses another word unique in Scripture, proteinó, translated by the NKJV as “bound.” It signifies “to stretch forward.” There is a debate about the correct way to translate these words. It could either say, “As they stretched him out to thong him...” or “And as they stretched him forward with thongs.”
 
In other words, are the thongs used to tie him in preparation for being beaten, or is he being tied up in order for the thongs, on which are the scourges, to be used on him? Vincent’s Word Studies argues that it would be superfluous to say, “bound him” and then add in “with thongs.” But Luke is normally very precise in his use of words. What others may find superfluous, he will find as an exacting and necessary detail.
 
On the other hand, Ellicott notes that “The Greek word for ‘thong’ is always used in the New Testament in connection with the idea of tying.” A good question to ask is, “Does it make any difference in the end?” For precision, yes. However, in the overall picture, the result will be the same. Paul is facing a good beating with scourges. Therefore, “Paul said to the centurion who stood by.”
 
The commander gave the order. A centurion is ensuring the order is complied with and will probably be the one to administer the scourging. Lower-ranking soldiers are the ones tying Paul up. Paul addresses the one in greatest authority in the room at the current time, asking, “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?”
 
His question would have an immediate effect on the centurion. If this person were a Roman citizen, those in the barracks would already be guilty of a crime for violating Paul’s rights by not giving him a trial first. Further, even if guilty, this type of punishment could not be given to a citizen.
 
To continue would make him even more guilty and possibly liable to the same punishment he was about to administer. If Paul were not a Roman, he would be a lunatic. To claim citizenship in this way would be punishable, probably by death. His claim alone would be enough to make the centurion stop and investigate what he was about to do.
 
Cicero says, “It is a heinous sin to bind a Roman citizen, it is wickedness to beat him, it is next to parricide to kill him, and what shall I say to crucify him?” Another ancient witness says, “According to the Valerian law, it was not lawful for magistrates to condemn a Roman without hearing the cause, and pleading in it; and such condemned persons might appeal to the populace” Pompon. Laetus de Legibus, p. 157.
 
Life application: If we think about the situation being described, Paul possessed certain rights that kept him from being bound, scourged, or executed without the strictest of investigations and proper judicial processes. Jesus was born in the same general generation, but He did not possess these rights.
 
Although we can dismiss that idea without much thought, we can also contemplate the enormity of it and stand in awe of what it means. God could have sent His Messiah into the world as the son of a Roman citizen. If this were to have been the case, the result would have been completely different.
 
But He preordained every aspect of the birth of Christ to meet His purposes. Hebrews 10 says –
 
“Therefore, when He came into the world, He said:‘Sacrifice and offering You did not desire,But a body You have prepared for Me.6 In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sinYou had no pleasure.7 Then I said, “Behold, I have come—In the volume of the book it is written of Me—To do Your will, O God.”’” Hebrews 10:5-7
 
God’s preparation of a body for Jesus includes every ancestor who came into His genealogy, purposefully selecting the line to ensure each prophecy about Him would come to pass. It included the timing of His birth, its location, the rights or lack of rights He would possess, etc.
 
Everything was meticulously ordained by God for the purpose of redeeming man. Those who dismiss the life of Christ do so without thinking through the incredible nature of what transpired, and thus the immense love God must have for the objects of His affections, meaning those whom He will save through the giving of Jesus.
 
Let us never minimize the magnitude of the marvel that is displayed in the coming of our Lord. God’s affections are on redeeming the people of the world. May we consider this and be willing to speak out the good news to those who so desperately need to hear it.
 
Lord God, how can it be that You would look upon us and see anything of value? We have all sinned and gone astray in our hearts, minds, and actions. And yet, You have graciously accepted us and forgiven us because of faith in what was done in the giving of Christ Jesus our Lord. We shall praise you forever and ever because of the glory of our Lord. Hallelujah and amen.

Acts 22:24

Tuesday, 12 December 2023
 
the commander ordered him to be brought into the barracks, and said that he should be examined under scourging, so that he might know why they shouted so against him. Acts 22:24
 
The Greek reads, “The commander ordered him to be brought into the barracks, having directed him examining by scourges so that he might know for what reason they cried out thus against him” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Paul’s words had caused the crowd to go into an uproar, casting off their clothes and throwing dust up into the air. With that, Paul’s words were forcibly finished, and, as it next says, “The commander ordered him to be brought into the barracks.”
 
No further purpose could be served by allowing Paul to again attempt speaking to the crowd again. As Paul spoke in the local dialect to the people, the commander probably would not have known the substance of what he had said. He might have known a little of the language, but he obviously didn’t understand the entire discourse. And so, he gave order to his men to bring him into the barracks, “having directed him examining by scourges.”
 
This implies that this was the standard way of eliciting information from someone. Were it not, the account would have gone through stages of interrogation leading up to torture. As for the word translated as examining, anetazó, it is used o  nly twice in the Bible, first here and then again in verse 29.
 
It signifies thorough examining, as if a person were on trial, such as a witness. Strong’s notes that this was frequently accomplished through the aid of torture. Such is the case now with Paul. The word is not found anywhere in classical Greek, but it is used once in the apocryphal book of Susanna.
 
As nothing is noted concerning interrogation leading up to torture, it shows that the Romans wasted no time in getting to the point. Hence, it next says, “so that he might know for what reason they cried out thus against him.”
 
It would be well known that this type of punishment was how the Romans operated. Therefore, it would be a way of keeping the peace through threats. Paul was to be subjected to a brutal interrogation that would leave him in agonizing pain and with permanent scars to remind him of the ordeal.
 
Life application: Ecclesiastes 8:11 says, “Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.” We can philosophize all day long about whether the judgment to beat Paul in order to elicit information from him was wrong or not. But it is certain that it was an effective deterrent within the Roman society.
 
When people saw the consequences of being a miscreant, it would keep them in check concerning their own conduct. Today, it is exactly the opposite. Those who do right are punished as offenders of the law. Those who break the law are given no bail, light or no sentences, and are pandered to by the news media, portraying them as victims.
 
Because of this, society in many large cities has devolved into abject fear among the general populace. They know that if they defend themselves and their property from evildoers, they will be charged. Police are likewise hand-tied. If they capture a thug who should otherwise be removed from society and something happens to him, even accidentally, they can be charged and spend many years in prison.
 
This has led to a total breakdown in society. Ecclesiastes, Proverbs, and even Job provide wisdom concerning these things. This wisdom has been rejected by left-leaning politicians, media, judges, and academia. Thus, societal harm, possibly permanent, has arisen.
 
A society cannot function like this. A rejection of the biblical standard of morality by a nation that was established on the biblical model can only result in its own implosion. Be sure to vote when the time arises. The only thing that will stem this unholy tide is to vote against these ungodly lefties.
 
Heavenly Father, nations that previously honored You, Your word, and the moral principles set forth by You are quickly turning away to ideas that can only result in societal degradation and ever-increasing moral turpitude. Give us wisdom and the ability to stand against these things. It is our desire that our societies be honoring of You. Help us to restore godly values in the nations we live in. Amen.

Acts 22:23

Monday, 11 December 2023
 
Then, as they cried out and tore off their clothes and threw dust into the air, Acts 22:23
 
The tense of the verbs is all wrong in the NKJV. The Greek uses present participles, saying – “And they – howling and hurling their garments and casting dust into the air” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, the crowd before Paul shouted out for him to be removed from the earth, not being fit to live. With that, it next says, “And they – howling.”
 
It is a word that signifies clamor. It is properly identified with the loud bay or croaking of animals. Thus, it can signify shouting, shrieking, etc. Plato used it when describing the howling of dogs. These people, who were supposedly the holy nation of the law, had assumed the aspect of unclean canine, yelping as if a pack of rabid Dobermans. Next, it says, “and hurling their garments.”
 
It is a word found only here in Scripture, rhipteó. It signifies to cast or hurl. In this case, one can see them like a bunch of angry school children ready to fight. They pull their outer garments off and toss them in the air or to the ground, away from their bodies, thus freeing themselves for a rumble. It then adds, “and casting dust into the air.”
 
It is a metaphor for their conduct about Paul. He is a man of the dust, and they are recommending he be returned to dust. It is a sign of great distress and, at times, mourning. The scene may seem almost comical to us, but what is written here is the customary way of showing both anger and a sense of anguish over what they perceive as blasphemy.
 
Even today, we can see this type of Middle Eastern rage on TV as people show their offense or revulsion in similar displays. Both acts also have to be considered in light of Paul’s detention by the Romans.
 
The Jews knew that they couldn’t stone Paul while he was in their custody. But showing him that this is what they would do if he wasn't protected by them, they 1) cast off their clothing, a sign that they were readying to stone him; 2) they threw dust into the air, a sign that if he wasn’t surrounded by Romans, it would be rocks instead of dust.
 
Both actions are signs that they would gladly fulfill their words of removing him from the earth.
 
Life application: There is a lot of rage in the world against the gospel. That is becoming more pervasive as time goes by. Nations that were once heralds of the gospel now send government agents to spy on people who simply want to worship Jesus as their forefathers had done.
 
This attitude stems from an internal hatred concerning their own deviant morals. Christians hold that their ultimate moral standard is based on what God expects of them, not what the government dictates. Thus, it is ultimately an attack against the God who gave man the moral guidelines in the first place.
 
These people claim they don’t believe in God, and yet they have a vehement hatred for the God they claim doesn’t exist. Their thinking is irrational and violent, just as the Jews in Paul’s time were. They hated that the God Paul proclaimed had a moral base inclusive of Gentile salvation. Thus, they hate His Messiah, who came to represent God.
 
From there, they hate any messenger of this Messiah. But Jesus stated this would be so –
 
“For the Father judges no one, but has committed all judgment to the Son, 23 that all should honor the Son just as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him.” John 5:22, 23
 
“If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it hated you. 19 If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.” John 15:18, 19
 
This attitude continues today toward those who hold to the words of Scripture. The world hates the message of Jesus because it proclaims a standard of morality that the world does not accept. It also holds a standard of acceptance that most people groups do not want to accept. All people are on the same level of acceptance in Christ, regardless of culture, genealogy, etc. This is highly unpalatable to many.
 
Hold fast to the word despite this. God is calling out a group of people from this world who will worship Him in spirit and in truth for all eternity. What happens now is a temporary blip on the way to glory.
 
Lord God, thank You for allowing us to come to You just as we are. The color of our skin, the family line we descend from, the cultural background we possess, and other such distinctions are set aside in Christ. We are accepted by faith in Him. How freeing that is! Thank You for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Acts 22:22

Sunday, 10 December 2023
 
And they listened to him until this word, and then they raised their voices and said, “Away with such a fellow from the earth, for he is not fit to live!” Acts 22:22
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told Paul he was to depart because he was being sent far from Jerusalem to the Gentiles. Now, that continues with, “And they listened to him until this word.” The reference is to the word “Gentiles.” 
 
One word. Just one word is all that it took to remove any further chance of reasoned dialogue. That same thought permeates the theological and cultural minds of Jews to this day. Gentiles, though being the people among whom they dwell, are not considered on the same spiritual or cultural level as they are.
 
To think that one of their own would be willing to minister to them about the “supposed” Messiah was worse than a slap in the face. Everything Paul had said implied that he was a spokesperson for this Messiah and that the message he proclaimed was in line with this Messiah’s intents and purposes. Therefore, Paul’s Messiah could not be their Messiah. Therefore, it next says, “and then they raised their voices.”
 
One can see the crowd suddenly roaring as one. Those who had sat down to listen while he spoke would have raised to their feet with their fists held high. Teeth would have gnashed, and faces would have fumed with fury. They collectively shouted out “and said, ‘Away with such a fellow from the earth, for he is not fit to live!’”
 
The Messiah Paul proclaimed was, to them, a total failure. How could He favor the Gentiles when He hadn't even broken off their bonds? The people of Israel were looking for an earthly ruler, never considering that the bonds they were in were spiritual ones. They were slaves to sin, and the law kept them in that bondage.
 
Only in the Messiah that Paul proclaimed could such bonds be removed, but they couldn’t see this. They stumbled over the stumbling block, and in the process, they killed the messengers of the truth. They now intended to kill this one as well.
 
In proclaiming that the messianic message was intended for all people, Paul had raised Gentiles to their level. At the same time, he had lowered them from their supposed exalted and chosen status. However, this attitude was from a selective reading of their own Scriptures that proclaim salvation to the nations and restoration of life to the Gentiles as well as Israel.
 
Having missed this obvious precept, they found him wholly unfit to live and called for him to be removed from the earth.
 
Life application: When we are taught something by someone we trust, such as our preacher, we will generally accept his words as correct. After all, he is the specialist in matters of faith. Dad might be a dentist, and the preacher may go to him to have his teeth repaired, but Dad goes to the preacher to be taught the word.
 
As we grow up, having believed a particular doctrine, we will tend to mentally dismiss anything that contradicts what we now believe is true. This is known as cognitive dissonance. It is a state where we have inconsistent thoughts, attitudes, or beliefs that are related to particular matters or concepts.
 
For example, if we are taught that there is no such thing as a rapture of the church, we will tend to ignore any teaching that supports that doctrine, even if there is a preponderance of evidence that supports it. Even irrefutable arguments will be dismissed.
 
This is why it is so difficult for people to leave cults. What has been trained into them is extremely difficult to overcome. Therefore, it is so very important to read and know the Bible and ask God to correct anything in your doctrine that is wrong. But you must be willing to go where He leads directly from His word.
 
Removal of bad doctrine is difficult, but it is not impossible. As Paul says, “Test all things; hold fast what is good” 1 Thessalonians 5:21.
 
Lord God Almighty, we are prone to take wrong turns in life, thinking we are on the right path. Help us to keep our feet on sound doctrine and proper biblical interpretation. Clean out those doctrines that are faulty and fill us with right and proper thinking concerning this precious and sacred word You have given us. Amen.
 

Acts 22:21

Saturday, 9 December 2023
 
“Then He said to me, ‘Depart, for I will send you far from here to the Gentiles.’” Acts 22:21
 
Paul just tried to defend why he was no longer a threat to the people, even after Jesus had told him he should quickly leave Jerusalem. However, Jesus had already spoken, knowing what was best. Therefore, without allowing any further appeal, it next says, “Then He said to me, ‘Depart.’”
 
After Jesus’ first instruction to depart and Paul’s rebuttal concerning his certainty that the Jews would understand his conversion and surely convert as well, Jesus again instructs him to depart. What is implied in this is that Jesus knew that the Jews would continue to reject His Lordship.
 
The offer of salvation had been made, and those who were to accept it had done so. However, the leaders of the nation, thus representing the entire nation, had rejected their Messiah. Paul’s words would fall on deaf ears. But more, Jesus doesn’t just tell him to depart, but He specifically says, “for I will send you far from here to the Gentiles.”
 
Jesus’ words directly imply that Paul’s being sent to the Gentiles was for the purpose of telling of his conversion, of the offer of salvation that extends to them, and that they would accept it.
 
There can be no doubt this is what is implied in His words based on the reaction that is forthcoming from the crowd. It must be remembered that the word “Gentiles” included the Romans who ruled over them and who stood between them and Paul at that very moment.
 
Israel was anticipating a Messiah who would break off their yoke and set them at the head of the nations. One of many prominent sets of verses that promise this is from Isaiah 2 –
 
“The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem.2 Now it shall come to pass in the latter daysThat the mountain of the Lord’s houseShall be established on the top of the mountains,And shall be exalted above the hills;And all nations shall flow to it.3 Many people shall come and say,‘Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,To the house of the God of Jacob;He will teach us His ways,And we shall walk in His paths.’For out of Zion shall go forth the law,And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.” Isaiah 2:1-3
 
These words are repeated, almost exactly, in Micah 4. They, along with many other assurances, prophesy about a time when Israel would be under her own control while also being the main point of focus throughout the world.
 
For Jesus to instruct Paul to depart to the Gentiles did not fit in with that idea at all. With Rome having authority over Israel, Paul was saying that he was directed to evangelize the very people who had the yoke upon the necks of the people. They could not accept such a Messiah who would allow this at their expense.
 
Life application: The problem with Israel lay in a misunderstanding of their position before the Lord. That same problem continues to this day. Everything about Israel’s calling, even before the calling was made, was of grace.
 
Noah found grace and was saved through the waters. Abraham was selected by grace. Isaac was chosen apart from any merit. Jacob was known to be the one God favored before the children were born. Israel was given grace in the sending of Moses.
 
The covenant between the Lord and Israel came about because of the gracious promises made to the patriarchs. The continuation of the covenant, even after Israel’s breaking it repeatedly, was based on the grace of God. Every step of the way, God demonstrated grace in the establishment, calling, and preservation of Israel.
 
Today, Israel has been called back from among the nations as prophesied by the Lord. Thus, this restoration is an act of grace. And yet, Israel has consistently looked at their calling as one of personal merit – “We deserve this because we are Israel.” If Israel truthfully looked at their history, they would realize what every sinner who comes to Christ realizes – “All we deserve is condemnation, and yet God has given us grace.”
 
Until they come to this realization and accept Jesus, thus entering into the New Covenant, their days will be marred with unhappiness. In our relationship with God, personal merit is excluded. Let us consider this and be grateful to Him for His unlimited grace in saving even us.
 
Lord God, thank You for the grace of God that is found in Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Acts 22:20

Friday, 8 December 2023
 
“And when the blood of Your martyr Stephen was shed, I also was standing by consenting to his death, and guarding the clothes of those who were killing him.’ Acts 22:20
 
Paul has been defending his conversion and adherence to the Way based on his life prior to his conversion. He continues that thought now, saying, “And when the blood of Your martyr Stephen was shed.”
 
Paul uses the word martus to describe Stephen. Some translations say “martyr,” while others “witness.” Either is correct, depending on the context. It is generally believed that the use of “martyr” came later. Therefore, “witness” is probably a better rendering for this account.
 
Also, as he is speaking to a congregation about the events that occurred and of which they would have been familiar, the idea of Stephen having been a witness seems more appropriate. However, by the time Revelation was written, “martyr” was probably more in use and is probably a correct translation for Revelation 2:13, although even there, “witness” is possible. Of Paul’s conduct at the time of Stephen, he next says, “I also was standing by consenting to his death.”
 
Paul ensures that the account of Stephen is conveyed to them with exacting detail in order to show them the extent of his zeal before his conversion. He was willing to consent to the murderous act of a person because of his belief that it was the right thing to do. He was part of a crowd, not unlike those now standing before him, looking for the blood of the accused.
 
His words are an attempt to show them that just what they were engaged in is what he previously engaged in and for essentially the same reasons. Therefore, there must have been a change in him that converted him to the stand he now took. As for his actions at Stephen’s death, he next says, “and guarding the clothes of those who were killing him.”
 
These were the outer garments of the people who stoned him. Today, we might take off our jackets if we are going to engage in an activity that needs labor or precision of movement. This is true with the outer garments of the Jews. They were flowing and cumbersome for such activities.
 
Therefore, the people would have removed them and placed them near someone trustworthy to watch them. The meaning is that even if Paul did not pick up stones and cast them at Stephen, he was complicit in Stephen’s death through his actions, approving of what was occurring and giving the death a better opportunity to come about.
 
Life application: Paul was a part of the execution of Stephen, even if he never cast a stone. There are ways that groups of people can execute someone where no one person is directly responsible for the person’s death.
 
For example, if a hundred people lined up and each punched someone, none of them might land a death blow, but the person would die from the many blows he received. The same is true with death by a thousand cuts. One little cut on the skin may not kill someone, but when a person is cut many times, he will not survive.
 
Such actions reveal to us that we may know something is wrong, but we will take various legal or quasi-legal avenues to make it happen, thus trying to find a way of exonerating our consciences from the guilt of what we have done. This may occur in divorce situations, business dealings, and so forth.
 
These types of things show us that there is a problem in man that already exists. It is the infection of sin. It is in our lives, and it permeates ourselves and our societies. We all bear guilt for many things that occur. An example of this is found in the law –
 
“So you shall not pollute the land where you are; for blood defiles the land, and no atonement can be made for the land, for the blood that is shed on it, except by the blood of him who shed it.” Numbers 35:33
 
This is a statement that is found in the law, but it follows from a general principle about the nature of God. That can be deduced from other verses that speak of such things in relation to the inhabitants of the land prior to Israel’s entry.
 
As this is so, we collectively bear guilt when we allow murderers to walk free. Abortion is something that cannot be excused, and yet we pass laws allowing it to happen, as if a human law can override a God-centered principle. When we vote for those who will pass such laws, we bear direct responsibility for such deaths.
 
The only way to be free of such sin debt is to come to Jesus and be cleansed. Only through the atonement of His precious shed blood can we ever find restoration with God because of the sin debt that we bear. And when that restoration is made, it is an eternal restoration. Therefore, let us not disgrace what God in Christ has done for us by continuing in sin.
 
Rather, let us be grateful for His gracious atonement and live for Him according to holiness. May we have this attitude, to the glory of God who saved us.
 
We praise You for Your goodness to us Lord God Almighty! Thank You for the forgiveness we have been granted because of the work of Jesus. May we live out our lives in gratitude and holiness all our days. Praises to You for JESUS! Amen.