BIBLE IN TEN

Matthew 21:2

Thursday, 25 June 2026
 
saying to them, “Go into the village opposite you, and immediately you will find a donkey tied, and a colt with her. Loose them and bring them to Me. Matthew 21:2
 
“Saying to them, ‘You go into the village, the ‘opposite you,’ and immediately you will find ‘donkey, having been bound’, and ‘colt, with her’. Having loosened, you bring to Me.’” (CG)
 
The previous verse noted that Jesus and those with Him drew near to Jerusalem, coming to Bethphage by the Mount of Olives. At this point, it needs to be understood that Matthew is giving details categorically, not necessarily chronologically.
 
John’s gospel includes the death and the raising of Lazarus, coming before the triumphal entry. Therefore, there is time and there are events between leaving Jericho and the events that will take place that occurred while Jesus was in this area. Understanding that, when there, He sent two disciples. Matthew next records, “Saying to them, ‘You go into the village, the ‘opposite you,’.’”
 
The village is not identified. Some argue it is Bethphage, the city just mentioned in verse 1. Others, because of the term “opposite you,” think it refers to Bethany. John Gill, with lively defense, suggests it is Nob, a city of the priests mentioned first in 1 Samuel 21.
 
Regardless, because the name is not given, it has purposefully been left out to keep the narrative typology untarnished. Once in this city, Jesus continues, saying, “and immediately you will find ‘donkey, having been bound’.”
 
The onus, donkey, is introduced here. It is a primary word. Donkeys are found in both testaments. The Topical Lexicon says it is “a symbol of humble service, patient endurance, and covenant blessing.” This word is found five times in the New Testament in Matthew, Luke, and John. Although onomastic scholars don’t generally tie this word onus to our modern word onus, signifying a burden, it is a likely candidate for its etymological root.
 
This is a female donkey, a jenny. That makes her comparable to the Hebrew word athon, coming from ethan, permanence or enduring. As such, the idea of “patient endurance” noted above is written right into the Hebrew naming of this animal. Jesus continues with, “and ‘colt, with her’.”
 
Another new word, pólos, a foal or filly, especially a young donkey, is seen. This word is found twelve times, only in all four gospels. In Zechariah 9:9, it says of the coming Messiah that He would be “riding upon jack (khamor, a male donkey), and upon colt (ayir), ‘son, jenny’.”
 
The words are telling a story. The khamor, jack, is derived from khamar, to boil (but with the sense of redness as in a reddened boiling pot). The word ayir, colt, is from ur, to awaken. Thus, it is a colt that is just being broken. The athon, jenny signifies permanence.
 
This will be further explored when we come to verses 4 and 5, where the prophecy is explicitly cited. Of these two donkeys, it next says, “Having loosened, you bring to Me.”
 
Jesus is specifically directing what will be the fulfillment of this ancient prophecy. Matthew is the only one who notes two donkeys. The other gospels focus only on the one Jesus will ride on. This makes sense because Matthew’s writing is directed most specifically to the Jewish people, presenting Jesus as the King of the Jews and the fulfillment of their Scriptures.
 
The colt would follow its mother as she led it along in this procession.
 
Life application: An ancient analysis of these verses from Jerome looks to the mother donkey as representing the Jewish people who had, for many hundreds of years, borne the yoke of the Law of Moses. He points to the colt as representing the Gentiles, being as yet unbroken until the time Christ sat on it.
 
Considering the roots of the words presented above, does that fit with what is being said and what fits into the dispensational model? Think about this as the verses continue to be evaluated. God is not just telling us surface stories of what actually took place. Rather, He is giving us deeper information in His word.
 
What is said and anticipated in the Old Testament through typology is confirmed in the New. The physical reality of the past is teaching us spiritual truths concerning God, the coming of Christ, the effects of His work, etc.
 
Many scholars call this “mystical,” as if it were a fanciful notion of made-up stuff. Some dismiss typology altogether, as if it has no use in biblical interpretation. What is wrong with such evaluations? The answer is found explicitly right in the New Testament, in passages such as 1 Corinthians 10:1-6 and Galatians 4:21-31.
 
In those passages, Paul says that the stories of the Old Testament were examples of Christ being presented through typology. He even says it indirectly in verses such as in 1 Corinthians 5 –
 
“Your glorying is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump? 7 Therefore purge out the old leaven, that you may be a new lump, since you truly are unleavened. For indeed Christ, our Passover, was sacrificed for us. 8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, nor with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.” 1 Corinthians 5:6-8
 
Paul makes a one-to-one comparison between the Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread to Christ and our life in Christ. God is working through types and pictures in the Old Testament, conveying information about what lies ahead. Every word and every detail of these ancient passages is given to point us to spiritual truths.
 
Be sure to think about what you are reading in the Old Testament. It is all pointing to Jesus, what He has done, and how it applies to us. Typology is how God is doing this.
 
Lord God, thank You for how Your wisdom is on display in ancient passages of Your word that seem to make no sense... until we look for Jesus. Then they fall into place, making all the sense in the world. What a treat it is for us to search out our Lord in them! Amen.
 

Matthew 21:1

Wednesday, 24 June 2026
 
Now when they drew near Jerusalem, and came to Bethphage, at the Mount of Olives, then Jesus sent two disciples, Matthew 21:1
 
“And when they neared unto Jerusalem, and they came unto Bethphage toward the ‘Mount, the Olives’, then Jesus, He sent two disciples.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Chapter 20 ended with Jesus healing the sight of the blind men, who were then said to follow Him. In Luke, the account of Zachaeus, the wee little man, comes after the healing. Matthew skips over that, saying, “And when they neared unto Jerusalem.”
 
The walk from Jericho to Jerusalem is uphill. The path follows a wide gorge at times with stunning views. Eventually, Jerusalem comes into view. Along this well-beaten track, certainly still accompanied by a large group of people, it says, “and they came unto Bethphage.”
 
Béthphagé is a location found only three times, once in each of the synoptic gospels. It is, unfortunately, rendered by some as House of Figs. This does not give the full sense of the word. The name is derived from beth, house, and pag (Hebrew pagah), crude, which is found only once in the Old Testament, in Song of Songs 2:13. There it says, “The fig spiced her crudes.” The word khanat signifies to spice. It is a term used when referring to embalming.
 
The meaning isn’t that of putting forth but of the sweetening, or spicing, of the fruit as it ripens for harvesting. This process then explains the word pagah, crude, an unripe fig. The fig is already on the tree, but until it goes through the spicing process, it otherwise remains an inedible crude unless it is properly prepared to make chutneys, jams, and preserves. However, once it is spiced by the season, it becomes edible right off the tree.
 
Understanding this, Béthphagé means House of Unripe Figs, or more scientifically, House of Unspiced Figs, with the understanding that the spicing process is on the tree, not in later preparation. Bethphage is collocated with Bethany, as is seen in Mark’s and Luke’s gospel records.
 
The actual site of Bethphage has never been determined, but its general location, based on the gospels, is certain. Being near Bethany, it is within what is known as a Sabbath-day’s journey, which is 2000 cubits or less, to Jerusalem. That is determined from Acts 1:12, which places the Mount of Olives within this distance. Matthew says it is “toward the ‘Mount, the Olives’.”
 
This contains another new word, elaia, olive. It refers to the tree or the fruit. In Judges 9, the olive is noted as the finest of the fruit trees. Its fruit is highly prized. Olives are used for eating, oil, soaps, and more. The oil is used for lighting lamps and cooking food, among other uses. The wood is prized for its beauty and can be burned for warmth.
 
As for the olive itself, it is a symbol of religious privilege. For example, it reflects the Spirit working through those who are included in this privilege. The olives receive their fatness from the roots. The branches receive this fatness and produce olives, which are then used to put forth light before the Lord in the form of olive oil. At this location, it next says, “then Jesus, He sent two disciples.”
 
These two are to prepare for a special moment prophesied by the prophet Zechariah, hundreds of years earlier.
 
Life application: It is important to know what the various things noted in the Bible represent. The olive was just seen as a symbol of religious privilege. The fig has its own connotation as well. Unfortunately, the meaning of the fig has been misapplied by many to signify the nation of Israel.
 
That misinterpretation has been passed around for eons, and it damages any hint of trying to figure out what is being presented in Scripture. Rather, the fig speaks of the spiritual connection between God and man.
 
When this was lost in the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve attempted, by their own works, to restore that connection through the use of fig leaves covering the disconnect, the shame of sin.
 
When Jesus curses the fig tree, in the gospels, it forms a parable concerning the place He was coming from and going to, the temple, which is the place where the spiritual connection with God was effected for the people.
 
In His words, “Let no one eat fruit from you ever again” (Mark 11:14), He was indicating that the temple that served the law would never again be the source of connection to God. Instead, that connection would only come through Him.
 
Understanding this, the House of Unspiced Crudes will have its own particular meaning. It refers to a fig that is not yet ready to be eaten unless it is manually prepared in a manner similar to pickling. Pay attention to such details. In considering the details, typology is likely to come forth from the surrounding narrative, forming a larger picture of something else.
 
Lord God, it is so wonderful to search out the treasures found in Your word. Help us to be diligent to research what is said, paying attention to every detail. In doing this, we will more clearly understand what You are telling us. Help us, Lord, to be methodical and patient as we search out this precious word. Amen.
 

Exploring the Connection Between Matthew 20, the Book of Proverbs, and Isaiah 20

Exploring the Connection Between Matthew 20, the Book of Proverbs, and Isaiah 20
For Bible in Ten – By DH – 23rd June 2026
Yesterday we completed Matthew 20.   
W. Bullinger associates the number 20 with expectancy. It is one short of 21, which is three times seven, a number suggestive of divine completion in spiritual perfection. Therefore, 20 carries the thought of waiting, looking forward, standing just short of completion, and expecting what God alone can bring to pass.
As we will see, Matthew 20, Isaiah 20, and Proverbs, the twentieth book of the Bible, each harmonise around the same spiritual note of expectancy.
Matthew 20 opens with workers waiting for their reward. Some have borne the burden and heat of the day. Others came at the eleventh hour. All are dependent upon the goodness of the master. The issue is not merely labor, but expectation. What will the master give? How will he judge? Will his goodness offend those who think reward should be measured by comparison?
The answer is grace.
The last receive what the master has freely determined to give. The first are not wronged, but their hearts are exposed. Thus, Matthew 20 begins with expectancy and turns it into a revelation of grace. Man expects according to merit. God gives according to His goodness.
Isaiah 20 gives a darker companion witness. There, Isaiah becomes a sign against Egypt and Cush. The nations that seemed strong, useful, and dependable are exposed. Human refuge is stripped bare. The expectation placed in worldly strength is shown to be empty.
This is the other side of expectancy. If man waits upon Egypt, he will be ashamed. If man waits upon Cush, he will be disappointed. Similarly if man waits upon his own wisdom, labor, greatness, or position.
But if man waits upon the Lord, he will not be put to shame.
This is where the pattern begins to shine. Isaiah has 66 chapters, and the Bible has 66 books. Isaiah, in broad outline, seems to stand as a remarkable miniature witness to the whole Bible. Within that larger 66-fold witness, Isaiah 20 fits with the twentieth book, Proverbs. 
That is not random noise. It is the sort of pattern that causes us to marvel at God’s wonderful word. It is ordered, layered, and spiritually alive. The same God who numbers the stars and calls them all by name has arranged His word, inspiring human authors with a wisdom that continually exceeds mere human ability and spanning vast distances of human history.
Proverbs, as the twentieth book, is typically fitting. If 20 speaks of expectancy, Proverbs teaches us how to wait rightly. It teaches the fear of the Lord. It teaches humility before honor. It warns against pride, envy, haste, self-trust, and the evil eye. It teaches that the Lord weighs the heart and that man must not lean on his own understanding.
This is exactly the wisdom needed in Matthew 20.
The vineyard workers need Proverbs. They must learn not to grumble against goodness.The disciples need Proverbs. They must learn that greatness is not grasped through ambition.The mother of Zebedee’s sons needs Proverbs. She must learn that honor is not seized by request, but prepared by the Father.The blind men heed what Proverbs points toward: the fear of the Lord, humble dependence, and a cry for mercy.
The book of Proverbs gives immediate access to God’s view of these things. It tells us plainly that pride blinds, envy corrodes, humility precedes honor, and wisdom begins with reverence for God. Matthew 20 then shows these truths embodied in living form.
And at the centre stands Christ.
He is the One for whom all true expectancy waits. He is the wisdom of God. He is the Servant who does not come to be served, but to serve. He is the ransom for many. He is the One going up to Jerusalem, where peace will be secured not through worldly power, but through His suffering, death, and resurrection.
In Isaiah 20, false hope is stripped.In Proverbs, true wisdom is taught.In Matthew 20, true hope and true wisdom meet in Jesus Christ.
So by considering the chapter through the lens of the number 20 and its Biblical meaning , we can see once again that man is waiting. Creation is waiting. Israel is waiting. The nations are waiting. The disciples are waiting. The blind are waiting. But the question is: what are they waiting for?
Some wait for Egypt.Some wait for reward.Some wait for status.Some wait for human greatness.Some wait for their own works to justify them.
But the faithful wait for the Lord.
The two blind men at the end of Matthew 20 show the right response. They do not come boasting. They do not argue wages. They do not ask for thrones. They cry, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on us.” That is expectancy purified. That is wisdom in action. That is the opposite of trusting Egypt. That is the heart looking to the only One who can open blind eyes.
And He does.
The Lord stops. The Lord calls. The Lord asks. The Lord touches. The Lord restores sight. Then they follow Him.
This is the glory of the pattern. The number 20 brings us to expectancy, but Christ brings expectancy to fulfillment. Proverbs teaches us to fear the Lord. Isaiah warns us not to trust in man. Matthew reveals the Lord Himself, walking the road to Jerusalem to accomplish what no man, nation, ruler, disciple, worker, or wise man could ever accomplish.
Life application: We are always waiting for something. We wait for reward, vindication, provision, healing, direction, peace, and completion. The question is whether our expectancy is placed in the Lord or in something that will be stripped away.
Isaiah 20 warns us that false confidence will be exposed. Proverbs teaches us that wisdom begins with the fear of the Lord. Matthew 20 shows us that the grace of God is found in Christ, the Servant-King, who gives His life as a ransom for many.
Let us therefore wait rightly. Let us not grumble against grace. Let us not grasp after status. Let us not trust in Egypt. Let us not lean on our own understanding. Let us cry out with the blind men, “Lord, have mercy,” and follow the One who opens our eyes.
Lord God, how wonderful is Your word. Its patterns are beyond us, its wisdom is pure, and its testimony always leads us to Christ. Thank You for showing us that our expectation must not be in man, merit, power, or position, but in You alone. Open our eyes, humble our hearts, and teach us to rejoice in the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.
 

A summary of Matthew Chapter 20

Tuesday, 23 June 2026
 
A summary of Matthew Chapter 20.
 
Chapter 17 revealed that there is a future for Israel in God’s redemptive plans. The main message of Chapter 18 was that childlike faith is required to enter into the kingdom. The final parable, that of the wicked servant, dealt with Israel’s rejection of Christ’s fulfillment of the law, showing that they would be delivered up until they entered the New Covenant. Chapter 19 took the reader through various topics to reveal what God prioritizes. The contrasts between law and faith were seen throughout the chapter.
 
Chapter 20 began with a parable based on Peter’s question that came toward the end of Chapter 19, “See, we have left all and followed You. Therefore what shall we have?” (Matthew 19:27). Jesus mentioned what would happen in the regeneration, meaning during the millennium, when the Son of Man would sit on the throne of His glory along with those who would sit judging the twelve tribes of Israel. The chapter closed out with Jesus’ words of verse 30, “But many who are first will be last and the last first.”
 
That is what precipitated the parable of the workers in the field. Those who came last during the dispensation of the law would be the first to enter into the New Covenant, receiving grace, while those throughout the dispensation of the law had to labor.
 
Immediately after that parable, it noted that Jesus was going up to Jerusalem (Foundation of Peace). He took His twelve disciples aside to tell them about His coming passion. The place known as the Foundation of Peace would be where peace is realized through Christ’s accomplishment of His work.
 
Immediately following those three verses, it noted that the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Him. Rather than their names being stated, it called them “Zebedee’s sons”. Zebedee is from the Hebrew Zebadyah (translated as Zebadiah). That is from zabad to confer or bestow, and the shortened form of Yehovah, Yah. The name means Yah Has Bestowed (Given).
 
Their mother’s request was that Jesus would grant that her two sons would sit at Jesus’ left and right in His kingdom. Ironically, she was asking the Lord incarnate to bestow upon Zebedee’s (Yah Has Bestowed) sons what she requested. His answer was that it was not His to give. Instead, it was for those whom His Father had prepared.
 
As noted at the time, this does not mean that Jesus isn’t God, but that His humanity had to complete His mission before the Father, through Him, could make such a grant. That discourse ended with the words, “just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many” (Matthew 20:28).
 
The punning continued with that statement because Jesus is the fulfillment of the name Yah Has Bestowed. Despite this truth, there is an order and a propriety in all things pertaining to God. Each step in the redemptive process must be completed before the next step can be taken or before the next allowance can come to pass.
 
With that matter settled, the final section concerning the blind men was given. That began with, “Now as they went out of Jericho.” Jericho is Place of Fragrance. Typologically, it signifies the surety of heaven. Matthew, unlike Mark and Luke, notes that there were two blind men sitting by the road. Two is the number of division or difference. Whereas one precludes the thought of another, two signifies that there is another.
 
As this occurred while Jesus was going out of Jericho on His way to Jerusalem, it can be deduced that this refers to the surety of heaven (Jericho) for those who follow Christ to where He establishes peace (Jerusalem). Their cry was to the “Lord, Son of David.” They have recognized Him as the fulfillment of the messianic promises.
Because there are two in Matthew’s gospel, the number of division and difference, it can be assumed that this typologically refers to Jews and Gentiles who were previously blind, but who come to the realization that Jesus is the Christ.
 
They have heard the word that Jesus is passing, they have asked for their sight to be restored, and He touched their eyes, and they were restored. With that accomplished, it says that they followed Him. It is thus an anticipatory note of salvation by grace through faith based on the completed work of Christ. With that complete, the surety of heaven is realized.
 
The physical blindness is used as a picture of the spiritual blindness that infects all humanity and which is corrected by faith in the completed work of Jesus.
 
Life application: Chapter 20 is a chapter filled with hints of the transition from the dispensation of the law to the dispensation of grace. It deals with order and propriety concerning each step of the redemptive process to ensure that nothing is dealt with until the previous steps are completed.
 
The words from Jesus to the sons of Zebedee about being great in the kingdom show that greatness in God’s redemptive process is not based on ruling over others, but rather serving others, Jesus being the example par excellence of that concept. He is the quintessential Servant to humanity, having given His life as a ransom for many.
 
To procure the blessings of heaven, God has made faith in what He has done the necessary condition. Nothing more can be added to it, and without meeting that one condition, there is no chance of obtaining access. These are the precious details of this wonderful chapter of Matthew.
 
Lord God, thank You for the incredible details that are tucked away in Your word. We are the recipients of Your wisdom and favor when we pick it up, read it, and consider its contents. Thank You for the innumerable mysteries You have allowed us to see within it. Thank You for this precious word that tells us of our wonderful Savior, Jesus. Amen.
 
Matthew 20
 
20 Like, for, it is the ‘kingdom, the heavens’: man, housemaster, who he exited concurrently early to hire toilers into ‘vineyard, his’. 2Having also harmonized with the toilers from ‘denarius, the day,’ he sent them into the ‘vineyard, his’. 3And having exited about the third hour, he saw others having stood in the market, inactive. 4And to them, he said, “You go, also you, into the vineyard, and whatever if it should be righteous, I will give you.” And these, they departed. 5Again, having exited around ‘sixth and ninth hour’, he did likewise. 6Around, also, the eleventh hour, having exited, he found others having stood inactive. And he says to them, “Why, here, you ‘having stood all the day’ inactive?” 7They say to him, “Because no one, us, he hired.” He says to them, “You go, also you, into the vineyard, and the ‘if it should be righteous’, you will take.”
 
8Evening, also, having become, he says, the ‘lord, the vineyard’ to ‘commissioner, his’, ‘You call the toilers, and you pay them the reward, having commenced from the last unto the first.’ 9Having come, also, those about the eleventh hour, they took each – denarius. 10Having come, also, the first, they deemed that more, they will take, and they took, also themselves, each – denarius. 11Having taken, also, they grumbled against the housemaster. 12Saying that “These, the last, one hour they made, and equal, them, to us, you made those who were bearing the burden of the day and the blaze.” 13The ‘also answering one of them’, he said, ‘Scammer! Not I wrong you! Not for a denarius, you harmonized me? 14You bear the ‘yours’, and you go! I will, also, this: the last to give as also you. 15Or not it permits me, what I will to do in ‘these, mine’? Or the ‘eye, you’ evil, it is, because I – good, I am? 16Thus, they will be the last, first, and the first, last. Many, then, they are called; few, also, selected.’
 
17And ascending, the ‘Jesus to Jerusalem’, He took twelve disciples apart alone, and in the road, He said to them, 18You behold! We ascend to Jerusalem, and the ‘Son, the Man’, He will be surrendered to the chief priests and scribes, and they will sentence Him – death, 19and they will surrender Him to the Gentiles unto the ‘mock, and flog, and crucify’, and the third day, He will rise up.
 
20Then she approached Him, the mother – the ‘sons, Zebedee’, with the ‘sons, hers’, worshipping and asking something from Him.
 
21The ‘Also He said’ to her, “What do you desire?”
 
She says to Him, “You said that they might sit, these, the ‘two sons of mine,’ one from ‘rights, You’, and one from ‘lefts, You’, in the ‘kingdom, Yours’.”
 
22Answering, also, Jesus, He said, “Not you have known what you ask! Are you able to drink the cup, the ‘I, I am about to drink,’ or the immersion, the ‘I, I am immersed’ to be immersed?”
 
They say to Him, “We are able.”
 
23And He says to them, ‘The ‘indeed, ‘cup, Mine’,’ you will drink, and the immersion, the ‘I, I am immersed’ you will be immersed. The, also, to sit from ‘rights, Me’, and from ‘lefts, Me’, not it is Mine – these to give, but those it has been prepared under the ‘Father, Mine’.’
 
24And having heard, the ten, they outraged about the two brothers. 25The ‘also Jesus having summoned them’, He said, “You have known that the ‘rulers, the nations’ they subjugate them, and the greats, they dominate them.” 26Not thus, also, it will be in you, but whoever if he wills in you to ‘great, become’, let him be your attendant. 27And whoever, if he wills in you to be first, let him be your slave. 28Just as the ‘Son, the Man’, not He came to be attended to but to attend, and give the ‘soul, His’ – ransom for many.
 
29And they, proceeding from Jericho, it followed Him, ‘crowd, great’. 30And you behold! Two ‘blind’ sitting beside the road, having heard that Jesus, He passes, they croaked, saying, ‘You compassionate us, Lord, ‘Son, David’!’
 
31The ‘also crowd’, it admonished them that they should mute. The ‘also greater they croaked’, saying, “You compassionate us, Lord, ‘Son, David’!”
 
32And having stood, Jesus, He vocalized to them, and He said, ‘What you ‘will’ I should do to you?’
 
33They say to Him, ‘Lord, that they might be opened the ‘eyes, ours’.’ 34Having gut-wrenched, also Jesus, He touched the ‘eyes, theirs’, and immediately they up-looked, their ‘the eyes’, and they followed Him.
 

Matthew 20:34

Monday, 22 June 2026
 
So Jesus had compassion and touched their eyes. And immediately their eyes received sight, and they followed Him. Matthew 20:34
 
“Having gut-wrenched, also Jesus, He touched the ‘eyes, theirs’, and immediately they up-looked, their ‘the eyes’, and they followed Him.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, the blind men told Jesus they desired that their eyes be opened. With that noted, it next says, “Having gut-wrenched, also Jesus.”
 
A great multitude of the city of Jericho had followed Jesus as He traversed the city. It would have been a scene of chaos as people vied to get close to Him and get His attention. And yet, at the calls of these two men, He has stopped His exiting of the city and waited as the blind came to Him. Because of their appeal to have their sight restored, Jesus was moved with compassion.
 
Instead of basking in the accolades of a multitude of “fans”, Jesus was concerned about a few blind beggars. This was so much the case that “He touched the ‘eyes, theirs’.”
 
Instead of reaching out for a stalk of reed with ink on it to sign someone’s parchment, and instead of stopping for a “memory photo” with a group of mid-yeshiva students, Jesus took the time to reach out and touch the unusable eyes of the blind. The people around Him would have watched curiously as the scene unfolded. Sure enough, Matthew next records, “and immediately they up-looked, their ‘the eyes’.”
 
This is the third time the word anablepó, to up-look, has been seen. Thus far, each has been in connection with the healing of the blind. But this is not its only usage. At times, it is when a person stops and looks up for one reason or another. With the blind, however, the meaning is clear. They didn’t just look up with dead eyes. They did so with their sight restored. And because of this, Matthew notes, “and they followed Him.”
 
As Jesus is heading out of Jericho on His way to Jerusalem, it is likely that they followed for a while and then returned to their city, but it is also possible that one or both of them continued the long walk to Jerusalem. Bartimaeus is remembered by name in Mark, so that could be the reason why.
 
Life application: In the world, it is a rare thing for the rich or famous to pay attention to such people in need as the blind men at Jericho. Think of Hollywood actors. They step out of expensive limos and are conducted to whatever award ceremony they are attending with fanfare, photos, and idolizing eyes watching their every step.
 
Not only would they not think of stopping to talk to a blind man begging for money, but there would also be no blind people in sight. Such dregs of society would have been moved away from the area to ensure these more “important” people would not be bothered by people like that.
 
The same is true with politicians. The people they have been called to serve are ignored at the expense of wealthy builders, entrepreneurs, and famous people. The only time they get anywhere near the lowly masses is when they are stomping for their next reelection.
 
Jesus, however, despite all of the masses hemming Him in, repeatedly stopped to tend to the lowliest of society. He has set the example, and innumerable souls have followed in His footsteps, tending to the masses of humanity throughout the world, helping them when even their own leaders ignore or abuse them.
 
The Bible never tells people that they shouldn’t be rich or famous. But it does provide warnings for those who have many possessions that such things are not the priority in life that God is evaluating. Rather, He is concerned about our hearts, motivations, and interactions with Him and with those around us. Are we willing to emulate Jesus in how we honor God and treat our neighbor?
 
This is what is ultimately of eternal importance. Someday, we will be separated from our possessions, bank accounts, and even the bodies we so carefully maintain. All such things are temporary and fleeting. Be sure to keep your priorities straight, holding to biblical values as you interact with this world.
 
“Command those who are rich in this present age not to be haughty, nor to trust in uncertain riches but in the living God, who gives us richly all things to enjoy. 18 Let them do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to give, willing to share, 19 storing up for themselves a good foundation for the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life.” 1 Timothy 6:17-19
 
Lord God, help us to keep our priorities in line with Your word. May we not squander our lives in pursuit of that which perishes when there are heaven’s riches awaiting us that will be eternal in nature. May our “right now” be dedicated to that wonderful goal, all our days. Amen.
 

Matthew 20:33

Sunday, 21 June 2026
 
They said to Him, “Lord, that our eyes may be opened.” Matthew 20:33
 
“They say to Him, ‘Lord, that they might be opened the ‘eyes, ours’.’” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, it said that Jesus stood and called the blind, asking what He could do for them. Matthew next records, “They say to Him, ‘Lord, that they might be opened the ‘eyes, ours’.’”
 
They use the same wording, open, as Isaiah concerning the blind. It was as if their eyes were doors that had been shut and were incapable of opening to the light. They are asking for that to be rectified. What Isaiah had said would have been known and anticipated by the people of Israel concerning the promises of the messianic era to come –
 
“Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened,And the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped.6 Then the lame shall leap like a deer,And the tongue of the dumb sing.” Isaiah 35:5, 6
 
As noted in previous commentaries, Mark and Luke focus on one person. Matthew focuses on two. Did both come forward as seems to be the case from Matthew, or did one speak on behalf of the other? The text leaves us guessing, but there is no reason to dismiss Matthew’s account.
 
It is generally assumed that Mark was written first. As such, he may have specifically written about Bartimaeus, having personally come to know him, or because he became known among the people. Later, however, Matthew, remembering the fuller aspect of the account, would have presented the event, acknowledging that there were two blind men.
 
Whatever the case is with these subtle differences, the request has been placed before Jesus.
 
Life application: Reading Scripture and comparing what Jesus did to what was promised concerning what the Messiah would do, it makes one wonder how Israel missed the significance of Jesus’ coming. It seems so obvious when the patterns, parallels, and prophecies are laid side by side to see how He fulfilled everything necessary to prove He is the Messiah.
 
And yet, they missed Him. To this day, they continue to do so. Why is this the case? The reason is the same as how many people treat Scripture, their relationship with God, and their interactions with the world around them.
 
If we look at the contents of the Bible from a me-centric focus, we will have pity parties when things don’t go well or when we think things are unfair about how our lives are in comparison to what is recorded in the word. If we look at God as the Giver of this word and think we should have been dealt a better hand, we will naturally find fault in God.
 
And when our interactions with others don’t put us ahead of everything and everyone else, then those around us will never meet our own misdirected expectations. But the world is not about us. The Bible, though including God’s redeemed in the overall plan, is not about us. And our interactions with God are no more difficult or unbearable than those presented in Scripture.
 
And more, seeing what God was willing to do to bring us back to Himself through the life and torturous death of Jesus, we should realize that God does love us despite whatever we are going through.
 
Understanding this, why did Israel miss the coming of their Messiah? It is because they have, and they continue to think that Scripture is about them. Their attitude is a culturally me-centric view of how things should be. When things don’t go well for them, they simply stop believing in God, pushing Him out of their mind, as innumerable Jews live today.
 
Whether it is Israel as a nation or humanity as individuals, in order to receive the full understanding and blessing of what Scripture is telling us, we need to remember that it is first and foremost about God, the infinitely good and gracious Creator, Sustainer, and Redeemer.
 
The fact that we have been included in what God has done should humble us and redirect our focus away from ourselves to Him. By doing this, we will have a fuller appreciation of Scripture, and we will have a much more directed focus on how to conduct our personal relationships with those around us.
 
“Therefore we also, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which so easily ensnares us, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, 2 looking unto Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.” Hebrew 12:1, 2
 
Lord God, thank You for having loved us enough to send Jesus despite our sin and turning from You. May we have the right attitude concerning our position before You, accepting what You have done in our lives, even if it is difficult, painful, or tedious. This is a temporary walk. You have given us sure promises that the best is yet to come. May we patiently endure this present walk with our eyes focused on You. Amen.

Matthew 20:32

Saturday, 20 June 2026
 
So Jesus stood still and called them, and said, “What do you want Me to do for you?” Matthew 20:32
 
“And having stood, Jesus, He vocalized to them, and He said, ‘What you ‘will’ I should do to you?’” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, the two blind men continued to cry out to Jesus, begging for His mercy upon them. Their persistence paid off, as noted by Matthew. He notes, “And having stood, Jesus.”
 
Eventually, Jesus neared the blind men enough so that their voices could no longer be drowned out by the crowds. As such, and certainly wanting to know why they remained at a distance, it next says that “He vocalized to them.”
 
A new word is seen, phóneó, to emit a sound, and thus, to vocalize. It is used when a rooster crows. It was used to describe when Jesus cried out on the cross. One can see the etymological ancestor of our modern word “phone.” Of this word, the Topical Lexicon says –
 
“Strong’s Greek 5455 portrays the purposeful use of the voice—whether summoning, exhorting, pleading, or proclaiming. It occurs forty-three times across the New Testament, spanning the earthly ministry of Jesus Christ, the life of the early church, and a single eschatological scene. The verb’s settings cluster around five broad spheres: personal encounters with Jesus, miraculous works, parabolic instruction, apostolic ministry, and final judgment.”
 
Mark and Luke give different details concerning this. Mark says that Jesus commanded (using the word “vocalized”) that the blind should be called. They called Bartimaeus, telling him that he was being called. With that, he cast aside his garment and went to Jesus. Luke agrees with this, leaving off the details about the garment.
 
Each account agrees, but is given from a different perspective that builds into one full scene. With the details of the calling stated, all three accounts agree on the next words, “and He said, ‘What you ‘will’ I should do to you?’”
 
In Matthew, the address is plural. In Mark and Luke, it is singular. The attention being on one as opposed to two was addressed in an earlier verse. If there are two, then there is one. For whatever reason, Matthew chose to focus on both while Mark and Luke focused on one individual.
 
One possible explanation for the difference is that despite being at the exit of the city, they were on opposite sides of the gate. If two were sitting side by side, it may be that people would only give to one, and some would go to the opposite side to avoid giving at all. But with both sides of the gate covered, the potential for more givers would be realized.
 
As such, Matthew, being a tax collector, would have been keenly aware of such a system. The other two accounts focused on the one specifically called first, Bartimaeus. This is speculation, but it is a logical reason why the two accounts differ in this detail.
 
Life application: If you have ever been to a place where people beg, you will see the proposed scenario played out. Beggars don’t just lump together, as if a person will stop and give every person a coin. Rather, they divide up in order to avoid overwhelming someone to the point where nothing is given.
 
Having both sides of the gate covered reasonably resolves the variation between the two accounts. The two could talk between the two of them, both raised their voices as Jesus neared, and one could speak for the other if he were called. Bartimaeus could have been called and directly asked what he wanted, and then said, “I want to see, but so does that guy over there. We are blind, Sir.”
 
We should not have any doubt that the accounts happened exactly as all three gospels describe, even if the details seem contradictory at first. A little thought about how things actually work in such a situation makes the entire scene understandable.
 
Lord God, Your word is a treasure that we can study and contemplate for all our days. Even doing this, we will never be able to fully plumb its depths. Thank You that we have it to guide us, instruct us, and challenge us as we walk before You. Amen.

Matthew 20:31

Friday, 19 June 2026
 
Then the multitude warned them that they should be quiet; but they cried out all the more, saying, “Have mercy on us, O Lord, Son of David!” Matthew 20:31
 
“The ‘also crowd’, it admonished them that they should mute. The ‘also greater they croaked’, saying, ‘You compassionate us, Lord, ‘Son, David’!’” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, it was noted that two blind men were sitting by the road. When they heard Jesus was passing by, they cried out to Jesus for mercy, calling Him the Lord, and the Son of David. In their crying out, there was a reaction. Matthew records, “The ‘also crowd’, it admonished them that they should mute.”
 
As with everything in Scripture, scholars debate why the crowd would tell them to be silent. Various suggestions have arisen. They were at the gates for a reason, which was to beg for money. This is seen elsewhere, such as the lame man in Acts 3. They would be taken to the most propitious place for getting something to help pay for their daily needs.
 
Depending on the time of year, that might change. At this time, because this gate sat on the road to Jerusalem, it is certain that it would be a great choice. Many people who were going to Jerusalem for the Passover would traverse the Jordan and go through the city. In the city, they would get supplies, maybe stop for some chicken kabobs, and then head out.
 
Having stopped, they would be refreshed and happy as they set out on the road to Jerusalem. Thus, they would be predisposed to doing something nice for a blind beggar by tossing him a coin. This would be especially so as they were heading to the Passover celebrations. Their thought would be that it is always good to have done something favorable to another when going to meet the Lord at the temple.
 
As such, the crowd probably admonished them to shut up, supposing that these men wanted Jesus, the great Prophet, Teacher, and possible Messiah, to give them something. The scene would be perfectly normal to anyone living at the time and surrounded by such circumstances. Despite the admonitions of the crowd, Matthew continues, “The ‘also greater they croaked’.”
 
One can mentally picture it. They hear that their one chance to encounter the Messiah is happening right then as He passes through the city. They lift their voices in hopes of getting His attention. The people get annoyed at the two blind people, as if they are not important enough to get a moment of Jesus’ time. “Shush! He’s not going to give you anything. Just be quiet.”
 
Knowing that they have been rejected by the crowds would cause them to amplify their calls. If nobody was going to help them, they would have only themselves to bring about success. Therefore, they continued “saying, ‘You compassionate us, Lord, ‘Son, David’!’”
 
It is completely reasonable that the crowds would have thought they were looking for a handout. Beggars have to make themselves noticed. Thus, as people walked by, they would call out, “Help for the blind. Help for the blind.” Having them crying out at the top of their voices would be... annoying. If they realized their true intent, the crowds may have been a bit more sympathetic.
 
The blind men repeat the same words as the previous verse, calling Jesus Lord, ‘Son, David’. Their intent goes beyond a coin being handed out to them. They are looking for the same relief that they had surely heard others had received.
 
Life application: The old saying, “The squeaky wheel gets the grease,” is true of these two men. They are making noise in hopes of receiving relief. If they paid heed to the admonishments of the people, their chances of having their sight restored would probably never come about. Therefore, they not only ignored the crowd’s words but they also amplified their calls.
 
In Luke 18, Jesus gives a parable about a woman who went to a judge in the city to get justice from her adversary. She repeatedly went to him until he finally got tired of being bothered by her and agreed to resolve her case. Her persistence brought about the result she desired.
 
The same is true with the person in Luke 11 who went to his neighbor’s house at midnight to borrow bread. Jesus noted that the man in the house wouldn’t get up because they were friends. Rather, he would rise because of the other man’s persistence.
 
The point of these teachings, and what can be seen in the plight of these beggars, is that the Lord appreciates us diligently petitioning Him. He will respond when He sees the true nature of a person who is willing to extend himself to persistently call out for an answer to his request. As the Bible bears this out, we can learn from it and continue to present our requests, knowing that in His perfect timing, He will act according to His perfect will.
 
Lord God, sometimes it is hard to continue prodding You for our desires and needs through prayer, as if we are bothering You. But Lord, Your word tells us we should not feel this way. Help us to be bold in presenting our petitions to You, knowing that You will respond in the manner that is best for us. Thank You for hearing our prayers. Amen.

Matthew 20:30

Thursday, 18 June 2026
 
And behold, two blind men sitting by the road, when they heard that Jesus was passing by, cried out, saying, “Have mercy on us, O Lord, Son of David!” Matthew 20:30
 
“And you behold! Two ‘blind’ sitting beside the road, having heard that Jesus, He passes, they croaked, saying, ‘You compassionate us, Lord, ‘Son, David’!’” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, it was noted that as they went out of Jericho, a great multitude followed Jesus. Along with that, Matthew records, “And you behold! Two ‘blind’ sitting beside the road.”
 
The issue of the seemingly contradictory time of Jesus encountering and healing the blind in this account, as recorded by Matthew, Mark, and Luke, was dealt with yesterday. Though getting ahead in the narrative, it was necessary at some point to rectify that.
 
However, that is not the only discrepancy between the accounts. The words “two ‘blind’ sitting beside the road” are also problematic for some. This is because Mark and Luke say –
 
“Now they came to Jericho. As He went out of Jericho with His disciples and a great multitude, blind Bartimaeus, the son of Timaeus, sat by the road begging.” Mark 10:46
 
“Then it happened, as He was coming near Jericho, that a certain blind man sat by the road begging.” Luke 18:35
 
As such, detractors of the Bible immediately claim that there is a contradiction in Scripture. One account says two men, the other accounts refer to a single individual. The fact is that if there are two, there is one. This is not a contradiction at all. It is a way of focusing differently on a matter.
 
This “two as opposed to one” is seen elsewhere in the gospels, such as the two demoniacs in Matthew 8 as opposed to a single one in Mark and Luke. The same thing occurs in the accounts at the time of the resurrection, where one or two are mentioned. This is an issue of focus and presentation, not a contradiction.
 
Mark goes beyond both Matthew and Luke and names the blind person he focuses on. The reason for this could be that the blind person who was healed became well known later among the believers, whereas the second man faded out of the spotlight. There is no contradiction in a “two” or “one” record. Understanding this, Matthew continues, saying, “having heard that Jesus, He passes.”
 
This was explained yesterday. The commotion of Jesus traversing the city, from one end to the other, means that they had a chance to encounter Him as He did so. Those who could see would have rushed to meet Jesus as He entered, passing the blind on their way. As the people passed the blind, “they croaked, saying, ‘You compassionate us, Lord, ‘Son, David’!’”
 
The present tense verb “He passes” tells us that they were fully aware of Jesus passing through Jericho. This was probably the main route for one who had traveled south on the east side of the Jordan and then passed over the Jordan on a trek to Jerusalem. As such, it makes complete sense that Jesus would pass right through the city. It would also be why the blind sat at the exit gate, hoping for some pilgrim heading to Jerusalem to have mercy on them with a blessing.
 
The men were strategically positioned to be in the most favorable spot for such things. Calling Jesus “Lord, ‘Son, David’” means they fully accepted that He was the promised fulfillment of the messianic promises. Surely, they had heard of His miracles and believed that He had the ability to perform what no one else but the Messiah could do.
 
Life application: As with the previous verse, there is no reason to assume there is a contradiction between Matthew’s account and that of the other gospels. Matthew was there with Jesus. He would have seen the two men calling out to the Lord for healing.
 
Mark may or may not have been there, but his focus was on someone who became well known enough to be remembered by name. Luke was not there, but gathered his information from various sources. He focused on a certain blind man, maybe having spoken to Mark, who was excited to mention Bartimaeus.
 
The fact is that if all three accounts were identical, or even if they were a bit differently worded, but said the same thing, they would be considered forgeries, ripped off from a single writer, something the Jesus Project is famous for claiming.
 
Don’t get discouraged by those whose seeming sole purpose in life is to destroy people’s faith in God and in the surety of His word. Press on with the understanding that if this is God’s word, it is completely reconcilable with His perfect character.
 
Just because we do not understand a difficulty does not mean that there is a problem with what is presented. Most of us do not understand how a nuclear bomb is made, but we know that they explode. Nobody would say, “I just don’t see how such a little bit of plutonium can make an entire city disappear. Therefore, it can’t happen.”
 
And yet, this is how we treat the Bible when we believe some knucklehead’s assertion that the Bible is in error. When his claim proves to be incorrect, who then is the knucklehead? Don’t be a knucklehead! Accept that what you don’t know simply means there is a limitation in your knowledge, not a problem with what you are trying to understand.
 
Glorious Lord God, thank You for guiding us as we read and contemplate Your word. As we continue to read it, study it, meditate on it, and accept it as Your word, the more profitable it is to us in our walk with You. Thank You that this is so. May we be diligent in our study of it all our days. Amen.
 

Matthew 20:29

Wednesday, 17 June 2026
 
Now as they went out of Jericho, a great multitude followed Him. Matthew 20:29
 
“And they, proceeding from Jericho, it followed Him, ‘crowd, great’.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus explained that He did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many. The narrative continues, saying, “And they, proceeding from Jericho.”
 
This is the first mention of Hiericho, Jericho, in the New Testament. Depending on the root of the name, it has two possible meanings: Place of Fragrance or Place of the Moon. The account says that they, meaning Jesus and the disciples, were proceeding from Jericho.
 
This has caused a great deal of difficulty based on the words of Luke 18, where it says, “He was coming near Jericho” when the account occurred. This should not be a problem. The accounts can be reconciled by understanding the full picture.
 
Jesus is nearing Jericho (Luke 18:35). A blind man sat by the road begging. As Jesus approached, he heard the multitude. It does not say where he is, just that he heard the multitude as they were passing (meaning him) by (Luke 18:26). He asked what was going on and heard it was Jesus who was coming. He starts to cry out, having no idea where Jesus is, just that He is coming. People tell him to be quiet. It then happens that as Jesus and His disciples are on their way out of Jericho, the multitude followed Him (Matthew 20:29). It is at this time that Jesus will heal the blind. This is why it says in Luke 19:1, “And having entered, He traversed the ‘Jericho’” (CG).
 
The assumption people make from Luke’s account is that the blind were on the entrance side of Jericho. But that is only an assumption. Jesus entered and passed through Jericho. The blind would have heard the commotion from the very beginning of the ruckus as the entire city went out to see Jesus. The perspectives are given by each gospel writer:
 
Luke says He was coming near Jericho.
Mark says they came to Jericho.
Matthew says they were proceeding from Jericho.
 
Luke records the beginning of the encounter as Jesus approached Jericho: the blind man heard the crowd and began crying out. Matthew and Mark record the point at which the healing is associated with Jesus’ departure from Jericho. Whether the cry began on the approach and culminated near the departure, or whether the locality of Jericho is being described from different sides of the city/region, the accounts need not contradict. Luke 19:1 confirms that Jesus entered and passed through Jericho in connection with the same movement, so the event belongs to the whole Jericho passage, not necessarily to a single frozen instant at one gate.
 
When Jesus got to the other side of Jericho as He passed through, He would have come to where the blind man was (while exiting the city), and the two parties would have finally met. It is Luke 19:1 that solves this otherwise difficult and wholly misunderstood situation. Since the beginning, excuses have been made to justify the event. To read some of them, go to the Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 20:29.
 
The problem is that at times, the gospels present information categorically rather than chronologically. However, it is evident throughout the gospels that this is not the case. Unless something is described with a time marker, there is no reason to assume the information is chronological instead of categorical.
 
We tend to assume that everything happened all at once when reading the accounts, but the man is blind. He would not have gotten up and gone to the other side of Jericho. He would have sat and called out, hoping someone would assist him. But the accounts all say otherwise, saying to him that he should be quiet. As such, “he cried out all the more” (Luke 18:39 et al.).
 
To “hear” and to “be present with” are not the same things for a blind person as they are for the seeing. The people would have flocked to Jesus as He entered. The blind would have sat in misery-filled anticipation until Jesus finally exited. Understanding this “supposed” discrepancy, it next says, “it followed Him, ‘crowd, great’.”
 
This would include those who travelled with Jesus, those who met up with Him on His nearing Jericho, and those who were in Jericho who flocked to Him.
 
Life application: There are other supposed contradictions in Jesus’ movements as He traveled from the Galilee to and through Jericho. Some were mentioned in earlier commentaries. There are also supposed contradictions in the account of the healing that will take place. These are not contradictions.
 
However, when coming to the narratives found in Scripture, we have to insert ourselves into the surrounding events. After giving several options to resolve the matter discussed above, options which span nineteen hundred years of scholarly study, the Pulpit Commentary sadly says, “Inspiration extends not to petty circumstances, and the credibility of the gospel depends not on the rectification of such minutiae.”
 
That is a cheap and inexcusable way of handling God’s “inspiration.” If God inspired the word, then there will be a resolution to the matter. God deals in minutiae. He created the universe, and yet a single atom will not be out of place. He set forth His plan of salvation, and not a single saved person will be forgotten by Him. If God weren’t in the details, the whole universe would collapse in on itself.
 
By placing ourselves in the narrative and seeing it (at least in a non-visual way) as the blind saw it, there is no contradiction at all. If Luke 19:1 didn’t exist, the matter would be more difficult to reconcile. Despite this, if Luke 19:1 were not included, we could make our own assumptions, knowing that God had a reason for saying things the way He did.
 
Unfortunately, without having the right information, errors will naturally seem to arise. The NKJV does not say “And” in Luke 19:1. It says, “Then Jesus entered and passed through Jericho.” That would cause a real contradiction. But the Greek kai (and), not tote (then), is used. It is simply a statement of fact that Jesus entered and passed through without regard to time.
 
Commentaries will also muddy the waters. Benson says, “Jesus entered and passed through Jericho — Namely, after performing the miracle recorded at the close of the preceding chapter.” This is an assumption (as noted above) that the account of the events is chronological rather than categorical.
 
The thought Benson presents is that Jesus was entering Jericho, He healed the blind, and then proceeded through Jericho. But taking Matthew, Mark, and Luke together, along with considering Luke 19:1, there is no discrepancy.
 
Regardless of the fumbling of fallible man, God’s word will be vindicated. Be careful not to assume that a commentary (even this one) is correct until you have fully thought through what is being said. If you still cannot come to a resolution on the matter, you can still have faith that God is in the details. All will be made clear someday.
 
If this is true with His word, it is true with you as well. He is there with you as you struggle through life. Trust that it is so. Keep your eyes, heart, and affections on Him. You will be rewarded for your faith on that day when you stand before Him.
 
Lord God, thank You that we possess a sure word about what You are doing to bring us back to Yourself. Thank You that Jesus is in the details, and that we are on the right and proper path back to You. Help us to walk in faith each step of the way. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.
 

Matthew 20:28

Tuesday, 16 June 2026
 
just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many. Matthew 20:28
 
“Just as the ‘Son, the Man’, not He came to be attended to but to attend, and give the ‘soul, His’ – ransom for many.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told the disciples that whoever desires to be first among them should be their slave. With that noted, He next explains why this is to be so in His kingdom, saying, “Just as the ‘Son, the Man’.”
 
Referring to Himself, Jesus highlights His humanity. He is fully human. Thus, His example is one that is understandable and attainable in the stream of human existence by others, even if it is not what is normally expected of greatness or preeminence. In this example He sets forth, He notes that “not He came to be attended to.”
 
This would have been evident to the disciples, even if they didn’t really pay attention to it throughout their days together. People didn’t come to Jesus to serve Him. The disciples followed Him and learned from Him. They also did the things He directed, such as telling Peter to get a fish in which he would find a coin in its mouth, but there is nothing about people coming to Him and serving Him in a designated capacity.
 
There is a note in Luke 8:2, 3 about the women who helped provide for Him from their substance, but that is not so much attending to Him as one would think of a servant or slave, but as helpers assisting the ministry of which He was the leader.
 
Examples such as Martha serving while Mary listened to Jesus cannot be used to dismiss Jesus’ words here. Those were duties people do in their regular lives. Jesus being present was incidental to the fact. In other words, Martha would have served anyone who came into her house in a similar manner.
 
Jesus’ words are referring to a person who actively allowed people to serve Him because they were under Him and designated to do so. And so, to explicitly state that the opposite was true, He continues, saying, “but to attend.”
 
The disciples had seen Jesus tirelessly serving the masses, tending to them, even at His own expense. He didn’t expect people to come to His castle and meet His every need. He was in the thick of the masses of Israel, tending to their needs, both physical and spiritual.
 
In just a short time from His words to these disciples, He would give them a visual, tangible lesson of servitude, which is recorded in John 13:1-17. The Creator and Sustainer of all things would wash their feet, instructing them on what it means to live a life of servitude. And more, Jesus says, “and give the ‘soul, His’ – ransom for many.”
 
A new word is seen, lutron, something to loosen with. As such, it signifies a redemption price, as in one paying a sum to loosen another’s bonds. The word is found only here and in the parallel passage in Mark 10:45. However, it is also used in the Greek translation of the Old Testament over twenty times, including key passages, such as Exodus 21:30, Leviticus 19:20, Proverbs 13:8, and Isaiah 45:13.
 
The word is used to translate specific Hebrew words (such as pidyon, geulah, and kopher) to indicate a redemption price or ransom paid to liberate individuals, such as slaves, captives, or those subject to the death penalty.
 
The meaning of Jesus’ words is clear and unambiguous. Jesus would give His soul, meaning His life, as a ransom payment for others. This, then, would be the ultimate ministration of His life on behalf of those He came to attend to.
 
Life application: As noted above, Jesus was among the people of Israel, actively serving them with His life, and yet, the disciples probably never stopped to think, “Jesus is spending all His time serving others.”
 
They would have heard the teaching and thought, “He sure is a great Teacher.” They would have seen the miracles and thought, “He has the most incredible healing abilities.” But they probably didn’t put two and two together to conclude, “Jesus is the most stupendous Servant we have ever seen.”
 
And yet, this is exactly what He was doing. The teaching, healing, counseling, and training were all forms of service which permeated His existence. As Christians, we can get so myopic about things that we miss the greater picture of what is going on in the world around us.
 
Some focus so heavily on Israel that they miss what God is doing in the church. Some focus so heavily on the church that they miss what God is doing in regard to Israel. We might focus so much on helping that we never take time to teach personal responsibility. We might focus so much on doctrine that we forget about evangelizing.
 
This doesn’t mean that we don’t each have our own specialty that we can excel at. But we should not become so focused on our specialty that we forget that others are doing great things that are not necessarily directly related to what we are doing.
 
A church that teaches sound doctrine may not have a lot of converts, but a church with very basic doctrine may get multitudes saved. One is not better than the other. Rather, they have different abilities and capabilities that should be considered.
 
It is great to have converts. People’s eternal destinies are changed by that. But it is also great that people don’t just get converted and then stagnate. There needs to be proper doctrine taught that will keep people from being led astray.
 
Let us not get bogged down in our own little circle where we forget that God is doing a great work of building His church with an almost innumerable number of specialties, all of which overlap and are intended to bring His purposes together into a perfect body someday.
 
Lord God, may we be ready to recognize the value of what others are doing, seeing the importance and effect of their efforts, and acknowledging them as such. It took the disciples of Jesus quite a while to figure out what He was doing. May we be willing to carefully evaluate all You have going on in order to build Your people into an everlasting dwelling. Amen.

Matthew 20:27

Monday, 15 June 2026
 
And whoever desires to be first among you, let him be your slave— Matthew 20:27
 
“And whoever, if he wills in you to be first, let him be your slave.” (CG)
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told the disciples that whoever desires to be great among them should be their attendant. In that He contrasted megas, great, with diakonos, attendant (a deacon). The word diakonos is likely derived from two words signifying through and dust. One other supposed root would make it through, and to run (such as errands).
 
Either way, the one who is great is to be the one who either scurries through the dust, getting dirty helping others, or he is to be running errands for others. Jesus now continues the contrast, saying, “And whoever, if he wills in you to be first.”
 
In this, Jesus uses the word prótos. It means first in time, place, order of importance, etc. It speaks of the position of preeminence. If someone desires to be preeminent in God’s eyes among those he associates with, Jesus says, “let him be your slave.”
 
The word is doulos, a slave. It is derived from deó, to bind. One can see the idea of a person being bound in some manner, and thus in subjection to another. He may be bound with shackles or with something as simple as an understanding that he is another’s property, but he is bound and without any inherent rights within the relationship.
 
Jesus has turned the idea of what greatness and being preeminent are upside down. With these points set forth, the disciples were probably thoroughly confused at what He was trying to tell them. In the next verse, He will explain why these things are the way they are. However, even until the time leading up to His cross, they will not truly understand what He is talking about.
 
After that event and the subsequent resurrection, the mental tumblers will begin to click.
 
Life application: Greatness has many forms, and it is perceived differently by various people. Suppose someone has a lot of money and is being driven somewhere very important in a limousine.
 
The car hits a major pothole and receives significant damage. The driver cannot fix it, communications are down, and the weather is horrifying. The meeting will not take place, money will be lost, the competition will gain the advantage, and calamity may be the result.
 
Along comes an old farmer in his beat-up old pickup. He just left Bible study where they looked over Matthew 20. He sees there is trouble, pulls over, and gets out in the terrible weather. It is so bad that rolling down the window to explain the situation practically floods the limo. The farmer walks around, looks things over, and gives a thumbs-up that he can take care of it.
 
For the next forty minutes, he lies in the mud, fixing the car, smacking his knuckles, cutting his hand, and missing mom’s home-cooked dinner while rectifying the situation. He never said, “I’ll do it for this much.” He just got to work and fixed it.
 
Once the job was done and he was certain the car would make it, he explained what the problem was, told them what to do as soon as they could for a permanent, reliable fix, bid them good night, handed them a tract (a bit wet, bloody, and muddy), and headed back to his truck without saying another word.
 
Who is the greatest in this encounter? The businessman will make it just on time if the patch holds. He will secure a big deal, and life will continue to be cushy. The farmer gets home, apologizes for being late, soaked, and covered in mud. His wife tends to his wounds. She never asks what happened and he never explains. It’s just another day in his wonderful, simple life. Who is the greatest in this encounter?
 
Someone has to drive a limo while the man does his business. Someone has to get the gas out of the ground for a car to run. Someone has to provide the electrical skills to get the motors to run the lights. Someone needs to cook dinner.
 
What is greatness? Think about it from Jesus’ perspective.
 
Lord God, help us to have hearts filled with faith in You. When this is the case, whatever our job is will be one of joyful service, considering others, and desiring to bring glory to You. May it be so in our lives. Amen.