BIBLE IN TEN

Matthew 8:5

Saturday, 1 March 2025
 
Now when Jesus had entered Capernaum, a centurion came to Him, pleading with Him, Matthew 8:5
 
“And Jesus, having entered into Capernaum, a centurion, he came to Him, invoking Him” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus, having cleansed the leper, instructed him to go directly to the priest and offer the gift commanded by Moses. Now, the narrative changes direction, saying, “And Jesus, having entered into Capernaum.”
 
It should be noted that some manuscripts omit the name of Jesus. For example –
 
“When He entered Capernaum, a centurion came to Him, pleading with Him.” Holman
 
If the inclusion of the name is not original, someone may have inserted it to clarify that it was Jesus, not the leper who entered Capernaum. That seems a bit obvious, however. If the name is original and now missing in those manuscripts, it may be a copyist’s error that came about for one reason or another.
 
Either way, the surrounding context leaves no doubt about who the verse is referring to. Jesus had come down from the mount, met a leper on the way to where He was going, and then continued on to His destination, which was Capernaum. Once inside the city, it next says, “a centurion, he came to Him, invoking Him.”
 
The hekatontarchos, centurion, is introduced here. The word is derived from hekatón, a hundred, and archó, to rule or reign. Thus, he is a Roman soldier who rules over a cohort of one hundred men.
 
It is highly unusual that a man with such authority would actively seek out a Jew, much less plead with him over a matter. In such a position, it would be expected that he might send one of his underlings to Jesus and direct him to do whatever it is he has on his mind. But the man’s approach is an exception.
 
If it is the same account being referred to, which seems likely, the same narrative in Luke 7 gives a bit more background, saying –
 
“So when he heard about Jesus, he sent elders of the Jews to Him, pleading with Him to come and heal his servant. 4 And when they came to Jesus, they begged Him earnestly, saying that the one for whom He should do this was deserving, 5 ‘for he loves our nation, and has built us a synagogue.’” Luke 7:3-5
 
However, no discrepancy between the two should be considered. By sending elders of the Jews instead of one of his underlings, he is making a personal appeal through the elders rather than an authoritative demand through a soldier. The reason for sending the elders is more fully explained in Luke as well.
 
For now, this man has made a personal appeal to Jesus, invoking Him to come for a personal reason. As for translating the word parakaleó as invoke here, the reason is that one of its meanings is to call earnestly for. But there is associated with it the sense of a capability of the one being invoked that is beyond that of the one invoking.
 
For example, one might invoke a spirit, god, lawful edict, etc. This centurion is making a particular appeal to Jesus as an authoritative figure, able to do something that is beyond himself or those whom he is sending. As these are elders, it shows an immense trust in Jesus that extends beyond what one would normally expect of another, including leadership figures in Israel.
 
Life application: The words of Matthew in this account are already setting the stage for what is to become a normal theme from this point on. It is something that was seen, however, early in Matthew when Magi came to the land of Israel to worship the Child.
 
The Gentiles are taking on a position within the narrative that is contrasted to that of the Jews. This might seem out of place, but it is precisely what was prophesied by the Lord through Isaiah –
 
“And in that day there shall be a Root of Jesse,Who shall stand as a banner to the people;For the Gentiles shall seek Him,And His resting place shall be glorious.” Isaiah 11:10
 
As the story of the interaction between Jesus and this centurion continues, ask yourself why the Lord included this account in His word. Then consider the world around you and how it continues to be relevant today. As you read through the book of Acts, consider what it is saying from this same perspective.
 
What is God looking for? The answer is faith. Pay attention to this key point. Both testaments of Scripture ultimately reveal this truth.
 
Lord God, may we be people of faith who live faithfully in Your presence. Give us the willpower and focus to not get distracted by our own supposed goodness or our own good deeds. Rather, may we understand that who we are, what we have, and what we can offer are all given by You and belong to You. May we align our lives to show that we believe this is true. Amen.

Matthew 8:4

Friday, 28 February 2025
 
And Jesus said to him, “See that you tell no one; but go your way, show yourself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, as a testimony to them.” Matthew 8:4
 
“And Jesus, He says to him, ‘You see you tell none, but you go, you show yourself to the priest, and you present the gift that Moses, he commanded, for a testimony to them’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus reached out His hand and willingly touched the leper. In this act, the leper was immediately cleansed. Next, it says, “And Jesus, He says to him, ‘You see you tell none.”
 
The reason for this injunction is debated. The Pulpit Commentary refers to several different views to consider –
 
(1) to save the man from temptation to self-importance; or
 
(2) to prevent any rumour of the miracle coming to the ears of the recognized authorities, and thus prejudicing them in their verdict upon his case; or, and more probably,
 
(3) for the Lord's sake, for this seems to be the reason for the command in all the other occasions when it is given (Matthew 9:30; Matthew 12:16; Matthew 17:9; Mark 5:43; Mark 7:36; Mark 8:26; cf. Mark 1:34; Mark 3:12). The Lord did not desire to be thronged with multitudes who came only to see his miracles; he would work in quiet (cf. the quotation from Isaiah in Matthew 12:18-21).
 
Although the Pulpit Commentary’s third point receives their note of it being the likely explanation, it actually seems unlikely. The reason for this is what it just said as the chapter opened –
 
“When He had come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed Him. 2 And behold, a leper came and worshiped Him, saying, ‘Lord, if You are willing, You can make me clean.’” Matthew 8:1, 2
 
The note that “great multitudes followed Him” is a part of the surrounding context and was stated purposefully. His miracle was, in fact, viewed by many people. This is attested to again in Matthew 8:10 where it notes that Jesus spoke to those who followed, implying the crowd was still there.
 
So why would Jesus instruct this man to tell no one then? The answer is found in the rest of the verse, beginning with, “but you go, you show yourself to the priest.”
 
This is the first mention of the hiereus, priest, in the New Testament. The word is derived from hierós, meaning sacred, holy, set apart, etc. This is a person set apart, belonging to the temple, thus, a priest. Jesus told the man to go to the priest because, as is recorded in Leviticus 14, it says –
 
“Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 2 ‘This shall be the law of the leper for the day of his cleansing: He shall be brought to the priest.’” Leviticus 14:1, 2
 
From there, the ritual required for the cleansed leper is recorded all the way through Leviticus 14:32. The reason why Jesus instructed the man to tell no one is that if he ran home and started telling his family and friends he was back, cleansed from his uncleanness, he would be in violation of the law.
 
First and foremost, his responsibility was to receive the rites of the law. As it says in Leviticus 14:20, “So the priest shall make atonement for him, and he shall be clean.” The validation of his cleansing was necessary for him to be deemed clean. If he was at home celebrating without this validation, then there would be a person not yet deemed clean among the people.
 
Jesus purposefully spoke to the man in this way in front of the thronging crowd to show that the man was instructed to be fully obedient to the Law of Moses. Thus, Jesus was not promoting disobedience but full obedience. That continues to be seen with the next words, “and you present the gift that Moses, he commanded, for a testimony to them.”
 
Here is another new word, marturion, a witness or testimony. It speaks of something evidential. It is where our modern word martyr is derived from. A martyr’s life is something evidential concerning the witness he bears.
 
As for the gift Moses commanded, that is what is recorded in Leviticus 14 as noted above. It was a requirement set forth in the law. To not offer this would be a violation of the law.
 
Life application: The proverb says –
 
“The first one to plead his cause seems right,Until his neighbor comes and examines him.” Proverb 18:17
 
Several views concerning Jesus’ words about telling no one were presented above. Any of them might seem correct when someone presents his case concerning the meaning. You might say, “Yeah, that makes sense.” But then someone else will say, “No, the reason must be this...” From there you might say, “Yeah, that makes more sense.”
 
When someone adds in their thoughts with the word probably attached to them, then you might say, “Well, he is an authority, and he has checked out the possibilities. Therefore, he is probably right. That makes the most sense of all.” However, words like probably are subjective and need to still be considered carefully.
 
By checking the context, it is seen that their “probably” is completely incorrect. Many people saw and heard. They would have gone and told what they saw. Jesus was purposefully doing what He was doing in front of many so that they would bear witness that He was doing everything in accord with the law.
 
Be sure to not get caught up in the first opinion you read. Check many views, reread the passage along with the surrounding context, and then come to your conclusion. You may find what seemed right at first is actually incorrect.
 
Lord God, help us to carefully consider Your word as we read it. May we not be sent down wrong paths of understanding, but give us the wisdom to check what we are told and to verify if it is right. Help us to be responsible in our understanding of Your word through right doctrine. Amen.

Matthew 8:3

Thursday, 27 February 2025
 
Then Jesus put out His hand and touched him, saying, “I am willing; be cleansed.” Immediately his leprosy was cleansed. Matthew 8:3
 
“And having outstretched the hand, Jesus – He touched him, saying, ‘I desire. You be cleansed.’ And immediately his leprosy, it was cleansed” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus was approached by a leper who prostrated himself before Him and noted that the Lord could cleanse him if He desired. Now, in response to that, it next says, “And having outstretched the hand.”
 
There is a new word, ekteinó, to stretch out. It is found only in the gospels and Acts. It is derived from ek, out of or from, and teinó, to stretch. Thus, it signifies to outstretch, extend, or even cast out as in the casting out of anchors on a ship. In putting His hand forward, it is an indication that He was unafraid of catching the leprosy from the man. And so, it next says, “Jesus – He touched him.”
 
Here is another new word, haptomai. The meaning behind the word is to attach oneself, but the context gives the broader sense of what is being conveyed. HELPS Word Studies says, “(‘to modify or change by touching’) – properly, ‘touching that influences’ (modifies); touching someone (something) in a way that alters (changes, modifies) them, i.e. ‘impact-touching.’”
 
Jesus’ response through outstretching His hand and touching him is to effect a change in the leper in some manner. Along with His touching him, He was “saying, ‘I desire. You be cleansed.’”
 
Although the instructions for dealing with leprosy in Leviticus 13 do not explicitly say a person is made unclean by touching a leper, it can be inferred from elsewhere, such as –
 
“Or if a person touches any unclean thing, whether it is the carcass of an unclean beast, or the carcass of unclean livestock, or the carcass of unclean creeping things, and he is unaware of it, he also shall be unclean and guilty.” Leviticus 5:2
 
Leprosy caused a state of uncleanness. That is explicit in Leviticus 13:3 and elsewhere. Therefore, verses such as Leviticus 5:2, along with many others in Leviticus, reveal that in touching something or someone unclean, the uncleanness transfers to the individual. Depending on the situation, it required a minimum of washing oneself and being in a state of uncleanliness until evening.
 
Despite this, Jesus touched the man. With that done, and with a note that He was willing to cleanse him, it next says, “And immediately his leprosy, it was cleansed.”
 
The change was instantaneous, having gone from one state to the next. As the man is clean, how could Jesus be accused of being unclean? Did a state of uncleanliness transfer to Him, or did a state of cleanliness exist that overshadowed the man’s state of uncleanliness?
 
The debate among the crowd, especially among the scribes and Pharisees probably went on and on. But the fact is that the man was cleansed. As this was so, how could they prove a state of uncleanliness in Jesus? Indeed, they could not. The man was standing there without leprosy.
 
Life application: Human beings are born in a state of uncleanliness. This is due to being born with a state of inherited sin. No human is acceptable to God in this state. This is a truth fully and explicitly stated in Scripture. And yet, in coming to Christ, that state is changed.
 
The wages of sin is death. However, eternal life is promised to those who believe in Jesus and His completed work. If this is so, then there can no longer be sin associated with that person. This is also explicit in Scripture –
 
“Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation, 19 that is, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation.” 2 Corinthians 5:18, 19
 
Not only are past sins forgiven, but the person – because he is in Christ and no longer under law – no longer has sin imputed to him. The problem is law. It is the problem that must be worked through in order to no longer be imputed sin.
 
Jesus fulfilled the law. His fulfillment of the law is credited to anyone who believes in Him. As this is so, law is annulled in that person. Without law, sin is no longer imputed. Jesus is demonstrating this to Israel, teaching them a truth that they completely missed.
 
If God never said, “A person with leprosy is unclean,” then there would be no imputation of uncleanliness in another person who touched him. But by giving the law, uncleanliness is transferred. The Bible uses tangible states of being to convey to us spiritual truths. There is nothing in the Christian faith today that says a person is unclean if he touches something forbidden by the law.
 
So why on earth do people keep going back and putting themselves under the law? We must consider what Christ has done, accept it as fully capable of bringing us near to God, and then rest in His completion of everything necessary to accomplish that. Trust in this! It is what God expects of you.
 
Glorious God, thank You for cleansing us from all of our impurity through the precious blood of Christ. We praise You for what You have done. Hallelujah and amen.
 

Matthew 8:2

Wednesday, 26 February 2025
 
And behold, a leper came and worshiped Him, saying, “Lord, if You are willing, You can make me clean.” Matthew 8:2
 
“And behold! A leper having come, he worshipped Him, saying, ‘Lord, if you desire, you can cleanse me.’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus came down from the mountain with great multitudes following him. Now, it says, “And behold! A leper.”
 
It is a new word, lepros, a leper. It is derived from the same root as lepra, leprosy. That root is lepis, a scale, such as that seen in Acts 9:18. In turn, that comes from lepó, to peel. From this, one can see that the affliction is a scaly, peeling disease.
 
A person with such an affliction was unclean according to the law. The requirements for such diseases are meticulously recorded in Leviticus 13. Of anyone with such an affliction, the law said –
 
“Now the leper on whom the sore is, his clothes shall be torn and his head bare; and he shall cover his mustache, and cry, ‘Unclean! Unclean!’ 46 He shall be unclean. All the days he has the sore he shall be unclean. He is unclean, and he shall dwell alone; his dwelling shall be outside the camp.” Leviticus 13:45, 46
 
Such a person, therefore, would be an outcast. There was to be no physical contact with him due to his state of uncleanness. However, this person, hearing about Jesus – probably from the crowds talking and considering Him the Messiah – believed he could be healed by Him. Therefore, it next says, “having come, he worshipped Him.”
 
The word proskuneó is the same as that used when the Magi came to worship the Child in Matthew 2 and when the Traducer asked for worship in Matthew 4. It is variously translated as worship, bowed down, prostrated, etc.
 
Such a gesture does not mean the man thought Jesus was God. It would be the same as coming before a high-ranking Roman authority, a king, etc. Each instance demands its own interpretation and the viewpoints on such things will vary based on the context, presuppositions, etc.
 
In some instances later, it is obvious that Jesus is being worshipped with the same reverence as God. In this one, however, that fact was yet unknown to the people. But if He was thought to be the Messiah, He would be God’s promised representative.
 
If one were to understand the implication of the prophetic words, they would be able to deduce that this coming One was the God/Man, but there is no indication the people understood this –
 
“‘Behold Me – Sending My messenger,And turned way to My facesAnd instantly comes unto His temple,The Lord, whom you seek,And Messenger the covenant,Whom you – delighted.Behold! Coming!’Said Yehovah Sabaoth.” Malachi 3:1 (CG)
 
Regardless of the act, bowing for honor or worshiping as the Lord, the leper was “saying, ‘Lord, if you desire, you can cleanse me.’”
 
The word translated as “Lord,” likewise has a variety of meanings based on the context. It can mean a superior of any kind or even a person who is greatly respected. It can also be applied to the Lord God. Again, regardless of what this person thought about Jesus’ nature, he was convinced that He could perform this cleansing.
 
The word is katharizó, to cleanse or purify. The man was unclean according to the law. His concern was to be cleansed. The cleansing, however, implies healing. One cannot be clean under the law unless he is healed of this type of affliction. The main concern here, however, is cleansing.
 
Depending on one’s state, he could be healed and yet still unclean for some other reason. What this person wants is to be fully cleansed. Thus, he would be healed and also acceptable to return to enjoy living among the people in that state.
 
This is the first direct account of the healing of an individual by Jesus. In Matthew 4, it did say –
 
“And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all kinds of sickness and all kinds of disease among the people. 24 Then His fame went throughout all Syria; and they brought to Him all sick people who were afflicted with various diseases and torments, and those who were demon-possessed, epileptics, and paralytics; and He healed them.” Matthew 4:23, 24
 
This person had probably heard of the healings previously conducted along with the words of the crowd as He passed through this city. In hearing these things, he had the faith to know he too could be cleansed by Jesus.
 
Life application: The healings recorded in the gospels and Acts are there for the reason of proving Jesus is the Messiah. They are recorded at times as an indication of individual faith by those who were healed. They were recorded at times to demonstrate a lack of faith by those who should have possessed it, such as in Matthew 17:14-21.
 
The purpose of these events has been met. Israel was given sufficient evidence that Jesus was the Messiah. Likewise, the authority of Jesus among the apostles and the early church stood as a witness to Israel that God’s favor had moved from Israel to the church.
 
Because those purposes have been met, there is no longer a need for miracle healing. Making claims on healing, as is so common in the church, demonstrates a misunderstanding of the purpose of Scripture and it demonstrates an arrogance in the one claiming such healing because the Bible does not align with the claims.
 
At times, for example, Paul was able to simply heal at a command. However, he prayed for the healing of others many times. Sometimes, Paul was unable to heal others, and the person’s affliction remained. This was true of Trophimus (2 Timothy 4:20) and Timothy (1 Timothy 5:23), among others.
 
The Bible does not provide the authority for the church today to claim healing. We are to pray for healing and allow the Lord to determine if it will happen or not. Anything beyond that is presumptuous and inappropriate.
 
Lord God, we are to live by faith. May our prayers for the healing of others be faithfully presented to You. May we never arrogantly demand from You, remembering that we may have afflictions that suit Your purposes. Lord, with the strength to praise You, even in times of affliction, may we be content. Amen.
 

Matthew 8:1

Tuesday, 25 February 2025
 
When He had come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed Him. Matthew 8:1
 
“And He having come down from the mountain, great crowds – they followed Him” (CG).
 
The previous verse ended Chapter 7. Chapter 8 closes out the event we call the Sermon on the Mount beginning with the words, “And He having come down from the mountain.”
 
The reason for going up the mountain to preach is not stated. All it said as Chapter 5 opened was, “And seeing the multitudes, He went up on a mountain, and when He was seated His disciples came to Him” (Matthew 5:1). It could be that because of the multitudes, He expected more room to preach and still be seen and heard. A level area might be more difficult to speak to so many.
 
In the spot believed to be where the sermon was conducted, today known as the Mount of Beatitudes, the acoustics are said to be well suited to such a discourse. It could also be that teaching in such an area was to give the sense of exaltation of His words. Moses received the law from an elevation on Mount Sinai.
 
When receiving the law, Moses was alone on the mount. On the other hand, while Jesus spoke, He was surrounded by people. In fact, at the giving of the Law of Moses, it said –
 
“You shall set bounds for the people all around, saying, ‘Take heed to yourselves that you do not go up to the mountain or touch its base. Whoever touches the mountain shall surely be put to death. 13 Not a hand shall touch him, but he shall surely be stoned or shot with an arrow; whether man or beast, he shall not live.’ When the trumpet sounds long, they shall come near the mountain.” Exodus 19:12, 13
 
The first account, at the giving of the law, shows the inaccessibility of man to God through the law. On the other hand, the latter account of the Sermon on the Mount demonstrates access to God through Christ’s fulfillment of the law just as He noted He would do in Matthew 5:17.
 
Nothing done by Jesus is without significance, including going up the mountain to speak His words to the disciples and the others who gathered.
 
Understanding this, it next says that “great crowds – they followed Him.” These would certainly include all those descending after the instruction He provided. But it probably would have included many more who heard that His words were astonishing and that He was probably the Messiah. Hence, there would be a great throng following Him.
 
This would then provide a chance for many to witness the events that will next be revealed by Matthew as His narrative continues.
 
Life application: As you read the unfolding events recorded in the gospels, think about why the surrounding words are included in the movements Jesus makes. Why did He go up on a mountain to speak? Why did He immediately come down from the mountain when He was finished? Why will He go to Capernaum instead of another nearby town?
 
Each thing is there for a reason as Jesus’ life and actions form walking parables of what God wants us to see and consider. Just as the land of Israel – its geography, layout, and location in relation to other countries and people groups – is used to teach us spiritual truths, so is the life of Jesus as He interacts with the people in the land.
 
God’s word is precise and filled with details that have importance. Remember this and consider the surrounding events in relation to the rest of Scripture. Hints of the very process of man’s redemption in relation to the dispensations of time are being provided. They will be revealed to those who consider them and align them with the rest of what is recorded in the word.
 
Lord God, what a precious and wonderful word You have given to us. Thank You for the intricate details that are being used to teach us truths about Jesus and His work in relation to the rest of Scripture. Thank You! Thank You, O God for revealing Your heart to us through the revealing of Jesus. Amen.

Matthew 7:29

Monday, 24 February 2025
 
for He taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes. Matthew 7:29
 
“For He was teaching them as having authority, and not as the scribes” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, it noted that the people were astonished at Jesus’ teaching. Next, it explains why it was so, saying, “For He was teaching them as having authority.”
 
Of the coming Messiah, Isaiah prophesied –
 
“Who has believed our report?And to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?For He shall grow up before Him as a tender plant,And as a root out of dry ground.He has no form or comeliness;And when we see Him,There is no beauty that we should desire Him.” Isaiah 53:1, 2
 
Jesus didn’t come with great looks. We have no idea what His oratory skills were like, meaning the eloquence of the delivery of His messages. However, the content of what He said stunned those who listened to Him. They were outstruck as they considered His words.
 
Matthew says He was as having “authority.” The word is new, eksousía, coming from ek, “out or from,” and which intensifies eimí, “to be, being as a right or privilege” HELPS Word Studies says of this word, “authority, conferred power; delegated empowerment (‘authorization’), operating in a designated jurisdiction.”
 
It was the empowered nature of His words, stating them as if authoritative. Taking the roots of the word eksousía, one can see the intent. His words were “out-being.” The authority, the “out-being” He possessed, was transferred to the content of His words. This then is set in contrast to the next words, “and not as the scribes.”
 
The scribes may have been handsome, rich, very eloquent, etc., but their words lacked the “out-being” necessary to convince the people of what they taught. They treated the Mosaic code as a means to an end. Jesus has not done that. He has spoken of the end of the code, noting that it was authoritative and applicable until He fulfilled it (Matthew 5:17, 18).
 
He then explained the true weight of the law, meaning how God viewed it in relation to His people. From there, He continued to explain things in a manner that no person had ever done so before, revealing things that were expected of the people that they had never considered as such. The scribes did not, nor could they.
 
They had placed their hopes in Moses and forgotten that Moses prophesied of another who would come. John 5 notes this several times. Thus, Jesus set Himself apart from the other teachers. Not only did He speak with authority, but He did so claiming that He was the authority that Moses pointed to.
 
Life application: Churches around the world look for pastors with charisma. They seek out people with exceptional oratory skills as well. They will have big bands with long musical shows each Sunday.
 
Christian TV is filled with this kind of stuff. And yet, those who know the Bible well enough can tell that what is presented is lipstick on a pig. Having excellent elocution doesn’t mean the content is proper or authoritative. But, because of such oration, people who are uninformed will believe it and follow them.
 
Praising God through music is something the Bible not only condones but promotes. However, it is to be based on alignment with Scripture, not emotion with Jesus tossed in as a bonus. We all need to be careful to not get caught up in what is unimportant in our church-seeking lives.
 
Rather, we should be looking for adherence to the word and a proper exposition of it before all else. But we cannot do this if we don’t know the word. Read your Bible.
 
Lord God, help us to be responsible about knowing Your word. May we diligently make it a priority every day of our lives. Help us to not get caught up in sensationalism or hype, but to be careful, contemplative, cautious, and conservative in our approach to Your precious word. Amen.

Matthew 7:28

Sunday, 23 February 2025
 
And so it was, when Jesus had ended these sayings, that the people were astonished at His teaching, Matthew 7:28
 
“And it was when Jesus, He had completed the words, these, the crowds – they were outstruck at His teaching” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus finished His words about the houses built on the rock or on sand. That finished His speaking and the words now are given to show the people’s reaction. They begin with, “And it was when Jesus, He had completed the words, these.”
 
It is a summary statement that covers everything from Matthew 5:1 –
 
“And seeing the multitudes, He went up on a mountain, and when He was seated His disciples came to Him. 2 Then He opened His mouth and taught them, saying...”
 
From that point, Jesus methodically worked through a vast number of subjects and points on theology, finishing up with Matthew 7:27. The content of His words surpasses the thoughts of the greatest theologians to have ever lived, and people are still learning new insights from them two thousand years later.
 
Because of the volume of information He presented, surely without any prepared notes, overhead projectors, or video displays, the minds of those who heard would have been packed full. Because of this, it next says, “the crowds – they were outstruck at His teaching.”
 
Notice the difference between the opening and closing thoughts of the sermon –
 
5:2 - ...and when He was seated His disciples came to Him. 2 Then He opened His mouth and taught them, saying
7:28 - ...the crowds – they were outstruck at His teaching.
 
Jesus taught the disciples. However, others joined the instruction who listened intently. These would be those mentioned at the end of Matthew 4 –
 
“Great multitudes followed Him—from Galilee, and from Decapolis, Jerusalem, Judea, and beyond the Jordan.” Matthew 4:25
 
Wherever Jesus went, crowds thronged Him. This crowd, however, didn’t just get physical healing as noted in Matthew 4. They got doctrine never before heard. It must have been an incredible thing for them. Because of this instruction, Matthew uses the word ekpléssó, outstruck.
 
The word is derived from ek (out, from) and pléssó, to pound, strike, smite, etc. A comparable English word, here given a new context and meaning, would be “outstruck.” The people were completely floored by what they heard.
 
Life application: The Sermon on the Mount is complete. It is a teaching that has provided people with a lot of hope and inspiration over the millennia. However, it is a teaching that also has brought a lot of misunderstanding and confusion to those who follow Jesus. The reason for this can be summed up with one word, context.
 
The context of Jesus’ words is instruction to Israel while under the law. Although there are precepts found in the teaching that convey eternal truths that everyone should apply to their lives, the overall tenor of His words is given to Israel. They were spoken prior to the completion of His ministry, and a great deal of what He said is now set aside.
 
This is explained in the book of Hebrews with verses like the following, each of which is referring to the Law of Moses:
 
“For on the one hand there is an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness, 19 for the law made nothing perfect; on the other hand, there is the bringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God.” Hebrews 7:18, 19
 
“In that He says, ‘A new covenant,’ He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.” Hebrews 8:13
 
“Previously saying, ‘Sacrifice and offering, burnt offerings, and offerings for sin You did not desire, nor had pleasure in them’ (which are offered according to the law), 9 then He said, ‘Behold, I have come to do Your will, O God.’ He takes away the first that He may establish the second.” Hebrews 10:8, 9
 
These verses concerning the end of the law are confirmed by Paul quite a few times in his epistles as well.
 
Remember this context and then as you read through the Sermon on the Mount in the future, be sure to apply it to what you read. In so doing, you will avoid a great deal of theological error and even contradiction in your understanding of Scripture.
 
Lord God, thank You for Your precious word that conveys life and hope to Your people through its contents. In it, we find Jesus. And in Jesus, we find Your love for the people of the world. Thank You for tending to Your people as You have done. Amen.
 

Matthew 7:27

Saturday, 22 February 2025
 
and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it fell. And great was its fall.” Matthew 7:27
“And the rain, it descended. And the floods, they came. And the winds, they blew. And they struck the house, that. And it fell, and the falling of it, it was great” (CG).
 
The previous verse conveyed Jesus’ words concerning the foolish man who built his house on the sand. Of him, it next says, “And the rain, it descended.” The words are identical to the corresponding clause in verse 7:25.
 
The house is built, its foundation is on sand, and there will be a result forthcoming, just as with the house built on the rock. But what will this result be? Before it comes, the rains have to be sufficient to test the matter. That is noted in Jesus’ next words, saying, “And the floods, they came.”
 
Again, the words are letter for letter identical to the corresponding clause in Matthew 7:25. With sufficient rain, the water begins to amass and move along. Along with the rains, stormy conditions came, as indicated in the next words, “And the winds, they blew.”
 
The identical wording continues here. Such accompanying winds are not unexpected, even with a small shower, but when combined with heavy rains and flooding, the winds will add extra stress to a structure. Obviously, the more wind, the more stress is then laid against it. Jesus next continues with, “And they struck towards the house, that.”
 
The words contain a single small change from the corresponding clause in verse 7:25 –
 
25 And they fell towards [prospiptó] the house, that.27 And they struck towards [proskoptó] the house, that.
 
The house on the rock had rains fall toward it, but it remained unaffected by them. The implication seems to be that by building on the rock, the house was elevated enough to avoid being struck. On the other hand, the house on the sand was right where the floods were moving. Instead of merely falling towards the house, they struck towards it. Surging against it.
 
Depending on the swiftness of the water, this rushing water would have at least two major effects. The first is to actively hit against the house. The second is to subduct the house as the waters swirled around it. Because of at least one and possibly both actions raging against the house, Jesus says, “And it fell, and the falling of it, it was great.”
 
The contrast is set forth for the hearer to mentally heed and attend to –
 
Rock: And it fell not, for it had been founded upon the rock.Sand: And it fell, and the falling of it, it was great.
 
In life, a little care and planning can go a long way. As this is true with physical things that we encounter, Jesus is demonstrating through metaphor how much more important it is concerning spiritual things. His words are a foundation of rock when they are heeded and adhered to. Failing to do so leaves one’s future resting on the shifting sands of doom.
 
Life application: In 2024, three hurricanes hit the area of Sarasota, Florida within just 2 months and 4 days. The damage was extensive, and the words of Jesus were proven true concerning houses. The barrier islands are only sand. They can take a certain amount of wind and flooding, but even with a mild hurricane, there will be changes to the topography.
 
With larger storms, entire sections of land can be cut through, making two islands out of one. Houses sitting on a sandy foundation can be lifted up and swept away. Those with concrete foundations will withstand more before disaster comes. Those with piles driven deep into the ground, and which are then elevated above ground level, will generally stand even more raging winds and water.
 
Advance planning and careful thought are needed to determine what type of foundation will work best in any given location. But the point is that a stable foundation will always outlast a less stable one.
 
If one bases his life’s decision on the words of Scripture, there can be no surer foundation for things to turn out well. This doesn’t mean in this life. Too many people use the words of Scripture almost as a talisman to claim this life will be carefree and without complication when they are adhered to. But there is no guarantee in the Bible for this.
 
Rather, the surety is in what is spiritual and eternal. What happens here is often common to all men. Hurricanes hit both believers and nonbelievers. Economic collapses will affect both as well. This is a fallen world, and difficulties are to be expected. However, adherence to the word will bring salvation and reward on top of that.
 
Call on Jesus to be saved. That is recorded in the word. Live in faith and conduct your life in faith and rewards will be credited to you. This is also recorded in the word. Pay heed to what it says. It is the blueprint and guide for living in the presence of our glorious Creator.
 
Lord God, when we properly consider and apply Your word, things will go well with our relationship with You. When we fail to do so, we are the ones who put up the wall between us. You have made the way known and the path smooth if we will just follow it according to what You have set forth. Help us, O God, to use wisdom and properly follow You all our days. Amen.

Matthew 7:26

Friday, 21 February 2025
 
“But everyone who hears these sayings of Mine, and does not do them, will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand: Matthew 7:26
 
“And all the hearing – these, My words – and not doing them, he will be likened to a moronic man who – he built his house upon the sand” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus described the state of the house that was founded on the rock. Now, He begins a contrasting thought, saying, “And all the hearing – these, My words – and not doing them.”
 
Jesus, speaking as a state of fact concerning what He says conveys to His disciples the thought that His words are necessarily to be heeded. In doing so, there is to be one result. However, in failing to do so, there will be another. Of this alternative result, He next says, “he will be likened to a moronic man.”
 
The adjective móros, moronic, has already been seen in Matthew 5:22. It speaks of a dull, mentally inert person or someone lacking a grip on reality. This is the state of someone who hears Jesus’ words and doesn’t heed them.
 
It is as if there is an electric outlet in front of him saying, “Caution, electrical hazard.” And yet, he extends his index finger and shoves it in the socket anyway.
 
Jesus is speaking words of life. To reject them means death lies ahead. Hence, rejecting what He says is truly moronic. Understanding that, Jesus again provides a metaphor for understanding, saying, “who – he built his house upon the sand.”
 
The word ammos, sand, is introduced. It is derived from hama, an adverb meaning together, at the same time, or along with. One can see the connection when considering innumerable grains of sand on the beach all lying together.
 
Despite this unity, there is no true cohesion. Sand is not bound together but simply rests freely along with their billions of partners to form the borders between the oceans and the dry land. Sand performs its particular function, but one thing it is not good for is stability as a foundation.
 
Life application: Jesus has been speaking since Matthew 5 about various issues. His words have been filled with the wisdom of God because He is the God/Man. Once people understand this, they immediately want to reread and carefully consider what He says. It would be foolish to know that what He says is to be heeded and then to ignore His teachings.
 
However, as has been seen, the audience and surrounding context must be considered. When there is a seeming conflict or even contradiction between the words of Jesus in the gospels and the words of the apostles in Acts or the epistles, a state of confusion can result in the minds of the readers.
 
For those who fail to consider the context properly, an “all or nothing” mentality arises. In other words, “If Jesus said this and it appears to be contradicted by what Paul says, I must follow Jesus and reject Paul.”
 
This false dilemma eventually results in arrogant or uninformed proclamations, such as, “Who are you going to trust, Jesus or Paul?” The responsible answer to this should be, “Both, with their words being considered in their proper context.”
 
We are to instruct others in what is proper concerning this matter. At times, there are those who will utterly reject such a notion because they are steeped in whatever theology they have been taught and they are unwilling to consider anything else.
 
However, for those who understand that God is working in dispensations and laying out a program for the world to see and understand His ways, such seeming contradictions immediately clear up.
 
Peter, Paul, and the other writers of the epistles are not contradicting Jesus’ words. Instead, they are building their thoughts upon His completed work and instructing their audience on what the completion of that work means for the people of the world. Once this is understood, the purpose of the law and Jesus’ instruction under it becomes obvious.
 
Keep things in context and contemplate why disparate thoughts are not contradictory but are merely teachings that belong in different theological boxes from other teachings. When the boxes are kept separate, there will be soundness of doctrine to guide you.
 
Lord God, help us to be diligent in contemplating Your word. May our walk with You be appropriate according to the times in which we live. We have the fulfillment of Christ’s work behind us, and so, we have the freedom from law that comes with it. Thank You for this walk of freedom in the grace of Christ Jesus. Amen.
 

Matthew 7:25

Thursday, 20 February 2025
 
and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it did not fall, for it was founded on the rock. Matthew 7:25
 
“And the rain, it descended. And the floods, they came. And the winds, they blew. And they fell towards the house, that. And it fell not, for it had been founded upon the rock” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus noted that he who hears His sayings and then does them is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. He continues that thought next, saying, “And the rain, it descended.”
 
Jesus gives the first of several short thoughts, one following right after the next. This first one contains a new word, broché, rain. It is only seen here and again in verse 7:27. It is derived from the verb brechó, to rain.
 
This is something that happens all the time in Israel. However, there are times when the rain is especially heavy or that lasts longer than normal. In such instances, the rains overflow the lands. In such instances, Jesus gives the next short thought, “And the floods, they came.”
 
Another new word is seen, potamos, a flood. It speaks of a flood, be it a running river, water that is unrestrained and flows heavily, etc. It is believed to be a derivative of the word pino, to imbibe or drink. Jesus uses the word metaphorically in John 7:38 when speaking of rivers of living water flowing out of the heart of the one who believes in Him.
 
In the case of Jesus’ words now, the word is plural, floods. The rain has come in such quantities as to flood everything in the area. This can be especially catastrophic depending on where a person is situated during such an event. But this rain and flooding is not all that has occurred. Jesus next says, “And the winds, they blew.”
 
The word pneó is first seen here. It is a primary word meaning to breathe hard. As such, it further signifies to blow or breathe as the wind does. It isn’t just a deluge, but a strong storm that is raging. The winds, along with the flooding, can be quite disastrous.
 
Anyone who has been through a major event like this can testify that it is frightening and dangerous. In the case of the wise man’s house, He says, “And they fell towards the house, that.”
 
The word translated as “fell towards” is prospiptó. It is derived from pros, toward, and piptó, to fall. It has already been seen when describing someone falling down and worshiping. The rains fell in the direction of the house. The floods then fell towards it. Along with them, the winds fell toward it. The entire scene taken together is like a barrage set against that house. And yet, Jesus next says, “And it fell not, for it had been founded upon the rock.”
 
Jesus uses yet another new word, themelioó. It signifies “to lay a basis for,” coming from themelios, a foundation. Thus, it is to found, as in setting a foundation to ensure rigidity. In this case, the word is used in the pluperfect tense. The person had completed the founding of his house in the past. Because he prepared in advance, the foundation was solid and stood when the violence of the elements was thrust upon it.
 
Remembering now that Jesus is equating the founding of this house to hearing and doing His words completes the thought in the mind. When one hears the word of Christ, heeds it, and follows through by applying His words to his life, the greatest trials of life will not prevail over him.
 
What He says here must naturally be taken in the proper context of the times, meaning the dispensation of the law, the audience, meaning the people of Israel under the law, and the situation, meaning heeding the word of God as it has been presented in contrast to the traditions, incorrect teachings, or falsities that have been introduced into the lives of the people.
 
Eventually, Jesus will fulfill the law and these things will have to be considered from that light. However, that has not yet occurred. He is telling the people to trust His word of instruction and to then see how it will fit into the greater context of His ministry as He continues on the path toward the cross.
 
Life application: It is wholly inappropriate for those in the church to insert themselves into the words of Jesus at this time. What Jesus is saying is instruction to God’s people while they are living under the law. This was clearly stated by Him in Matthew 6:32 where He contrasted the people He was speaking to, meaning Israel, to the Gentiles.
 
This confirms that He was not speaking to the Gentiles. It also means that the Gentiles were not under the law, an obvious point, but one that continues to escape so many in the world today. This does not mean that Jesus’ words do not have value for the instruction of the church, but that the context must be considered.
 
“All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.” 2 Timothy 3:16, 17
 
All Scripture is useful and profitable, but it must be taught or contemplated while considering the surrounding context.
 
Lord God, help us to consider Your word in the appropriate way that You intend. We are to learn from those things that are stated but not directed specifically to us, and we are to apply those precepts that apply to us today. May we not confuse the intended audience of the words as we consider them. Help us to remember this truth. Amen.
 

Matthew 7:24

Wednesday, 19 February 2025
 
“Therefore whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock: Matthew 7:24
 
“Therefore, everyone – whoever he hears these, My words, and he does them, I will liken him to a wise man who, he built his house upon the rock” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told those who claimed to do things in His name but who do not do His Father’s will that He never knew them and to depart from Him. He now makes a general conclusion concerning the things He has been saying, beginning with, “Therefore, everyone – whoever he hears these, My words.”
 
Jesus is summing up the entirety of the Sermon on the Mount which began in Matthew 5:1. There, it specifically said that when He was seated, His disciples came to Him. From there it said, “Then He opened His mouth and taught them.”
 
Despite this being an address specifically to them, the coming verses will show that it was a larger crowd gathered there who listened. These were all people of Israel, living under the Law of Moses, and who anticipated the coming of Messiah.
 
It is clear from His discourse that He is speaking with the authority of the Father, whether they each realize it or not. Regardless of whether all did or not, He has set forth precepts that have shown the higher standard expected of the law. If the people accepted His words, they would see that more was required than mere rote observance.
 
God is looking at the heart and intent behind what people do. All of this instruction, then, is pointing beyond the law to faith in Him. Jesus is giving them the final tutoring under the law in His ministry. When He is complete, and His work is finished, He will offer a new direction based on His tutoring. It is a foundation that is based on Him and His words.
 
That continues to be seen with His next words, “and he does them.” Jesus has said a lot in these three chapters. However, the key point in what He has said is to be found in verse 5:17 –
 
“You, deem not that I came to disintegrate the law or the prophets. Not, I came to disintegrate but to fulfill” (CG).
 
Jesus didn’t come to ignore the law. Nor did He come to tell people they didn’t need to do the things of the law. Remember that He is talking to Israel under the law. They were bound to it. If He told them they didn’t have to do the things of the law, He would be violating the words of the Lord in the law.
 
However, He came to both do them and fulfill them. In doing so, He could then introduce a New Covenant with a new direction for the people. Hence, doing His words, as He just said, is inclusive of what He will say throughout His ministry. It is not limited to the words of these three chapters. That was seen in verse 7:21 –
 
“Not all, the ‘saying to Me, “Lord, Lord,”’ he will enter into the kingdom of the heavens, but the one doing the will of My Father the ‘in heavens’” (CG).
 
One cannot tear the Sermon in the Mount out of the rest of the book and say, “You must do these things, and you will stand approved.” As was seen in the commentary on verse 7:21, doing the will of the Father is equated to doing the works of God. And those works, according to John 6:29, are to believe in the Son whom the Father has sent.
 
For those who do such, Jesus continues with, “I will liken him to a sagacious man who, he built his house upon the rock.”
 
Jesus introduces a few new words. The first in phronimos, sagacious. In Greek, the word sophos refers to being wise, learned, skilled, etc. It focuses on practical skills or acumen. The word phronimos a cautious character. He has keen mental discernment and good judgment.
 
The next new word is oikodomeó, to be a house builder. Thus, it is to construct or figuratively to confirm something. The word ultimately comes from oikos, house, and demō, to build a house.
 
Finally, the word petra, stone, or rock, is used. It is the basis for the name Peter. But this doesn’t mean Peter is the first pope and that Catholicism is the basis and approved structure of the Christian faith. That will be explained in Matthew 16. A leap like that is unfounded and should be demolished (house destroyed) immediately.
 
Jesus is saying that His words are the rock upon which one’s house, his structure of life and faith, should be built. In doing so, there will be a firm foundation. Paul uses the metaphorical use of the word house when referring to our bodies in 2 Corinthians –
 
“For we know that if our earthly house, this tent, is destroyed, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.” 2 Corinthians 5:1
 
As for the rock, Jesus is making a claim that His words are authoritative and have the approval of God. The rock metaphor is found throughout the Old Testament. An example directly from Moses explains the meaning –
 
“For I proclaim the name of the Lord:Ascribe greatness to our God.4 He is the Rock, His work is perfect;For all His ways are justice,A God of truth and without injustice;Righteous and upright is He.” Deuteronomy 32:3, 4
 
Life application: What will be our foundation in our spiritual walk? Will it be a particular church? It is incredible to see how sheeple will follow Roman Catholicism, even right over a ledge of wickedness and perversion to their destruction.
 
Others build their house on their own deeds, trying to earn their place in heaven through law observance, taking Jesus’ words out of their overall context, and claiming that is the way to be pleasing to God.
 
But Jesus is incrementally instructing His people in their need for Him. There is a logical progression of thought being presented from the first pages of the Bible. Each step is part of a much larger body of history that has been recorded to show us what God is doing as He directs our attention to Jesus.
 
Stopping at any particular step or ignoring the focus of God’s calling of our attention to Jesus will result in a faulty understanding of what we are being shown. The point of Jesus’ coming is not to establish something beyond Himself, like a church filled with sexually deviant priests. Nor is it to show us how we must repeat what Jesus has already done by observing the Law of Moses.
 
Rather, we are to direct our attention to Jesus. Hebrews 12:2 sums it up, “Eyeballing unto the ‘the faith Pioneer and Perfecter,’ Jesus” (CG). Nothing else will do. All else will lead to a sad end.
 
Heavenly Father, may we rightly consider Your plan of redemption, understanding that Jesus is the focus of it and that in honoring Jesus, we are honoring You. Help us to never forget this fundamental point in our lives. Amen.
 

Matthew 7:23

Tuesday, 18 February 2025
 
And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’ Matthew 7:23
 
“And then, I will assent to them that, ‘Never I knew you! You depart from Me – Those working lawlessness!’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus spoke of those who will call out saying that they had prophesied in His name, cast out demons in His name, and done many wonders in His name. And yet, it will be seen that their conduct was not because of faith in Him. That is realized in His next words which begin with, “And then, I will assent to them.”
 
The word homologeó is introduced here. It is derived from homou, the same or together, and logos, a word, as in a statement or speech. Thus, the thought is more than just “declare.” It signifies to agree with or speak the same. As such, it means to assent, a word defined as the expression of approval or agreement.
 
These people have stated their case before the Lord. They have claimed that their actions were based on His name. He, knowing that it was a false pretense, will assent “that, “Never I knew you!”
 
The word oudepote, never, is introduced here. It is derived from oude, not, and pote, a disjunctive particle signifying once, formerly, ever, etc. Taken together, it signifies “not ever” and thus, never. There is no point at which Jesus knew them. Their works were always unsanctioned by Him.
 
Therefore, the assent or agreement is that they had, in fact, done these things. He will acknowledge it is so, but their actions, despite being done in His name, were not with His approval. They simply went about saying and doing things without the proper allowances for them to be done, meaning truly being one of His followers. His words are a denial that they are. Because this is so, He next says, “You depart from Me – Those working lawlessness!”
 
Again, Jesus introduces new words. The first is apochóreó, to depart. It is derived from words signifying away and to make room. A paraphrased thought based on these roots would be “Get away from me and give me space.” But saying depart sufficiently explains the matter.
 
The next new word is the verb ergazomai. It is derived from ergon, work. Thus, it is the action of working. It is something a person is engaged in to accomplish a task. In this case, Jesus tells them to depart from Him because they are engaged in anomia, lawlessness.
 
The word is formed from the negative particle a and nomos, law. Hence, it signifies without law, lawlessness. Despite having done the things they did in Jesus’ name. They had no law allowing them to do so. Deeds done in Jesus’ name must be done in faith or they have no true basis of being in His name.
 
The reason for this is that saying or doing something in the name of someone you don’t believe in is a fool’s business. It is like a professor who teaches the Bible but who doesn’t believe the Bible is what it claims to be.
 
Life application: Politicians love to invoke the name of Jesus when it is convenient. But few of them will actually stand up and say, “I am a follower of Jesus Christ.” Someday, people will be gathered before the Lord and they will understand that He truly is the Lord of all.
 
When they are there, many will fall back on their words. Those politicians who invoked Jesus’ name or who arbitrarily used Jesus’ words for their own purposes might call out, “I proclaimed your name in churches all over America while on the campaign trail.” He will say to them words in accord with those of Matthew 7:23.
 
This will be true of many people in the pulpit as well. Based on his life and actions, this appears to be the case with the current pope. These people invoke Jesus’ name, but their lives and actions have nothing in common with the truth of who Jesus is and what He directs as is recorded in Scripture.
 
Be sure that when you consider the word, you don’t just do so for external show, but for internal guidance. When you praise Jesus, do it in faith that He hears. Anything, no matter how small it is, when it is done in faith will receive its rewards. Have faith and be at peace with God through His wonderful Son, our Lord and Savior, Jesus.
 
O God, You have given us Jesus to lead us back to Yourself. Help us to fix our eyes on Him and maintain Him as our first love all our days. Thank You for Jesus who returns us to You through His perfection. Yes, thank You for Jesus! Amen.