BIBLE IN TEN

Matthew 10:13

Tuesday, 20 May 2025
 
If the household is worthy, let your peace come upon it. But if it is not worthy, let your peace return to you. Matthew 10:13
 
“And indeed, if the house, it should be worthy, it came – your peace – upon it. And if not it should be worthy, your peace, it returns to you” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus said, “And entering into the house, you greet it.” He now continues, saying, “And indeed, if the house, it should be worthy.”
 
The order at first seems off. How can they greet a worthy house that is found later to be unworthy? The meaning is found in the greeting as stated by the Jews mentioned in the previous commentary, Shalom lekha, “Peace to you.”
 
This was not something that was stated after the household was determined worthy. It is what any person in the Middle East would do upon entering any house, meeting any stranger on the way, or even walking into a restaurant where someone is immediately greeted. It is as common as someone in America coming to a house and saying “Good afternoon.”
 
For example, in Arabic nations, when greeting another, it is standard to say, As-salamu alaikum, “Peace be upon you.” It is essentially the same thought as the Hebrew just mentioned. In other words, Jesus is telling His disciples to walk into a house with the standard greeting for peace. It is at this time that “if the house, it should be worthy” applies. Only after that, He says, “it came – your peace – upon it.”
 
Here, the word eiréné, peace, is introduced. It signifies peace both literally and figuratively, such as quietness, rest, restoration, etc. The word is derived from eiró, to join. Thus, one can get the sense that a state of harmony has been enjoined.
 
The apostles are to send forth their peace, looking for it to be enjoined with the household. However, only after explaining their intent and purpose for being in town would that peace actually be realized or denied. If so, their peace would truly rest upon the house. On the other hand, “And if not it should be worthy, your peace, it returns to you.”
 
Another new word is seen here, epistrephó, to turn, return, convert, etc. It is derived from epi, upon, and strephó, to turn or return. Thus, it bears much the same meaning as strephó, but it is accentuated.
 
Jesus’ meaning here is that the standard greeting for peace should always be extended, but it may not always apply. When it is extended and the house is one of peace towards their message, then their peace, meaning a state of harmony with the owners, will exist. However, if the opposite is true, those in the house have set themselves against the gospel, and there will be no peace between them. As such, they are to depart from that house.
 
Jesus will continue to explain just what this state of lacking harmony means for them in the coming verses.
 
Life application: The false teaching that Christians must forgive everybody all the time for all offenses against them has been so heavily pushed within the church that Christians face one of two general states in their existence for those who actually care about this particular doctrine.
 
The first is a group of neurotic people who stand frustrated at the fact that they are constantly abused by others with no foreseeable relief or remedy. Their state of salvation becomes one of works, ever attempting to merit what has already been given to them through accepting Jesus.
 
In other words, they are told they are saved by grace through faith in Christ. They accept this message and are saved. However, they are also told that if you don’t forgive others, you will not be forgiven. Thus, there are contradictory thoughts tearing at the soul of the poor believer.
 
The only possible escape is to follow a path of works to continue to be saved, to merit God’s favor, and to retain their salvation. It is an unhealthy, unbalanced, and unbiblical approach to one’s walk with the Lord. It is an impossible dilemma that ruins their joy in Christ.
The second state is a group of people who claim they forgive everyone, are at peace with all people, and are actually better than all other Christians because they are able to do what they know no one can actually do. The resulting arrogance in such people is, at times, astonishing.
 
The reason they can live in this state, knowing it is not true, is that they don’t actually care about discovering the truth of how to resolve the dilemma. Instead, like anyone who has the upper hand over others, they feel they have the right to other’s respect and adoration. They are the super Christians worthy of other’s emulation. They hold the secret and thus have implicit control over those who are inferior in their walk with the Lord, or so they think.
 
The words of Jesus in these verses clearly demonstrate that there are times when people are at odds with one another and that no peace exists between the two. There is no forgiveness of the offense against the gospel to be obtained. That will be seen in the next two verses.
 
It is important for saved believers to know and remember that forgiveness in Scripture is never unconditional. If it were, it would mean the believer has a higher standard to meet than God has set forth in Christ. Jesus’ sacrifice is offered to all. However, it is conditional upon belief in what the cross, burial, and resurrection mean.
 
Without belief, no person will be saved. Thus, there are conditions for forgiveness, even from God’s position. To teach that all believers must forgive all people all the time without meeting certain standards is completely unbiblical, it is opposed to the gospel message, and it produces insecure or arrogant attitudes that are damaging to a sound walk with the Lord.
 
Lord God, help us to take all things in their proper context and to apply them appropriately. Taking verses out of the intended context can only damage our doctrine and a proper walk with You. So, keep reminding us to carefully consider and apply Your wonderful word to our lives. Amen.

Matthew 10:12

Monday, 19 May 2025
 
And when you go into a household, greet it. Matthew 10:12
 
“And entering into the house, you greet it” (CG).
 
The previous verse noted that when a worthy house is found, the apostles were to stay there until they left. Jesus continues with, “And entering.”
 
Being a participle, the intent is “at the time you enter,” or “while you are entering.” He continues with “into the house.”
 
The KJV and NKJV say “a house.” This is incorrect. They were to go to houses until they found a worthy one. They were not required to react positively to those in an unworthy house. There is a reason for this, which will be seen in the next verses. For now, the verse finishes with the words, “you greet it.”
 
This would be the standard Jewish greeting of Shalom lekha, “Peace to you.” These are the Hebrew words Jesus would have used, as is recorded in John 19 –
 
“Then, the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in the midst, and said to them, ‘Peace be with you.’ 20 When He had said this, He showed them His hands and His side. Then the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord.21 So Jesus said to them again, ‘Peace to you! As the Father has sent Me, I also send you.’” John 19:19-21
 
Concerning such visits as the church later expanded, Vincent’s Word Studies says –
 
“The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles," a tract discovered in 1873 in the library of the monastery of the Most Holy Sepulchre at Constantinople, by Bryennios, Metropolitan of Nicomedia, is assigned to the date of 120 a.d., and by some scholars is placed as early as 100 a.d. It is addressed to Gentile Christians, and is designed to give them practical instruction in the Christian life, according to the teachings of the twelve apostles and of the Lord himself. In the eleventh chapter we read as follows: "And every apostle who cometh to you, let him be received as the Lord; but he shall not remain except for one day; if, however, there be need, then the next day; but if he remain three days, he is a false prophet. But when the apostle departeth, let him take nothing except bread enough till he lodge again, but if he ask money, he is a false prophet." And again (ch. 8): "Likewise a true teacher, he also is worthy like the workman, of his support. Every first-fruit, then, of the products of wine-press and threshing-floor, of oxen and sheep, thou shalt take and give to the prophets, for they are your high-priests....If thou makest a baking of bread, take the first of it and give according to the commandment. In like manner, when thou openest a jar of wine or oil, take the first of it and give to the prophets; and of money and clothing, and every possession, take the first, as may seem right to thee, and give according to the commandment.”
 
Life application: Whether the tract noted by Vincent’s Word Studies is accurate or not, it is an ancient witness to the fact that people were going around evangelizing. As noted in the previous commentary, people will occasionally come spreading a message or asking for assistance who might not have the best intent for the church. Therefore, wisdom in dealing with others is necessary.
 
And more, there is no longer a need for wondering if someone is a false prophet based on whether they remain for a certain amount of time or not. The Bible has been compiled and its instructions are set. To determine if someone is teaching falsities, all we need to do is refer to Scripture and find out what it says.
 
This shouldn’t be something we need to do when someone shows up. Rather, it should be something we are doing daily. That way, we will know what the word says and where to find it. When we are presented with false teachings, all we will need to do is go to the Word to ensure we are remembering properly.
 
Once we have determined they are spreading a false message, we can kick them out to the street curb and tell them to beat it. There is no point trying to convince heretics, charlatans, or grifters that they should turn from their ways. They already know this. What they need is a dose of being evicted from the presence of the church.
 
That will be much more effective in hopefully waking them up from their ways than all the words we could utter. Sometimes, a tough example is what is needed to get people to change. Jesus overturned the tables at the temple for a reason. Let us not be timid in dealing with false teachers.
 
Lord God, please give us wisdom and fortitude to stand against false teachers. May we be bold in proclaiming what is true, and may we be intolerant of those who proclaim otherwise. May we not get into back-and-forth argumentation when decisive action is needed. Help us in this, O God. Amen.

Matthew 10:11

Sunday, 18 May 2025
 
“Now whatever city or town you enter, inquire who in it is worthy, and stay there till you go out. Matthew 10:11
 
“And into what city or village you shall enter, you inquire who in her, he is worthy. And there you remain until if you shall depart.” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus continued His instructions to the twelve about what they should not take with them, noting that the toiler is worthy of his food. Next, He continues, saying, “And into what city or village you shall enter, you inquire who in her, he is worthy.”
 
In the Bible, both in Hebrew and Greek, cities and villages are feminine entities. As such, some translations faithfully translate the Hebrew in this manner. It is generally not so in the New Testament, but the thinking would have been this way among Jesus and the apostles. In both testaments, even until Revelation, this thought continues –
 
“The virgin, the daughter of Zion,Has despised you, laughed you to scorn;The daughter of JerusalemHas shaken her head behind your back!” Isaiah 37:22
&
 
“And the woman whom you saw is that great city which reigns over the kings of the earth.” Revelation 17:18
 
This same thought carries on in modern English in various ways, such as when referring to a sweet car by saying, “She is a beauty,” or speaking of a majestic ship, saying, “She is set to sail the seven seas.”
 
As for Jesus’ words concerning being worthy, the hospitality of the Middle East was to welcome strangers into one’s home. This even extended to enemies. When someone was in the home, a set of cultural rules would be adhered to by both parties. The apostles would be there to preach and teach, but the homeowner may say, “Please do not do that in or from this house.”
 
It is his house, and they are his rules. The apostles would be under no obligation to stay in such a house. It would be an insult to come to a village to preach and then be asked not to do so. Because of this, they would decline the invitation and seek another home to use as a base with an owner more favorable to their mission. Of such an abode, Jesus next says, “And there you remain until if you shall depart.”
 
Here is a new word, menó. Strong’s says, “A primary verb; to stay (in a given place, state, relation or expectancy) -- abide, continue, dwell, endure, be present, remain...” The agreement would be mutual, and it would allow the apostles to have a base until they had evangelized the whole town.
 
It would also make it convenient for those who wished to talk to know where to find them. Jesus will continue to explain this type of arrangement for the next few verses. Though it is something rather foreign to us today, this was a common and expected situation at the time.
 
Life application: As noted, it is less common today for people to arbitrarily open their doors to strangers, but there are times when people can help out in similar matters. Visiting missionaries are usually on a tight budget. Some churches have houses set up for them to stay in. If not, there may be some kind soul in the church who is willing to take them in.
 
If neither is the case, the least the church could do is to ask for help getting a place to rent during their stay. Some churches will have a person who is aware of missionary needs and may arrange these things.
 
Try to be inventive in how you can help in whatever way is possible to assist visitors or traveling missionaries. However, it is good to be circumspect as well. There are people who come into churches and ask for help, including money for a supposed need. They, however, often just go from church to church, ripping them off in this manner.
 
The best plan for such things is to have a policy where the church and the congregants do not give out cash. Until a person is known, it is unwise to hand money to someone just because they claim they have a need.
 
Wisdom in how to handle people usually comes through learning. Unfortunately, learning when not to give means there was a time when giving was taken advantage of. It is good to help, but getting ripped off by deceivers is as common as car wheels turning on a busy highway.
 
Lord God, help Your people to use wisdom and discernment when helping out those who say they have a need. Quite often, it is later discovered that the only need they had was to avoid working, and do so at other people’s expense. May we be cheerful to help others, but wise in how we do so. Amen.

Matthew 10:10

Saturday, 17 May 2025
 
nor bag for your journey, nor two tunics, nor sandals, nor staffs; for a worker is worthy of his food. Matthew 10:10
 
“nor wallet in the way, nor two tunics, nor sandals, nor staff. For the toiler, he is worthy of his food” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus began a list of things that the twelve were not to take when they went out to evangelize the cities of Israel. That list now continues, saying, “nor wallet in the way.”
 
Here, the péra, pouch, is introduced. It will be seen six times in total between Matthew, Mark, and Luke. It signifies a leather pouch for food. Strong’s defines it as a wallet, but today we think of a wallet as something folded and carried in a pocket.
 
This would rather be a pouch that would carry food or money as a traveling bag. It is probably something similar to what David carried in his battle with Goliath –
 
“Then he took his staff in his hand; and he chose for himself five smooth stones from the brook, and put them in a shepherd’s bag, in a pouch which he had, and his sling was in his hand. And he drew near to the Philistine.” 1 Samuel 17:40
 
Continuing, Jesus next says, “nor two tunics.” The meaning is the same intent as that of Mark 6:8, where it says, “and not to put on two tunics.” Having a second tunic would mean they put both on. Instead, they were to wear the simplest attire without any extra for comfort, replacement, or fashion. Next, He says, “nor sandals.”
 
Seemingly contradictorily, Mark says that they were to wear sandals. The reconciliation between the two is to consider first the nature of the land. It would be close to impossible to walk in Israel without footwear. The land is hot, and the feet would burn. The stones on paths range from every type imaginable. Some would bruise the feet, some would slice them like razors, etc. And there are thorns of various types that are everywhere. They pierce, slice, and scratch.
 
Therefore, these words probably default to what was just said about “nor two tunics.” In other words, this is a second category where only one pair is to be taken. If they were to get ruined, they would be at the mercy of others to provide repair or replacement. Likewise, it next says, “nor staff.”
 
Again, Mark says, “He commanded them to take nothing for the journey except a staff” (Mark 6:8). As such, this is a third category limiting them to a single staff. Having a second staff would be a help at times in various ways, but they had to make do with just one. Should they break or lose it, they would have to be provided by those whom they tended to.
 
Each of these points becomes obvious based on the next words, “For the toiler, he is worthy of his food.”
 
In this thought, Jesus is lumping each of these traveling necessities into one thought, that of food. It is the overarching need to be provided for from day to day. The others were needs that arose from time to time and would be considered a part of the “food” necessity that these men would have.
 
The same thought is seen in the words “Bread is the staff of life.” It is the principal need, as if a staff of support. The staff, however, is included in the phrase. It thus means, “Bread is the principal support.” In Matthew, the word “food” speaks of the whole of that which is necessary, which includes a tunic, sandals, and a staff. Anything extra of each goes beyond the basic needs.
 
Life application: As with other seeming “contradictions” found in Scripture, there is a reasonable explanation for Jesus’ words. What seems at first contradictory is merely one person’s way of explaining what was said as opposed to someone else truthfully telling the same account using different words to convey the substance of what is said.
 
Matthew focuses on the negative of the subcategories, “you shall not.” This is dependent on a main thought. In this case, two of something. Mark places that thought at the end. Therefore, his positive command becomes necessary –
 
Matthew: Provide neither gold nor silver nor copper in your money belts, 10 nor bag for your journey, nor two tunics, nor sandals, nor staffs; for a worker is worthy of his food.
 
Mark: He commanded them to take nothing for the journey except a staff—no bag, no bread, no copper in their money belts— 9 but to wear sandals, and not to put on two tunics. Matthew’s final words about the wages form an explanation to sum up the overall thought.
 
When you come to difficult passages, be sure to stop and consider the structure of them, the surrounding words that are provided, etc. In doing this, what seems at first contradictory is not. Rather, it is the natural way that different people will present the same thought, and it is as common as windows on a skyscraper.
 
Lord God, lots of people have spent an inordinate amount of time trying to tear apart Your word in order to confuse those who read it. Help us to think clearly and soberly about the difficulties presented in it. From there, give us wisdom in what is presented. Help us, though, not to rationalize away such things, but to logically explain why things are presented as they are! Help us in this, O God. Amen.
 

Matthew 10:9

Friday, 16 May 2025
 
Provide neither gold nor silver nor copper in your money belts, Matthew 10:9
 
“Not you shall acquire gold nor silver nor copper into your girdles” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus instructed the twelve concerning what to do when they went out among the people. He finished with, “Freely you received, freely you give.” Now, His words continue with, “Not you shall acquire gold nor silver nor copper.”
 
The word ktaomai is introduced here. It signifies to acquire. It has various meanings based on the surrounding context, such as obtain, possess, provide, purchase, etc. In this case, it is applied to the acquisition of precious or semi-precious metals, including gold, something already introduced in Matthew 2:11. Also, He notes arguros, silver.
 
In the Bible, silver generally speaks of money. It is the standard metal used for transactions going all the way back to Genesis 13:2. The word in Greek is derived from argos, shining. The underlying, typological meaning of silver is redemption, something it consistently signifies in this regard. Finally, Jesus mentions chalkos, copper.
 
In this case, copper is the main metal, but the word also signifies copper alloys, such as bronze and brass. For example, a copper bell wouldn’t make a very nice sound, and it would be worn out quickly. However, a bronze or brass bell would be stronger and have a much clearer sound. As such, it is what Paul refers to in 1 Corinthians 13:1 –
 
“Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass [chalkos] or a clanging cymbal.”
 
The same is true in the Old Testament, where the Hebrew word nekhosheth, copper, also refers to copper alloys. The context must determine what is being referred to. As for these metals, each is used in the Bible concerning the acquisition of wealth, which can be stored up, used for currency, etc. The twelve are instructed not to acquire these as such.
 
This instruction to not acquire them is because this was not the purpose of their going forth. What they needed was to come from the care of others without additional profit. Therefore, Jesus finishes the verse with, “into your girdles.”
 
This refers to how the girdle is twisted, forming folds where money could be kept. This practice continues among various tribes of people in the Middle East to this day. The girdle thus equates to the modern fanny pack.
 
In the comparable passage in Mark, it says, “He commanded them to take nothing for the journey except a staff—no bag, no bread, no copper in their money belts” (Mark 6:8). In Luke, it says, “Take nothing for the journey, neither staffs nor bag nor bread nor money” Luke 9:3.
 
Life application: In the comments above, it says concerning the translation as copper, bronze, or brass, that “the context must determine what is being referred to.” You might then ask, “Charlie, what are you talking about?” The answer to the appropriateness of each translation is to be found in what is being talked about.
 
For example, there is a time when brass was not yet used. Therefore, before it was introduced as an alloy, any copper alloy referred to would be best translated as bronze. This was known as the Bronze Age, a period that extended from around 2000 BC to about 700 BC.
 
During this period, if a sword is referred to it would probably have been bronze. Copper would have been too soft to make an effective, lasting sword. Therefore, translations that say brass during this period would be incorrect. Further, being an alloy, bronze and brass are not found in nature. Therefore, the following verse has two errors in it concerning the word nekhosheth –
 
“A land wherein thou shalt eat bread without scarceness, thou shalt not lack any thing in it; a land whose stones are iron, and out of whose hills thou mayest dig brass [nekhosheth].” Deuteronomy 8:9
 
The first error is that it was too early in history for it to have been brass. Rather, bronze was the alloy referred to at that time. But even that would be incorrect. This is because one mayest not dig brass or bronze from them thar hills. Only copper could be obtained from them, after which they would be mixed with other metals to form bronze.
 
For those stuck in the cult mindset that the KJV is the only acceptable translation, this causes a dilemma, which then demands they excuse such an error. Their answer is that it is believed that such an alloy was found in Siberia when a meteor entered the atmosphere and formed a copper alloy as it heated and cooled.
There are several problems with this. First, the supposed alloy that was found was microscopic. Second, it was ... in Siberia. Checking a map will help the student of the Bible to see that Israel is not in Siberia. And more, the Lord tells the people through Moses that they mayest dig nekhosheth out of the hills. This implies an abundance of it, not microscopic amounts.
 
Therefore, Deuteronomy 8:9 contains several of the innumerable translational errors found in the KJV. And yet, because of a cult mindset, they must go to absurd lengths in an attempt to justify what is unjustifiable. Be reasonable in how you consider what you believe. If something you have accepted is wrong, admit it and move on.
 
Lord God, help us to think clearly and reasonably about what Your word is telling us. Help us to put aside biases, presuppositions, and faulty thinking as we consider what You are telling us. We may have been misinformed about something in the past, and so help us not to try to justify error but instead admit it and determine what is correct. May we do this so that our understanding of Scripture will be honoring of You. Amen.

Matthew 10:8

Thursday, 15 May 2025
 
Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out demons. Freely you have received, freely give. Matthew 10:8
 
“Being feeble – you heal, leprous – you cleanse, dead – you rouse, demons – you eject. Freely you received, freely you give” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus instructed the twelve what to say when they went forth to proclaim their words to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Now, adding to the proclamation they were to make, He tells them of the authority they will possess as well, beginning with, “Being feeble – you heal.”
 
This is a new word, astheneó. It is a verb signifying to be feeble, coming from the adjective asthenés, to be feeble. The verb, being a present participle, literally reads “being feeble.” The word, however, is generally translated as a noun or an adverb. Jesus gives the apostles the ability to heal those who are feeble. Also, He next says, “leprous – you cleanse.”
 
This is something Jesus has already done. This same ability is now conferred upon them. Being a leper was something that required additional steps to be taken after a person was cleansed. This is because having leprosy was something that was determined by the priest. Once he proclaimed a person to be leprous, he was to be excluded from the community.
 
The specific details are found in Leviticus 13. If a person was cleansed, the instructions in Leviticus 14 were then to be followed. Therefore, only the priest could officially declare a person free from the leprosy that once afflicted him. Next come disputed words, saying, “dead – you rouse.”
 
These words are not recorded in some manuscripts. Even if original, there is no indication that any were raised from the dead except by Jesus. Only after the resurrection are Dorcas (Tabitha) and Eutychus restored to life by Peter and then Paul. If the words were inserted later, it was probably in connection with that thought concerning what was done through Peter and Paul.
 
However, that would be an inexcusable reason to insert it here. Whether the words are original or not, Jesus possessed the ability, and after the completion of His ministry, it was granted in those two instances. Next, it says, “demons – you eject.”
 
In Luke, not only are the twelve given authority to do these things, but seventy disciples were also sent out. Upon their return, it says –
 
“Then the seventy returned with joy, saying, ‘Lord, even the demons are subject to us in Your name.’” Luke 10:17
 
Therefore, these gospel narratives support one another in confirming this granted ability from the Lord. Finally, Jesus finishes the verse saying, “Freely you received, freely you give.”
 
Here he introduces the word dórean. It is a word signifying without cause, freely, for nothing, or even in vain. Each instance requires the context to be considered. In this case, it signifies they were not to charge for their services.
 
Life application: In Acts 8, Simon the sorcerer is said to have believed the gospel message preached to him. After that, however, it says –
 
“And when Simon saw that through the laying on of the apostles’ hands the Holy Spirit was given, he offered them money, 19 saying, ‘Give me this power also, that anyone on whom I lay hands may receive the Holy Spirit.’20 But Peter said to him, ‘Your money perish with you, because you thought that the gift of God could be purchased with money! 21 You have neither part nor portion in this matter, for your heart is not right in the sight of God. 22 Repent therefore of this your wickedness, and pray God if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you. 23 For I see that you are poisoned by bitterness and bound by iniquity.’24 Then Simon answered and said, ‘Pray to the Lord for me, that none of the things which you have spoken may come upon me.’” Acts 8:18-24
 
It is often argued that Simon was not saved because of his conduct. However, it says quite clearly in Acts 8:13 that he believed. It is the same word used when speaking of belief leading to salvation elsewhere. If he truly believed he was saved. Salvation is not conditional on knowing everything about the faith. Nor is it conditional on not adhering to proper doctrine after being saved when what is proper is known.
 
Rather, salvation is conditional on one thing: belief in the gospel. We do not read the hearts of others. As such, it is entirely inappropriate to say of someone, “He is not saved.” It may be true that he is not reflecting proper Christian values, but that is not a salvific issue.
 
Let us not be finger-pointers when we do not have all the facts. If someone is not living for the Lord as expected after being saved, there are verses that deal with what we are to do with them. However, let us not make proclamations about things we cannot truly be certain of.
 
“But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.” 1 Corinthians 5:11
 
Lord God, thank You for the simplicity of the gospel. If it were up to us, none of us would continue to be saved after we first believed. But Your grace extends to all of our faults – past, present, and future. Thank You for the surety of salvation we possess. Amen.
 

Matthew 10:7

Wednesday, 14 May 2025
 
And as you go, preach, saying, ‘The kingdom of heaven is at hand.’ Matthew 10:7
 
“And going, you proclaim, saying that ‘It has neared – the kingdom of the heavens’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told His twelve to specifically go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Next, He instructs them, “And going, you proclaim, saying.”
 
Jesus uses the same word that has been used several times already, kérussó. It signifies to proclaim or herald an announcement. HELPS Word Studies says of it, “bringing eternal accountability to all who hear it.”
 
Consider it! Jesus is sending His chosen twelve out among the people of Israel. He has already been conducting His ministry for some amount of time, but the harvest field is so ready for reaping that He has decided to send forth those who have followed Him and learned from Him to expand the process. What words will He ask them to proclaim? The answer is “that ‘It has neared – the kingdom of the heavens.’”
 
In Matthew 3:2, the first recorded words of John the Baptist were, “Reconsider! For it has neared – the kingdom of the heavens!” Likewise, in Matthew’s gospel, after His baptism and temptation, the first words of Jesus’ ministry to the people were, “Reconsider! For it has neared – the kingdom of the heavens!”
 
Now Jesus instructs these disciples to likewise tell the people that the kingdom of the heavens has neared. In each instance, there is the anticipation that a great change in the economy and focus of God’s redemptive plans is set to take place.
 
This is just the beginning of the instruction to these men. In Luke 9, there is a complementary account of Jesus’ instructions to the twelve. That is followed in Luke 10 with Jesus sending out seventy more to continue the proclamation throughout Israel.
 
Life application: A common question that arises concerns the terms “kingdom of the heaven(s),” and “kingdom of God.” The words are certainly used interchangeably at times. For example, Jesus says that the kingdom of God is the kingdom of the heavens in Matthew 19 –
 
“Then Jesus said to His disciples, ‘Assuredly, I say to you that it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.’”  Matthew 19:23, 24
 
In those two verses, which are given in parallelism, He is clearly indicating that they are the same thing. The term kingdom of the heaven(s) is not used in the epistles. Rather, they refer to the kingdom of God. However, Paul does say that the Lord would deliver him and preserve him for His heavenly kingdom.
 
As such, there is certainly overlap in the thought. At times, however, it is clear that the promised kingdom to Israel is a literal earthly kingdom. This is how the disciples understood it when asking Him about the restoration of the kingdom in Acts 1:6.
 
The best approach to understanding the idea of a kingdom, then, is to check the surrounding context to see what is spoken of. God is working through time and dispensations in various ways to bring man to a state of restoration.
 
As He does this, a kingdom is either set up or being set up that is being expressed in various ways, actual or anticipated. In Romans 14, Paul speaks of the kingdom as a reality for believers now, and yet it is something that is only so positionally, as indicated elsewhere. The actual kingdom is something anticipated for believers at this time.
 
As such, it is good not to get overly dogmatic about things but rather to consider that there is a positional belonging and an actual belonging that may apply in one way or another.
 
For us, because of faith in Christ, we can be reassured that we are accepted into the kingdom now, even if we have to await the rapture to be actually received into the marvelous blessing of the kingdom that lies ahead for us. Be assured that Christ has accepted you if you have believed. Every good promise He has made will, therefore, be realized on that day.
 
Lord God, despite not yet being with You in heaven, we know we are with You through faith in what You have done. Help us to remember this in our times of trial and difficulty. We have a better and surer hope ahead than anything this fallen world can provide. May You come soon for Your people so that we can forever rejoice in Your presence. Amen.
 

Matthew 10:6

Tuesday, 13 May 2025
 
But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Matthew 10:6
 
“And you rather go to the sheep, the ‘having been lost’ – house, Israel” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus instructed His twelve to not go into the way of the Gentiles nor into a city of the Samaritans. Rather, He next says, “And you rather go to the sheep.”
 
The use of sheep is a common metaphor in Scripture to denote people, but most especially people needing the care of a shepherd. They are not animals that do well on their own, but when under the care of a shepherd, there is a mutual relationship that develops where they provide for one another.
 
But there is the truth that sheep will follow the care of even bad shepherds. Hence, we have the term “sheeple” to describe the stupidity of people who follow a leader, even when he is terrible. The Old Testament is replete with examples of people following bad leaders.
 
As for these sheep, Jesus next says, “the ‘having been lost.’” Using a perfect participle places a stress on their state, they are “the sheep, the ‘having been lost.’” They were lost and they continue to be lost. They need to be recovered, if possible. The metaphor is derived from Jeremiah 50. The words there explain their state and how they became the way they are –
 
“My people have been lost sheep.Their shepherds have led them astray;They have turned them away on the mountains.They have gone from mountain to hill;They have forgotten their resting place.7 All who found them have devoured them;And their adversaries said, ‘We have not offended,Because they have sinned against the Lord, the habitation of justice,The Lord, the hope of their fathers.’” Jeremiah 50:6, 7
 
The Lord, through Jeremiah, equates His people, meaning the house of Israel, to lost sheep. Jesus confirms this same thought as the verse finishes, saying, “house, Israel.”
 
Jesus has excluded the Gentiles in His words. He has also excluded those of Samaria. He is referring only to the people of Israel. This was to be the scope of His ministry at this time.
 
Life application: The evangelization of Israel took place first. Only after Christ’s atoning sacrifice would this expand to the rest of the world. But the covenant in Christ’s blood was directed specifically to the Jews –
 
“Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah— 32 not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, though I was a husband to them, says the Lord. 33 But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put My law in their minds, and write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. 34 No more shall every man teach his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, says the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.” Jeremiah 31:31-34
 
A new covenant implies there was an old covenant. This is then explicitly stated by the Lord when referring to Egypt. One covenant is replacing another. Gentiles are not the direct recipients of the New Covenant. Rather, Israel is the recipient, and Gentiles are then brought into the commonwealth of the blessings of that covenant (see Ephesians 2:11-13).
 
At no time is the church called Israel, including the term Israel of God mistakenly ascribed to the church, which is found in Galatians 6:16. Paul is careful to show the difference between Jews and Gentiles despite there being no distinction, meaning for obtaining salvation and covenant graces, between them. Paul says, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28).
 
Paul is not saying there are no longer Jews and Gentiles any more than he is saying there are no longer men and women. He is saying that in Christ, there is no distinction. This must be properly understood to then comprehend what God is doing in the world in relation to Israel.
 
Israel, the nation, has not yet come into the New Covenant. Until they do, the offer stands. They have not been replaced by the church at all. Rather, those Jews who have rejected Jesus have been cut off from the covenant promises. But this has no bearing on the call of the nation to enter the New Covenant, exactly as Scripture says will come about.
 
Don’t allow those who have misunderstood the greater redemptive plan mislead you. If God could cut off Israel, He could likewise break His covenant with You. Such will never be the case.
 
Lord God, may we carefully consider Your plan of redemption. And then, give us the ability to grasp its many intricacies so that we will not mix the categories You have so carefully kept separate for us in Scripture. May it be so to Your glory in our lives. Amen.
 

Matthew 10:5

Monday, 12 May 2025
 
These twelve Jesus sent out and commanded them, saying: “Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans. Matthew 10:5
 
“These, the twelve, He sent – Jesus – having notified them, saying, ‘Into Gentiles’ way, not you shall go. And into Samaritans’ city, not you shall enter’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, the list of the twelve named apostles was completed. Now, their mission to venture out to the harvest field begins with, “These, the twelve, He sent – Jesus.”
 
The contents until the end of this chapter can logically be divided into three sections, each ending with Jesus saying, “Assuredly, I say to you...” This occurs in verses 15, 23, & 42. It won’t be until verse 11:1 that His words to the twelve will be complete.
 
This first section will give instructions concerning their travels through Israel during this first sending.
 
The second section anticipates a more permanent evangelization of Israel. This is indicated, for example, by comments such as them being “a testimony ... to the Gentiles.” Despite this note concerning the Gentiles, Jesus’ words of that section still only refer to “the cities of Israel,” demonstrating the focused nature of the work.
 
The third section most heavily focuses on the benefits, costs, and consequences that will result from being in such an evangelistic ministry. Understanding this, He next says, “having notified them, saying, ‘Into Gentiles’ way, not you shall go.”
 
Here is a new word, paraggelló. It signifies “to charge, or give a command that is fully authorized because it has gone through all the proper (necessary) channels” (HELPS Word Studies). In other words, Jesus is directing them, under His own authority, to take the steps necessary to meet His purposes.
 
As for the term “Gentile’s way,” this means the places where Gentiles dwelt were to be avoided. Their ministry was to be to Israel alone. They were not to be distracted from this cause. The promises of God found from the time of Abraham on have focused on this line of people, meaning his son Isaac, and then Isaac’s son Jacob.
 
From there, the twelve sons of Israel were considered one family under this promise. Therefore, the Messiah’s work was to be directed to them first. So directed was this commission that Jesus continues with, “And into Samaritans’ city, not you shall enter.”
 
These people, the Samarités, Samaritans, are introduced into the New Testament here. It signifies those who inhabited the region of Samaria, once the capital of the Northern Kingdom of Israel.
 
The Samaritans were partly of Jewish descent, but they were a mixture of other cultures and beliefs that had been brought into Israel after the Assyrian exile. They had their own Pentateuch, which follows the writings of Moses but which was modified to meet their own culture. That is believed to date back as far as 120 BC.
 
Due to their mixed status, the apostles were told to refrain from going to any such area. Only Israel was to be their focus at this time. This will only change for them after His resurrection and ascension.
 
Life application: The words of Jesus in this verse should clue people in concerning who Jesus’ ministry was focused on during His earthly ministry. And yet, it is as common as spots on a leopard to cite verses from this chapter and elsewhere in the synoptic gospels and apply them to the people in the church age.
 
That is a hermeneutical error known as “taking a verse out of context.” Jesus has set the context for the ministry of the apostles. As noted, that will not change until after the resurrection when the scope of His ministry will go forth, according to Jesus’ words, to “Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.”
 
Jesus confirms this elsewhere, saying, “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 15:24). Because of this, we are not to use Jesus’ words to Israel, as recorded in the synoptic gospels, as direction for our lives and church conduct.
 
Rather, they are words informing us what occurred as Israel encountered their promised Messiah. Once He was rejected by them, only then did the ministry go out beyond Israel’s border. Along with that, new directions were laid down for the people of the world. They are directions that have nothing to do with law observance.
 
Instead, they are words of grace and confidence in the hope of eternal life found in the full, final, finished, and forever work of Jesus Christ. With that complete, grace has come.
 
Lord God, may we remember the lesson concerning maintaining proper context when reading the Bible. In doing so, we will not be tossed about by every wind of doctrine that removes the notion of eternal security that we possess because of what Jesus has done. Help us to remember that grace is unmerited and that we should cling fast to it always. Amen.
 

Matthew 10:4

Sunday, 11 May 2025
 
Simon the Cananite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed Him. Matthew 10:4
 
 “Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, the ‘also having betrayed Him’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, the list of the twelve named apostles continued with six names. The final two are mentioned next, beginning with, “Simon the Kananaios.”
 
The name Simon has been explained. The title that is given to him is Kananaios, sometimes translated as a Canaanite. At other times, it is translated as a Zealot or some other word indicating being zealous, like the word Patriot. The word is found only here and in Mark 3:18, again describing the same person. In Luke 6:15 and Acts 1:13, the same person is described with the word zélótés, to be zealous.
 
The reason for all the variances is that there is a dispute about where the word is derived from. One supposed root is the Hebrew word qanna, which means jealous. It is a word used six times in Exodus and Deuteronomy when referring to the Lord, speaking of His jealous nature. Some apply this root to indicate a zealous nature for the Lord.
 
That would make sense based on Luke’s use of zélótés as a comparable meaning word. However, it is questionable if a title given only to the Lord would later be applied to people. If it were, it would be as an honorific, saying something like, “He has the Lord’s jealousy guiding his life.”
 
However, as noted, others translate the word as Canaanite. This seems to be less preferable because he would have been a Jew, but it could be that he associated himself with the land of Canaan as being the home territory of the Jews and wanted to restore it to Jewish control. However, another word group is used in Greek to indicate Canaan. Thus, this translation is rather unlikely.
 
Another option is the occasional translation of this word as a Cananaean. That would mean he was from Cana of Galilee. This is not improbable. As it is a transliteration, this rendering doesn’t do any harm. It simply gives an Anglicized rendering of the Greek.
 
Leaving the Greek directly transliterated into English avoids a mistranslation, and so that is what has been done here. Next, it says, “and Judas Iscariot.”
 
The name Judas is derived from the Hebrew Yehudah, meaning Judah. Judah was the fourth son of Jacob, born to Leah as recorded in Genesis 29:35.  His name means Praise. The name in Greek includes Jude, the author of the book of Jude. It is also translated as Judah in Matthew 1 and Luke 3. Each time, it is in Jesus’ genealogy.
 
The title Iscariot is from the Greek Iskariótés. It is believed to be a transliteration from the Hebrew words ish, man, and qirya, city or town. Thus, he would be a man of the city or a man of Kerioth, a city in Israel noted four times in the Old Testament. If he were from Kerioth, he would be the only non-Galilean apostle because Kerioth was a city found in the territory of Judah. Of him, it next says, “the ‘also having betrayed Him.’”
 
He is introduced into Scripture with the sad epitaph attached to him. Later, using the word apóleia, meaning destruction, ruin, loss, etc., other than the antichrist, he is the only person called a son of perdition in Scripture –
 
“While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition, that the Scripture might be fulfilled.” John 17:12
 
“Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, 4 who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.” 2 Thessalonians 2:3, 4
 
It is as if these two notorious men were born to be destroyed. Such is the nature of misusing one’s freewill to work against the Lord.
 
Life application: The names of the apostles are recorded, some with descriptors to give further hints about their nature. From there, some of them will have various things said about them. Peter is recorded as having denied Jesus and been weak in his stand for proper doctrine, as recorded in Galatians 2.
 
Thomas is forever known as a doubter. He is used as an example of this quality today, such as, “Come on, man! Stop being a Doubting Thomas.” David is known as a man after God’s heart. Jeremiah is known as the weeping prophet. Nabal the Carmelite is known as a fool.
 
We will all be remembered before others and before the Lord for how we conducted our lives. What is it that you want to be remembered for? “He was a faithful Christian.” “He was a loving father.” “He was one greedy dude.” Like the designation of these apostles, we are generally summed up with a very short thought when remembered by others. What few words do you expect people will remember you by?
 
Lord God, we are living our lives out before others and in Your presence. How will we be remembered when we are gone? Help us to consider this and to do our best to live our lives in a manner that will honor You and reflect the positive qualities of faithful followers of Jesus Christ. Amen.

Matthew 10:3

Saturday, 10 May 2025
 
Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus; Matthew 10:3
 
“Philip and Bartholomew, Thomas and Matthew, the taxman. Jacob the ‘of Alphaeus,’ and Lebbaios, having been denominated Thaddaeus” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus’ apostles began to be listed. The next names in the list begin with “Philip.”
 
Philip has been with Jesus since the time He was in Judea, as is recorded in John 1. However, he is only first mentioned here in Matthew’s gospel. This was a common Greek name, especially because of the founder of the monarchy of the Macedonians, Philip, the father of Alexander the Great.
 
The name is derived from philos, friendly, and hippos, a horse. As such, it signifies Lover of Horses. Next, it says, “and Bartholomew.”
 
This is not a given name, but signifies Son of Talmai. The word bar is the Aramaic word for son. Talmai would be the name of his father. It means Plowman. Hence, he is Son of Plowman. Bartholomew is believed to be the same as Nathanael.
 
If so, he was from Cana in the Galilee, as is recorded in John 21:2. The two were together in John 1:44. As such, it would make sense that they are listed together and probably were sent out together. Nathanael is from the Hebrew Nethanel. It means Given of God or God has Given. Next in the list is “Thomas.”
 
The name is derived from the Hebrew to’am, twin. As such, his name means Twin. He is also called Didymus, the Greek word for Twin. Next, it says, “and Matthew, the taxman.”
 
Matthew was introduced in Matthew 9:9. He is the tax collector called by Jesus, who is also known as Levi. In Mark and Luke, Thomas and Matthew are named in reverse order.
 
The seeming implication is that Matthew and Thomas are twins, with Matthew being the older. However, in his humility, he places his brother Thomas, the twin, first. Whereas the other two place him according to birth order. This is only speculation, but it does fit. Next, it says, “Jacob the ‘of Alphaeus.’”
 
Jacob is derived from the Hebrew Yaaqob, the meaning of which was explained in Matthew 1:2. His father is identified as Alphaeus. It is believed to be derived from the Hebrew name Heleph found in Joshua 19:33.
 
That comes from the noun kheleph, an exchange. In other words, “Your compensation for this will be this.” That comes from khalaph, a verb signifying to pass on or pass through. The sense is still of a change, though. Thus, the name means Change or Exchange. Next, it says, “and Lebbaios.”
 
This name is only found in some Greek texts. Others skip it and go straight to his other name. This name is believed to be derived from the Hebrew word lev, the heart. The extended word derived from that is levav. This gives the sense of courage (and in being heartened).
 
Therefore, the name probably means Heart, Courageous, Sentimental, or Lionlike. In other words, something to do with the condition of the heart. Of him, it says, “having been denominated Thaddaeus.”
 
In other words, this is a name bestowed upon someone. The name is believed to be derived from the Aramaic word tadday, the breast. As such, it may be a somewhat euphemistic way of calling him something like Breast Boy, meaning “mommy’s boy.” It may speak of his immaturity or of his inability to break away from her control.
 
Life application: In these names, like in all things in the Bible, we are being given information about other things. Some of these names will make connections back to Old Testament passages so that when they are studied, typology will be revealed.
 
It is not wise to jump to sudden conclusions, making dubious connections until a thorough study of the words and names is made. This is especially true when using English translations. Quite often, people will read a passage that may have the same English word in the Old Testament that is found in a passage in the New Testament.
 
From there, a conclusion is made that there is a pattern or parallel. However, when the root words are studied, it is discovered that there is no etymological connection. In other words, a pretext was formed by wrongly associating two passages which had nothing to do with one another.
 
This is quite common, and it has led to piles and piles of incorrect deductions. However, once such incorrect connections are made, they quickly get passed on and become standard teachings, even though they are wrong. As such, it is always best to take patterns and parallels based on English words with a grain of salt until one is sure that the connection is valid. Therefore, be circumspect in what you accept.
 
Lord God, thank You for the challenge Your word presents us. We are given this treasure and should, therefore, handle it carefully. Help us to remember to do so at all times. May we never teach something that is not first checked out and substantiated to be correct. Help us in this, O God. Amen.

Matthew 10:2

Friday, 9 May 2025
 
Now the names of the twelve apostles are these: first, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother; Matthew 10:2
 
“And the twelve apostles, the names, they are these: First, Simon, being called Peter, and Andrew, his brother. James the ‘of Zebedee,’ and John, his brother” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus called His twelve disciples together and gave them power over spirits and sicknesses. Matthew continues his narrative with, “And the twelve apostles.”
 
The word apostolos, apostles, is introduced. It signifies a delegate or one who is sent. In this case, being apostles of Jesus, they are essentially ambassadors of Jesus for the mission of conveying the gospel. Understanding that, it next says, “the names, they are these.”
 
Matthew will give a list of the selected men. They are not the same names recorded in each gospel, but they are the same people, being described by the differing names each possessed, such as Simon being Peter. The names are recorded in Matthew 10:2-4, Mark 3:16-19, Luke 6:13-16, and Acts 1:13.
 
In all lists, Simon (Peter) is recorded first, while Judas the betrayer is listed last. Each time they are listed, they are divided into three separate groups of four each. However, the internal grouping of each group is not always the same.
 
For an extensive analysis of the patterns of groupings, names, and relationships of these apostles, consulting the commentary of Charles Ellicott will provide great detail. Of these men, the list begins with, “First, Simon, being called Peter.”
 
The name is derived from the Hebrew name Shimon, which, in turn, is derived from the verb shama, to hear. Thus, the name means Hearing or He Who Hears. Peter is derived from the Greek petra, a rock, and this is the meaning of the name. He is also called Kephas, the Aramaic name meaning Rock. Next, it says, “and Andrew, his brother.”
 
The name is derived from anér, a male human, a man, a husband. The meaning is Manly, but that can also be equated to Courageous or Brave. Next is “James the ‘of Zebedee.’”
 
Both names are given detailed explanations in the commentary on Matthew 4:21. The last name in this verse is given next, saying, “and John, his brother.”
 
The meaning of this name was also explained in Matthew 4:21.
 
Life application: It is not uncommon to see people on social media call themselves Apostle This or Apostle That. The implication is that they are to be likened to the apostles in the Bible.
 
There is a problem with this. The title, as noted above, signifies a delegate. One does not designate oneself a delegate or an ambassador. Rather, that appointment comes from the one they represent. In the case of an apostle of Jesus, it means a person must be appointed by Jesus.
 
There are certain qualifications for the position that are explained in the Bible, none of which apply today. Like the sons of Israel, there is a set number of apostles. In the case of the sons of Israel, there are the twelve born to Jacob through his wives Leah, Rachel, Zilpah, and Bilhah.
 
There are also the two sons of Joseph who were adopted by Jacob as his own, as is recorded in Genesis 48. This makes a total of fourteen sons. Likewise, there are the twelve apostles named by Jesus in the gospels. There is then Matthias, who was selected to replace Judas in Acts 1.
 
This is then followed by Paul, who was personally selected by Jesus, “as by one born out of due time” according to 1 Corinthians 15. Thus, there are fourteen named apostles. Like the sons of Israel, that is all there are. Therefore, to claim to be an apostle of Jesus is biblically incorrect and unacceptable.
 
Denominations, such as Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox, Swedish Lutheran, Anglicans, etc., who claim apostolic succession do so without biblical support. There is no such thing.
 
Be careful to evaluate people in the ministry based on their adherence to Scripture, not on a title, degree, or capability (such as knowing Hebrew or Greek). Instead, what matters is how they handle Scripture.
 
The Bible designates the number of sons of Israel. It also designates the number of apostles of Jesus. In this process, God is providing us with information. Patterns are made for us to understand what is on God’s mind and what He is doing in the stream of redemptive history. Pay attention to such things, and a greater understanding of the workings of God will be realized.
 
Lord God, how grateful we are to You for Your wonderful and amazing word. We stand in awe at the wisdom behind it. For thousands of years, man has been studying it. And yet, it continues to provide us with new information from day to day. Praise You for Your word! Amen.