BIBLE IN TEN

Matthew 9:36

Monday, 5 May 2025
 
But when He saw the multitudes, He was moved with compassion for them, because they were weary and scattered, like sheep having no shepherd. Matthew 9:36
 
“And having seen the crowds, He gut-wrenched about them, for they were having been enervated and having been strewn, as sheep not having a shepherd” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus was said to have gone about all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues about the gospel of the kingdom. He was also said to cure those with every sickness and disease. Now, Matthew records, “And having seen the crowds, He gut-wrenched about them.”
 
Here is a new word, splagchnizomai, translated as gut-wrenched. It is derived from splagchnon, meaning the bowels or inward parts. Thus, it signifies to have the bowels yearn. A single, hyphenated word to get a literal sense of what is conveyed would be gut-wrenched. Figuratively, it signifies having compassion.
 
Jesus looked at the masses, and His internal parts surely moved with pity, sadness, and a deep yearning to take away their lost state. Understanding this, the reason for it is next stated, saying, “for they were having been enervated and having been strewn.”
 
Two more new words, both perfect participles, are seen here. The first is ekluó. HELPS Word Studies says, it is from “ek, ‘out from and to’ and lýō, ‘loose, let go’) – properly, let completely out as to (entirely) succumb, i.e. with the outcome of losing inner strength; hence, to become weary (exhausted), to the point of fainting.” Thus, a great word to match the thought is enervate.
 
The next new word is rhiptó. The root of this word signifies to fling. Thus, it gives the sense of being scattered about. A suitable word to catch the intent is strewn. The reason for this tired and disheveled state of the people is because they were “as sheep not having a shepherd.”
 
Sheep without a shepherd would be in just this state. They would be worn out from a lack of care. They would also be enervated and strewn about as they were harassed by lions, wolves, or other predators. This is what the people of Israel were like. The Old Testament repeatedly explains why this was so. Jeremiah 50 gives the sense –
 
“My people have been lost sheep.Their shepherds have led them astray;They have turned them away on the mountains.They have gone from mountain to hill;They have forgotten their resting place.7 All who found them have devoured them;And their adversaries said, ‘We have not offended,Because they have sinned against the Lord, the habitation of justice,The Lord, the hope of their fathers.’” Jeremiah 50:6, 7
 
The shepherds of Israel, the leaders of the people, failed to responsibly tend to the people. They led them astray, they abused them for their own gain, and they wore them out in the process. This sentiment is reflected throughout the writings of the prophets.
 
Life application: In the New Testament, Jesus states He is the good Shepherd, thus fulfilling the typology seen in the Old Testament, such as –
 
“Behold, the Lord God shall come with a strong hand,And His arm shall rule for Him;Behold, His reward is with Him,And His work before Him.11 He will feed His flock like a shepherd;He will gather the lambs with His arm,And carry them in His bosom,And gently lead those who are with young.” Isaiah 40:10, 11
 
By claiming to be the good Shepherd, Jesus was claiming to be the Lord incarnate. He was stating to the people that it is He who would tend to His flock and bring them safely through the times of trouble. This is not limited to the people of Israel, but all of God’s people. Jesus is the one to unite the flocks into one –
 
“I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd gives His life for the sheep. 12 But a hireling, he who is not the shepherd, one who does not own the sheep, sees the wolf coming and leaves the sheep and flees; and the wolf catches the sheep and scatters them. 13 The hireling flees because he is a hireling and does not care about the sheep. 14 I am the good shepherd; and I know My sheep, and am known by My own. 15 As the Father knows Me, even so I know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep. 16 And other sheep I have which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one shepherd.” John 10:11-16
 
Thank God for Jesus, who is there to lead and tend to His people.
 
Glorious God, thank You for the hope we possess of resting forever in Your presence because of Jesus. We long for the day when we, Your sheep, are gathered together forever under our Great Shepherd, Jesus. Amen.

Matthew 9:35

Sunday, 4 May 2025
 
Then Jesus went about all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every sickness and every disease among the people. Matthew 9:35
 
“And Jesus, He traverses all the cities and the villages, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom, and curing every disease and every malady in the people” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus was accused by the Pharisees that He was ejecting demons by the ruler of demons. Now, a new paragraph with a new direction commences, which is very similar to Matthew 4:23. For most of the verse, it is word-for-word identical – 
 
4:23 - And Jesus, He traverses all the Galilee, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom, and curing every disease and every malady in the people.
 
9:35 - And Jesus, He traverses all the cities and the villages, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom, and curing every disease and every malady in the people.
 
As can be seen, the major difference is found in the opening words, which state, “And Jesus, He traverses all the cities and the villages.” Instead of saying “the Galilee,” it says, “all the cities and the villages.”
 
As for the word translated as “villages,” it is a new word, kómé. Strong’s says it is derived from keimai, to lie, be laid, be set, or be appointed. In other words, it indicates a hamlet as if laid down in the countryside.
 
This is the same general area that was identified as the Galilee in Matthew 4. It seems likely that Jesus is revisiting the places He had already gone to. There were only so many cities and villages in the area. Wherever He went, though, the people continued to receive Him, as is noted in the next words. He was “teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom.”
 
What is interesting is that after Matthew 4, Jesus gave the Sermon on the Mount. In Chapter 10, Jesus will commission the apostles to go forth to speak to the people.
 
Therefore, in each instance after speaking throughout the Galilee, a great time of instruction that was intended to mark out His ministry results, first directly from Him and then through His appointed apostles. For the time being, while traversing the region to teach, it also says, “and curing every disease and every malady in the people.”
 
Just as in His earlier time going throughout the area, He continued to heal the people. The ministry must have been very tiring for Him and the apostles, but there was only so much time set for the Lord to complete His ministry. And so, He went about His business according to that sobering thought.
 
Life application: A cliché occasionally passed among some missionaries and which is then spoken in churches as they seek funding essentially says, “Nobody should be given the gospel twice until everybody has heard it once.”
 
At first, that sounds like a reasonable proposition. “Yeah, we need to get the word out to the whole world.” However, the thought is entirely wrong. It is a ploy by missionaries to increase their funding, but it ignores the fundamental truth that innumerable people had to hear the gospel many times before coming to saving faith.
 
In fact, many of the people who are being asked to give were probably included in that thought. This is the purpose of local churches. The gospel should be given to the congregation each week in hopes that some family member may finally get it and yield himself to the Lord.
 
Each time you go to the restaurant or bank, do you say to yourself, “Well, I already told this person about Jesus seven years ago. I don’t need to tell her again.” Of course not! Be careful not to get caught up in nice-sounding clichés that have no basis in reality, but which are actually unbiblical.
Jesus traversed all the Galilee “teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom, and curing every disease and every malady in the people.” He did this again sometime later, surely anticipating that some who heard and rejected His word before would yield to it on a second visit.
 
Is it reasonable to think that a Christian physician would go into a village once a year to cure every disease and every malady in the people, but then not give them the gospel when he did because he had already done it three years earlier?
 
Which is more important, the gospel for spiritual healing or going forth to cure physical maladies? Be sure to think when you are given a nice-sounding proposition. Does it match what Scripture says? If not, ignore what you have heard.
 
Glorious God, may we do what is right and proper in regard to sharing the good news about Jesus. May we never withhold the word that tells of Him and what He has done for the world, even if we have to repeat it over and over again. Help us to be faithful in our witnessing. To Your glory we pray. Amen.

Matthew 9:34

Saturday, 3 May 2025
 
But the Pharisees said, “He casts out demons by the ruler of the demons.” Matthew 9:34
 
“And the Pharisees, they said, ‘In the ruler of the demons He ejects demons’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, it said that the multitudes marveled over what Jesus had done, noting that nothing like it had ever been seen in Israel. Now, in an obvious jealous response to this, it records, “And the Pharisees, they said, ‘In the ruler of the demons He ejects demons.’”
 
The people, having seen Jesus’ miracles, were overwhelmed with awe at the demonstrations of power and healing they had seen. But in complete contrast to that, the Pharisees, who were considered the spiritual elite, certainly felt that their authority was being challenged by the things Jesus was doing, of which they had no such ability.
 
Therefore, to diminish Jesus and His works in their eyes, they ascribe His power not to God but to Satan. In Matthew 12, the charge will be made again. Although getting ahead of the narrative as Matthew presents it, at that time, they will use the term Beelzebub to describe this ruler.
 
It is a reference to Satan, but the name itself is derived from the Hebrew words baal, lord or master, and z’vuv, a fly. As such, it would indicate Lord of the Flies. It is a title that speaks of corruption and malignancy as much as anything else. It speaks of Satan’s power over the demons (as in demonic flies).
 
Further, they use the word en, in, to describe the matter, “in the ruler of the demons.” The sense is that it isn’t just that Jesus is using the authority of the ruler of the demons, but that He is in a state of union with him. Because He is supposedly so aligned with Satan, He has the power and authority to eject the demons that work on behalf of Satan.
 
Life application: The New Testament uses the word en, in, when referring to a positional status, such as, “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive” 1 Corinthians 15:22. These are the two great distinctions for man. One is either in Adam and fallen or he has moved to Christ and has been redeemed by God.
 
As such, the positional status is what is being referred to. The change is not something that occurs and can be undone. Rather, it is a permanent move. This is why Jesus says this to the people in John 6 –
 
“And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day.” John 6:40
 
One can see the ridiculous nature of the argument for the loss of salvation. People who teach this view know it is. Therefore, as the evidence mounts against them with verses presented in their proper context, the arguments become more and more outlandish to continue to justify the unjustifiable. Eventually, the argument is, “Well, what if someone changes his mind and wants to go to hell?”
 
The answer is not that Jesus suddenly takes away their salvation and they are condemned to hell. The answer is that Jesus will raise them up at the last day, and He will deal with their lives at that time. The positional status of a person no longer changes when one comes to Christ. There is nothing in Scripture to even hint at that. Therefore, teaching the doctrine of “loss of salvation” is unbiblical.
 
Be sure not to get duped by such failing arguments. God’s integrity is on the line. He has saved the person who believes. He has sealed that person with His Holy Spirit, the guarantee that the person possesses until the day of redemption. From there, that person will be raised. After that, Jesus will handle the rest. This is what the Bible teaches. Be sure to convey it properly to those who want to argue an alternative, nonsensical position.
 
Lord God, we know Your word is true. Because of this, we know that those who believe in You will be raised. At that time, You will sort out all of the baggage of our lives, revealing our strengths and forgiving our shortcomings. We stand in awe of You who would save such poor and wayward sinners as us. Thank You, O God, for Jesus who makes this possible. Amen.
 

Matthew 9:33

Friday, 2 May 2025
 
And when the demon was cast out, the mute spoke. And the multitudes marveled, saying, “It was never seen like this in Israel!” Matthew 9:33
 
“And the demon, having been ejected, the mute – he spoke. And the crowds, they marveled, saying that never it appeared thus in Israel” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, a demon-possessed man who was mute was brought to Jesus. That thought now continues with, “And the demon, having been ejected.”
 
The surrounding details that took place are omitted. At other times, Jesus may ask a question or make some sort of statement in connection with a miracle, and that was surely the case at this time as well. However, the narrative is focusing on the miracle for effect. The mute man, who was also demon possessed, was brought forward, and the narrative goes right to the fact that the demon is ejected. With that accomplished, it next says, “the mute – he spoke.”
 
This would be as incredible as healing the blind. A mute person has some sort of cause for his condition. In his case, it is attributed to being demon-possessed. Jesus’ authority over the demon is made manifest in His ability to cast it out. If the demon is under authority, meaning under Satan, it demonstrates that Jesus’ abilities are greater than those of the house of Satan.
 
This is an important consideration because of what is recorded in the next verse. For now, however, those who beheld the miracle were amazed, as it next says, “And the crowds, they marveled.”
 
With the healing accomplished, the masses could hardly believe what their eyes saw. Even today, such a display would be considered incredible. It is one thing to go to a doctor, schedule surgery or some type of lengthy rehab, or take some other avenue to be cured of such things, and another to have someone taken to another person who immediately cures him of some major ailment. And yet, this is just what Matthew records. Therefore, the people were “saying that never it appeared thus in Israel.”
 
The words are debated over because such a statement is not usually made. People are cured of major issues by Jesus, the young girl was raised to life, etc., but this expression is a mark of something inordinate, as if healing a mute man is more exceptional than the other miracles.
 
Because of this, fanciful explanations have been made up over the years. One such explanation is that it was common to ask the name of a demon. By knowing its name, its source of power could be determined, and therefore, it could be properly handled. However, because this man is deaf, Jesus was exercising a power over an unnamed demon, something never seen before.
 
The explanation is ridiculous. There is nothing to even hint at this, but because it is sensational, people will pass it on as if it is true. Rather, the words “never it appeared thus in Israel” are a summary of everything thus far presented while Jesus is in Capernaum.
 
He had arrived there, and right in the middle of reclining, He was asked to come and restore a girl who had died to life. On the way to do this, a woman who had bled for twelve years was restored by faith. All she did was reach out to Him, and she was healed. After that, the young girl’s life was restored. That was followed by the two blind men having their sight restored, and then this mute man having a demon ejected. This then loosened the man’s tongue to speak.
 
Because of all of these marvelous things happening in rapid succession, the people of Capernaum were exceedingly astonished and made their exclamation that Israel had never seen such things. Throughout their Scriptures, which extensively cover their history and the lives of many prophets, nothing like this had ever been seen.
 
Life application: When watching videos or reading commentaries about the Bible, be careful not to accept what you read without checking things out. Innumerable falsities have become accepted explanations of things because people don’t know how to otherwise explain them, and so they make something up out of thin air.
 
In a similar fashion, there are innumerable Jewish traditions (at times, invented Jewish traditions) that are inserted into the Bible in an attempt to explain matters. By saying, “The Jews often did xx and this is what Jesus is basing His example on,” a seeming note of authority is assigned to the explanation. In other words, “If the Jews did this, God must be using their tradition to explain His word.”
 
A major problem with that is that it makes God’s word subject to some supposed Jewish cultural tradition. This is especially problematic when there actually is no such tradition. Rather, we must let Scripture interpret Scripture. To assign meaning to events in the Bible that come from outside of it destroys the integrity of what the Bible is presenting. It becomes an “anything means anything” approach to explaining Scripture.
 
Be careful of what you believe until you can verify that the matter is true. More often than not, if it sensationally explains the matter, you will find it is not.
 
Lord God, the record of Jesus’ miracles as He ministered to Israel is extensive. They are laid out in a manner that tells us, with all certainty, that He is the Messiah. Despite this, the people as a whole rejected Him. We lift up the nation of Israel today, praying that many will have their eyes opened to the truth of what You have done through the coming of Jesus. Amen.

Matthew 9:32

Thursday, 1 May 2025
 
As they went out, behold, they brought to Him a man, mute and demon-possessed. Matthew 9:32
 
“And they, departing – you behold – they presented Him a man, mute – demon-possessings.” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, the two men healed from blindness disregarded Jesus’ admonition and then went out and divulged Him in all the land. Now, the narrative focuses on a new subject, found only in Matthew’s gospel. The words begin with, “And they, departing – you behold.”
 
In other words, no sooner had the two healed men left than this event took place. Understanding this, it next says, “They presented Him a man, mute.”
 
The word “they” is not referring to the two healed men who just departed, but either the friends of the man being presented, or maybe the apostles, or even the multitudes who will next be mentioned. Jesus was in “the house” noted in verse 9:28. While he was inside healing the two blind men, the man next to be presented had arrived outside and was promptly brought before Him.
 
This man is described as kóphos, mute. It is a new word in the New Testament. It is derived from the verb koptó, a word signifying to cut off or sever. In this case, it is used to describe one whose speech had been cut off. Vincent’s Word Studies notes –
 
“The word is also used of deafness (Matthew 11:5; Mark 7:32; Luke 7:22). It means dull or blunted. Thus Homer applies it to the earth; the dull, senseless earth ("Iliad," xxiv., 25). Also to a blunted dart ("Iliad," xi., 390). The classical writers use it of speech, hearing, sight, and mental perception. In the New Testament, only of hearing and speech, the meaning in each case being determined by the context.”
 
Because he is mute, he would be unable to describe any affliction that could go beyond his inability to speak. Thus, Jesus would have to determine anything else wrong, maybe by asking those with him. Seeing he was mute, Jesus also discovered he was “demon-possessings.”
 
In other words, Matthew is connecting the man’s being demon-possessed to his being mute. One led to the other. This account is very similar to that of Matthew 12. Some even say it is the same account from different sources.
 
That is a rather inane proposition when the man there is said to be blind, and Matthew says nothing of the accounts being the same. It would have to assume that Matthew was not the only author, something not hinted at by the contents of the gospel.
 
Life application: The previous account was equated to the doctrine of eternal salvation. People can believe in Jesus, be saved and healed by Him, and yet demonstrate disobedience to Him without being “unsaved.” This happens in all of us at one time or another.
 
However, the men being brought from blindness to seeing can also be equated to those Jews who were blinded to the gospel. Eventually, someone tells them that Jesus is the Messiah and He can heal them. With that, they ask for sight in order to see. In essence, “We have heard and we believe. Now show us the truth.” In that, the blindness Paul refers to in Romans 11 will end, and the veil that he refers to in 2 Corinthians 3 will be lifted. Israel’s spiritual sight will be restored.
 
The next logical step is that they go out and tell the world what they know. The healing of the mute, though a different account, would be a logical next step in the proclamation concerning Jesus. Israel is unable to see Jesus for who He is. Because of that, they are unable to speak about Him. In fact, to this day, Jesus is the great unmentionable in Jewish society.
 
The only times He is brought up, it is usually in a very negative way. This anti-Christian sentiment is so profound, it is as if the society is mute in its ability to speak. But this, too, will be healed in Israel. One step at a time, they are being presented with this truth. The young girl is raised, the blind see, and now the mute are brought before Him for healing.
 
Though the accounts seem arbitrary and random, they do show a process that seems logical in how the nation will be healed of its great malady. Restoration is promised, and it will come about in God’s pre-determined timing.
 
Lord God, though we may not understand everything concerning the blindness of Israel, Your word speaks of it as a truth that exists. But the veil will be lifted, the people will see, and then they will be brought to speak. We know it is coming. We pray for the nation to see the truth about Jesus that they have rejected for so long. Amen.
 

Matthew 9:31

Wednesday, 30 April 2025
 
But when they had departed, they spread the news about Him in all that country. Matthew 9:31
 
“And they, having departed, they divulged Him in all that land” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus strictly charged the men whose eyes had been healed to see that none knew about what He had done. However, the account now says, “And they, having departed, they divulged Him in all that land.”
 
Charles Ellicott tells of a difference of perception about their actions, saying that the matter “curiously enough, has been answered by most patristic and Roman Catholic commentators in the affirmative, some even maintaining that the command was not meant seriously; and by most Protestant commentators in the negative.”
 
It is hard to see how what is plainly stated in black and white can be intended as anything other than disobedience to the word. There is no hint that Jesus wasn’t serious. That must be read into the text. One must wonder, then, why there is a striking divide.
 
A couple of possibilities come to mind. The first is that some noted Roman Catholic theologians may have decided their actions were ok and others fell in line with his analysis. This would not be uncommon. Reading commentaries that span hundreds of years, one can tell why a point is agreed on by various scholars by simply looking at unusual words that are used to make a point.
 
In other words, someone may comment on a verse using the word fructifying. Though this word may not be seen again in his writings, it is used in an analysis of the same verse by numerous later scholars. This tells us that later scholars read his analysis, liked the use of the unusual word, and used it in their own analysis, which mirrors in content that of the older scholar.
 
It is kind of a “follow-the-bandwagon” way of analyzing a verse. A second possibility is that the overall theology of the Roman Catholic Church finds this verse difficult to swallow as being a sign of disobedience because it would then conflict with their own theology in other areas.
 
What needs to be done is to consider why Jesus charged them in the first place and then why Matthew points out their reaction. It could be that there was an immediate reason for Him telling them not to tell others, such as noted in the previous commentary, which said Jesus may not yet have wanted it to be openly accepted that He was the Messiah.
 
By restoring sight to the blind, something Isaiah indicates is something the Messiah would do, it might then spur the masses in a direction not yet desired for Him to accomplish His work. However, there may be a reason for His charging them that would only be understood after He completed His work.
 
In other words, it has been seen that the healing of the woman with a flow of blood mirrored salvation in the church that Christ would establish. The raising of the child mirrors the restoration of Israel after the church age. Thus, it is logical to consider that this account may have something to do with future theology as well.
 
Here we have sight restored to two blind men. This was obviously something they thought Jesus could do, and when they called out to Him, they called Him the Son of David. They believed Him to be the Messiah and that He was capable of healing them. However, after He did so, He gave them a word to be obedient to. In the very next verse, they are shown to be disobedient to the word.
 
Despite their disobedience, there is no later note that they lost their eyesight, something Matthew would surely have recorded. But more, it goes on to say that they divulged Him in all that land. They didn’t just tell about Him to their family or in their city, but everywhere they went.
 
Though unstated, accompanying their words would have been praises to God and notes that this was surely the Messiah. It is unlikely they would hail Him as such, believe in Him, and then later say, “Some guy healed us.” Rather, they would say, “We were restored by the Messiah!”
 
So what is this account telling us? It is a note that when one is saved and has seen the light of Christ, that salvation is eternal. Despite their obvious disobedience to the spoken word, they retained their eyesight.
 
If we are honest with ourselves, each person who has been saved by Jesus will openly avow that he has been disobedient to the word we have been given, the word spoken by God, which is then recorded by His apostles. And yet, Jesus continues to save us and allow us to go out and tell others about who He is and what He has done for us.
 
Despite our failing Him, He is full of grace – enough to carry us for all of our days until He brings us to Himself. This must be the reason the words are recorded for us as they are.
 
Life application: Understanding the premise laid out concerning these men, it begs the question of why most Roman Catholic theologians see their actions as not being disobedient, while most Protestants take the opposite view.
 
It may partially be a follow-the-bandwagon thing, but more than that, it shows a vast gulf in the basic theology of the two approaches to the word. Protestants have accepted the five Solas since the Reformation: Sola Scriptura (Scripture alone), Sola Fide (faith alone), Sola Gratia (grace alone), Solus Christus (Christ alone), and Soli Deo Gloria (glory to God alone).
 
Roman Catholics reject all of these to some extent. They believe Scripture to some point, but add in authoritative edicts from the Vatican, along with the apocrypha. It is Scripture, plus. They believe in faith plus works. They believe in grace, but personal merit is included for “getting out of purgatory” and all kinds of other nonsense.
 
They believe in Christ but also exalt Mary to co-redemptrix. They pray to her, petition her, and build lots of idols of her to worship. They also believe in exalting God, but their theology exalts angels and even the pope within their worship. Everything about Roman Catholicism is “plus.”
 
Because of this, seeing the man’s actions as disobedient would return too much emphasis concerning disobedience upon their own corrupt theology, which rejects the word of God as our sole authority that must be adhered to.
 
Most Protestants, however, understand that ignoring or being disobedient to the word is not something that can be denied. Thus, there is an understanding that it is grace that heals us (like the eyes of the blind men), and it is grace that continues to carry us through until the day when Jesus will bring us to Himself (as displayed in their disobedience without being re-blinded for it).
 
We are seeing in these few verses the doctrines of 1) free will, and 2) eternal salvation. Our perception of what Jesus has done and the effectiveness of it in our lives will be understood and worked out in how we perceive what the word “grace” means. The more we understand it, the more willing we will be to adhere to His word. And yet, it will also comfort us when we realize we continue to fail Him from day to day.
 
Lord God, even before Jesus came, we have types, pictures, and prophecies that reveal to us the many things He would do. They literally permeate the Old Testament. And in Jesus’ coming, we have hints concerning what things would be like after the completion of His work. Thank You, O God, for giving us such insight to help us make proper decisions about our theology now that we are saved by You through Him. Amen.
 

Matthew 9:30

Tuesday, 29 April 2025
 
And their eyes were opened. And Jesus sternly warned them, saying, “See that no one knows it.” Matthew 9:30
 
“And their eyes, they opened. And Jesus, He in-snorted at them, saying, ‘You see none knows’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told the blind men that according to their faith, their sight would be restored to them. Now, that is realized in the words, “And their eyes, they opened.”
 
The power of the Lord to give sight to the blind is realized. Regardless of what type of blindness they suffered, He went to the cause, identified it, and corrected it with merely the word that it should be done. This is something prophesied would come to pass concerning the ability of the coming Messiah. For example –
 
“Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened,And the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped.” Isaiah 35:5
 
However, the state of blindness referred to by Isaiah may be interpreted as simply dulled spiritual senses. This is seen, for example, in Isaiah 42 –
 
“Hear, you deaf;And look, you blind, that you may see.19 Who is blind but My servant,Or deaf as My messenger whom I send?Who is blind as he who is perfect,And blind as the Lord’s servant?20 Seeing many things, but you do not observe;Opening the ears, but he does not hear.” Isaiah 42:18-20
 
Because of this, the verses concerning giving sight to the blind could be taken as a metaphor. However, this is not what the people expected. They took them to be literal. This is why the two men called out to Jesus, calling Him the Son of David. They knew the Messiah would come from the line of David, and they knew that He would be able to restore sight to the blind. Jesus even reminded John that this was a messianic promise –
 
“And when John had heard in prison about the works of Christ, he sent two of his disciples 3 and said to Him, ‘Are You the Coming One, or do we look for another?’4 Jesus answered and said to them, ‘Go and tell John the things which you hear and see: 5 The blind see and the lame walk; the lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear; the dead are raised up and the poor have the gospel preached to them. 6 And blessed is he who is not offended because of Me.’” Matthew 11:2-6
 
Jesus’ healing of these men clearly pointed to Him being the Messiah. They understood Him to be such, and their appeal to Him was not in vain. Once healed, Matthew next says, “And Jesus, He in-snorted at them, saying, ‘You see none knows.’”
 
Here is a new word, embrimaomai. It is derived from en, in, and brimaomai, to snort with anger. Thus, it is a word that mimics an animal like a horse or pig. If one makes a piggy grunt with the nose by inhaling while properly forming the nostrils (gnugnugnugnu), it gives the sense of the intent of the word. But its meaning is that it is accompanied by a sense of anger more than anything else.
 
When someone is passionate about what he has to say, this in-snorting sound can occur suddenly. Therefore, the word is used to express a strong admonition or warning, such as here. It can be a mark of scolding, such as in Mark 14:5. It can also be used as being moved in the spirit and even groaning, as in John 11:33 and 11:38.
 
Jesus’ in-snorting here signifies His urgent desire for them not to reveal to others what occurred. Otherwise, there would be displeasure in Him for it. The exact reason for this isn’t stated, but He had waited until they were inside before attending to them. This means He wanted the matter done privately. And yet, He did other such miracles openly. But those instances were later (Matthew 12:22).
 
Therefore, because this was a sign that the Messiah would accomplish, it seems that He did not want this openly divulged at this time. It is not until Chapter 16 that Peter declares Jesus to be the promised Christ of God.
 
Life application: Today, two thousand years after Jesus’ miracle healing of these men, people in the world continue to struggle with blindness. Some are born blind, some develop blindness through age or sickness, and some receive trauma that causes blindness.
 
Think of all that had to go into Jesus’ “simple” miracle of giving sight to these blind men. He had to know if they had trauma, what sort it was. If they had an infection, tumor, nutrient deficiency, or stroke, how did it affect the eye? Did the men have diabetes, or was it caused by macular degeneration or glaucoma?
 
To determine what causes blindness today and then treat it takes many specialists being involved in the process, expensive machinery, an understanding of many variables, etc. From there, some types of blindness can be corrected. Others have no hope of it being so.
 
And yet, with the spoken word and nothing more, Jesus was able to heal these two men. The power of God was evident in Him and working through Him to effect the miracle. And Jesus, unlike the prophets of Old, did not appeal to the Lord (Yehovah). He merely spoke the word under His own authority.
 
This reveals the nature of the Man. He is the Lord God. He is great and He is glorious. He is Jesus!
 
Lord God, how exciting it is to see Jesus for who He is. He isn’t just a prophet in a long succession of prophets that came to reveal Your intent for His people. Rather, He is the fulfillment of all prophecy. He is the true and great Prophet. You have united with humanity in the Person of Jesus. Thank You for having so revealed Yourself to us. Amen.

Matthew 9:29

Monday, 28 April 2025
 
Then He touched their eyes, saying, “According to your faith let it be to you.” Matthew 9:29
 
“Then He touched their eyes, saying, ‘According to your faith, it became to you’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus asked the two blind men if they believed that He was able to have mercy on them. Their response was in the affirmative. With that remembered, it next says, “Then He touched their eyes.”
 
Jesus does this elsewhere, such as in Matthew 20:34. It would be an indication to them that there is no doubt where the power came from. However, this is not the only way that Jesus restores sight to the blind. In Mark 8, Jesus spat on a blind man’s eyes, partially restored his vision, and then placed His hands on the man’s eyes and brought him to full vision.
 
In John 9, Jesus spat on the ground, made clay with it, and then anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay. From there, He instructed the man to go to the pool of Siloam and wash his eyes. When he did, he came back seeing.
 
Therefore, Jesus’ various methods of restoring sight are instructive as much as they are curative. In this case, it is instructive to the men being healed that the power to heal has come from Him and that it came about when He touched them with His hands and then spoke the word. This restoration of sight would leave no doubt about who Jesus is because He would be the first person they would see.
 
Their testimony in this case would be infallible proof to those who knew them when they were blind. As such, upon touching their eyes, Jesus was “saying, ‘According to your faith, it be to you.’”
 
It is not the physical touching that healed them, nor is it their faith that healed them. They have professed faith, and that is what Jesus is acknowledging to them. In other words, “according to” isn’t “If you have this much faith, you will be healed and if you don’t, you won’t be.” Rather, “according to” is in response to the faith they have already acknowledged.
 
The healing is then brought about by Jesus’ spoken word. It would be like saying, “Because you have professed faith in My ability, I will now heal you. And so it is.”
 
Life application: The healing of these blind men is not unlike the process of our salvation. The Bible says, “that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation” Romans 10:9, 10
 
Jesus doesn’t ask, “Just how much do you believe in your heart?” Every person’s faith is on its own level. If Jesus were looking for a certain amount of faith, there would be a faith exam attached to the promise. No such thing exists. We are not asked to stand on a rooftop in an Islamic city and shout out that we have believed the gospel.
 
Nor are we told we must eat a habanero chili pepper to prove our faith. God reads the heart, and salvation is granted. These men professed faith in Jesus’ ability to heal them. In turn, He healed them.
 
Understanding this should help us to understand the fallacy of “works as a demonstration of salvation.” This is a common teaching that says, “If you don’t have works to support your profession of salvation, you are probably not saved.” This begs the obvious question, “What works? Just what exactly do I have to do to prove I am saved?”
 
The Bible doesn’t specify any such thing. It does provide instructions on what we should do in our salvation, but it never makes them a proof test for our salvation. The blind men were healed, and there is no string attached to the healing, such as, “If you don’t do what I say, you will lose your sight.”
 
In fact, there will appear to be a mark of disobedience in those men in the verses to come. But there is nothing to indicate that they somehow were re-blinded for it. In fact, the words indicate otherwise. We must keep the salvation message simple. Complicating it with requests for proof of salvation will only produce weak believers who will struggle with the surety of what Christ has done for them for the rest of their days.
 
Keep the gospel simple. From there, tell people to learn the Bible and apply it to their lives. In doing so, their walk with the Lord will be sound and their time in His presence will be sweet.
 
Lord God, may we be confident in our salvation, not because of an arrogant, haughty attitude, but because we understand what the word says. Christ died for our sins according to Scripture, He was buried, and He rose again on the third day according to Scripture. This is what You have asked us to believe in order to be saved. We do! Thank You for the salvation You have granted us. Amen.
 

Matthew 9:28

Sunday, 27 April 2025
 
And when He had come into the house, the blind men came to Him. And Jesus said to them, “Do you believe that I am able to do this?”They said to Him, “Yes, Lord.” Matthew 9:28
 
“And having come into the house, they came to Him – the blind – and Jesus, He says to them, ‘You believe that I can do this?’ They say to Him, ‘Yes, Lord’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus departed from the ruler’s house, and two blind men followed Him, crying out for mercy upon them. Now, the narrative continues with, “And having come into the house, they came to Him – the blind.”
 
It doesn’t say what house He went into, but the use of the definite article means it is a particular house. Verse 10 of this chapter mentions a house, but it doesn’t say which. But going back to the previous chapter, verse 8:14 specifically notes Peter’s house. So this may be the house being referred to.
 
Either way, it doesn’t say why He didn’t just stop and turn to them as they followed Him. But it may be that He wanted His next actions to be in a private setting. Therefore, now in the house with the two blind men there, it next says, “and Jesus, He says to them, ‘You believe that I can do this?’”
 
What seems apparent is that they did believe. Calling out to Jesus for Him to have mercy on them means they understood His capabilities. Continuing to follow Him in a blind state, even to the house He was staying in, demonstrated this as well. Therefore, the question is probably for faith-building.
 
Such questions span human history and innumerable circumstances. A question like this might be asked by a gym coach to spur on an already-capable student, “Are you really sure you can do this?” “Yes, I am confident I can.”
 
Jesus wants them mentally prepared for what He certainly already intends to do. Therefore, the question is asked. And as anticipated, “They say to Him, ‘Yes, Lord.’”
 
They already knew this, but their own words have testified to Him and also encouraged their own faith. They are prepared for what lies ahead...
 
Life application: Innumerable books have been written about confidence-building. Seminars are held on the subject. People living in clamshells are spurred on to break free and live an emboldened life.
 
These things are common to human nature, and different levels of confidence exist in all of us. Some of us may be fully confident in one matter and yet totally reluctant to act in another. There is nothing wrong with this. Those who are overconfident will often cause more trouble than their confidence supports.
 
For example, a person may be so sure of himself that he decides to tear out his wall and fix a leaky pipe by himself. In doing so, he forgets that he doesn’t know everything about the entire process of hydraulics or maybe structural engineering, or even the nuances of electrical wiring.
 
Without understanding the whole process, he may bust the pipe while under pressure and cause tens of thousands of dollars of water damage. Or he may cause a wall to collapse or otherwise be so damaged that he will need a crew of specialists to fix it. Or he may need a coffin because he didn’t think about live wiring while standing in a pool of water that had dripped on the floor.
 
After a short adventure of hair standing on its end, he collapses like a bunch of broccoli, never to rise again. Thus, it is good not to be overly confident. And yet, when things are lined up properly and the outcome appears certain, we shouldn’t hesitate to act.
 
It is true that there may be some small point that was overlooked that may end in a negative outcome, but this is what the clam dwellers fear to the point of complete inability to act. There needs to be a point where we will allow for error if the outcome has a high enough probability of success.
 
At the same time, we need to be willing to accept the results of defeat without becoming so stressed that we allow it to shape the rest of our lives. Where the balance in such situations is will be hard to determine at times, but that is where prayer comes in.
 
We have access to the Creator of all things. And so, if we have things set to the highest probability of success and are still reticent, we should have already prayed that the Lord will be with us through the process. If there is failure, we can accept that He allowed it for His purposes. This is true if we really believe in God’s unlimited wisdom and power and the power of prayer that He has allowed us, as explained in His word.
 
We have what no other people on the planet have, absolute and certain access to the throne of grace, where we can go in times of need. Let us use this most important tool as we move forward in life from decision to decision.
 
Lord God, help us to be people of prayer as we walk in Your presence. From moment to moment, may our existence be filled with communication with You to help us as we continue this path through life. We know that You are as close to us as the spoken breath we utter for our needs, thanks, and praises. Thank You for this knowledge. Amen.
 

Matthew 9:27

Saturday, 26 April 2025
 
When Jesus departed from there, two blind men followed Him, crying out and saying, “Son of David, have mercy on us!” Matthew 9:27
 
“And Jesus, passing thence, they followed Him – two blind – croaking and saying, ‘You compassionate us, Son of David’” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, it was noted that the report of what Jesus did in restoring life to the damsel went throughout all the land. Now, the narrative continues with the account of another miracle, beginning with, “And Jesus, passing thence, they followed Him – two blind.”
 
A new adjective, tuphlos, translated as blind, is introduced. It signifies opaque, as if smoky. Thus, it gives the sense of an inability to see. It is derived from the verb tuphoó, to be enveloped in smoke. It can be taken literally or figuratively. In the latter sense, it would refer to someone who is lifted up with pride or who is conceited. That word is, in turn, derived from tuphó, to make smoke, as if slowly consumed without flame, as in a smoldering wick.
 
This word, signifying blindness because of being opaque, probably covers the whole range of blindness, from cataracts to being born blind (as in John 9). These men were unable to see, but their ears were fine because they were able to discern that Jesus was passing by. In hearing this news, they followed Him, “croaking.”
 
It is the same word used in Matthew 8 when the demon-possessed men croaked out to Jesus. It is thus an elevated cry of consternation or desire. They raised their voices as if croaking, “and saying, ‘You compassionate us, Son of David.’”
 
Outside of Matthew 1, this is the first time David is mentioned in the New Testament. In Matthew 1, the name was mentioned 5 times in Jesus’ genealogy and then once, saying –
 
“But while he thought about these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, ‘Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. 21 And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.’” Matthew 1:20, 21
 
These two blind men are calling out in acknowledgement that they believe Jesus is the promised Messiah who would sit on David’s throne. This was a confident act of faith because the current king was Herod, who descended from his father Herod the Great. Thus, a dynasty had been in place. And yet, it was believed based on Scripture that the Messiah would be Israel’s king.
 
There is nothing stated as to how they concluded that Jesus was the Son of David. It wasn’t as if people carried around a copy of His genealogy. Therefore, it may be that the thought was that any Jew could somehow fulfill this kingly role, thus fulfilling the messianic prophecy.
 
In other words, the authority, character, or role of a famous person may be used as an identifier. So, if someone was thought to be a great prophet, they may say, “He is a son of Isaiah,” thus identifying him as a figurative son of a great prophet. This is not an unknown concept because Paul uses it concerning Gentiles in relation to Abraham –
 
“Therefore He who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you, does He do it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?— 6 just as Abraham ‘believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.’ 7 Therefore know that only those who are of faith are sons of Abraham.” Galatians 3:5-7
 
It also could be that there may have been some other commonly used identifier that allowed people to know the tribal heritage of others. If this is the case, there is no record of it being so. Whatever was on the minds of these blind men, they are clearly identifying Jesus with the authority of the throne of Israel, believing that His power extended beyond that of David as a man of war in earthly battles to a Man of war in the physical/spiritual realm of being able to heal the blind.
 
Life application: With the resurrection of Christ and the writing of the New Testament, we now have a full understanding of the many roles of Jesus the Messiah. He not only fulfills the role of the Son of David in kingly authority and power, but He also is the great prophet who is the Giver of all other prophetic utterances because He is God.
 
He is also the great High Priest who has initiated a New Covenant and who now advocates and mediates on behalf of His people. He is the Shepherd of His people, the Author and Perfector of our salvation, and so much more. When we consider what God has done in Christ Jesus, we are considering how He has fully and exactingly expressed Himself to His creatures.
 
Let us consider this as we contemplate who Jesus is, understanding that the glory and honor we ascribe to Him are that which is due to our Creator. Let us never disassociate the two in our thoughts. When we behold Jesus, we are beholding our God, who is united with humanity to restore us to Himself. All hail the name of Jesus!
 
Heavenly Father, we thank You for what You have done for us when You sent Jesus to bring us back to Yourself. It is hard to fathom what value we possess that You would do what You have done. But we accept it by faith, knowing that for all eternity we will behold Your greatness and glorify You for what You have done. Thank You for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
 

Matthew 9:26

Friday, 25 April 2025
 
And the report of this went out into all that land. Matthew 9:26
 
“And this saying, it went out into all that land” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus had seized the hand of the damsel, at which time she arose. The tragedy for the parents had ended in joy. With that complete, Matthew next begins his final words of this short account with the words, “And this saying.”
 
This is a new word in Scripture that will only be seen again in Luke 4:14, phémé, a report, fame, a saying, a rumor, etc. It is derived from the verb phémi, to say. This event became a spoken word that was retold time and again as “it went out into all that land.”
 
The child was reported as having died. Reliable witnesses, not a few in number, who had seen the dead before confirmed it. The parent was a ruler of the synagogue and would be considered trustworthy in his testimony. And his once-dead daughter being alive was evidence to the fact concerning what occurred.
 
Because of the circumstances, the event became a spoken word and a testimony to the matter.
 
Life application: Though Matthew and Mark omit the age of the girl, Luke gives her age as about twelve. The woman with the issue of blood who had just been healed was likewise afflicted for twelve years.
 
Without trying to read too much into this, it appears that a progression of thought is being presented concerning the dispensations of time. It was noted in the comments on verse 9:22 that the woman with the issue of blood was typical of the church.
 
She was brought directly from a state of uncleanness to a state of salvation and being deemed clean. There are no works involved, and the one who is far away is brought near by the blood of Christ.
 
In this account, which encompasses the account of the woman, having begun in verse 18 (before the account of the woman) and which is completed now (after the healing of the woman), can be equated to the restoration of Israel.
 
The ruler has a child who is sick, an accurate description of Jerusalem (the seat of power of the Jewish people) throughout her history, and who is also equated to a daughter (such as in Lamentations 2 and elsewhere) –
 
“How shall I console you?To what shall I liken you,O daughter of Jerusalem?What shall I compare with you, that I may comfort you,O virgin daughter of Zion?For your ruin is spread wide as the sea;Who can heal you?14 Your prophets have seen for youFalse and deceptive visions;They have not uncovered your iniquity,To bring back your captives,But have envisioned for you false prophecies and delusions.15 All who pass by clap their hands at you;They hiss and shake their headsAt the daughter of Jerusalem:‘Is this the city that is called“The perfection of beauty,The joy of the whole earth?”’” Lamentations 2:13-15
 
 While Jesus is tending to the woman who believed by faith and was saved (being equated to the church of those who believe by faith), the daughter dies. Likewise, the spiritual connection of Israel to God was severed. However, Jesus says that the girl is not dead but only sleeping. Israel, likewise, was separated from God but not cut off entirely. She will be raised after the church age –
 
“And you, O tower of the flock,The stronghold of the daughter of Zion,To you shall it come,Even the former dominion shall come,The kingdom of the daughter of Jerusalem.” Micah 4:8
 
The girl, being about twelve years old, has the same symbolism as that of the woman. Twelve is the number of perfection of government or governmental perfection. It thus represents the state of Israel after Jerusalem, the seat of power, is again raised to life –
 
“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing! 38 See! Your house is left to you desolate; 39 for I say to you, you shall see Me no more till you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!’” Matthew 23:37-39
 
Jesus’ life and actions as He interacts with Israel, and as He moves around to various areas within the land, are like a walking parable. His very movements and actions form their own typology for us to consider. If the picture presented here for Israel is valid, it demonstrates that there is still a plan for Israel in the future.
 
As the people of Israel have been returned to the land of Israel, it appears that it will not be long before the church age comes to its end. And may that day be soon.
 
Heavenly Father, how wonderful it is to read Your words, seeking out hints of what You are telling us concerning the times, events, and interactions between You and Your people that are ongoing in the stream of time. Help us to not jump ahead and form illogical conclusions, but to consider Your word from what is clearly presented so that we can make sound conclusions about what is veiled. May it be so. Amen.

Matthew 9:25

Thursday, 24 April 2025
 
But when the crowd was put outside, He went in and took her by the hand, and the girl arose. Matthew 9:25
 
“And when He ejected the crowd, having entered, He seized her hand, and the damsel, she arose” (CG).
 
In the previous verse, Jesus told those mourning the death of the damsel that she was not dead but only sleeping. In response, they derided Him. Matthew next says, “And when He ejected the crowd.”
 
Mark’s gospel adds the following –
 
He took the father and the mother of the child, and those who were with Him, and entered where the child was lying. 41 Then He took the child by the hand, and said to her, “Talitha, cumi,” which is translated, “Little girl, I say to you, arise.” Mark 5:40, 41
 
Therefore, there were seven people in the room at the time of the raising. These were Jesus, Peter, James, John, the two parents, and the damsel. Once these were free of the commotion of the mourners, it next says, “having entered, He seized her hand.”
 
This is a new word, krateó, to seize. It is derived from kratos, which signifies power, might, dominion, strength, etc. T herefore, this is an act where strength is employed. He didn’t just touch her hand, but He grasped as if to pull her into an awakened state. Such an act would cause a person under the law to be defiled –
 
“Whoever in the open field touches one who is slain by a sword or who has died, or a bone of a man, or a grave, shall be unclean seven days.” Number 19:16
 
In such a state, a rite of cleansing was to be performed according to the next verses of Numbers –
 
“And for an unclean person they shall take some of the ashes of the heifer burnt for purification from sin, and running water shall be put on them in a vessel. 18 A clean person shall take hyssop and dip it in the water, sprinkle it on the tent, on all the vessels, on the persons who were there, or on the one who touched a bone, the slain, the dead, or a grave. 19 The clean person shall sprinkle the unclean on the third day and on the seventh day; and on the seventh day he shall purify himself, wash his clothes, and bathe in water; and at evening he shall be clean.” Numbers 19:17-19
 
However, Jesus had just said to those gathered that she had not died but was sleeping. Because of this, as a person might awaken another, He seized her by the hand to rouse her. Having done so, it next says, “and the damsel, she arose.”
 
It is not uncommon for scholars to use the word “resurrect” here. This is incorrect. This was a restoration of life to the body, not a resurrection. Paul says that Christ is the Firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. His resurrection was a unique occurrence based on a sinless life. It is a complete conquering of death.
 
Those who were raised, both in the Old Testament and the New eventually died again. Their restoration of life was granted by God to serve His purposes, but they remained stained with sin. Only after Christ’s work was complete could the permanency of a resurrection be applied to others. And that will only occur, as Paul says, “at His coming” (1 Corinthians 15:23).
 
As for this damsel, her restoration was temporary until whatever time she had lived her life and died. But Jesus has shown that He possessed power over the state of death. In His resurrection, He has demonstrated that it is permanent. We are being incrementally shown what God is doing in His marvelous work through His Messiah.
 
Life application: We must be careful about what we believe concerning dead people being raised. There are those who have died on the operating table but who have been brought back. Their physical body is worked on, and if done quickly enough, the life can return.
 
However, there is a point where it is no longer possible to bring a person back. The brain quickly begins to break down. After a short amount of time, if a person is brought back, there will be permanent brain damage. There are exceptions, such as being in a very cold environment. But even then, other things quickly break down.
 
So, stories of people being raised who had been dead for extended periods of time or who had already been embalmed (as mentioned some years ago by “Evangelist” Reinhard Bonnke on the 700 Club) are to be rejected outright.
 
Further, people who have died and claimed to have gone to heaven or hell are not to be listened to. If someone went to heaven, that means he bypassed the judgment seat of Christ, which all believers must face.
 
As hell, meaning the Lake of Fire, is something that will not be meted out until the end of days (as recorded in Revelation 20), then we can be absolutely positive that no person has yet gone to hell. It is appointed for man to die, face the judgment, and that is that. If you are tempted to buy the book, don’t. You are wasting your money as well as time that you could spend reading your Bible.
 
Such things are sensational, and they often enrich those telling these tales, but they have no basis in biblical reality. Stick with the Bible. It is sensational enough, and it is the truth of God because it is His word.
 
Lord God, help us to have our thinking caps on. Keep us from being duped by people who want to get rich by spreading falsities about heaven, hell, or powers on earth that are not true. There is no need to listen to such nonsense. May we focus on Jesus, who possesses all power and authority in heaven and on earth. Amen.